Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: D10-0032
Parcel: 133452190

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D10-0032
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/20/2010 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/21/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Passed
09/21/2010 DAVID MANN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
09/27/2010 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 09/23/2010 12:42 PM >>>
Regional Traffic Engineering has no comment on this submittal and
recommends approval of this development. It will have no impact on any
ADOT facilities. Thank you.

Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
.
10/01/2010 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

AUDREY FARENGA
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 740-6800
FAX #: 623-5411


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW
SUBJECT: D10-0032 HOUGHTON ROAD AND BROADWAY BOULEVARD PARK AND RIDE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: September 30, 2010



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Shade the project location on the Vicinity Map.
Include the section, township and range on all title blocks.
Delete adjacent tax codes.
Change Eastpoint Commercial Center MP Book 43 to Book 42 on all applicable sheets.
10/04/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Houghton Road & Broadway Blvd. Park & Ride
Development Package (1st Review)
D10-0032

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 4, 2010

DUE DATE: October 15, 2010

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 30, 2011

2. This development package was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance.

The following comments are based on the Development Package Submittal Requirements:

1. The drawing order does not follow the Development Package Submittal Requirements. The details should follow the grading plan and the SWPP should follow the landscape planting details.

The following comments are based on the Development Standard 2-01.0:

1. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Provide an administrative street address for the proposed Park & Ride adjacent to the title block.

2. D.S. 2-01.3.3. Provide the following relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet, D03-002, SCZ-03-13, LS-03-53, S99-036, C10-99-55 & C9-83-09.

3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.3 List the rezoning conditions on sheet 2.

4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 At development designator "29" the General Note 3 next to the proposed use.

5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b As a general note state "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, SEC. 2.8.2, SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ); SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". For the SCZ provide the date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval.

6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Per Development Designator "28" & "29" lot coverage is not relevant. Provide a floor area ratio (FAR) that includes the allowed and proposed for the entire site.

7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.A As this project is comprised of three (3) parcels a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request Form with your next submittal.

8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show the existing sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the plan.

9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 It appear that one-way parking area access lanes (PAALs) are proposed, clearly indicate on the plan how the one-way PAALS will be controlled, i.e. signage, pavement markings etc.

10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a There are numerous areas on the plan where parking vehicles will over hang proposed sidewalks. Provide width dimensions for the sidewalks and if the proposed sidewalk adjacent to the vehicle parking space is less than 6.5 feet provide wheel stops to prevent parking vehicles from overhanging the sidewalk.

11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a vehicle parking space calculation that encompasses the entire site. The calculation should include the number of required and provided.

12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The Class 2 bicycle parking detail shown on sheet 16 does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.5.1.A, show the seventy-two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space on the detail.

13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R There is an angled "ADA CROSS WALK STRIPING AREA", shown north of the seven (7) handicapped parking spaces located near the center of the project, due to safety issues this striped cross walk needs to run perpendicular to the PAAL.

14. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0032
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan.



CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Houghton Road & Broadway Blvd. Park & Ride
Development Package (1st Review)
T10BU01438

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 4, 2010

DUE DATE: October 15, 2010

GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/08/2010 FRODRIG2 ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied October 8, 2010

Due Date Case Number Project Address
October 15, 2010 D10-0032 Houghton Road and Broadway Boulevard
PARK AND RIDE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Comments: Denied,
The proposed Development Plan for the Houghton Road and Broadway Boulevard,
Case No.D10-0032. Dose not meets the minimum requirements for Environmental
Services, Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01. The Plan must show provisions for
both Solid Waste and Recycle collection.

1. All containers shown on Development Plans must be labeled for the intended use being Solid Waste or Recycle materials
.
2. If the waste generated is proposed to be collect by the City of Tucson,
Environmental Services Department.The type of containers proposed will need to
be reviewed by ESD.


Environmental Services Department
Development Plan Review
Reviewer: Tony Teran
Office Phone (520) 837-3706
E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov
10/13/2010 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Denied 1. Please provide large scale sectional site plans as per Utility Plans, sheets 6 and 7 and include all construction reference notes.
2. On sheet 3, the note 3 reference to PC COT Std Dtl 207 is applicable only to accessible construction in the right of way. Please refer all ramps within the property boundaries to ADAAG, Section 4.7 and 4.8.
a. Detectable warning strips for curb ramps may be 2' deep.
3. Insure all accessible routes comply with slope requirements of Section 4.3.2. Please show slope indicators of actual slopes on the site plan.
4. Please provide large scale details of all different types of ramps including detectable warning strips and reference to these details from the large scale site plans requested in comment 1 above.
5. The generic accessible parking plan detail shown on sheet 15 does not provide compliant access to the accessible route.
a. Generic plans are not acceptable. Please provide a large scale detail of all the different types of accessible parking layouts as shown on sheet 3.
b. Show all dimensions, aisles and widths, ramps or flush access to the accessible route, detectable warning strips, signage, "Van Accessible" parking, slopes and all other required accessible conditions as per ADAAG requirements foe accessible parking.
6. For the two grouped accessible spaces, how does one access the accessible route?
7. Ditto comment 6 for the 5 accessible parking spaces.
8. As per section 4.7.5, flared sides of curb ramps are only required where pedestrians may cross the ramp. Otherwise, return curbs may be used as per figure 12 (b).
9. Please provide a large scale detail of all the different types of sidewalk and curb ramp layouts as shown on sheet 3.
a. Show all dimensions, widths, detectable warning strips, slopes and all other required accessible conditions as per ADAAG requirements for curb/sidewalk ramps Section 4.7 and 4.8.
10. Please provide a parking space analysis and show compliance with 4.1.2 (5).
END OF COMMENTS
10/14/2010 FERNE RODRIGUEZ COT NON-DSD TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT Denied >>> Rebecca Noel 10/12/2010 5:04 PM >>>
I have one concern about this project. Stated on attachment A page 3 of 3 #10 it reads that lights shall be as close to the ground as possible. How close is this? If the lights are placed too low they are susceptible to vandalism. They need to be placed at least 12 feet up to try and help prevent this.
10/15/2010 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Submit 100% landscape plans.
2) Add the current and previous CDRC case numbers (rezoning, DP, Variance etc.)to the landscape plans.
3) Clarify how the site meets the conditions of rezoning or those of other cases.
4) The previous NPP and landscape mitigation plans may be applicable to this site and may affect the plant selection. Review the applicable approved plans and revise as necessary.
10/18/2010 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135


October 18, 2010

To: Joesph Vaskovic
Parsons Brinckerhoff

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department


____________________________________________
From: Chad Amateau, PE , Civil Engineer, (520-740-6547), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department

Subject: Houghton Road and Broadway Boulevard Park & Ride
Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal
D10-0032


The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has received the plans for this project and per Arizona Revised Statues 32-125. (Seals for registrants) and Arizona Administrative Code R4-30-304. (Use of Seals) we are unable to conduct a plan review.
Please resubmit plans signed and sealed by a professional registrant in the State of Arizona.
Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For
the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $250.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima
County Code Title 13 by:

___________________________
Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer
PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit





cc: Tom Porter, Sr CEA
Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager
DLU Project folder
10/18/2010 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


WR#229902 October 18, 2010



Dear Tom Fisher:

SUBJECT: Houghton Rd / Broadway Blvd. Park & Ride
D10-0032


Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted October 1, 2010.

All relocation costs or removal of existing TEP facilities will be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:

Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Richard Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions.

Sincerely,


Henrietta Noriega
Office Specialist
Design/Build
hn
Enclosures
City of Tucson (Email only)
cc:N. DiMaria
10/18/2010 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
10/18/2010 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied October 18, 2010
D10-0032

1. Provide discharge quantities on the site plan and grading plans for all significant concentration points.

2. Remove the note indicating that the project is in a floodplain and floodplain use permits and/or elevation certificates will be required.
10/19/2010 JOHN WILLIAMS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

October 19, 2010

Joseph A. Vaskovic
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc.
177 N. Church Avenue
Tucson, Arizona 85701

Subject: D10-0032 HOUGHTON RD AND BROADWAY BLVD PARK AND RIDE Development Package

Dear Joseph:

Your submittal of September 15, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 8 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

8 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, Env Svcs, ADA, Tucson Police, Landscape, Wastewater, Engineering, PDSD)

2 Copies Copy of Approved Pima County Combo Request Form (Zoning, PDSD)

1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $250.00 (Wastewater)

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917.


Sincerely,




John Williams
Planning Technician

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: (520) 882-8830