Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0038
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/02/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/02/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | Revise the plans to clarify the timing of the completion of the Spanish Trail Bike Path Improvements. Each phase of the project shall include keeping the path operational at all times. |
| 11/03/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Revise the plans to clarify the timing of the completion of the Spanish Trail Bike Path Improvements. Each phase of the project shall include keeping the path operational at all times. |
| 11/03/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Additional fire hydrants required . Please review C.O.T. amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code, section 508.5.1 for spacing requirements, locate accordingly, and show on plans. |
| 11/05/2010 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 11/05/2010 7:01 AM >>> Regional Traffic Engineering has no comment on this submittal and recommends approval of this development. It will have no impact on any existing ADOT facilities. Thank you. Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 11/19/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#230952 November 19, 2010 BSH Investments, LLC Attn: Brandt Hazen 3320 N.Country Club Rd. #100 Tucson, AZ 85716 To Brandt Hazen: SUBJECT: NWC Harrison & Old Spanish Trl D10-0038 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 5, 2010. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. If there is a conflict then the cost would be to relocate or resolve the conflict and this would be the customers responsibility. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The customer is responsible for the new trenching to relocate them as well as the relocation cost. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-918-8726 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson (Email only) N. DiMaria Tucson Electric Power |
| 11/22/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D10-0038 NWC HARRISON AND OLD SPANISH TRAIL/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 22, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 11/29/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | >>> Malini Banerjee <mbanerjee@pagnet.org> 11/29/2010 9:37 AM >>> No Objection regarding trip generation numbers. Let me know if you have any questions. -- |
| 11/30/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 6: 1. At the most Northerly Marked Crossing: a. Delete the flared ramp sides at the North curb ramp. b. Zoning will require the marked asphaltic paving adjacent to the 6" depression peninsula to be concrete. Delete the curb ramp shown and extend the concrete walk to the end of the peninsula, provide a return curb sidewalk ramp down and include a detectable warning strip. This extension should be part of the peninsula. c. Delete the flared sides of the Northerly curb ramp and return the curbs on either side of the sidewalk ramp. 2. Please reference all curb and sidewalk ramps and parking assemblies to large scale details provided and to be provided if not shown, on sheets 11 and 13. 3. Provide a large scale detail of the most Northerly sidewalk ramp. 4. Please identify all "Van Accessible" parking spaces. 5. At the Most Southerly Marked Crossing a. Reverse the accessible parking aisles so the smaller aisle and the marked crossing may be the same width. b. Provide a raised curb or a concrete wheel stop at the middle accessible parking space. 6. At Note 20, ADAAG is not the governing accessible code for this project. Please reference all code compliance to the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1). Please change the referenced code sections to the appropriate sections of ICC (ANSI 117.1). SHEET 7 7. DITTO Comment 6 above. SHEET 8 8. DITTO Comment 3 above. Provide all required accessible dimensions, slopes, handrails and landings as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 405 and 505 9. Correct the 5% slope to the West entrance of building 2 or provide a ramp as per Section 405 and 505. SHEET 9 10. DITTO comment 8 above for the 6.04% ramp connecting to the Old Spanish Trail right of way. SHEET 10 11. The details on this sheet are strictly for City of Tucson right of way accessible construction only and may not be used within the boundaries of the property lines of this project. SHEET 11 12. Typical accessible parking details such as Detail "I" are not acceptable because there are so many variations design that are not typical to each other at all. Please provide large scale details of each different variation of accessible parking layouts show on sheets 6 and 7. SHEET 13 13. DITTO comment 12 above for Detail "W". Provide all required accessible dimensions, slopes, handrails and landings as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 405, 406.12, 406.14 and 505. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/01/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | Revise the plans to clarify the timing of the completion of the Spanish Trail Bike Path Improvements. Each phase of the project shall include keeping the path operational at all times. |
| 12/01/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | CDRC Review Planning and Development Services Dept., Community Planning Review D10-0038, NWC, Harrison and Old Spanish Trail, 1st submittal Comments Due: 12/3/10 Comments Submitted: 121/1/10 Items reviewed: Development Plan, Landscape Plan Community Planning Comments: 1) To demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #9, regarding masonry screen walls, please provide a typical section showing the decorative wall detail. Also, please indicate that the wall will be constructed of/painted with graffiti-resistant materials. 2) To demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #12, please show all pole lighting on the plans, and indicate pole heights. 3) Per rezoning condition # 20, the pedestrian and bicycle path along Old Spanish Trail and the landscaping need to be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. It's unclear which trail and landscaping improvements will be constructed with Phase 1, and how these interim improvements will tie into the existing conditions, prior to the completion of the Phase 2 improvements. Please see the comments from the Landscaping Section. Also, please clarify what "Proposed improvements for Old Spanish Trail under separate permit" means on sheet 7/30. 4) Per rezoning condition #27, canopy trees are to be planted every 25 feet on center along the length of the western, southern and eastern property lines. The tree spacing along the southern property line looks fine, but the trees appear to be spaced approximately every 30 feet along the eastern and western property lines. Please revise the landscaping sheets so that they're spaced closer to 25 feet on average, along the east and west property lines. Reviewed by: J. Hershenhorn, 12/1/10 F:\Shardir\UPDfiles\Development Review\CASE_REVIEW\CDRC\2010 Cases\D10-0038.doc |
| 12/02/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Revise the landscape, water harvesting and native plant preservation plans to show the phases represented on the development plan and revise as necessary to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Integrate or show another phase for the transportation improvements. Any proposed phasing plan must comply with rezoning conditions and the PDP for the site. Certain perimeter elements may have to be included in Phase one. 3) Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan, including those in the adjacent right-of-way areas. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 4) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 5) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A 6) An additional Native Plant Preservation Plan or approval is required for any construction or disturbance of public right-of-way areas adjacent the site. Contact Gary Wittwer, the Department of Transportation Landscape Architect, at 791-5100 for additional information. LUC 3.8.4.2 Alternatively, right-of-way areas may be incorporated into the submitted plans, with separate calculations. The plans must show all of the protected plants in the ROW. The approved Native Plant Preservation Plan can then be used to obtain any required permits from the Department of Transportation where an NPPO clearance is required. 7) Address the rezoning conditions relative to wall design and decorative materials. C9-01-19 8) Clarify how the "Annual Demand Met By Water Harvesting" was calculated on the rain water harvesting plans. The percent of annual demand met per WHIA should not be included in the calculations as more than 100 percent, if the excess is transferred to the site average. DS 10-03.2.2.B.3.a) 9) Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater. Slopes for basins less than three feet are to be no steeper than 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected. DS 10-01.4. Revise as necessary. 10) Revise the plans to comply with rezoning condition 27. |
| 12/02/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | Revise the plans to clarify the timing of the completion of the Spanish Trail Bike Path Improvements. Each phase of the project shall include keeping the path operational at all times. |
| 12/02/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | December 2, 2010 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D10-0038 PROJECT NAME: NWC Harrison/Old Spanish Trail PROJECT ADDRESS: NWC Harrison/Old Spanish Trail PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering recommends a conditional approval of the Development Plan. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/03/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: NWC Harrison and Old Spanish Trail Development Package (1st Review) D10-0038 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 3, 2010 DUE DATE: December 03, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 01, 2011 2. This development package was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. The following comments are based on the Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.3. Provide the following relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet, D10-0038, T10BU01653 2. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Revise General Note 3 so that the subject to sections listed for food service read as follows "3.5.4.6.A & C" or "3.5.4.6.A and C". 3. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There are numerous easements shown on the plan to be released. These easements will need to be released, abandoned prior to approval of the development package. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 It appears that covered parking is proposed for some vehicle parking spaces. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.2 A minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between any open structure, such as a carport, and a PAAL. That said clearly show and dimension the required one (1) foot setback on the plan. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Per LUC Section 3.3.5.1 the Mixed Use Reduction may not be used for the proposed Office use. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The proposed elimination of four (4) vehicle parking spaces from the parcel to the north will require a revision to the existing development plan D05-0016 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Based on Development plan D05-0016 the development on the parcel to the north has a requirement for seventy (70) vehicle parking spaces and only seventy (70) spaces provided. That said the four (4) spaces removed will need to be accounted for on this development plan. Also a cross access and cross parking agreements will be required. 9. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. 10. Until comment 4 has been addressed the calculations cannot be verified. Additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0038 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 12/06/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Due Date Case Number Project Address December 3, 2010 D10-0038 NWC HARRISON and OLD SPANISH TRIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: The proposed Development Plan for the Harrison and Old Spanish Trial, Case No. D10-0038, meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01.0 and is here Approved. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/06/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 12/06/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: December 6, 2010 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: NWC Harrison & Old Spanish Tr., 1010 S. Harrison Rd. Development Plan D10-0038 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 15 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package and Drainage Report. The Development Package (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat per D.S. 2-01.3.2.B. 3. Remove the "Grading and Paving" from "General notes" title that is continued from sht. 2 on sht. 3. 4. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown per D.S. 2-01.3.8.F. 5. If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information per D.S. 2-01.3.9.G. 6. If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access and incorporation of future phases into this project are require per D.S. 2-01.3.9.H. 7. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes D.S. 2-01.3.9.I. 8. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) D.S. 2-01.3.9.J. 9. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private per D.S. 2-01.3.9.L. 10. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development document area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) per D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.5. 11. Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm per D.S. 2-01.3.9.T. Show 10'x10' clear area on the refuse enclosure detail. 12. Show Development plan number and reference DP number (D10-0038 & D06-0003) on all sheets. 13. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 14. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 15. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 16. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Provide cross-sections and details of the retention/detention basin. 3. Include percolation test results for the basin in the DR. Submit the geotechnical report with the DR. 4. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting" 3. Add the following notes to the grading plan notes: " "The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work." " "The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of the detention/retention basin and scarify the basin bottom once the construction activities are completed in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation." " "Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it." 4. List GP number (T10BU01653) on all sheets. 5. Show Phase numbers and delineate. Each phase must function independent of future phases. Show interim structures and stabilization techniques on future phases. 6. Show water harvesting areas on all street x-sections on sheet 11. Water harvesting area shall be no more than 6" deep maximum, not 6" minimum. 7. Provide curb and sidewalk along Harrison Rd. per TDOT standards. 8. Show future improvements along Harrison Rd. per "Off-site" note on GP page 9. 9. Any grading within the established right-of-way is prohibited. The grading in the right-of-way occurs on both Harrison Rd. and on Old Spanish Trail. 10. It appears that a retaining wall is also located in the R/W adjacent to the Old Spanish Trail entrance, this is also prohibited. 11. Provide greater detail for the OST entrance, i.e: headers, trim, radii etc. 12. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located will suffice. 13. Show details of all surface materials. 14. Detail U/12 calls for the number of barricade posts and dimensions to be called out per plan, however the plan does not give the information. 15. Detail the basin maintenance ramp w/ depressed curb, gates, slope etc. 16. Remove the "UON" call-out w/ the "2' min." noted on the cross-sections at the P/L. The distance shall not be less than 2'. 17. Provide exist. cross-sections of Harrison Rd. and OST. 18. A permit or a private improvement agreement might be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 19. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 20. Drainage patterns with percent slopes (Show patterns within the first 100 feet from the property line). 21. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan: 1. The stabilized const. entrance must abut a stabilized surface, i.e.: The edge of pavement. 2. Tucson Code Chap.26 Art.2: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to the following comments: a. Address the following comments for the SWPPP exhibit sheet(s): i. Depict /clarify all specific interim erosion/stormwater control measures and locations of all stabilization practices on planview, including control measures needed along downstream disturbance limits, specific interim erosion control devices at basin outlets, and other controls as necessary for this project. ii. Provide specific interim erosion control devices at any basin boundary and exits. A general call-out is not project-specific and needs to be specifically called out on the plans. iii. Revise boundary controls according to the following comments: 1. Interim control measures on SWPP exhibit shall be placed within the parcel boundary limits and grading limits that match grading plan. 2. Label 2-ft grading offset from boundary limits. 3. Revise location of controls at edge of project to be included within the grading/disturbance limits. Assure all construction areas for improvements are included within the boundary/disturbance limits and within the control measures. b. Submit a revised SWPP exhibit/report with revised grading plans for review. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1010 S. Harrison Rd. Dev Pkg |
| 12/06/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/06/2010 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | Revise the plans to clarify the timing of the completion of the Spanish Trail Bike Path Improvements. Each phase of the project shall include keeping the path operational at all times. |
| 12/06/2010 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 12/06/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 November 30, 2010 To: DAN CASTRO RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department __________________________ Reviewed by: Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD Subject: NWC HARRISON AND SPANISH TRAIL Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0038 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #17 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IS REQUIRED BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. Sheet 14: Call out the proposed sewer on site as private. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions about this review letter please call me @ the phone number below. ______________________________ Tom Porter, Sr. CEA, (520)740-6719 PCRWRD cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 12/07/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 7, 2010 Dan Castro Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 3945 E. Fort Lowell Road # 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D10-0038 NWC HARRISON AND OLD SPANISH TRAIL Development Package Dear Dan: Your submittal of November 2, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 9 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Package (Fire, Zoning HC, Planning, Landscape, Zoning, Wastewater, Parks & Rec, Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised SWPPP Exhibit/Report (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $100.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 322-6956 |