Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0044
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 3, 2011 Gene Goldstein Bramic Design Group 6255 N. Camino Pimeha Alta # 136 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D10-0044 CULVERS RESTAURANT Development Package Dear Gene: Your submittal of December 13, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 9 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Package (Planning, Engineering, Landfill, Addressing, Wastewater, Zoning, Zoning HC Site, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised SWPPP (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $100.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via Email |
| 01/03/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/28/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Revise landscape plan to identify the type proposed for the Phase 2 Pad. LUC 3.7.2.7.B&C. DS 2-06.5.2.C. 2) The redevelopment plan indicates a thirty-foot wide landscape buffer along Prudence Road and the conditions of rezoning require a twenty-foot wide landscape area along Broadway Blvd. Revise as necessary. 3) The Broadway Proper Redevelopment Plan requires: A) Minimum Landscaping Coverage: 10% of site area. Provide calculations. B) Compliance with the Methane Control plan: BROADWAY PROPER MASTER METHANE CONTROL PLAN "Landscaping and Maintenance, even with proper drainage, some water can be expected to enter the refuse. Careful landscaping and maintenance of the Broadway Proper site will, however, minimize infiltration. As part of the Master Plan, irrigation will be limited to that required to maintain healthy foliage, and irrigation systems will be located to ensure sufficient watering of areas needing irrigation, while preventing over-irrigation of other areas. A relatively fine-grained soil will be placed to prevent the percolation of. irrigation water and precipitation into the refuse. However, continued maintenance will be needed to eliminate cracks, holes, and other fissures through which water could enter the refuse. The need to provide a dense cover which will prevent infiltration of moisture oust be balanced against the effect such a cover will have on the lateral migration of gas. The plants chosen for the site will be those requiring little water, with root systems capable of capturing irrigation water so that It does not penetrate the soil. Plants which effectively remove moisture from the root area by evapotranspiration, thus decreasing the amount of water present in the soil cover and minimizing the potential for percolation into the landfill are preferred. Also, tensiometer measurement of soil moisture can regulate irrigation intervals in order to maintain plant health without excessive water application. Figures A to E on the following pages show alternative planting techniques. Although minimizing the amount of water entering the refuse will prevent a rapid increase in the rate of landfill gas production, production of landfill gas cannot be entirely prevented. Measures to control the migration of landfill gas are therefore needed." C) Refer to Figures A-D for planting details that are consistent with the BROADWAY PROPER MASTER METHANE CONTROL PLAN provisions. Add details to the landscape plans as necessary to ensure compliance. Incorporate any recommendations or requirements of the individual methane control plan required for this development plan. D) The Native Plant Preservation Plan proposes removal of several of the existing trees in the Calle Sinoloa and Broadway place medians. Landscaping for these medians should be consistent with Exhibits E-1and E-2, include desert landscaping, support a strong pedestrian corridor and landscaping theme as an integral part of the overall design and project activity concept, reflect standards of quality and excellence required for acceptance of the concept through development plan review procedures, and provide excellence of design and provision of publicly accessible, landscaped open spaces according to the plan. 4) The propose water harvesting plan should be developed in concert with the methane control plans. Based on the existing Master Plan, there are likely just a few suitable areas for rainwater capture and retention. Revise the plans to correspond with the BROADWAY PROPER MASTER METHANE CONTROL PLAN (see quotes below) and any individual control plans. The Redevelopment Plans require that individual Development Site Plans address methane control for each development prior to the issuance of building permits. In addition to providing for methane control for each building, utilities and site Improvements, the developer will demonstrate that the intended land use will not increase the potential for gas migration beyond the property lines or have a detrimental impact on existing gas control systems. Water infiltrating into the landfill through rainfall or irrigation of landscaping could cause the landfill gas production rate to increase. Moisture management is therefore an important element of the Master Methane Control Plan for the Broadway Proper development. |
| 12/28/2010 | JWILLIA4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/28/2010 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner Zoning Review Section PROJECT: D10-0044 Culvers Restaurant Development Package / Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 23, 2010 DUE DATE: December 28, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is December 13, 2011. 2. DS 2-01.2.4 - The title block on all sheets should be consistent. Revise the title block on the landscape and NPPO sheets to match the DP sheets. The box in question is the information portion of the title block that refers to the development name, site address, and legal description etc. 3. DS 2-01.3.4.C - Under the location map on sheet one (1) revise the section number reference to section 17. 4. DS 2-01.3.2.B - It is my understanding that a lot reconfiguration of lots 2 and 3 will be processed separate from the development package. I would say that the title block should be revised to state that a lot reconfiguration of lots 2 and 3 rather than a re-subdivision and/or the new legal description reconfiguration should be listed in the title block of all plan sheets. Existing lot lines that are to be reconfigured should be removed from all plan sheets and only the new lot lines should be drawn and labeled with the new distance and bearings. A condition of approval of the DP will be that a lot application be processed and approved prior to final signoff of the DP by the CDRC manager. Therefore the lot split will have been processed and approved with the new lot line configuration. 5. DS 2-01.3.7.A.8 - A lot split/reconfiguration will be required for the lot line adjustment. A separate permit is required and must be reviewed and approved prior to approval plan. List the lot split case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets and add the case number to the lot split notes on sheet 2. 6. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.a - Under the development Package calculations section on sheet one (1), list the Allowed and proposed FAR ratio. 7. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.d and DS 2-01.3.9.G - The site is proposed with a phased development. Phase one (1) calculations have been listed but the only phase two (2) calculations listed is the parking. Please indicate what use is proposed that requires or will require a minimum of 26 spaces. In addition add a general note that a separate or revised development plan will be required for the phase two (2) development. 8. DS 2-01.3.8.A and DS 2-01.3.9.A - Label the correct distance and bearing for the new southeast lot line. Also label the curve data for the northwest spandrel of the Culvers property. 9. DS 2-01.3.8.B - Per the plan it appears that a 36' ingress/egress easement is proposed along the south side of the site. Clarify if a separate document is to be used to record this easement. Also a note for the 24' ingress / egress easement along the west side of the phase two development is labeled. Clarify if this easement is to be recorded under separate instrument as well. Clarify if either of the easements mentioned shouldn't be part perpetual cross access agreement. An easement will be required in three locations to cover the sidewalk system that meanders onto the phase one and two lots at the three driveway access locations. While the majority of the sidewalk system is within the private street the access ramps and portions of the sidewalk due encroach onto private property. Some form of maintenance agreement will also be required to ensure that the sidewalk system is maintained by the responsible party. Clarify if there are and type of Covenants, conditions and Restrictions or some other form of recorded agreement to deal with this type of maintenance and liability issue. 10 . DS 2-01.3.9.B - If the reconfigured lots are to be labeled with the previous lot numbers label lot numbers on the plan. If the lots are to be relabeled with new lot numbers label the lots as required. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a - Clarify if the Phased-two development is going to encompass the entire future pad. If so where is the ADA parking for Phase Two proposed. This drawing rendition does not provide for the ADA spaces that are to be within close proximity to the front door. It is acknowledged that there may not be a building proposal at this time and if this is the case add a note on the plan that states how the ADA parking will be addressed for the Phase Two development. A miscount of the number of parking spaces has been made for the Phase Two south parking area. Per the plan, a note labeling the number of parking spaces as 11 should be revised to 12 spaces. This will make the overall parking for both phases under this development plan at 84 spaces provided. Revise the note and the parking calculation. 11a. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5 - a. Draw and label the stacking spaces within the drive-through lane. b. Label the dimensions of the stacking spaces. c. Clearly identify the pick-up window location. d. label the PAAL area adjacent to the customer waiting line spaces. e. Dimension the customer waiting parking spaces. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c - A separate loading zone for the Phase two Development will be required. Add a note that the loading zone for the Phase Two will be designed and incorporated into the vehicular use area at time of the submittal of the Phase Two development plan. 13. DS 2-01.3.9.I - Label the existing and future curb to property line dimensions. The existing and future curb locations are required in order to verify the building setbacks. 14. DS 2-01.3.9.O - The building setbacks from both Prudence and Broadway (both roads are +100 ADT) are to be based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure form the back of future curb locations. The building setback along prudence is depicted on the site plan and noted in keynote 1 from the nearest edge of travel lane. While the setbacks are not an issue the correct distance based on the correct ADT and should be labeled. Revise as required. Future sight visibility triangles for Broadway and Prudence shall be drawn and labeled. 15. DS 2-01.3.9.R and .S - per 3-05.2.1.C.2.a, pedestrian access must not cross the stacking lane for drive-though lanes. Both sidewalks that provide access to Prudence and Broadway are crossing the through the stacking lanes of the drive-trough. Revise the sidewalk locations to comply with this standard. 16. DS 2-01.3.9.X - Please review the Landscape reviewer comments with regards to street perimeter landscape buffers, screening and parking lot landscaping. 17. There appears to be a conflict in the accessibility to the class one bicycle parking facilities. Along the west side of the lockers there is a proposed vegetative screen and on the east side there appears to be minimal access due to the door stoop. There needs to be a clear four-foot walkway to the class one parking space facilities. Revise as required. Additional observations: 18. Zoning has no comments on the grading plan on this review. However any changes that are made to the base site plan must be made to the grading and landscape plan sheets. 19. Please respond how the conditions of the redevelopment plan have been complied with, based on this plan, for this proposed development, and on this parcel of the overall development site. 20. Revise the text "90' Common Area" to 90' Public Street on cross section D/5. 21. Wheel stops are to be placed 2.5' from the front of the parking spaces. The parking space detail on sheet 5 has been depicted with a 2' distance from the front of the parking spaces. 22. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 - Wheel stops are required for the parking spaces along the south side of phase 1 and 2. The spaces are adjacent to a landscape buffer and without wheel stops the vehicles will overhang the buffer and damage the vegetation. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D100044dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 12/28/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 27, 2010 SUBJECT: Culver's Restaurant Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 40 S Broadway Pl, T14S R15E Sec07 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D10-0044 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Floodplain Use Permit (T10OT02648), Drainage Statement (JE Fuller Hydrology and Geomorphology, Inc., 07DEC10), Geotechnical Engineering Report (Terracon, 10DEC10) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (STAR Consulting, 15NOV10). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) DS 10-03: Revise the Drainage Statement and Section 5.7 to clearly show that the overall development complies with the new Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance. The Development Plan and Landscape Plan have been designed for passive water harvesting and it does allow for retention of up to 6-inches of water in the required landscape areas. Revise the statement to show it complies with the DS 10-03. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 2) Tucson Code Chapter 29: Provide all requirements per the Environmental Services plan review comments. Specifically provide all documentation to satisfy the requirements within Chapter 29-23. 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.2: Clarify the Gross Area of the site as shown in Zoning and Land Use Note #2. Per the Drainage Statement and the assessor website the gross area of the site should be 1.87 acres not the 1.82 acres as shown, clarify. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.B.2.b: Revise Drainage Note #13 to completely state; "A Floodplain Use Permit and Elevation Certificates are required." Since the building location does fall within the existing 100-year floodplain limits Elevation Certificates will be required for both the Prior to Slab (P2S) and Prior to Final (P2F) inspections. 5) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan documents to include the CDRC approval stamp within the 3-inch by 5-inch space provided in the lower right quadrant on all sheets. Per the standard the 3x5 inch box is to ensure that the CDRC approval stamp has a spot on the plan set, please revise. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.E: Revise the plan documents and the Sheet Index to reflect the SWPPP Exhibit Sheet that is required within the development plan package (in addition to the 3 SWPPP Reports and exhibits required for review). 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The correct Development Plan Package number (D10-0044) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets where indicated by "D10-." 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.A: Revise the plan documents to remove the existing property lines due to the reconfiguration of the Lots. Plan view should only show the new property lines with bearings and dimensions for the lot reconfiguration. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Provide approval from Tucson Electric Power for all improvements located within the easements as shown. Specifically the 15'x15' easement that is within the PAAL. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.I.1: Revise the floodplain note on Sheet 4 to clarify 100-yr water surface elevation. Per the note the WSEL is 2589.75; however per the Drainage Report and cross sections shown the water surface elevation is 2589.72. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.A: A lot reconfiguration approval through the Zoning Department will be required due to the new lots lines being proposed under this review. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Revise the plan documents to label the 18-foot radii at all proposed driveway locations. Specifically the south driveway located on Calle Sinaloa. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the plan documents to clearly show the correct near side dimension for the proposed sight visibility triangles along Broadway Blvd. Per the Development Standards the near side dimension is 345 feet. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise the plan document and/or Grading Plan Note # 3 to provide all recommendation within the Geotechnical Engineering Report. Specifically the report recommended the use of a geotextile fabric under the fill and vehicular use area due to landfill conditions. Verify all of landfill requirements with Environmental Services. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.6: Provide the recordation information, labeled in plan view, for all proposed ingress/egress easements as shown. 16) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise the plan documents to clearly label all drainage infrastructure that is to be removed per the proposed drainage design. Specifically the existing 18-inch RCP connected to the existing catch basin that is to be relocated. 17) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise the detail on Sheet 6 to clearly label all drainage improvements within the landscape buffer yard. Specifically the proposed catch basin and 18-inch RCP. Provide all construction information such as; proposed elevations, type, standard detail references, and other construction details for this infrastructure. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.I: Refer to any comments from Jose Ortiz, PE Transportation Department for all Public Right-of-Way requirements. 19) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 20) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Provide a public access easement for all areas of the public sidewalks that are proposed to be constructed onsite and not within the right-of-way of the private roadways. Clearly label and dimension the easements in plan view and provide the recordation information for said easement labeled in plan view. 21) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and all associated details to clearly label and dimension all construction details for the proposed refuse container and enclosure location. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 (Figure 3) for all required refuse enclosure dimensions and construction details that must be provided for construction purposes. 22) A right-of-way use permit application will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way and for the proposed drainage infrastructure that will be tied into the existing public drainage infrastructure prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: 23) Per City of Tucson Code Ordinance 10209, Chapter 26 Section 26-42.2: "For land disturbing activities that fall under the jurisdiction of this Article, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be prepared and certified by an engineer, or a landscape architect and submitted along with the application for a grading permit to the City of Tucson Development Services Department." The SWPPP report and exhibits must be signed and sealed by the engineer of record or by a Registered Landscape Architect, revise. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 12/28/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Tucson Electric Power Company 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 WR#232425 Bramic Design Group Attn: Gene Goldstein 6255 N Camino Pimeria Alta #136 Tucson, AZ 85718 To Gene Goldstein : Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 December 30, 2010 SUBJECT Culvers Restaurant D10-0044 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted December 22, 2010 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P.O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-918-8726 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, /IMa^A^ Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson , (Email only) S. Doniere, Tucson Electric Power |
| 12/28/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 December 22, 2010 To: Erin Harris, PE STAR CONSULTING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department __________________________ Reviewed by: Tom Porter, Sr, CEA PCRWRD Subject: Culvers Restuarant Development Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0041 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits Provide to this office, a copy of the approved private sewer plan which runs east to west, connecting to IMS MH #2447-02 and identify the ADEQ Private Sewer Plan Number. Provide pipe size information for the private sewer line. Provide velocity calculations for the BCS connection from the Culvers restaurant to the public connection that ensure the contributing flow into the public is 10ft/s or less. Relocate the portion of the proposed water service that is located in, and runs parallel to the existing public sewer easement. Revise the legend to represent sewer symbology shown in the plans. Clarify demolition note on sheet 3, which indicates that all existing on site utilities will be removed. The existing private sewer is proposed to be utilized for the Phase 2 development. Identify and label the IMS MH #2447-01 and label the pipe size and slope connecting to IMS MH #2447-02. Contact Dave Martin, PE (740-6323) to obtain approval from the RWRD Engineering Department for new connections to public sewer lines 12” and greater. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions about this review letter please call me @ the phone number below. ______________________________ Chad Amateau ,PE, (520)740-6719 PCRWRD cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 12/28/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/28/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | LANDFILL | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | I have reviewed the plan with the assistance of Jeffrey Drumm of Environmental Services. The plans as submitted indicate that the project is within 100 feet of a landfill. The project is subject to all of the provisions in the Landfill Development Ordinance as noted in Article IX Regulations and Public Notice in the Proximity of Designated Landfills Section 29-21 through 23 AND 29-25 through 29-29. I have provided a link to the ordinance. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az/tucsonarizonacharterandgeneralordinances?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0 Should the developer choose to move forward with the project, a submittal will be required that addresses all of those issues. That submittal will require the approval of the Director of Environmental Services. Should solid waste from the landfill be unearthed during the construction phase of the project, the material will be subject to regulation under the solid waste rules of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. If you have any questions concerning this matter feel free to contact me at 791-4502 These comments were made by Mike Jones with Tucson Fire. |
| 12/28/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. For all curb ramps shown on this development plan, flared sides are not required. Turn back curbs are acceptable. 2. Please show a curb ramp at the North end of the marked crossing connecting to Calle Sinaloa. 3. Detectable warning strips are not required at the accessible parking aisles. 4. Please correct the 8' dimension shown for the most Northerly accessible parking space shown on the "Parking Space and Class 2 Bike Rack Detail" plan on sheet five. The dimension includes a 5' bike parking area. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/28/2010 | JWILLIA4 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | Date Case Number Project Address December 28, 2010 D10-0044 Culvers Restaurant DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: The proposed Development Plan for the Culvers Restaurant Case No.D10-0044. Meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal and Recycle Materials Standard 6-01, and is Approved. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/28/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | ADDRESSING REVIEW 201 N STONE AVE, 2ND FLOOR TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 PHONE: (520) 740-6800 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D10-0044 CULVER'S RESTAURANT DATE: DECEMBER 29, 2010 The above referenced Project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Label project number on all sheets. 2. Delete blank address block from all sheets except sheet 1. 3. Correct "Section 7" to "Section 17" on location map description, sheet 1. 4. Correct "Marvin Avenue" to "Kenyon Drive" on location map, sheet 1. 5. In legal description of property notes on sheet 1, correct "a resubdivision of lots 2 & 3…" to "a development of lots 2 & 3…" 6. In Title Block on all sheets correct "a resubdivision of lots 2 & 3…" to "a development of lots 2 & 3…" 7. Delete "Prudence Place" from sheets 2, 3 & 4. 8. Please provide copy of recorded deed/s for new lot line reconfiguration. 9. Correct lots 1 & 2 to lots 2 & 3 in both places on Development Package Calculations, sheet 1. 10. Correct lots 1 & 2 to lots 2 & 3 in three places on Reconfiguration Notes, sheet 2. 11. Correct "Section 24" to "Section 17" on Location Plans, sheets 7 and 9. 12. Correct "Section 24" to "Section 17" in Title Block, sheets 7 - 11. 13. Label section corners on Location Plans, sheets 7 and 9. 14. Change suffix of "BLVD" to full spelling "Boulevard" for Broadway, sheets 7 - 10. |
| 12/28/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/28/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | CDRC Review Planning and Development Services Dept., Community Planning Review D10-0044, Culvers Restaurant, 1st submittal Comments Due: 12/28/10 Items reviewed: Development Plan, Landscape Plan Broadway Proper Redevelopment Plan Community Planning Comments: This section reviews for compliance with the Broadway Proper Redevelopment Plan. 1) The site is within "Development Area B", and the proposed restaurant is a permitted use. 2) Based on input from Environmental Services and the Tucson Fire Department, the project site is within 100 feet of a landfill, and the project is subject to the provisions of the Landfill Development Ordinance (per the Tucson City Code). 3) The project may be subject to Special Landscaping Requirements associated with Development Area B. Please refer to the comments from the Landscape Section. 4) The project is denied until comments #2 above, and, as warranted, #3, have been addressed. A resubmittal is required. Reviewed by: Joanne Hershenhorn, 12/22/10 F:\Shardir\UPDfiles\Development Review\CASE_REVIEW\CDRC\2010 Cases\D10-0044.doc |