Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0033
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/24/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/27/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/01/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 1, 2010 SUBJECT: Country Club Commerce Center Development Plan Core Review- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 5990 S Country Club Rd, T15S R14E Sec08 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D10-0033 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 10SEP10) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Cypress Civil Development, 17SEP10). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the draft policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan documents to include a 3-inch by 5-inch space in the lower right quadrant on all sheets that shall be reserved for the CDRC approval stamp. 2) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.D: Revise the development plan document to provide the administrative address within the Title Block per the referenced standard. 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.E: Revise the Sheet Index and page numbering to reflect the SWPPP Exhibit Sheet that is required within the development plan package (in addition to the 3 SWPPP Reports and exhibits required for review). 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The correct Development Plan Package number (D10-0033) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets where indicated by "COT Case NO:." 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Per DS 2-01 and the Development Plan submittal requirement revise the development plan document to include all General Notes (Site and Grading, Paving Plan Notes) together on a separate page. *Note- Master Cover Sheet and General Notes may be combined if content and space allow. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Provide the following note under the Grading Plan General Note Section; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a PDSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning & Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Per the last approved Development Plan there is a recorded 10-foot Trail Access and Landscape Easement (DK 9771, PG 2667) that runs along the eastern side of the property at the location of the proposed driveway entrance along the southern portion of the site. All existing easements must be drawn on the site and any proposed work within a public easement will require prior approval from all entities that have a vested interest (including the 15-foot Public and Private Utility Easement). 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan documents to provide the following information for the public right-of-way for the new proposed driveway since it is located on a separate detail; dimensioned right-of-way width and label as "existing and/or future." 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Refer to any comments from Jose Ortiz, PE Transportation Department for the proposed location of the concrete header at the south side of the proposed driveway entrance. Verify there is no conflict with existing drainage infrastructure, guard rails, signage, etc. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.I: Refer to any comments from Jose Ortiz, PE Transportation Department for all Public Right-of-Way requirements. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise Keynote # 13 on the grading plan sheet to clearly reference "Paving & Grading Notes #7 and 8" also revise the Sheet reference to show the Master Note Sheet per the above comment. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 13) Revise the Basis of Bearing references (General Note #3 Sheet 1 and the Grading General Note #2, Sheet 3) to reference found, readily locatable monuments, i.e. reference a record of survey or a recorded plat. The basis of bearing should be established from 2 found physically monumented points described and shown on the plan set. If the monuments at each end of the reference line are fully described in the recorded plat, they need not be described in the Basis of Bearing statement. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: 14) The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). However the SWPPP and Exhibits can not be stamped approved until approval of the development plan documents. Provide 3 copies with resubmittal for stamp approval. 15) Part III.D.3: A copy of the completed NOI form that will be submitted to ADEQ must be presented to the PDSD Grading Inspector at the preconstruction meeting when scheduled. DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 16) The Hydrologic data sheets are acceptable for this project only. In the future the City of Tucson requires a 3-inch value for the rainfall depths on a 100-year return period. The NOAA Atlas 14 data used under the County's Flood Peak Procedure software is only acceptable within the County jurisdiction. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 10/05/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | October 4, 2010 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D10-0033 PROJECT NAME: Country Club Commence Center PROJECT ADDRESS: Country Club/Bilby Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The access points should not exceed a curb return radius of 25-feet. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) Turning templates or AutoTurn exhibits will need to be provided to justify a larger curb return radius. 3. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 38 states that the maximum driveway width is 35' for business & industrial district parcels. Turning templates or AutoTurn exhibits will need to be used to justify a driveway wider then 35-feet. Keep in mind that 60-feet is as wide as a 5 lane arterial cross section so a driveway 60-feet wide will not be permitted. 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 5. Is there enough pavement width along Country Club Road to extend the continuous left turn lane for northbound to westbound left turning vehicles (at proposed driveway)? A meeting maybe warranted discussing this option. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/20/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Sheets 1 & 2 appear to indicate a fence south of the curb along the p.a.a.l adjacent to the southern property boundary. Is this an approved fence and does it occupy space in the 25' Trail Access and Landscape Buffer. 2) Revise the landscape plan to include the following calculations: Length and width of landscape borders and number of canopy trees per length. Square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage. The width of the street landscape border is the area between the required screen and the property line per DS 2-06.3.4.C.2. 3) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 4) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A 5) Submit a rainwater harvesting plan per DS 10-03. 6) The aerial photo included with the NPPP does not show the existing improvements. Provide an accurate photo or revise it to also depict existing conditions. 7) Revise the NPPP to include the proposed drive lane at the southern portion of the site and the impact on the existing improvements on the northern part of the site. The proposed project may affect installed NPP mitigation plantings. D07-0034 8) Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 9) Revise the landscape and irrigation to plan coordinate with the plans approved for D07-0034. This revision may not delete required elements of the previous plans. 10) Revise the plans to show the existing landscape easement along Country Club Rd. per Tucson Airport Commerce Center 1-6 11) All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Identify the proposed treatment between the proposed plantings and the proposed screen wall. LUC 3.7.2.7. DS 2-06.5.2.C 12) Revise the NPP to address the calculations for Acacia constricta. It does not appear that excess TOS credits are appropriate. |
| 10/22/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide an accessible route conection from the existing facility and for access to the rv storage yard up and down the 6' wide median. 2. Relocate or add at least one accessible parking space adjacent to the rv storage yard. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/22/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | CC&R | CC&R's | Passed | |
| 10/22/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D10-0033 Country Club Commerce Center Development Package TRANSMITTAL: 10/22/2010 DUE DATE: 10/22/2010 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 09/22/2011. 2. DS 2-01.2.5 A three inch by five inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 3. DS 2-01.3.1 Provide the name, address and phone number of the developer of the project. 4. This project appears to be a portion of the north lot which was split in May of 2010. A tax parcel lot combination with the lot to the south or a covenant regarding development and use of real property will be required. If the covenant is used a cross access agreement will be required to be recorded. Provide recording docket and page information for the covenant and the cross access agreement on the plan. Provide copies of the lot combo or the covenant with the next submittal. On sheet 1 of 10 the property lines indicated as L18, C5 and L19 have been removed by a tax parcel lot combination on the last approved development plan. Please remove from this sheet. If a tax parcel combo is used remove property line L14 from all plans as well. 5. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number D10-0033. Please add this case number near the lower right corner of all sheets. 6. DS 2-01.3.9.F Provide the zoning of the adjacent property along the north property line of the project. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D10-0033dp.doc GRADING COMMENTS 10/22/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 10/25/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 25, 2010 Michael Schooler GDA 250 S. Craycroft Rd; # 200 Tucson, Arizona 11 Subject: D10-0033 COUNTRY CLUB COMMERCE CENTER TRAILER DROPS Development Package Dear Michael: Your submittal of September 23, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 6 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Package (Engineering, Traffic, Landscape, HC Site, Zoning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 881-4390 |