Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0040
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/17/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/17/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 11/22/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/24/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D10-0040 SAN RAPHAEL MEDICAL PLAZA/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 23, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include the section, township and range under the Vicinity Map and on all title blocks. Include the legal description on all title blocks. Spell out Avenue of Rook Ave and Street of 3rd St. |
| 11/29/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | >>> Malini Banerjee <mbanerjee@pagnet.org> 11/29/2010 9:22 AM >>> No objections regarding the trip generation numbers. |
| 11/30/2010 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 11/30/2010 6:46 AM >>> Regional Traffic Engineering has no comment on this submittal and recommends approval of the development. It will have no impact to any existing ADOT facilities. Thank you. |
| 12/02/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: San Raphael Medical Plaza Development Plan (1st Review) D10-0040 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 2, 2010 DUE DATE: December 17, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 06, 2011. 2. The proposed development plan shows an expansion of vehicle use area and building area. Until cumulatively expansion calculation for both vehicle use area and building area the requirement for full code compliance for the entire site cannot be verified. That said this development plan has been reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site. 3. Provide a copy of the last approved development plan with the next submittal. 4. As this is a development plan, remove all references to "SITE PLAN". 5. D.S. 2-05.2.1.D Move the location map to the upper right corner of the development plan. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 Provide the section, township, and range; section corners and north arrow on the location map. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.1.K The following relevant case number shall be listed in the lower right corner, next to the title block; C9-73-75. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.2.A.1 List the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.1 The existing zoning listed under General Note 5 is not correct. The existing zoning is O-3. Also remove the reference to "(PREVIOUSLY R-4)" from the zoning listed under Site Plan Data. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Provide the development plan number D10-0040 near the title block on all sheets. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 List the proposed use on the plan. The use should be listed as shown in the LUC along with the development designator and any subject to sections. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a general note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. That said there are two easements listed under "DEVELOPMENT PLAN KEYNOTES: 23 & 25" that are not clearly shown on the plan and the recordation information has not been provided. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 There are two back-up spurs shown on the plan, one at the north end of the new northwest parking, and one at the east end of the new south parking areas. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D Back-Up Spur. A back-up spur will be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii, and will have a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced areas. That said the 2'-6" radii shown does not meet the 3'-0" requirement. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.2 A minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between any open structure, such as a carport, and a PAAL. That said show the required one (1) foot setback from the covered parking, shown along the south side of the property to the parking area access lane (PAAL). 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Provide a building street perimeter yard setback dimension for the eastern most building. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B the dimension is measured from the back of future curb. As the existing curb along Wilmot Road is not at the future location show the future curb on the plan and provide a dimension. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide width dimensions for all existing and proposed sidewalks on the plan. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N For all structures label the heights and dimensions. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Show all required loading spaces on the plan fully dimensioned. 20. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O The provided loading space calculation is not correct. Review LUC Sections 3.4.4 & 3.4.5 and revise the calculation. 21. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The vehicle parking space calculation needs to include the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. 22. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. 23. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P There are several accessible vehicle parking spaces shown on the plan that do not appear to have the required accessible access aisle. Clearly show all required access aisles on the plan. 24. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3 When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. That said provide a width dimension for the vehicle parking space shown at the southeast corner adjacent to the "Existing directional sign" called out under keynote 30. 25. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing all off-street bicycle parking locations. 26. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide a bicycle parking detail including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. 27. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. Based on 214 vehicle parking spaces provided, 17 bicycle parking spaces are required, 50% Class 1 and 50% Class 2. 28. D.S. 2-05.2.4.R Show all existing and future sight visibility triangles on the plan. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 29. D.S. 2-05.2.4.T Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. 30. There are keynotes that refer to "enlarged details, enlarged plan, and electrical site plan, these details and plans were not provided with this submittal. Please provide the details and or plans with your next submittal. 31. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0040 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 12/06/2010 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 6, 2010 SUBJECT: Development Plan Review TO: Bramic Design Group LOCATION: 899 N Wilmot Rd, T14S, R14E, Section 12, Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: D10-0040 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed development plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the development plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the development plan. Development Plan: 1. Per 2-05.2.1.D.3 - Provide Section, Township, and Range, within location map. In addition, add north arrow to location map. 2. Per 2-05.2.1.G.2 - Per Development Standard, brief legal description is to be identified within title block. 3. Per 2-05.2.1.H - Provide contour interval to development plan (together with north arrow and scale). 4. Per 2-05.2.1.J - Please provide legend that shows and describes all symbols used in the drawing. 5. Per 2-05.2.1.K - Verify that any applicable rezoning, annexation, or subdivision case numbers are listed in the lower right hand corner, next to the title block. 6. Per 2-05.2.2.A.1 - List the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project. 7. Per 2-05.2.2.A.2 - Please list the name and telephone number of the person that prepared the development plan. 8. Per 2-05.2.2.B.2 - Provide the proposed use of the property. 9. Per 2-05.2.2.C.1.a - Within Drainage Note 1, revise herein to "hereon" and add comma following now and in the future. 10. Per 2-05.2.2.C.1.b.- Within Drainage Note 2, revise note to add read "drainage" prior to "plan". 11. DS Sec.2-02.2.3.B - Verify that all easements have been drawn on the plan; be sure to include recordation information, location, width, and purpose of easement. More specifically, verify that there are no easements located within area of proposed addition to building. 12. DS Sec.2-02.2.3.C - Provide the existing and future right of way dimension and label appropriately. Include recordation data, street type (Local, Arterial, etc.), and provide dimensions for width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. Along with dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines 13. DS Sec.2-02.2.3.E - Indicate the ground elevation on site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). DS Sec.2-02.2.3.E.1 - For land less than one (1) percent, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one (1) foot. DS Sec.2-02.2.3.E.2 - For land that slopes between approximately one (1) percent and five (5) percent, , contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than two (1) feet. 14. DS Sec.2-02.2.4.E -H - Provide drainage statement and indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points to provide reference to future grading and site drainage. 15. DS Sec.2-02.2.4.K - Show onsite pedestrian circulation as required by the Land Use Code (LUC) utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. Ensure that sidewalks are constructed to conform to set development standards. 16. DS Sec.2-02.2.4.L - Show existing and proposed sidewalks along abutting right-of-way. Ensure that such sidewalks are in compliance with set accessibility requirements for the physically disabled. 17. DS Sec.2-02.2.4.N - Labe the height and width of all structures. 18 DS Sec.2-02.2.4.R - Label existing and future sight visibility triangles 19.DS Sec.2-02.2.4.S.- Show fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 20.DS Sec.2-02.2.4.T Show refuse collection area, including location of dumpsters, screening locations, size, materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. 18. DS Sec.2-02.2.4.W - Indicate location and types of any proposed signs. 19. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 20. Show Development plan number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 21. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide typical parking space detail for parking areas. Provide parking dimensions, note and depict parking details for both standard and handicap parking, together with access thereto. See DS Sec. 3-05.2.0.B.1 for minimum parking standards. Including but not limited to parking spaces located within garage. 22. Verify that keynotes are accurately identified within plan. 1. Keynote 1: Indicate height of curbing 2. Keynote 4: Dimension sidewalks within plan 3. Keynote 7: Keynote 28 being called out for sign, please clarify 4. Keynote 8: Unable to located detail being referenced for parking spaces 5. Keynote 14: Provide detail for ingress/egress and add note indicating that right of way permit will be obtained. 6. Keynote 16: Keynote 16 used southeast of proposed ingress/egress of proposed parking area in center of plan. 7. Keynote 17: Provide support for 2" asphalt over 2" ABC, soils report 8. Keynote 22: Clarify - Unable to determine location of detail being referenced 9. Keynote 23: Provide book and page for easement, 10. Keynote 34: Provide diameter of pipe 11. Keynote 41: Provide height of curbing 12. Check all notes within plan 23. Verify that onsite drainage is able to enter proposed water harvesting areas and landscape areas; depressed curbing to allow for drainage into these areas will suffice. 24. Verify that there are no easements located within proposed building expansion. 25. Keynoter 4 north of Wendy's of Tucson appears to be misplaced, please revise or clarify. 26. Additional Comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez, CFM Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 12/06/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/08/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3 Revise the landscape plan to indicate the minimum width and square footage of tree planters in vehicular use areas. Planters are to be measured from the inside edge of tree planters. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e, LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e Submit the existing landscape plans for the site. If the expansion is less than twenty-five (25) percent, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is still subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. Show the existing landscape improvements on the plans. LUC 3.7.1.7 Revise the landscape plan to indicate the minimum width and square footage of tree planters in vehicular use areas. Planters are to be measured from the inside edge of tree planters. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e, LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c |
| 12/09/2010 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 12/10/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 December 10, 2010 To: GENE GOLDSTEIN BRAMIC DESIGN GROUP Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department __________________________ Reviewed by: Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD Subject: SAN RAPHAEL MEDICAL PLAZA 899 N WILMOT ROAD Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0040 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: This site plan, as submitted, is significantly deficient, in that required wastewater Permitting and General Notes, existing sewers, existing easements and information about the point of connection to the existing public sewerage collection system are not shown. Refer to Pima County Development Services “Development Plan Checklist Requirements” Section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal guidance. The checklist is available at; http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions about this review letter please call me @ the phone number below. ______________________________ Tom Porter, Sr. CEA, (520)740-6719 PCRWRD cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 12/10/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | CDRC Review Planning and Development Services Dept., Community Planning Review D10-0035, 1st Street & Norris Ave., 2nd submittal Comments Due: 11/4/10 Comments Submitted: 1/3/11 Items reviewed: Development Plan, Landscape Plan, compact disc with photos of site and surrounding neighborhood area Comments: The plans are approved. No resubmittal is required. Reviewed by: J. Hershenhorn, 12/9/10 F:\Shardir\UPDfiles\Development Review\CASE_REVIEW\CDRC\2010 Cases\D10-0035a.doc |
| 12/14/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Ditto Zoning comments 2 and 3 requiring Full Code Compliance. 2. Please recalculate the number of accessible spaces required as per Table 1006.1 and include on the drawings. 3. Please design all required accessible spaces to be code compliant: a. All parking aisles to be minimum of 5' wide. b. Provide and identify all "Van Accessible" spaces as per 2006 IBC, Section 1106.5. c. Please show accessible access from the accessible parking aisles to the accessible route. d. Please provide large scales details of all the different accessible parking layouts including curb and/or sidewalks ramps. 4. Please show all accessible pedestrian routes to all the public right of ways as required by Zoning. 5. Please provide all necessary marked crossings. Please provide a large scale details of the different marked crossing designs as required. Please show all detectable warning strips, dimensions, slopes and curb/sidewalk ramps. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/17/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date: December 17, 2010 Date Case Number Project Address December 17, 2010 D10-0040 San Raphael Medical Plaza 899 W. Wilmot Road DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: Denied, The proposed Development Plan for the San Raphael Medical Plaza, Case No.D10-0040. dose not meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste and Recycle materials Disposal Standard 6-01. 1. The Plan must show that enclosures dimensions for both Solid Waste and Recycle collection. 2. All containers shown on the Development Plan must be labeled for the intended us being Solid Waste or Recycle materials 3. A Detail of the container enclosures must be shown on the plans clearly showing that the minimum inside dimension between the bollards shall be not less than 10'- 0" for each enclosure. As shown on the Solid Waste Standards. 4. All enclosures must show the gates installed and mounted to the end on the CMU screen wall as show on Solid Waste Standards. Also the size of containers proposed to be use must be noted on the plans. 5. The Collection service vehicle turning radius clears of 50ft to the outside and 36ft for the inside must be shown on the proposed Development Plan. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/20/2010 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 12/20/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 12/20/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/23/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 23, 2010 Gene Goldstein Bramic Design Group 6255 N. Camino Pimetia Alta # 136 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D10-0040 SAN RAPHAEL MEDICAL PLAZA Development Plan Dear Gene: Your submittal of November 17, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 9 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, Wastewater, HC Site, Env Svcs, TEP, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Last Approved Development Plan (Zoning, PDSD) 2 Copies Last Approved "Existing" Landscape Plan (Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $100.00 Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via Email: Ggoldsteinarchitect@gmail.com |
| 12/23/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | TEP has told the CDRC office that this plan has been denied but have not yet provided comments. As soon as the CDRC office receives the comments, they will be posted. |
| 12/23/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#231788 December 22, 2010 Dear : Mr. Goldstein: SUBJECT: SAN RAFAEL MEDICAL PLAZA D10-0040 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and disapproved the development plan submitted December 6, 2010. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. The transformer is located within the Electric Building enclosure and the doors are facing west toward the wall. Attached is SR-208 Page 1 of 2 Note 4. TEP will require customer to show the corrections they are going to make that will meet this requirement on the plan prior to TEP's approval. A facilities map is attached for reference. Conflicts can not be determined until facilities are properly indicated on the plan. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures Cc N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (E-Mail) |