Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0046
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/11/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 11, 2011 SUBJECT: QuikTrip #1496 Development Plan Core Review- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 6385 E Golf Links Rd, T145S R15E Sec19 Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D10-0046 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report (DOWL HKM, 22DEC10), and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (DOWL HKM, 22DEC10). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the draft policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) DS Sec.10-01.2.2: Verify that the Drainage Report and Development Plan Package meet all recommendation within the required Geotechnical Report. Provide a Geotechnical Report with recommendations on building setbacks from the basins, slope stability requirements and infiltration rates for the retention basins. Infiltration rates must have a drain down time per 10-01.3.5.1.3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 2) DS Sec.2-01.2: Revise the Notice to Bidders Section on Sheet C001 to include a phone number for the Construction Department or remove the number reference all together. 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The correct Development Plan Number (D10-0046) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Revise Permitting Note #4 on the development plan document to reference for all overlay zones associated with this project. Specifically "LUC Sec.2.8.4 Gateway Corridor Zone." 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: All easements that are proposed to be abandoned are required to be vacated prior to final approval of the development plan documents unless permission from the easement holder(s) is provided. Specifically the 15-foot Water Easement and the 32-foot ingress/egress easement (under the proposed building footprint). 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.F: Revise the development plan documents to provide the Improvement Plan number for all existing drainage improvements located within the right-of-way. 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.E: Due to the new lot lines being proposed this project should have being submitted as a Tentative Plat review along with the Development Package review. Provide a Tentative Plat/Development Plan Package meeting all criteria within DS Sec.2-01 and 2-03 and resubmittal. Further comments maybe forth coming due to the Tentative Plat review. 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Verify and label the required 25-foot radii (Wilmot Road) for the proposed driveway location per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Revise the documents to provide a separation from the proposed access drive onto Wilmot Road and the parcels to the north and south. Vertical curbing, wheel stops or bollards are an acceptable form of separation. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Provide a note on the documents for the proposed widening of the existing drive that is to be widened to state "Asphalt to remain, if broken, cracked or missing in places new surfacing will be provided." 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Provide a detail for the proposed monument sign located within the future sight visibility triangle. The detail should show conformance with DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A. If the sign does not meet the minimum requirements it must be located outside of the SVT to prevent encroachment to the line of sight. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.L: Provide the recordation information for all new proposed easements, specifically the new ingress/.egress easement for the access drive to Wilmot Road. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.L: Provide a temporary construction easement (this does not need to be labeled in plan view since it will be temporary for construction purposes) for the new proposed access drive to Wilmot Road. Prior approval from the land owner will be required since the project proposes a lot split and the area for the driveway is offsite of the property under development. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise the development plan documents and/or detail D1 on Sheet C540 to provide the rock rip rap (D50) size and thickness as stated in the detail. Could not be located in plan view, clarify. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise Detail D9 on Sheet C540 to clarify the proposed drainage infrastructure improvements. Section A-A should show (2) 12-inch HDP pipes with minimum distance between each pipe. Clarify the difference in Type 1 and Type 2 as shown for the rock rip rap. Since dimensions A and B are the same clarify why there are two sizes of riprap proposed and what type is being used where. 16) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Provide the Improvement Plan number for all existing drainage infrastructure (storm drains and catch basins) within the Public Right-of-Way. 17) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise Detail G5 to show the 6-inch vertical or extruded curbing on either side of the proposed 5-foot flume at all locations. The detail should clearly show how the curbing is tied into the concrete flume and provide terminal sections if required. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise Sheet C120 of the package to include the reference to the PC/COT STD Detail referenced for the proposed catch basin for the basin along the frontage of Golf Links Road. Currently it references Detail X, revise. 19) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Provide erosion protection in the retention basin for the outlet end of the proposed 12-inch storm drain from the gas canopy to prevent slope erosion. 20) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.5: Provide a notarized letter of approval from the adjacent property owner(s) for the 2 proposed 5-foot flumes located on either side of the access drive directly north of the subject parcel. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development document area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. 21) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.Q: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project, if applicable. 22) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.W: Provide a permit for the removal of the existing billboard that is shown to be removed by others. Since the billboard falls within the proposed water retention basin it must be removed prior to Development Plan Package approval and before any construction begins on the site. 23) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the development plan documents and associated details to clearly show the minimum 2-foot setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, water harvesting basins, top and toe of fill slopes, basin outlets and any associated erosion protection. 24) Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way and for the connection of the private storm drains into the public infrastructure. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. 25) Revise General Note #4 on Sheet C002 of the plan set to include the reference to the Geotechnical Report and any addendums prepared for this project. Provide the date, job number, engineer who prepared the report, etc. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 26) DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1.3.a and 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report evaluation that addresses the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for the retention basins, and provide a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and building setbacks from the required basins. b) Provide percolation rates for the retention basin for 5-year threshold to show that the drain down time meets the maximum per DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1. c) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. d) Provide slope stability recommendations for the proposed constructed slopes that are proposed. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 27) Part III.C.2.d: Clarify the 49% impervious area for post construction that is shown on the SWPPP Exhibit. Per the development plan documents it appears that more than 49% of the site will be built out. 28) Part III.C.3.d: Clarify on the SWPPP Exhibit, Sheet C142, the labeled area along the east side of the property. Plan view labels SW, sediment wattles along the east side however the symbol used to delineate the area is not shown, clarify. 29) Part III.C.4: Identify the areal extent where soils may be disturbed in plan view on Sheet C142. The Legend shows CL as the clearing limits with a symbol to delineate however the symbol or reference could not be located in plan view. Verify that the area to be disturbed for the new proposed access drive is also shown on the SWPPP Exhibit and accounted for in the disturbed area and for BMP placement. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package, Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report and SWPPP. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 01/14/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1496 Development Package D10-0046 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 14, 2011 DUE DATE: January 24, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 30, 2011 2. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide the number of pages on all sheets. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the Development Package number D10-0046, and Grading Plan number T10BU01903 adjacent to the title block. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Revise Permitting Note 3 to include "SUBJECT TO SECTION 3.5.9.2. A" adjacent to the proposed use. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Revise Permitting Note 4 to GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE; SEC. 2.8.5". 6. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There is a "32' Ingress/Egress Easement Per Dkt 12726, Page 291, P.C.R" that appears to be located under the proposed building. This easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E As this proposed lot split must be completed prior to approval of the development package. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing. That said provide the zoning for the area south of Golf Links. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per D.S. 2-09.4.1 Proximity to Main Entrances. Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than 50 feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that have entrances (see Figure 8). Bicycle parking must not obstruct the approved pedestrian access. That said the proposed Class 2 bicycle parking does not meet this standard. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per D.S. 2-09.4.1 Visibility. Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be clearly visible from the adjacent sidewalks, drives, and the main entrance(s). That said the proposed Class 2 bicycle parking does not meet this standard. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per D.S. 2-09.5.1.B A minimum of thirty-six (36) inches will be provided between a bicycle parking space and a perpendicular wall or other obstruction measured from the end of the bicycle rack to the perpendicular wall. A minimum of thirty (30) inches will be provided between a bicycle parking space and a parallel wall or other obstruction as measured from the side of the bicycle rack to the parallel wall (Figure 9). That said detail G1/C500 shows 24" from the center of the rack to the parallel wall not thirty (30) inches from the side of the bicycle rack to the parallel wall. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per D.S. 2-09.5.2 Show the required five (5) foot access aisle on detail G1/C500. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L Some type of access easement or access agreement is required for the proposed access at the southeast corner of this project. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R As vehicle access is proposed from Wilmot Road to this site and modifications to that access are required per these plans provide a sidewalk from Wilmot Road to the propose building. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide a width dimension from the proposed bollards to the proposed Class 2 bicycle parking located at the northeast corner of the proposed building. The minimum four (4) foot sidewalk walk width cannot encroach into the bicycle parking area, see comment ?? above. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide a width dimension from the proposed entrances located on the east and west end of the buildings to the proposed bollards. This width cannot be less than four (4) foot. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.W The propose Monument Sign appears to be located within future right-of-way and future sight visibility triangle. The proposed location will require a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR). 18. The order of drawings does not meet the development package submittal requirements. Review the standard and revise the drawing order. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0013 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1496 Development Package T10BU01903 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 14, 2011 DUE DATE: January 24, 2011 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/14/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D10-0046 QUIKTRIP STORE NO. 1496/DEVELOPMENT PLAT DATE: January 13, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. On the final Development Plan: Change Calle Pagaso to Calle Pegaso on the Vicinity Map. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. |
| 01/18/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a detectable warning at the accessible parking aisle East end of the single accessible parking space. 2. Relocate the accessible parking signs so that they are not so remote and can be readily seen. Possibly respace the bollards centered on the accessible parking spaces and create a combination bollard and accessible parking sign post. a. A concrete wheel stop will be required so cars can not bang into the sign posts. b. Park Wise and the Department of Transportation have an accessible parking sign location handout requirement; on the center line of the accessible park space and just inside the curb line at the top of the parking space. 3. At detail G5/C510: Please show the detectable warning and the extension of the aisle to the marked crossing. 4. Details G1 and G5/C510: Please show the location of the accessible parking signage and concrete wheel stops. 5. A pedestrian access from the building to Wilmot public right of way will be required by Zoning. Reference Zoning comments. This pedestrian access shall be accessible. END OF REVIEW. |
| 01/19/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | January 19, 2011 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D10-0046 PROJECT NAME: QuickTrip PROJECT ADDRESS: GolfLinks/Wilmot PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal.The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Along Golf Links Road ensure that all existing signs that are effected by the off-site improvements and are applicable to the roadway remain in place or relocated to an appropriate location. If damaged or unsuitable for reuse then replace with new sign and/or post. 3. An existing light pole may be impacted with the installation of the proposed driveway. If applicable, relocate the light pole and provide confirmation from Ernie Encinas that the new location is acceptable to the city. 4. Along Golf Links Road modify the existing signs in the median bull nose to allow for left turns into the proposed development. 5. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/20/2011 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#232983 January 19, 2011 Quik Trip Corp. Attn: Mike Wooten 5151 E Broadway Blvd #195 Tucson, AZ 85711 To Mike Wooten : SUBJECT: Quik Trip Store #1496 D10-0046 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 12, 2010. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The customer is responsible for the new trenching to relocate them as well as the relocation cost. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-918-8726 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) N. DiMaria Tucson Electric Power |
| 01/24/2011 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 January 21, 2011 To: RICHARD CORDOVA, P.E. DOWL HKM , INC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department __________________________ Reviewed by: Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD Subject: QUIKTRIP STORE #1496 Development Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0046 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions about this review letter please call me @ the phone number below. ______________________________ Tom Porter, Sr. CEA, (520)740-6719 PCRWRD cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 01/25/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Date Case Number Project Address January 25, 2011 D10-0046 QUIKTRIP STORE No.1496 DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: The proposed Development Plan for the QUIKTRIP STORE No. 1496, Case No.D10-0046. Meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal and Recycle Materials Standard 6-01, and is hereby Approved. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/27/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Revise the landscape sheets to show and identify the MS&R right-of-way line for Golf Links Rd. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan, per the development Standards. 3) If temporary use of the MS&R right-of-way is proposed, a site plan/landscape plan is required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City. LUC 2.8.3.5.F The standard MS&R Covenant is available on the PDSD web site. 4) Revise note 12 on sheet L100, the tree calculation is incorrect. 5) Revise the parking tree ratio on sheet L110 to comply with the current code requirements. LUC 3.7.2.3 6) Revise the Rain Water Harvesting Plan calculations to eliminate the use of excess rain water to areas where no water is actually diverted. In most cases an individual WHIA should only count up to 100 percent of demand met and the excess is not transferable without supporting information. 7) Consider adapting the water harvesting/irrigation system to accommodate the rain water deficit discussed in note 4 on sheet L130. If additional irrigation is required for WHIA 5, how can it be managed to prevent over-watering other areas on the same irrigation zone. 8) Retain and or improve the Golf Links Rd. landscaping. Contact Gary Wittwer of TDOT for Gateway Route landscape standards. Refer to the MS&R Plan @ http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/imported/plans/all/msr.pdf |
| 01/28/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 28, 2011 Richard Cordova DOWL HKM 166 W. Alameda St. Tucson, Arizona 857001 Subject: D10-0046 QUIKTRIP STORE # 1496 Development Package Dear Richard: Your submittal of December 22, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 8 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Package (Engineering, Zoning, Addressing, Zoning HC Site, Traffic, Wastewater, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies SWPPP (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $50.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 624-0384 |
| 12/22/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/27/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved |