Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0045
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add a new keynote number 16 referring to ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 405 and 406 and change all the note 6 references on the site plan for all the curb and sidewalk ramps located within the boundaries of the property lines to this note 16 reference. a. Note number 6 reference to SD 207 is for right of way construction only and may be used for the curb ramps at the drive entrances. b. Please provide large scale details of all the different types of curb ramps complying with the ICC (ANSI) Standards 405 and 406. 2. Zoning will require a pedestrian access from building three to building 1. This access must be accessible. Please provide all required detectable warning strips, marked crossings and curb ramps as required by ICC (ANSI 117.1) Sections 406.12 and 406.13. 3. At Details H and I/12: a. Detectable warning strips are not required for accessible parking aisles. END OF REVIEW |
| 01/12/2011 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | January 7, 2011 To: TRI MILLER RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department __________________________ Reviewed by: Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD Subject: LA FITNESS (TUCSON SOUTHEAST) Development Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0045 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Sheet 16: Call out the stubout shown off of proposed public MH #1 as private. Also call out the proposed sewer lines on property as private. Sheet 15: Show in the Legend a distinction in symbols for proposed verses existing sewer lines and elements. Sheet 16: Call out the section of proposed sewer in the ROW as public. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions about this review letter please call me @ the phone number below. ______________________________ Tom Porter, Sr. CEA, (520)740-6719 PCRWRD cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 01/12/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: LA Fitness - Tucson Southeast Development Package (1st Review) D10-0045 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 12, 2011 DUE DATE: January 18, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 30, 2011 2. This development package was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. The following comments are based on the Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.3. Provide the following relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet, D10-0045 & T10BU01842. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.3 List the rezoning conditions for C9-72-80 on the plan. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Until the Watercourse Amenities Overlay has been approved the development package cannot be approved. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) provided is not complete. Based on development designators 28, 30 & 31 there are three (3) different FARs for this project, 28 is 0.35, 30 is 0.75, & 31 is 0.90. Provide a FAR calculation that provided the allowed and proposed FAR for all development designators based on the lot square footage within each zone or shown that the worst case FAR of 0.35 is not exceeded for the entire site. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B Provide all existing easements on the plan including recordation information (Docket & Page) and purpose. This includes all easements for the existing cell site. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking study will need to be approved prior to approval of the development package. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a width dimension for the vehicle parking space shown south of the refuse enclosure that is location south of "BUILDING 3". Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3 this vehicle parking space is required to be ten (10) feet wide. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The provided bicycle parking space calculation calls out "17 CLASS 1 PROVIDED", Zoning was only able to find 16 Class 1 bicycle parking spaces provided. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Based on the pop outs shown on the northeast corner of "BUILDING 1", it appears that some of the Class 1 bicycle parking will not fit on site as shown. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O There is a "47' BUILDING SETBACK" dimension shown along the south side of "BUILDING 1", based on the provided building height of 30' this setback should be 45'. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R At the northeast corner of "BUILDING 1" provide a sidewalk width dimension from the proposed bicycle parking to the vehicle overhang line. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R At the northwest corner of "BUILDING 2" there is a pedestrian circulation/accessible route, that crosses the drive thru lane. This route appears to be located within what will be the stacking area for the drive thru. Zoning recommends that this route be relocated to the south end of "Building 2". 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R "BUILDING 2" east side, provide a sidewalk width dimension between the top of ramp and the building. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R "BUILDING 2" south side, provide a sidewalk width dimension between the refuse enclosure and the building. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 within a development a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route is required between all proposed buildings. Show the required sidewalks between "BUILDING 1" to "BUILDING 3" and from "BUILDING 2" to "BUILDING 3" on the plan. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.U If applicable, indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.W If applicable, Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. 18. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0042 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: LA Fitness - Tucson Southeast Development Package (1st Review) T10BU01842 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 12, 2011 DUE DATE: January 18, 2011 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/12/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D10-0045 LA FITNESS TUCSON SOUTHEAST/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: January 10, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: On the Location Map change 54/32 to 54/37. Correct the brief legal description on all Title Blocks. It should state “A portion of the excluded parcel” not “All that portion of the excluded parcel.” |
| 01/19/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | January 19, 2011 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D10-0045 PROJECT NAME: La Fitness PROJECT ADDRESS: GolfLinks Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal.The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Along Golf Links Road ensure that all existing signs that are effected by the off-site improvements and are applicable to the roadway remain in place or relocated to an appropriate location. If damaged or unsuitable for reuse then replace with new sign and/or post. 3. The existing rail within the right of way needs to be modified and reviewed by TDOT staff. Provide confirmation from Steve Tineo of TDOT-Engineering that the modification of the hand railing meets city standards and is acceptable to the city. 4. Along Golf Links Road modify the existing signs in the median bull nose to allow for left turns into the proposed development. 5. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/20/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | January 20, 2011 D10-0045 LA FITNESS, TUCSON SOUTHEAST Drainage Report: 1. Revise the run-off coefficients used for the determination of the retention requirements. The 5-year run-off coefficients must be used along with the 5-year rainfall data. 2. Ensure that the water harvesting areas provide sufficient capacity for the required retention once the requirements are calculated with correct factors. Provide calculations for the basin volumes in the drainage report. Development Plan 3. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. 4. Provide evidence of permission for off-site construction. The agreement must address both the common access and the proposed drainage structures. Also provide the maintenance agreements for these facilities. 5. The development plan cannot be approved until the WASH review has been completed and approved. Grading Plan 6. Provide details for the water harvesting areas, taking care to demonstrate that the volumes indicated in the drainage report will be provided. Show how the change in grade along the length of each water harvesting area will be accounted for in the water harvesting volume calculation. |
| 01/21/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the Native Plant Preservation Plan to include the inventory for the WASH study area. 2) Submit and an Environmental Resource Report and WASH Overlay application per TCC 23A-50 & 51. Approval is required prior to development plan approval. 3) Revise the plans to include any related case numbers, such as those for rezoning or overlay applications. |
| 01/24/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 24, 2011 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Compancy, Inc. 3945 E. Fort Lowell Rd. # 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D10-0045 LA FITNESS Development Package Dear Tri: Your submittal of December 16, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 8 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning HC Site, Zoning, Addressing, Wastewater, Traffic, Engineering, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Environmental Resource Report (Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 322-6956 |
| 12/16/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/16/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/17/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved |