Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0042
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/01/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/02/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned and/or operated property |
| 12/03/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/07/2010 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Denied | >>> Gary Wittwer 12/07/2010 2:05 PM >>> 1. Please show exact limits of NCZ on the plan and identify it. 2. Please show a section of the swale that runs through the NCZ. (depth?) 3. Please submit an irrigation plan - note NCZ limits and identify on plan. |
| 12/07/2010 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Denied | I have reviewed the 12/1/10 Development Package for 795 W Congress Street for the Tucson Parks and Recreation Department and have the found the following items which need clarification or revision: 1) More information regarding grading in the landscape area north of the building is needed in order to evaluate the impact on the 'no compaction zone' around the Heritage Eucalyptus Tree in that area. 2) Any new pavement located within the 'no compaction zone' around the Heritage Eucalyptus tree will need to be permeable. This includes sidewalks. 3) The path and trails within the adjacent Santa Cruz River Park (West bank) are to be upgraded to meet current River Park and Anza Trail Standards. This includes a 12' wide asphalt-paved multi-use path and a 10' wide decomposed granite trail. 4) There is no indication of new landscaping or grading on the east side of the property where the building abuts the Santa Cruz River Park. It is assumed that the construction of the building as well as the relocation of the reclaimed waterline will affect the park and these areas need to be addressed on the landscape plan. 5) Sheet C3 indicates that the parking lot south of the building will drain into a 24" underground stormdrain pipe which appears to daylight into the Santa Cruz River Park. The plan will need to show how the developer intends to convey this water into the Santa Cruz River channel without it flowing over the River Park Path and trail or causing erosion. Thank you, Howard B. Dutt, ASLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Fax: (520) 791-4008 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/08/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Date Case Number Project Address December 8, 2010 D10-0042 New Armory Building DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: The proposed Development Plan for the New Armory Building Senior Housing, Case No.D10-0042. Meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal and Recycle Standard 6-01. The Development is hereby approved with the following exception. 1. The proposed development plan for the New Armory Building Senior Housing must state the physical address on each sheet of the proposed plans Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/10/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | CDRC Review Planning and Development Services Dept., Community Planning Review D10-0042, New Armory Building, 1st submittal Comments Due: 12/15/10 Items reviewed: Development Plan, Landscape Plan Community Planning Comments: 1) The existing and planned zoning is C-3. This project is not associated with any active rezoning case. In the future, this area may be incorporated into a Planned Area Development (PAD), however, the development plan is being filed under the existing C-3 zoning. 2) This area was annexed in 1927. Because it was annexed so many years ago, there are no annexation conditions. 3) The site is within the bounds of the Rio Nuevo and Downtown Overlay Zone (Land Use Code 2.8.10), which includes a design review for applicable projects (LUC 2.8.10.5). 4) This section has no comments. A resubmittal isn't required. Reviewed by: Joanne Hershenhorn, 12/9/10 F:\Shardir\UPDfiles\Development Review\CASE_REVIEW\CDRC\2010 Cases\D10-0042.doc |
| 12/13/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: New Armory Building Development Package (1st Review) D10-0042 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 13, 2010 DUE DATE: December 15, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 30, 2011 2. This development package was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. The following comments are based on the Development Standard 2-01.0: D.S. 2-01.3.2.B Provide a brief legal description within the title block. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Complete the "SHEET ? OF ??" on all sheets. The total number of sheets should include the landscape plan(S) 1. D.S. 2-01.3.3. Provide the following relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet, D10-0042, T10BU01769 2. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Revise General Note 15 proposed use to read "FAMILY DWELLING DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATORS "R" & "S". 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a lot coverage calculation on the plan. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.8.A Remove all references to "ORIGIANL LOT LINE BETWEEN …" and "EXISTING PROPERTY LINE" from the plans. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The "30' RECLAIMED WATER ESMT (TO BE ABANDONED" will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C Provide the following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E As this project proposes a change to the property boundary Zoning cannot approve the development package until the final plat has been revised and approved. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 Provide site visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Provide a vehicle parking calculation that shows the number required and provided for standard, compact and accessible vehicle parking spaces. Per LUC Section 3.3.4, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings, Projects of any density for the elderly or the physically disabled, the required ratio is 0.75 space per dwelling unit or 143 units x 0.75 = 107 vehicle parking spaces required. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a bicycle parking calculation that provides the number required and provided on the plan. For your information a single inverted "U" rack can support two (2) bicycles. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per D.S. 2-09.5.2 show the required five (5) foot access aisle on detail 3/C4. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L Provide the docket and page for the proposed "RECLAIMED WATER ESMT." on the plan. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L Provide documentation from Tucson Water that allows the proposed improvements, shown at the northeast corner of the building, to be constructed within the reclaimed water easement. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B the required street perimeter yard is twenty-one (21) feet or the height of the proposed exterior building wall. That said the proposed building does not meet the street perimeter yard setback requirements. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Per LUC Section 2.5.5.2.F.1 Family Dwelling, development designator "S", perimeter yard indicator "CC", the required perimeter yard setback to the south, east and west property lines is the height of proposed exterior building wall. That said the proposed building does not meet setbacks. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The proposed "8' MASONRY WALL (TYP)" does not meet the require 8' setback. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide a pedestrian circulation/accessible route to W. Paseo De Los Zanjeros. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Clearly indicate the accessible route that connects to Congress Street. 20. Clearly show the vehicle maneuverability to and from the refuse collection area. 21. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0042 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: New Armory Building Development Package (1st Review) T10BU01769 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 13, 2010 DUE DATE: December 15, 2010 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/13/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. An accessible path to the dumpster is not required. Please delete all accessible elements in the pedestrian pathway to the dumpster. 2. Zoning will require a pedestrian path to both the Congress and Paseo de los Zanjeras rights of way. Reference Zoning comments. Both of these must be accessible. 3. Provide a detectable warning strip at the North end of the accessible parking aisle just prior to entering the PAAL. 4. At sheet C4, generic plans are not acceptable. Please provide actual design partial plans of the accessible parking with all code requirements included on the detail. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/15/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Development within the Rio Nuevo and Downtown (RND) Zone shall meet the design principles set forth in Sec. 2.8.10.1 by complying with the following Design Criteria (see Development Standards 9-10.0, 10-02.0, 10-03.0, and 10-05.0, except as may be approved pursuant to an application for Modification of Development Regulations (MDR). Alternatively, the optional Downtown Infill Incentive District overlay zone may be employed. Note on the Development Plan if any overly zones are applicable and list any associated case numbers on all of the plans. 2) Adequate shade shall be provided for sidewalks and pedestrian pathways, using shade structures or vegetation, where permitted by the City of Tucson. LUC 2.8.10.5.K Specifically, shade shall be provided for at least fifty (50%) percent of all sidewalks and pedestrian access paths as measured at 2:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is eighty-two degrees above the horizon. Provide calculations for the required shade. 3) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Revise the plans as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c. 4) 3.7.4.2 Use of Reclaimed Water. A. Reclaimed water is to be used in new and expanded development in accordance with the adopted Mayor and Council Water Policies and other applicable state and local requirements. 5) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C 6) Provide documentation to support the request for a Native Plant Preservation Exception. The area currently part of the public drainageway aoppears to include protected native plants per LUC 3.8.5. Also, refer to notes 11 & 12 on sheet 4 of 4 of the Native plant Preservation and Mitigation plans for Rio Nuevo Lots 1-15. http://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/Command?command=SearchSire&actno=S02-003%20%20%20&sirecabinet=P&streetno=795.0&streetdir=W%20&streetnm=CONGRESS%20ST%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&struct=&floor=&unit=&SearchButton=AssociatedDocumentsandPlans |
| 12/15/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: December 15, 2010 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: New Armory Building, 795 W. Congress St. Development Package D10-0042 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 14 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package. The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. D.S. 2-01.2.9. Symbol shown on the plan do not match legend or are not shown at all. 3. The title block shall include the following information. D.S. 2-01.3.2. B. A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. 4. Relevant case numbers (development package document, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. D.S. 2-01.3.3. Add the DP number (D10-0042) and complete the MDR number on all sheets. 5. General Notes. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. D.S. 2-01.3.7. B. Drainage Notes. List the following notes as appropriate. 2. If applicable, list the following notes and complete the blanks. a. "The following lots are affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations: _________." (List the lots affected by lot number.) In the case of one (1) lot development, substitute the words, "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." b. "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: __________." (List the lots affected by lot number, or in the case of a one (1) lot development, place a period after the word "required" and delete the remainder of note. F. Trails Notes. List the following notes as appropriate. 1. If a trail or path is proposed, provide a note, as appropriate, indicating that a trail or path will be constructed for public or private use, the general location of the trail or path, and whom it will be constructed and maintained by. If it is intended to connect to an offsite feature, such as an exiting trail, wash, sidewalk, road, commercial or residential development, etc., so indicate. If the trail or path is to be dedicated, indicate the method of dedication. 2. If a new trail or path will be constructed, add the following note, as appropriate: "All new onsite and offsite trails or paths constructed in conjunction with this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be subject to the review and approval of the City's Parks and Recreation Department, and, if requested, Pima County Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation." 6. Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-01.3.8. Show more detail of the river park/path adjacent to the site. A. Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. Show all perimeter information for both the existing and future property lines. B. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) are provided. C. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. D. The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. It appears that the reclaimed water line does not have sufficient distance between the easement line and pipe at the NE corner of the site to be constructed as designed. E. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). F. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. Provide greater detail of how the stormwater discharge from both the 8" and 24" pipes flows under the exist./proposed path and into the Santa Cruz River on the plans. H. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainageways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions. 7. Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. D.S. 2-01.3.9. A. Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. H. Proposed traffic circulation: 1. Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), handicap ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and handicap ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two (2) or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Sec. 4.1.2 of the LUC). Show the proposed alignment/design for the sidewalk where the existing driveway apron will be closed. 2. Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 3. Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. Show how the service vehicle will meet Dev. Stds. 6-01.0 for maneuverability. 4. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. J. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) L. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. N. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. 2. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow. 3. Provide locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings and pipe culverts. 4. Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage. 5. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development document area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) Contact Bill Zimmerman at 740-6350, Pima County Flood Control District, for information regarding permits within the Santa Cruz River. 6. The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more will be drawn on the development package documents. 7. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or onsite runoff discharge points. P. The following Pima County Wastewater Management information will be indicated on the development package documents. 1. Preliminary sewer layout, including points of connection to existing sewers, proposed rim and invert elevations, and flow arrows at all manhole locations, length and percent of grade between manholes, size of pipe, and proposed flow thru locations, should be shown if applicable. S. Show on-site pedestrian refuge areas per Development Standard 3-05. T. Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 8. Per a phone conversation with Bill Gideon of Lizard Rock Designs on December 14, 2010, the roof drainage patterns have changed and a portion of the roof drainage will now drain onto the North portion of the site. I mentioned to Bill G. that the preferred method of the stormwater drainage for the North portion of the site would be to drain onto Congress Street through a scupper and into the existing catch basin located next to the exist. East curb return. This would also eliminate the 8" pipe w/ rip-rap, scuppers ect. discharging stormwater into the River Park. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. Add notes to construction notes or to grading plan notes: a. "The following lots are affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations: _________." (List the lots affected by lot number.) In the case of one (1) lot development, substitute the words, "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." b. "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: __________." (List the lots affected by lot number, or in the case of a one (1) lot development, place a period after the word "required" and delete the remainder of note. 3. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting" 4. Add the following notes to the construction notes or grading plan notes: " "The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work." " "Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it." 5. Per a phone conversation with Bill Gideon of Lizard Rock Designs on December 14, 2010, the roof drainage patterns have changed and a portion of the roof drainage will now drain onto the North portion of the site. I mentioned to Bill G. that the preferred method of the stormwater drainage for the North portion of the site would be to drain onto Congress Street through a scupper and into the existing catch basin located next to the exist. East curb return. This would also eliminate the 8" pipe w/ rip-rap, scuppers ect. discharging stormwater into the River Park. 6. Remove from the note that calls out the removal of the driveway apron that states: "or comply with std. details 200 &209, which ever is greater". Contact Permits and Codes (see comment below) for the exact curb and sidewalk replacement requirements. 7. List Grading plan number (T10BU01769) on each sheet. 8. Show 6" depressed areas with elevations on the GP per the DR and landscape plans. 9. Show cross sections through out the GP with transverse and longitudinal slopes. 10. Call out surface paving material. 11. Show details of all surface materials. 12. A permit or a private improvement agreement may be necessary for any work performed within the public right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 13. Call out all slopes and stabilization material (concrete, riprap, gabbions or vegetation). Show details and/or cross-sections of the proposed swale including size of rip-rap, depth, fabric etc. on the plans. 14. Slopes of 3H: 1V require hand placed riprap. 15. Slopes of 2H: 1V or greater require grouted riprap. 16. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line. 17. Drainage patterns with percent slopes (Show patterns within the first 100 feet from the property line). 18. Flow arrows, grades and flow rates within and adjacent to site to show drainage scheme. 19. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site. 20. Show details of all surface and subsurface drainage devices. 21. Submit a copy of the Geotechnical report with the next submittal. 22. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 837-4932 for additional information. Per Matt Flick a SWPPP will accompany the re-submittal. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Correct and spell out the abbreviation for "L-Cert" to "Elevation Certificate" on page 7. 3. Include details and/or sections of all drainage structures, both on-site and off-site i.e.: catch basins, channels, rip-rap, pipes, etc. in the DR. 4. A hydraulics section showing details of all inlet and outlet structures, water-surface elevations, limits of ponding ect. is required per DS 10-01.5.2.6. 5. This comment is also made on DP and GP and shall be addressed in the DR: Per a phone conversation with Bill Gideon of Lizard Rock Designs on December 14, 2010, the roof drainage patterns have changed and a portion of the roof drainage will now drain onto the North portion of the site. I mentioned to Bill G. that the preferred method of the stormwater drainage for the North portion of the site would be to drain onto Congress Street through a scupper and into the existing catch basin located next to the exist. East curb return. This would also eliminate the 8" pipe w/ rip-rap, scuppers ect. discharging stormwater into the River Park. 6. Addendums to any Drainage Reports and Hydrology Reports etc. are not accepted. The new layout or revisions must be incorporated into the approved Drainage Report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/795 W. Congress St_Dev_Pkg |
| 12/15/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 December 14, 2010 To: CARL BUETER CORNERSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department __________________________ Reviewed by: Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD Subject: SENIOR HOUSING GROUP NEW ARMORY BUILDING Development Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0042 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The development plan submitted is significantly deficient. Refer to Pima County Development Services “Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements” section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at; http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.pdf On the next submittal please submit a signed and sealed set of plans. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions about this review letter please call me @ the phone number below. ______________________________ Tom Porter, Sr. CEA, (520)740-6719 PCRWRD cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 12/16/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | December 16, 2010 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D10-0042 PROJECT NAME: New Armory Building PROJECT ADDRESS: 795 W Congress St PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. The right of way for Paseo De Los Zanjeros does not exist. The proposed access point cannot be approved until the right of way has been recorded. 2. Solid waste vehicles will not be able to maneuver under the current design. 3. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 4. Illustrate the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT) at the driveway along Paseo De Los Zanjeros. Ensure that the proposed parking spaces do not impede the SVT. 5. Callout the radius of the proposed curb returns along Paseo De Los Zanjeros. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/17/2010 | MATT FLICK | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 17, 2010 Carl Bueter, EIT Cornerstone Environmental Group 17 W Wetmore Rd. # 310 Tucson, AZ 85705 Subject: D10-0042 NEW ARMORY BUILDING Development Package Dear Mr. Bueter: Your submittal of December 1, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 9 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, Wastewater, TDOT-Traffic, TDOT-Landscape, Zoning HC, Engineering, Landscape, Parks & Rec, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $100.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4931. Sincerely, Matt Flick, PE Project Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://cms3.tucson.az.gov/pdsd/ Via fax: (520) 888-4804 |
| 12/17/2010 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied |