Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: D11-0005
Parcel: 12510003F

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN

Permit Number - D11-0005
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/11/2011 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/16/2011 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Approv-Cond CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: D11-0005
Wal-mart Store @ El Con Mall
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 16, 2011

DUE DATE: May 25, 2011

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements.

2. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with DS 2-05 based on the application form that accompanied the development plan set.

3. The possible uses that could be included within the Wal-Mart development were listed as a response but were not listed on the plan sheet(s). I could not verify that these uses were listed on any sheet. Add the potential uses to DP-3.

Previous Comment 7: DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 - Clearly identify if this Wal-Mart store will also include secondary uses such as a fast food service, eye center, personal service, financial service etc. within the Wal-Mart building footprint. All proposed uses within the building footprint must be allowed as secondary or accessory to the Wal-Mart. Otherwise they must be considered separate principal uses and must be addressed accordingly with regards to performance criteria and development criteria as well as compliance with any conditions of ordinance 10279. Any food service must be provided with exhaust scrubbers.

4. Label the width of the PAAL adjacent to the south accessible parking spaces. A PAAL dimension could not be verified on the plan sheet DP-4.

A portion of the previous comment 9: DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 - Related to PAALs and parking spaces.

Label the width of the PAAL along the south side of the building. Label the width of the PAAL along the northwest corner sidewalk area next to the loading area.

5. The response to the loading zone comment is acknowledged. What has been noted with regards to the loading zones is the note on sheet DP-4. The response comment and the revised calculations indicate that five (5) loading zones have been provided. The notation on sheet DP-4 lists that four (4) spaces total. It is not clear if this is just a typo or if there is a fifth loading zone proposed in there truck well or is it intended to be somewhere else. Revise the notation and calculations as required or add and label the fifth loading zone.

Previous Comment 11: DS 2-05.2.4.O - Dimension the overall width and lengths of the loading zones. Label the number of loading zones proposed within the loading area. Also this area is not within the previous building footprint area. Dimension this area utilizing a distance and bearing. If this is new lease area, state so. If it is a new lease area how will this area and use conditions of the ordinance?

6. List under the cart corral note the total number of cart corrals existing and proposed.

Previous Comment 13: DS 2-05.2.4.P - A total 87 parking spaces are being lost due to the new loading and maneuvering area along the north side of the existing building. While it is clear that there is an excess of vehicle parking it should be clear on the plan and calculations how many spaces are being lost. I could not verify this info in the parking data on sheet 3. Clarify and revise the parking calculations to clearly show this change.

7. DP-3 sheet: After reviewing the very complicated calculations once again, I have noted that the total square footage added is incorrect. A difference of 20 square feet was noted. While this minimal difference will not make any significant difference in the grand schemes of things the numbers should be corrected in order to ensure that accuracy is carried forward for future developments. Review the calculations and revise any affected numbers as a result of the 20 square foot shortage.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D0110005dp2.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents.
05/16/2011 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved AUDREY FARENGA
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 740-6800
FAX #: 623-5411


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW
SUBJECT: D11-0005 WALMART STORE #3884-01/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: May 16, 2011



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.


Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.
05/19/2011 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond The response letter (from Optimus dated May 9, 2011) to the previous comment 2 indicates additional tree planting along Broadway Boulevard from the bus stop to Randolph Way. Provide plans for this addition in order to document compliance with condition. Reference the condition on the drawing to clarify that the condition is met in the manner proposed, eliminating questions in the future about applicability.
05/24/2011 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied The front entarnce transition from the PAAL to the walkway of the main entrance has so many varied elements that a larger scale detail needs to be provided to clearly explan all the different elements joining at this one location. It's impossible to read and understand at this scale with only minimal note explanation. Please provide a large scale detail explaning the design. Please note that detectable warnings are not required to separate a flush pedestrian walk area from the vehicle area when bollards are in place. Please reconcile with Zoning plan reviewer. Detectable warnings are required at both ends of a marked crossing.
05/25/2011 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
05/25/2011 JWILLIA4 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved Environmental Services Department
Development Plan Review

May 25, 2011 D11-0005 Wal-Mart Store El Con Mail
DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Comments:
The proposed Development Plan Case No.D11-0005 for the Wal-Mart Store No.3884-01 to be located at the El Con Mail. The plans meet the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal Standard 6-01. The proposed plans are hereby approved by Environmental Services.

Environmental Services Department
Development Plan Review
Reviewer: Tony Teran
Office Phone (520) 837-3706
E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov
05/25/2011 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved May 25, 2011

The Engineering Division recommends approval of this development plan.

Loren Makus
Senior Engineering Associate
05/26/2011 JOHN WILLIAMS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Approv-Cond COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES


May 26, 2011

Jeff Behrana
Optimus Civil Design Group
4650 E. Colton Center Blvd.
Phoenix, AZ

Subject: D11-0005 WAL-MART @ EL CON MALL Development Plan

Dear Jeff:

The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made, please submit the following documents for sign-off.

1 Rolled blue line COMPLETE SET of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews.

1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan.

Additional black line copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your mylars to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. The printing company will deliver the original rolled blue line to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options.

Plans will not be signed and released until the CDRC office has been notified by PC Addressing that all fees for this plan have been paid. The CDRC office will need this confirmation in writing

PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html.
BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION.

***NOTE *** Please bring a copy of the plans to Ronald Brown for HC Site review prior to submitting the final copies listed above to CDRC as he would like to go over the comments with you over the counter.

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893.

Sincerely,


John Williams
Planning Technician

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: (602) 286-9400
05/26/2011 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D11-0005 Wal-Mart Store @ El Con Mall

() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other -

CROSS REFERENCE: El Con Development Agreement

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon - Broadway Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/25/2011

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Rezoning
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
(X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 2/22/2011






REVIEWER: msp 791-5505 DATE: 05/25/2011