Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0034
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2011 | JWILLIA4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/22/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/24/2011 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 08/24/2011, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: The District D10-0034, T14S, R13E, SECTION 12 RECEIVED: Revised Development Plan Package August 19, 2011 The subject project has been reviewed. The proposed revisions are acceptable. The revised Development Package is recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review. |
| 08/26/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D10-0034 The District Development Plan for Student Housing TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 24, 2011 DUE DATE: September 6, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the revised development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. Zoning has reviewed the proposed revisions and approves the revised development plan as represented on the appropriate plan sheets. The zoning approval is conditionally approved contingent upon approval by the City of Tucson Transportation / Traffic Department. The issues of the retaining walls in the R/W are the reason for the conditional approval by zoning. If TDOT / Traffic denies the request or proposed design of the retaining walls in the R/W this conditional approval is void. Re-submittal of the plans would be required for further review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D100034revdpca.doc |
| 08/29/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/06/2011 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | Planning conditionally approves the revised development plan as represented on the appropriate plan sheets subject to approval by the City of Tucson Transportation / Traffic Department. |
| 09/06/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Landscape Review J. Linville 1) A complete or partial exception to the Landscaping and Screening Requirements (Sec. 3.7) was previously granted. Per the code this is only allowed when shade is provided for pedestrians and customers, such as along sidewalks, pedestrian circulation paths, and outdoor patios, consistent with Development Standard 9-10.4.3.B.1. The shade provided by plantings, shade structures, and building needs to cover at least fifty (50) percent of the aforementioned areas as measured at 2:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 82° above the horizon (based on 32°N Latitude). Revise the shade calculations for accuracy to correspond with plan revisions. Include the results on the landscape plans included as part of the Development Package (sheets 18-19). The previous planting plan which used 11 Cercidium hybrids was and is acceptable. I have discussed the matter with Gary Wittwer of TDOT and we agreed that using larger trees along the Sixth Street frontage would be acceptable. Please call if you have any questions. 837-4947 2) Based on a revised PDF of sheet L-18 received on 9/9/11, PDSD Landscape can check the revision on the final drawing without requiring the resubmittal and standard review period if approved by the CDRC Manager. |
| 09/07/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Date Case Number Project Address September 1, 2011 D10-0034 THE DISTRICT 5Th Avenue Student Housing DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: The proposed Development Plan for THE DISTRICT 5Th Avenue Student Housing, Case No. D10-0034. Meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal and Recycle Materials Standard 6-01, and is Approved. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/08/2011 | JWILLIA4 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | From: Chad Amateau [mailto:Chad.Amateau@wwm.pima.gov] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:21 AM To: Patricia Y. Gehlen (E-mail) Cc: Ferne Rodriguez (E-mail); Tri Miller; Thomas Porter; Kristin Greene Subject: 3811 - D10-0034 - The District<RickTag Job=T38110-A00 Office=TUC FiledBy=Tri Miller> Patricia, Based on the plans provided by Tri Miller, there are no changes to the connection to public sewer and this revision does not need review by RWRD. Tri may still need approval by DEQ for any proposed changes to the on site private sewer. Feel free to give me a call with any questions. Thanks, Chad |
| 09/08/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/12/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 8, 2011 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Co., Inc. 3945 E. Fort Lowell Rd. #111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D10-0034 THE DISTRICT REVISION 3 Development Plan Dear Tri: Your submittal of August 19, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 3 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |
| 09/12/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES *** REVISED *** September 12, 2011 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Co, Inc. 3945 E. Fort Lowell Rd. Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D10-0034 THE DISTRICT REVISIONDevelopment Plan Dear Tri: The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled COMPLETE SET of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. Additional print copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City’s contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your prints to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. The printing company will deliver the original rolled prints to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. Plans will not be signed and released until the CDRC office has been notified by PC Addressing that all fees for this plan have been paid. The CDRC office will need this confirmation in writing. A Development Plan remains valid for a period of three (3) years from the date of approval. This Development Plan will expire on 09/12/14 per LUC 5.3.8.2.B. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html. BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |