Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0001
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/10/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0001 WALMART SUPERCENTER #5626-00/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: March 9, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: The Vicinity Map is not to scale. Please correct per letter dated 01-26-11. Include the legal description (name of subdivision, block and book and page) on all Title Blocks per letter dated 01-26-11. Delete 3434 S. Kino Parkway on all applicable pages. This is not the address for Walmart. Please contact Jennifer Stephens at 740-6800 to assign an address if needed. |
| 03/15/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Date Case Number Project Address March 15, 2011 D11-0001 Tucson Market Place Phase No.2 Development Plan Comments: The proposed development plan for Case No. DS11-0001, Tucson Market Place Phase No.2, is approved for Environmental Services requirements. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/22/2011 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D11-0001 Tucson Market Place: Phase 2 3/22/11 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (X) Other - Master Development Plan CROSS REFERENCE: D09-0010, C9-06-32 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: PAD-15 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/23/2011 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (X) Approved Conditionally - Subject to Meeting Condition Below 1) Please provide a note on Sheet C1.0 that reads "If metal halide lighting is used, then lighting levels are to be reduced between 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. Notwithstanding all outdoor lighting shall comply with the City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code." REVIEWER: JBeall 791-5505 DATE: 03/22/2011 |
| 03/22/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Market Place Phase 2 Development Plan (1st Review) D10-0047 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 22, 2011 DUE DATE: March 23, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development pLAN for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. This development plan was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site. The following comments are for the Kimley-Horn Walmart Development plan. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 There is a striped triangle shown along the east side of the building within the drive-thru lane. Please clarify what this striped area is, or remove it from the plan. 4. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide a detail for both Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking that provides; including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. Clearly show that the requirements of D.S. 2-09.5.0 are met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D11-0001 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 03/22/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/23/2011 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | ACTIVITY: D11-0001 PROJECT: Tucson Marketplace (Wal-Mart at Bridges) 2ND review comments LOCATION: Ward 5 FEMA: 2237K, Zone X-Unshaded WATERSHED: Mission View Wash Watershed adjacent to Greyhound Wash REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE SUMMARY: The revised Development Plan package for the Wal-Mart at the Tucson Market Place was received and reviewed by Planning & Development Services Department Engineering. Currently, a separate stockpile grading permit exists for fill material within the limits of the proposed Phase 2 grading area. A separate rough grading plan submittal for the west area (Phase 2) of the Tucson Market Place is expected to be submitted for review that shall include the stockpile area, as well as a separate finished grading plan for Wal-Mart. Planning & Development Services Department Engineering does not recommend approval of the Wal-Mart Development Plan at this time. A meeting was held 8MAR11 to meet with consultants and discuss a few of the review comments. The Drainage Report was reviewed for development plan purposes only. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E, 2-05.2.1.H: It will be necessary to provide a local benchmark for basis of elevation for the Wal-Mart project. Show and label on a planview. A benchmark located within Phase 1 would be acceptable. 2) Preliminary comments for Optimus Master Development Plan: a) Assure temporary (or permanent) bleed pipe for temporary runoff storage areas is provided with sufficient positive gradient to assure drain down time is provided for temporary conditions for this project. b) Optimus plan needs clarification of the areas that are intended to be a part of the Phase 2 grading and improvements. Sheet DP-2 needs further clarification to assure that the spine road up to the area that was constructed in Phase 1 is included. Also the area on the north side of the spine road and areas around the future Wal-Mart up to and including the recent stockpile area shall be included / clarified on sheet DP-2. Indicate stockpile on a planview sheet. c) Due to the collapsible soils on site and the drain-down requirement, add revised proposed contouring for basin bottoms to indicate a positive gradient through basin / waterharvesting areas toward outlets. With a 1% or greater grade, potential for ponding issues lessen and thereby assisting with project completion, as discussed in meeting. The last meeting indicated basins with gradient and bleed pipe set at 6-in above basin bottom yet response letter indicates otherwise. Clarify intent to change design. d) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.a, 2-05.2.2.C.2.b: Show floodplain limits on planview for the regional basin and include WSEL notation at 200-ft increments. " e) It is important to clarify permanent erosion protection along the north side of the project. Clarify each stormwater runoff outfall on Optimus plans and label permanent erosion protection provided. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B, 2-05.2.4.G: Provide documentation from optical fiber (AT&T or other utility) regarding allowing fill on fiber optic easement. 4) DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.1: As stated in meeting, assure that all landscape plans comply with SVT regulations. Other than trees as noted below, plant materials located within existing and future sight visibility triangles shall be limited to ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty inches. Trees may be located within existing and future sight visibility triangles only if clear of leaves and branches to a height of at least six feet above grade upon installation, and at all times thereafter. The trunk caliper of any species selected may not exceed twelve inches in diameter at maturity. Trees with multiple trunks are not allowed. Trees may not be planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect as viewed from motorist's perspective. The number and location of trees within existing and future sight visibility triangles may be restricted or modified by City of Tucson in order to preserve visibility. Address the following landscape comments: a) Revise location of trees in SVT locations on sheets P-1, P-2, P-3, where the proposed landscaping is in conflict with SVT along connections to the spine road. b) Revise sheet C-1 planting note 16; remove last sentence, since SVT's will be needed to confirm that the trees are not a safety conflict. c) Trees may be located within existing and future sight visibility triangles only if clear of leaves and branches to a height of at least six feet above grade upon installation, and at all times thereafter. Please clarify with notation or remove trees from SVT locations. 5) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A: Address the remaining geotechnical engineering comments: a) The Ninyo & Moore environmental site assessment was a draft copy; a sealed report is needed. 6) Grading plan submittals may be submitted at this time for review; approvals may not be issued for grading permits until the Development Plans are approved. Resubmittal is required. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit same items as submitted in this first review submittal package and associated a revised Wal-Mart Development Plan, revised Phase 2 master development plan, response letter, and other supporting documentation. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 03/23/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) Clarify the landscape proposal along Park Avenue. It appears that the required borders will be completed in 2 phases; one portion with the Park Ave. landscape and the remainder with on-site landscape. Dimension and correctly identify the required border. Add the PIA plan number to the plan set for reference. 2) Revise both sets of landscape plans, and grading plans as necessary to indicate additional depressions in the landscape areas and general conformance with the LUC provisions for water harvesting and DS 10-03. Most, if not all, of the landscape areas will be required retain some runoff for supplemental landscape irrigation purposes. |
| 03/24/2011 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 03/24/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Jackson Jenkins Director 201 N. Stone Ave., 8th Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 PH: (520) 740-6500 FAX: (520) 620-0135 March 23, 2011 To: JIM PORTNER PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: TUCSON MARKETPLACE PHASE 2 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN & WAL-MART Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D11-0001 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Sheets C3.5, C3.6, C5.5 and C5.6: Demonstrate that the public sewer easement will have a minimum 16’ wide all-weather drivable surface per PC/COT STD DTL WWM 111 and WWM A-3 Accessibility. 2nd Request. Also show this on the master development plan extending over the entire existing public sewer line on-site. Sheet DP-13(Master Plan): Revise plan to accurately reflect as built conditions as of 3/23/11. The as built conditions are not compliant with PCRWRD Details 109-111 and Accessibility A-3. Revise site conditions and plans to comply with cited standards. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $351.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions please call me at the phone number above. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:______ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 04/12/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 12, 2011 Jim Portner Projects International Inc. 10836 E. Armada Lane Tucson, Arizona 85749 Subject: D11-0001 TUCSON MARKETPLACE PHASE 2 Development Plan Dear Jim: Your submittal of January 20, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 7 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Planning, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, Wastewater, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Planning, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, PDSD) 7 Copies Phase 2 Master Development Plan (Addressing, Planning, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Wastewater, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report/Geotechnical Evaluation (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Sealed Ninyo & Moore Environmental Site Assessment Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies CC&R's (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 760-1950 |