Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0037
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/02/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Sola Salon Studio Development Plan (2nd Review) D10-0037 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 2, 2011 DUE DATE: : March 11, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 06, 2011. 2. This development plan revision was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the area of change only. 3. This comment was not addressed correctly. Zoning acknowledges that a north arrow was provided for the location map. Provide a north arrow and contour interval for the development plan. D.S. 2-05.2.1.H The north arrow, contour interval, and scale should be placed together on each sheet, preferably in the upper right corner of the plat. 4. Add a "-" in the rezoing case number between the "4" and "11". D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Provide a general note stating "SEE TENTATIVE PLAT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN S05-207 FOR ALL CONDITIONS RELATED TO REZONING CASE C9-04-11" 5. This comment was not addressed correctly. General Note 1 "C-1 & C-2 is not a "USE". Revise General Note 1 to read. "PROPOSED USE - GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES "28", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.C". D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 List the proposed use on the plan. The use should be listed as shown in the LUC along with the development designator and any subject to sections. 6. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the docket and page for the water easement shown on the plan. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O It does not appear that a large vehicle will be able to access the western most loading space shown on the plan. Show the maneuvering area on the plan. 8. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0037 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan.. |
| 03/04/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 4, 2011 SUBJECT: Sola Salon Development Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 4262 N 1st Ave, T13S R14E Sec19, Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D10-0037 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed development plan, A.S.P. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the development plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Provide the recordation information for the water easement shown on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements must be provided in plan view. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.O: Provide (label and dimension) the required onsite maneuvering areas for the loading zone adjacent to the building and sidewalk on the plan set. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. All radii must be shown to scale. 3) DS Sec.2-2-05.2.1.T: Revise the development plan document and the refuse Detail to clearly label and dimension all construction details for the proposed refuse container and enclosure location. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 (draft Figure 3) for all required refuse enclosure dimensions and construction details. Provide any and all sheets that are referenced on the detail to verify construction, specifically Sheets AD & AD2. It is acknowledged that Environmental Services provided approval however the detail does not meet the minimum construction requirements and must be revised before Engineering can approve the plan set. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised development plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the development plan review. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services |
| 03/04/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 4, 2011 Mario Sanchez Anderson Studio Architects 1643 N. Alvernon Way Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D10-0037 SOLA SALON STUDIO Development Plan Dear Mario: Your submittal of October 29, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 3 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: N/A Sent to: Mario@Andersonstudioarchitects.com |