Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0031
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/13/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 09/14/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/16/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/21/2010 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 09/21/2010 8:42 AM >>> Regional Traffic Engineering has no comment on this submittal and recommends approval of this development. It will have no impact on any ADOT facilities. Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 09/23/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/28/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#229656 September 28, 2010 Kimley Horn and Associates Attn: Heather Hirshberg 7878 N 16th Street Suite 300 Phoenix, Arizona 85020 Dear Ms. Hirshberg : SUBJECT: Walmart Store 1321 D10-0031 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted September 14, 2010. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Existing transformer TMB-63 serves Wal-Mart and is not in conflict with future building. TEP proposes ti use existing transformer if load plans permit. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. ricahrd Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Jennifer Crawford at (520) 918-8708. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 09/29/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D10-0031WALMART STORE #1321-01 /DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: September 29, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all street directions. Change NW Quarter to NE Quarter on all title blocks. Include the legal description on all title blocks. Delete all adjacent tax codes. Spell out Road of Wetmore Rd on all sheets except on the Vicinity Map. |
| 10/06/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D10-0031 WAL-MART STORE - #1321-01 (N) () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-82-48 (Annexation) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: October 12, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (X) Proposal Complies with Annexation Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 9/24/10 |
| 10/07/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Due Date Case Number Project Address October 7, 2010 D10-0031 WAL-MART STORE#132-01 DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: Denied, The proposed Development Plan Case No.D10-0031 for the WAL-MART STORE, Located at East Wetmore Rd. and North 1st.Avenue. Dose not meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01. The Plan must show the locations for both Solid Waste and Recycle collection containers and enclosures. 1. All containers locations must be shown on the Development Plan and labeled for the intended use, being Solid Waste or Recycle materials 2. All enclosures must show Details with dimensions, and gates installed and mounted to the end on the CMU screen wall as show on Solid Waste Standards. 3. The detail of the container enclosures must clearly show that the minimum inside dimension between the bollards shall be a 10'- 0" for each container enclosures. As shown on the Solid Waste and Recycle materials Standards. 4. The proposed development plan for the WAL-MART STORE, Located at East Wetmore Rd. and North 1st.Avenue must state the physical address on the Title Block of each sheet of the proposed plans. In order to plan Environmental Services of Solid Waste and Recycle collection. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/07/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 October 6, 2010 To: HEATHER HIRSHBERG KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: WAL-MART TUCSON (N), AZ - STORE #1325-01 (415 E WETMORE ROAD, TUCSON, AZ 85705) Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0031 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 2: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). Sheet 5: Call out the IMS #’s with rim and invert elevations for the existing public manholes shown on plan. Also call out the construction plan # for the existing public sewer line and show the sewer line continuing west in Wetmore Rd. On-site private sewers will need to be reviewed and approved by PDEQ prior to approval of this development plan. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 10/07/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Where the accessible route is shown at the existing marked crossing to the Wetmore Rd. public right of way: a. Insure slope compliance of the two existing ramps to ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 406. b. Provide detectable warnings at the bottom of both existing ramps just prior to entering the PAAL as per Section 406.12. 2. At the existing marked crossing to the Wal-Mart Store: a. At the existing ramps with score marks please provide a detectable warning strip as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 406.12. 3. At both new accessible parking groups: a. Provide a marked crossing for each group that complies with ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 106, 406.12 and 406.14. The markings must be different than the markings shown for the whole front paved area of the main entrance. Insure detectable warnings are installed as required. 4. At the Typical Accessible Parking Stalls on sheet C2.0, extend the accessible aisle markings across the accessible route to the marked area on the East side at the two most Southerly accessible spaces. 5. Note 3 on sheet 03 references to a detail on sheet 2. No such detail is shown on sheet 2. Please provide detail and don't forget the detectable warning strip. 6. Please clarify the accessibility from the PAAL to the accessible route at the front entrance of the store. Is this area flush for 98.3'? If so please provide a separation as required by Zoning. Reference Zoning comments. If a curb runs along this entire length, please provide curb ramps and detectable warnings for the two marked crossings required for both of the accessible parking groups. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/12/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 10/12/2010, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Wal-Mart Store #1321 Expansion D10-0031, T13S, R13E, SECTION 24 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Statement on September 14, 2010 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Statement: 1. State in the statement that the Rillito River is bank protected to the 100-year storm level and the proposed addition will still be outside the reduced erosion setback line. Development Plan: 1. Complete the D (yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2. 2. If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits (D.S. 2-05.2.3.B.). 3. If applicable, all proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private (D.S. 2-05.2.4.G.). 4. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned (D.S. 2-05.2.4.T.). 5. Revise the Development Plan in accordance with the drainage report revisions. Landscape Plan: Landscape Plan is acceptable pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan and Drainage Statement |
| 10/12/2010 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 10/12/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C 3) Call out any proposed screen walls on the development/landscape plans. Call out existing screening elements on the landscape plan, along with descriptions and minimum heights per the requirements of the approved development plan. |
| 10/13/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D10-0031 Wal-Mart #1321-01 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 10/13/2010 DUE DATE: 10/12/2010 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 09/13/2011. 2. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D10-0031 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 3. DS 2-05.2.3.B All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purposes of all easements on site will be stated. For example: Provide recording info for the recreation / maintenance easement, the indicated 30' drainage easement per last approved plan has been abandoned provide docket and page, provide recording info for the existing electrical easement along the west and north side of the property, and any other existing or proposed easements. 4. DS 2-05.2.4.B Provide the existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 5. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 At the rear of the building near the tire and battery storage, the PAAL is indicated as 24.3'. The indicated bollards limit the PAAL to less than the required 24' for a two way PAAL. Revise. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide on the drawing the building footprint dimensions. Clarify if the existing entrance is to remain or be removed. If this entrance is to remain has it been considered in the overall square footage of the building? 7. DS 2-05.2.4.O Provide as a note the number of required and proposed loading zones. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.P Per LUC Sec. 3.3.7.2 the length of a parking space at a 60 degree angle is 19.8' not the indicated 18'. Revise all plans and details. The parallel handicap parking space is required to meet the size requirements of a parallel parking space which is a minimum of 8' X 23'. Revise. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.K Provide a 5' pedestrian refuge area along the north side of the building. This area can be a painted striped area but cannot be part of the PAAL. The pedestrian access area between the handicap parking spaces per a discussion with staff can be a striped asphalt. Indicate striping. Provide an enlarged detail of the entire front of the building area in order to clearly indicate the widths and locations of the pedestrian circulation path system. As indicated now it appears the pedestrian circulation path is part of the vehicle use area. This detail will also be helpful in providing the location of the bicycle parking spaces. See later comment. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.Q The bicycle parking calculations are not complete. 5% of the remainder over 500 spaces is based on 273 parking spaces thus requiring 14 more bicycle parking spaces. Revise calculations. Please provide a dimensioned detail for class 1 bicycle parking spaces including access aisle. Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. Clearly indicate the location of the class one and class two bicycle parking spaces on the development plans. As noted on the plans the class two bicycle parking spaces must be located within 50' of the main entrance or entrances. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D10-0031dp.doc |
| 10/13/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 13, 2010 Heather Hirshberg, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 7878 N. 16th St, # 300 Phoenix, Arizona 95020 Subject: D10-031 WAL-MART STORE #1321 EXPANSION Development Plan Dear Heather: Your submittal of September 13, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 8 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Zoning HC Site, Wastewater, Env Svcs, Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $100.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 944-7423 |
| 10/13/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 10/13/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/13/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 10/13/2010 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 10/13/2010 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed |