Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0005
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/24/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/25/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Completed | Not a City of Tucson operated or owned property |
| 03/01/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0005 WALMART STORE #3884-01/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: March 1, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. On the Final Development Plan: Change Jones Boulevard to Guapo Way on the Location Map. Delete East from East Broadway Boulevard on sheets 4 and 6. Delete East and spell out Boulevard from East Broadway Blvd. on sheet 5. |
| 03/04/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plans to include the westernmost portion of the Broadway Boulevard bufferyard. Add plantings and notes as necessary to bring the plan into conformance with the landscape plans approved as part of CDRC case number D00-0017 and Ordinance 10279 condition I.e. 2) Confirm that the proposed design complies with Ordinance 10279 condition III.b related to the provision of shaded pedestrian access from the bus stop to a principal entrance of El Con Mall. Revise the development/landscape plan as necessary to provide additional shading where applicable. 3) Provide updated landscape calculations. See sheet 1 of the landscape plans approved as part of CDRC case number D00-0017. |
| 03/04/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Both groups of accessible parking spaces must have a compliant marked crossing from the parking area, across the PAAL to the accessible route at the store front entrance in compliance with the 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 406.12 and 406.14. a. Insure that the markings for the two marked crossings differ from the stripped area on the asphaltic paving at the front entrance. They must be separate, 5' wide, distinct and clearly marked. b. Provide detectable warnings at both ends of the two marked crossings. 2. At detail 1/DP7, dimension the bottom of the largest sign 7' above finished grade. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/07/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | March 7, 2011 D11-0005 Wal-Mart Store at El Con Mall The Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the development plan for the Wal-Mart Store at El Con Mall at this time. The following comments must be addressed. 1. Provide dimensions for the building, parking area access lanes, landscape islands and other features. The plan must demonstrate that minimum widths of parking area access lanes and parking areas are maintained and that the loading zones and solid waste facilities can be accessed by appropriate design vehicles. 2. The development plan case number (D11-0005) should also be placed near the title block on each sheet. The drainage statement is accepted for Development Plan purposes. The proposed drainage patterns are consistent with the long-established drainage patterns at the site. If you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting with me, I can be contacted at 520.837.4927 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 03/07/2011 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D11-0005 Wal-Mart Store @ El Con Mall () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - CROSS REFERENCE: El Con Development Agreement NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon - Broadway Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/14/2011 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (X) Proposal Complies with Rezoning (The Bridges, PAD-15) () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: REVIEWER: msp 791-5505 DATE: 02/22/2011 Comments 1. Please revise development plan, sheet DP-1, General Note #1, to include in the note that the site is also subject to Resolution 10279, adopted on May 16, 2006. 2. If the intent is to identify all existing outdoor lighting (pole lights), which is to be preserved in place, then please revise development plan, sheet DP-4 (Construction Note 13) and DP-6 (Demolition Note 8), to identify and match the same pole lights which are to be preserved in place. 3. If the proposed use is to include auto services with bay doors, please provide a floor plan and building elevation to indicate use is in compliance with Ordinance 10279. If auto service with bay doors is not a proposed use, then should General Note #12 (El Con Development Agreement), be listed? 4. If the proposed use is to include "drive-through lanes," please indicate on sheet DP-1 and DP-4 location of drive-through lanes and vehicular stacking lane for this service and provide a building elevation with the drive-through lane area to indicate use is in compliance with Ordinance 10279. If "drive through lanes" are not a proposed use, then should General Note #13 (El Con Development Agreement), be listed? 5. Please provide with design revisions (to include Key Notes) and language to the development plan as to how the proposed use is in compliance with Ordinance NO. 10279 - OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES, Condition #' VI.i, VI.j, VI.k, VI. l, and VI.m. 6. Please revise development plan to include either wall mounted or freestanding post signs at the loading docks, which read that deliveries and loadings are not permitted between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. 7. Please revise development plan to include sign(s) at the trash compactor/bale & pallet/recycling areas, which read that no trash may be removed between the hours of 4:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. 8. Are General Notes # 19 and #47, on sheet DP-1 and sheet DP-2, respectfully, required as part of the Wal-Mart development plan? 9. Please provide documentation/language to show why the enclosing of the required trash bins is tied to the "parking phase," as indicated on sheet DP-1, General Note # 43, and how open trash bins meet the requirements/compliance of Ordinance NO. 10279, Condition # VI.e. 10. Please provide a specific time line for the Wal-Mart project as it relates to the "parking phase" described on Sheet DP-1, general note # 43. 11. Per Resolution 18489, Exhibit B, also made reference to in condition # VIII.a, is language that relates to a future building site to the north of the proposed Wal-Mart building footprint. Based on this potential future building site, please address how the proposed "loading dock" and the required PAAL's needed for semi-tractor can maintain its maneuverability at such time as when this future building is constructed. |
| 03/08/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Date Case Number Project Address March 8, 2011 D11-0005 Wal-Mart Store El Con Mail DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: The proposed Development Plan Case No.D11-0005 for the Wal-Mart Store No. 3884-01 to be located at the El Con Mail. The plans meet the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal Standard 6-01. The proposed plans are hereby approved by Environmental Services. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/08/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | March 7, 2011 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D11-0005 PROJECT NAME: Wal-Mart PROJECT ADDRESS: El Con Mall PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis to determine if off-site improvements are warranted due to the proposed development. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/08/2011 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#234519 March 7, 2011 Optimus Civil Design Group Attn: Jeff 4650 E Cotton Center Blvd Phoenix, Arizona 85 Dear Jeff : SUBJECT: Walmart Store at El Con Mall D11-0005 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 23, 2011. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 03/10/2011 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Jackson Jenkins Director 201 N. Stone Ave., 8th Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 PH: (520) 740-6500 FAX: (520) 620-0135 March 8, 2011 To: JEFF BEHRANA OPTIMUS CIVIL DESIGN GROUP Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: WALMART STORE #3884-01 AT EL CON MALL (3435 E BROADWAY BLVD) Development Plan – 1st Submittal D11-0005 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. If you have any questions please call me at the phone number above. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:______ Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 03/11/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 11, 2011 Jeff Behrana Optimus Civil Design Group 4650 E. Colton Center Blvd. Phoenix, AZ Subject: D11-0005 WAL-MART STORE @ EL CON MALL Development Plan Dear Jeff: Your submittal of February 22, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 8 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, HC Site, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, Planning, Traffic, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, PDSD) 2 Copies Ordinance 10270 Response Memo (Zoning, PDSD) 1 CD Digital Copy* of all Revised Plans and Documents (PDSD) * Digital copy format shall be 300dpi "TIFF" for Plans and "PDF" for all Documents. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 286-9400 |
| 05/16/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D11-0005 Wal-mart Store @ El Con Mall Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 16, 2011 DUE DATE: May 25, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with DS 2-05 based on the application form that accompanied the development plan set. 3. The possible uses that could be included within the Wal-Mart development were listed as a response but were not listed on the plan sheet(s). I could not verify that these uses were listed on any sheet. Add the potential uses to DP-3. Previous Comment 7: DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 - Clearly identify if this Wal-Mart store will also include secondary uses such as a fast food service, eye center, personal service, financial service etc. within the Wal-Mart building footprint. All proposed uses within the building footprint must be allowed as secondary or accessory to the Wal-Mart. Otherwise they must be considered separate principal uses and must be addressed accordingly with regards to performance criteria and development criteria as well as compliance with any conditions of ordinance 10279. Any food service must be provided with exhaust scrubbers. 4. Label the width of the PAAL adjacent to the south accessible parking spaces. A PAAL dimension could not be verified on the plan sheet DP-4. A portion of the previous comment 9: DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 - Related to PAALs and parking spaces. Label the width of the PAAL along the south side of the building. Label the width of the PAAL along the northwest corner sidewalk area next to the loading area. 5. The response to the loading zone comment is acknowledged. What has been noted with regards to the loading zones is the note on sheet DP-4. The response comment and the revised calculations indicate that five (5) loading zones have been provided. The notation on sheet DP-4 lists that four (4) spaces total. It is not clear if this is just a typo or if there is a fifth loading zone proposed in there truck well or is it intended to be somewhere else. Revise the notation and calculations as required or add and label the fifth loading zone. Previous Comment 11: DS 2-05.2.4.O - Dimension the overall width and lengths of the loading zones. Label the number of loading zones proposed within the loading area. Also this area is not within the previous building footprint area. Dimension this area utilizing a distance and bearing. If this is new lease area, state so. If it is a new lease area how will this area and use conditions of the ordinance? 6. List under the cart corral note the total number of cart corrals existing and proposed. Previous Comment 13: DS 2-05.2.4.P - A total 87 parking spaces are being lost due to the new loading and maneuvering area along the north side of the existing building. While it is clear that there is an excess of vehicle parking it should be clear on the plan and calculations how many spaces are being lost. I could not verify this info in the parking data on sheet 3. Clarify and revise the parking calculations to clearly show this change. 7. DP-3 sheet: After reviewing the very complicated calculations once again, I have noted that the total square footage added is incorrect. A difference of 20 square feet was noted. While this minimal difference will not make any significant difference in the grand schemes of things the numbers should be corrected in order to ensure that accuracy is carried forward for future developments. Review the calculations and revise any affected numbers as a result of the 20 square foot shortage. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D0110005dp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |