Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D10-0030
Parcel: 124171010

Address:
945 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D10-0030
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/10/2010 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/10/2010 FERNE RODRIGUEZ COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Passed
09/14/2010 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
09/14/2010 DAVID MANN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
09/17/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Dollar General - 22nd & Fremont
Development Package (1st Review)
D10-0030

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16, 2010

DUE DATE: October 08, 2010

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 12, 2011

2. This development package was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance.

3. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E The number of pages, page X of Y, shown in the lower right hand corner of the title block needs to reflect the total number of pages for the entire development package, i.e. X of 8.

4. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Remove the "ANNEXATION ORD. #486", located near the title block, as there are no relevant annexation conditions.

5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E This project comprises five (5) parcels lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request Form and a copy of the recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with the next submittal. Provide a general note on the plan stating "COVENANT REGARDING DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF REAL PROPERTY RECORDED AT DKT. ??? PG ???".

6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing. That said provide the zoning for the parcels on the south side of 22nd Street.

7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 The future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) to not appear to be shown correctly on the plan, see Engineering comments.

8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.4 The future curb does not appear to be shown correctly, see Engineering comments.

9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.4 Show the future sidewalk on the plan.

10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide a radius dimension for all backup spurs shown on the plan..

11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Detail 4 sheet 4 per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 the location of the wheel stop is not correct. The required dimension is 2'-6".

12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d It does not appear that the bicycle parking location meets the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1 Proximity to main entrances. Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more that 50 feet from the main building entrance. Provide a dimension on the plan from the main entrance to the bicycle parking.

13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Detail 2 sheet 4 show the require 5' clear access aisle on the detail, see D.S. 2-09.5.2.

14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L If applicable show all proposed easements on the plan along with the recordation information, Docket & Page.

15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R There does not appear to be enough sidewalk area between the top of the accessible access ramp and the proposed open building doors. Per D.S. 2-08.5.1.A a minimum of four (4) foot must be maintained.

16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Detail 3 sheet 4 provide a dimension between the two (2) post barricades shown within the access aisle. A minimum of four (4) foot must be maintained.

17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.W Provide a dimension from the proposed sign to the parking area access lane (PAAL) a minimum of two (2) foot must be maintained.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0030

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package.



CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Dollar General - 22nd & Fremont
Development Package (1st Review)
T10BU01404

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16, 2010

DUE DATE: October 08, 2010

GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
09/17/2010 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D10-0030 DOLLAR GENERAL - 22nd&Fremont

() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations

CROSS REFERENCE:

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Greater South Park Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO

COMMENTS DUE BY: October 08, 2010

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
(X) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(X) Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Other



REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 9/15/10



Planning and Development Services
Community Planning Section
D10-0030 Dollar General - 22nd & Fremont
September 15, 2010

Staff offers the following comments:

1. Please revise development plan, sheet 4, to include a wall elevation and a wall detail (cross-section) to the proposed masonry refuse enclosure wall (to demonstrate compliance with rezoning C9-96-08, condition 1.c).

2. Please revise development plan to comply with rezoning C9-96-08, condition # 1.d. Please provide four-sided architectural building elevations drawn to scale, in black and white with the proposed southwestern colors identified on each building elevation. Building elevations shall be drawn on full size 24" X 36" sheet(s) as part of the development plan sheet count/submittal. In addition, provide in a smaller print the color version(s) [may use color pencils which best resemble the proposed southwestern colors] of the four-sided architectural building renderings/elevations. The color version shall identify each southwestern color by brand name and color code. The color versions can be submitted on 11" X 17." print(s).

3. Please revise development plan to comply with rezoning C9-96-08, condition # 1.f. Please provide four-sided architectural building elevations drawn to scale, in black and white (as defined on comment # 2), with the proposed location and screening of the roof mounted HVAC, to demonstrate compliance with condition # 1.f.

4. Please demonstrate how seven existing mature mesquite trees will be preserved "in-place," within a proposed (graded) private detention basin design? If the grade surrounding each tree is to become a small island of undisturbed area, please provide this information on the development plan/landscape plan and in the grading plan for further review.

5. Please revise development plan sheet 2, revise Keynote 42 to include language that demonstrates the proposed light pole(s) will be in compliance with rezoning C9-96-08, condition # 3.
09/21/2010 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: September 21, 2010
SUBJECT: Dollar General Development Plan Core Review- Engineering Review
TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
LOCATION: 945 E 22nd Street, T14S R14E Sec18 Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: D10-0030


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report (Stanley Engineering and Drainage, 25AUG10) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Stanley Engineering and Drainage, 02SEP10). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the draft policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed:


DEVELOPMENT PLAN:

1) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan documents to include a 3-inch by 5-inch space in the lower right quadrant on all sheets that shall be reserved for the CDRC approval stamp.

2) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.D: Revise the development plan document so that the administrative address that is shown is correctly placed within the Title Block per the referenced standard.

3) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.E: Revise the development plan document to correctly label the number of all sheets within the development plan package. I.e. Sheet X of 8 (Landscape plans can still be referenced as Sheet L1 however the page count must reflect all 8 sheets).

4) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The correct Development Plan Package number (D10-0030) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets where indicated by "D10-."

5) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Per DS 2-01 and the Development Plan submittal requirement revise the development plan document to include all General Notes (Site and Grading Plan Notes) together on a separate page. *Note- Master Cover Sheet and General Notes may be combined if content and space allow.

6) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan documents to provide the following information for the public right-of-way; label right-of-way width as "existing and/or future", label the roadway as "Arterial", and clarify future SVTs. Required parking is not permitted within the future sight visibility triangles as shown on the plan set.

7) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.E: Clarify the proposed lot lines as shown on the development plan document. All lot combinations or reconfigurations will require approval from the Zoning Section of the City of Tucson Development Services Department prior to Development Plan Package approval.

8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Verify and label the required 18-foot radii (Fremont Ave) for the proposed driveway location per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards.

9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Verify and label the existing radii in plan view for the 22nd Street driveway location per DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C.

10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Provide a detail for the proposed sidewalk connection to the existing handicap access ramp within the public right-of-way of 22nd Street. Verify slopes and cross sections where the sidewalk ties into the wing portion of the ramp.

11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Provide all dimensions for the proposed back up spurs as shown on the plan set. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for minimum requirements; specifically the spur must have a minimum of 3-foot radii and 3 feet in depth.

12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document and Detail 4 to accurately label the 2.5 foot overhang for the proposed wheel stops. The detail currently dimensions 3-foot minimum. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.3.C.1.

13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan documents to clearly label and dimension all concrete radii within the proposed vehicular use area. Per DS Sec.3-05.2.1.C.3 all PAAL intersection must have a minimum unobstructed radii of 5-feet unless used for fire or refuse access then a minimum radius of 18-feet is required. For all other areas of curb returns or radii clearly label in plan view.

14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.I: Refer to comments from Jose Ortiz, PE Transportation Department on planned future right-of-way widening and intersection widening. Per discussion with Jose there is already a future plan for 22nd Street, verify that all proposed dimensions and locations meet Transportations requirements.

15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan documents to provide the following information on the plan drawing to indicate proposed conditions.

a) Provide a geotechnical report with discussion on the proposed setback (9.2-foot) from the proposed building and retention basin and the required infiltration tests to assure drain down time per DS Sec.10-01.

b) Provide filter fabric specifications either in the Keynotes or Details for all proposed spillways and splash pads for construction purposes.

c) Revise the basin configuration to meet the basin shape requirements of curvilinear shapes. If rectilinear or geometric slopes are used soften the contours with minimum 10-foot radius curves at all basin corners per DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1.

d) Clarify the 8.3-foot dimension in plan view for the Type 1 scupper under the sidewalk. Provide a label for length of scupper so that it is not confused with an 8.3-foot width.

16) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document to provide a label and/or detail call outs for a vertical curb termination section at all proposed curb cut locations.

17) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

18) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to verify the minimum width at the top of the access ramp and front door of the building and between the 2 bollards proposed at the handicap ramp location. Per DS Sec.2-08.5.1.A a minimum of 4-foot must be maintained.

19) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and Detail 1 to clearly label and dimension all construction details for the proposed refuse container and enclosure location. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 (Figure 3) for all required refuse enclosure dimensions and construction details.

20) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.X: Provide a length dimension in plan view or in Keynotes #32 for begin/end here points on the proposed 30-inch screen wall.

21) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the development plan document and Details 8 and 9 to clearly dimension the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, proposed construction, etc. Provide sufficient room to allow for the 2-feet setback from property lines to the toe of the fill slope as proposed in the referenced Details.


GEOTECHNICAL REPORT:

22) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.D: Provide a Geotechnical Report with a discussion on the proposed 9.2-foot setback from the building and retention basin and the required infiltration tests to assure drain down time per DS Sec.10-01.


STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN:

23) The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). However the SWPPP and Exhibits can not be stamped approved until approval of the development plan documents. Provide 3 copies with resubmittal for stamp approval.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Geotechnical Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package and Geotechnical Report.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
09/21/2010 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 09/21/2010 8:45 AM >>>
Regional Traffic Engineering has no comment on this submittal and
recommends approval of this development. It will have no impact on any
ADOT facilities.

Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
.
09/23/2010 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied September 23, 2010
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D10-0030
PROJECT NAME: Dollar General
PROJECT ADDRESS: 945 E 22nd St
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.


1. Add to keynote call outs (regarding future curb and sidewalk) a reference to the RTA 22nd widening project from I-10 to Kino.

2. Call out the radius of the curb returns for the proposed driveway.

3. Call out whether the illustrated driveways are proposed or existing.

4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
09/28/2010 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

AUDREY FARENGA
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 740-6800
FAX #: 623-5411


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW
SUBJECT: D10-0030 DOLLAR GENERAL – 22ND & FREMONT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: September 27, 2010



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1. Add the legal description to all Title Blocks.
09/29/2010 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702

WR#229654 September 29, 2010

Stanley Engineering and Drainage
Attn: Jeffrey
P.O. Box 1888
Tucson, Arizona 85702

Dear Jeffrey :

SUBJECT: Dollar General
D10-0030

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted September 13, 2010. It appears that there is a conflict with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP subsurface junction box in proposed driveway will have ti be relocated.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Mr. ricahrd Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244.

Sincerely,


Elizabeth Miranda
Office Support Specialist
Design/Build
Enclosures
cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email)
M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power
09/29/2010 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approved PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135


September 22, 2010

To: JEFF STANLEY
STANLEY ENGINEERING

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department

Subject: DOLLAR GENERAL - 22ND & FREMONT
Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal
D10-0030


The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use:

The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted.

This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima
County Code Title 13 by:

___________________________
Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer
PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit

cc: Chad Amateau, PE
Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager
DLU Project folder
10/01/2010 FRODRIG2 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved Due Date Case Number Project Address
October, 8, 2010 D10-0030 Dollar General-22nd&Fremont
Date of Comments: October 1, 2010 945 E. 22nd Street, Tucson AZ 85719
DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Comments: The proposed Development Plan for the Dollar General 22nd & Fremont,
Located 945 E. 22nd Street, Case No. D10-0030, meets the minimum requirements
for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01.0
and is here Approved,


Environmental Services Department
Development Plan Review
Reviewer: Tony Teran
Office Phone (520) 837-3706
E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov
10/06/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. Curb ramp at front entrance is non-compliant. As per 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 406.7, curb ramps must have a 3' clear length (with our door swings) landing.

END OF REVIEW
10/06/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond The site, grading, and landscape plans within the development plan package must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the plans. Ensure that all changes to any documents are reflected on each plan set.
10/08/2010 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Re: D10-0030 Dollar General 22nd and Fremont

>>> Malini Banerjee <mbanerjee@pagnet.org> 10/08/2010 3:47 PM >>>
No objections regarding the trip generation numbers.

Thanks,

Malini

--
10/12/2010 JOHN WILLIAMS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

October 12, 2010

Jeffrey A. Stanley
Stanley Engineering & Drainage
P.O. Box 1888
Tucson, Arizona 85702

Subject: D10-0030 DOLLAR GENERAL Development Package

Dear Jeff:

Your submittal of September 10, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 8 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

8 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, Planning, Engineering, Traffic, Addressing, Landscape, Zoning HC Site, PDSD)

2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, PDSD)

2 Copies PC Combo Request & Covenant Documentation (Zoning, PDSD)

2 Copies 11x17 Color Building Elevations (Planning, PDSD)

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917.


Sincerely,





John Williams
Planning Technician

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: (520) 624-0993
10/12/2010 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Passed
10/12/2010 JANE DUARTE COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved
10/12/2010 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved
10/12/2010 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Passed