Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0040
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/02/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: March 2, 2011 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: San Raphael Medical Center, 899 N. Wilmot Road Development Plan D10-0040 (Second Review) T14S, R14E, Section 12 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Development Plan (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. In light of the fact that the our reviewer, Bianca Ramirez, has accepted a job else where and is no longer working for the Planning and Development Services Department, this DP has been re-assigned to me to review. I have reviewed Bianca comments as well as the resubmittal response comments. 3. Per 2-05.2.1.H - Provide contour interval to development plan (together with north arrow and scale). The contour interval shall be shown next to the scale by the "SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN" title, not by the location plan. Remove the scale and contour interval be the locations plan. 4. Keynote 8: Unable to located detail being referenced for parking spaces. The keynote calls out that the detail is on sheet 2 instead of sheet 3. Revise keynote. 5. The refuse enclosure shall have a minimum inside clear distance of 10'x10', bollard to bollard and from front to back bollard. Drainage Statement: 1. The DS has been accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/899 N. Wilmot Road DP |
| 03/02/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D10-0040 SAN RAPHAEL MEDICAL PLAZA/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: March 2, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include the section, township and range on all title blocks per letter dated 11-23-10. Include the book and page of the legal description on all title blocks. Spell out Street of 3rd St. per letter dated 11-23-10. |
| 03/10/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 March 9, 2011 To: GENE GOLDSTEIN BRAMIC DESIGN GROUP Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: SAN RAPHAEL MEDICAL PLAZA 899 N WILMOT ROAD Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D10-0040 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Sheet 1: If you are not proposing any new sewer then the following General Note needs to be included: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 03/15/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date Case Number Project Address March 15, 2011 D10-0040 San Raphael Medical Plaza 899 W. Wilmot Road Development Plan Comments: Denied, The proposed Development Plan for the San Raphael Medical Plaza, Case No.D10-0040. dose not meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste and Recycle materials Disposal Standard 6-01. The Detail of the container enclosures must be shown that the minimum inside dimension between the bollards shall be not less than 10’- 0” for each enclosure. The dimension for the inside of the enclosure walls must be 12’-0” for each enclosure as shown on the Solid Waste Standards. All enclosures must show the gates installed and mounted at the end on the CMU screen wall, on a column or post as show on Solid Waste Standards. Also the size of containers proposed to be use must be noted on the plans. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/17/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#231788 March 16, 2011 Dear : Mr. Goldstein: SUBJECT: SAN RAFAEL MEDICAL PLAZA D10-0040 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and disapproved the development plan submitted March 8, 2011. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. The front of the TEP transformer faces West and opens in that direction. The plan indicates that the gate opening will be on the South Side of the transformer. TEP requires that the gate opening to be in the front of the transformer for operational purposes. The gate needs to be on the West Side of the transformer and directly in front of the transformer. If TEP needs to perform maintenance or switching at that transformer and cannot open the transformer to perform that work, TEP will remove the wall at the owners expense. Conflicts can not be determined until facilities are properly indicated on the plan. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures Cc N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (E-Mail) |
| 03/22/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: San Raphael Medical Plaza Development Plan (2nd Review) D10-0040 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 22, 2011 DUE DATE: March 24, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 06, 2011. 2. Based on the last approved plan and the provided expansion calculation this plan has now been reviewed for full code compliance for the areas of building and vehicle use area only. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.1.K Zoning acknowledges an error in this comment. The case number should be C9-73-74 not C9-73-75. Also please clarify what number C10-84-38 is in reference to. The following relevant case number shall be listed in the lower right corner, next to the title block; C9-73-75. 4. Zoning acknowledges that the correct use is shown under "F. Development notes" but the "Existing/proposed use" shown under "A. Zoning and land use notes" is not correct. Either correct the use shown under "A. Zoning and land use notes" or remove it from the plan. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 List the proposed use on the plan. The use should be listed as shown in the LUC along with the development designator and any subject to sections. 5. This comment was not fully addressed. Per the last approved development plan there was a 12x35 loading space shown in the northwest corner of the east parking area, this loading space is required and must be shown on the plan. Also D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Show all required loading spaces on the plan fully dimensioned. 6. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the materials for lighting specific type of rack. Also the 24" dimension shown on the detail does not meet the 30" require between racks, see D.S. 2-09.5.1.A D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide a bicycle parking detail including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show the seventy-two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space on the Class 2 detail, see D.S. 2-09.5.1.A 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show the five (5) foot wide access aisle on the Class 2 detail, see D.S. 2-09.5.2. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show the back-up spur curb on the Class 2 detail and show that the distance from the curb to the seventy-two (72) inch length for each bicycle meets the three (3) foot distance required between an obstruction and the obstruction (bicycle), see D.S. 3-05.2.2.D. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Detail 8, Sheet 3 calls out Class 1 bicycle parking and the detail shows Class 2. Revise the title. 11. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0040 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 03/23/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At Detail 4/3: a. There are two accessible parking signs located in the exterior building entry vestibule creating an exit hazard. For these two signs, please follow the COT DOT accessible signage guidelines and locate them just behind the curb on the sidewalk side. 2. For the new accessible spaces shown on sheet 1 and on detail 4/3: a. Please shown the accessible parking grade slope requirements as per section 403.3. b. Provide and identify all "Van Accessible" spaces as per 2006 IBC, Section 1106.5. 3. At detail 11/3, please show the "Van Accessible" sign. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/25/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 25, 2011 Gene Goldstein Bramic Design Group 6255 N. Camino Pimeha Alta #136 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D10-0040 SAN RAPHAEL MEDICAL PLAZA Development Plan Dear Gene: Your submittal of November 17, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 9 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Engineering, Wastewater, Env Svcs, TEP, Zoning, HC Site, Landscape, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Existing Approved Landscape Plans (Landscape, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $39.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: N/A Emailed |
| 03/25/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Please include a response letter with any submittals detailing revisions accomplished to address the following comments: Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3 Revise the landscape plan to indicate the minimum width and square footage of tree planters in vehicular use areas. Planters are to be measured from the inside edge of tree planters. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e, LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e Submit the existing landscape plans for the site. If the expansion is less than twenty-five (25) percent, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is still subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. Show the existing landscape improvements on the plans. LUC 3.7.1.7 Revise the landscape plan to indicate the minimum width and square footage of tree planters in vehicular use areas. Planters are to be measured from the inside edge of tree planters. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e, LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c Provide additional canopy trees for any vehicular use area expansion as applicable. LUC 3.7.2.3. |