Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0040
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/20/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: San Raphael Medical Plaza Development Plan (1st Revision) D10-0040 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 20, 2011 DUE DATE: August 02, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K & D.S. 2-05.2.4.P There are two accessible vehicle parking spaces shown south of the proposed angled vehicle parking spaces. Demonstrate on the plan how access is gained to an accessible route on site from these parking spaces. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Based on the letter from Gene Goldstein dated July 11, 2011 the vehicle parking space calculation was to be revised to show all medical office based on the current LUC Section 3.3.4.2. The calculation provided on the submitted plan still shows a mixed use of medical office @ 1 per 175 and office @ 1 per 200, please clarify. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Development Plan Keynote 8 points to the proposed angled parking. This keynote references "refer to an enlarged details sheet 3", there is not a detail that shows angled parking. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Clean up the accessible vehicle parking area along the west side of the existing building. There are several accessible pavements markers that overlap and/or are shown within the landscape areas. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Based on the letter from Gene Goldstein dated July 11, 2011 the revised LUC parking requirements were elected for use on this project. That said if the revised LUC vehicle parking requirements are used then the revised bicycle parking requirements are to be used. See LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0040 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 07/20/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/22/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide an enlarged plan of the ingress/egress patio showing grades complying with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3, slopes for an accessible route. a. Also, please show how the accessible route is connected between the two buildings over the drainage flume. 2. Detail 4/3: a. Show all signage centered on the accessible parking spaces. b. Show accessible route slopes to and through the new masonry opening/archway to the circulation way between the buildings. 3. The two existing accessible parking spaces located south of the new angled parking require a connection to the accessible route. Please clarify. 4. Your international accessible symbol layer and certain accessible aisle marking layer is not in consort with the parking space layer. They are all askew all over the plan. 5. Note 8 refers to an enlarged plan that is not detailed on this submittal. Please clarify. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/27/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: July 27, 2011 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: San Raphael Medical Center, 899 N. Wilmot Road Rev Development Pkg D10-0040 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 12 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package and Drainage Statement. The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the revised DP. 2. It is unclear on the plans what is actually being revised because of the other improvements done on the DP are also highlighted. Perhaps a way can be shown to distinguish what work is actually being proposed for the revision. 3. It is understood that the DP was approved as submitted minus the proposed revisions, however a number of discrepancies have been found in the "Development Plan Keynotes" and should be corrected. Re-check all the keynotes to ensure their accuracy. The following are a few of the keynotes that I have noticed, but not limited to, that need correcting: " Keynote no. 3 - Where is this used? " Keynote no. 4 - A key note just east of the revision is "floating" and not pointing to anything. " Keynote no. 8 - Calls out a parking detail that does not match any of the details shown on sheet 3. " Keynote no. 16 - Where is this used? " Keynote no. 22 and 34 - Refers to the grading plan. Where is the grading plan in the Dev. Pkg? See comment no. 4. " Keynote no. 41 - The parking island needs be detailed on the grading plan in order to be able to construct it. " Keynote no. 47 - Calls out for a 2.5' vehicle overhang but the indicator is in the water harvesting area. 4. Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes per D.S. 2-01.3.9.M, A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The DSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. It has been determined that there will be a grading plan submittal required because of the large area being paved. It must be demonstrated how the stormwater from the new paved area will be handled. Submit a drainage statement along with the grading plan upon the completion of a grading permit application. Further comments may be forth coming when the grading plan and drainage statement are submitted. Drainage Statement: 1. A Drainage Statement will be required for this project due to the amount of increased impervious area and the stormwater drainage associated with it. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/899 N. Wilmot Road DPkg rev.1 |
| 07/27/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise the plans if or as necessary to correspond with any pertinent changes made to the Development Plan drawing. Submit a revised print of the plan. A significant amount of detail and information from the previous version is missing, |
| 07/28/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 28, 2011 Gene Goldstein Bramic Design Group 6255 N. Camino Pimema Alta # 136 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D10-0040 SAN RAPHAEL MEDICAL PLAZA REVISION Development Plan Dear Gene: Your submittal of July 19, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 5 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, Zoning HC, Landscape, Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: N/A; Sent Email. |