Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0027
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/07/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/10/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Letter states use changing from "Business Park" to "Commercial Storage". Development Standards notes on page 1 of 17 states primary use - office, secondary use - business park. Perhaps this page should be amended? |
| 06/13/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Western Archaeological Conserv.. Development Package (3rd Review) D10-0027 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 13, 2011 DUE DATE: June 22, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Per PAD 4 Development Area 5 the Primary Use is Office with an Alternate Use of Business Park. Per PAD 4 Section I, F. Definitions; Office. A place where professional or semi-professional services are provided, or a particular kind of business is transacted, excluding retail and wholesale trade as a principle use. Support retail functions such as athletic clubs, pharmacies, restaurants, and Rio Nuevo Redevelopment Plan/ Planned Area Development XI-9 other limited retail uses, not to exceed 25 percent of the gross floor area, are permitted as secondary or accessory uses. Banks, savings and loan institutions, and brokerages, campus/garden office and corporate office are permitted uses. Business Park Uses. A business classification to include production, service and distribution businesses, whose activities are conducted within a completely enclosed building and produce no noxious fumes, obtrusive noises, and/or negative visual elements. Examples of acceptable uses are blueprinting, lithography, printing or publishing; research and development, including fabrication or component assembly; retail showroom; school or college (operated as a commercial enterprise); medical or dental laboratory; or other similar uses. Based on the approved uses listed in PAD 4, Development Area 5, commercial storage (warehouse) is not allowed. Also per PAD 4 Section I, F. Definitions the definition of Commercial excludes manufacturing or warehousing uses. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0027 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Western Archaeological Conserv.. Development Package (2nd Review) T11BU00234 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 29, 2011 DUE DATE: March 31, 2011 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/20/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/20/2011 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: June 20, 2011 TO: RICK Engineering, Tri Miller, P.E., Paul Iezzi, P.E. REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE SUBJECT: Western Archeological Conservation Center Development Package Engineering resubmittal ADDRESS: 251 N Commerce Park Loop LOCATION: T14S R13E Sec11 FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded & X-shaded zones, 2226K REZONING CASE: C9-07-14, PAD-4 CASE NUMBER: D10-0027, T11BU00234 SUMMARY: A submittal package was submitted for the proposed revision to parking improvements for Western Archeological Conservation Center Development Package. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Development Package and recommends approval of the Development Package with the following conditions to remain for the grading permit T11BU00234 to be completed during grading construction. GRADING PERMIT CONDITIONS: The following 15 conditions apply to grading permit T11BU00234: 1) Call for SWPPP inspection and Grading Pre-construction meeting. For a PDSD Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning & Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 837-4888. 2) For inspection purposes, post City of Tucson's "AZPDES - Posting Requirements" green sheet, or the NOI at construction entrance of site, at beginning of construction activities, and maintain this posted document throughout project construction. 3) A copy of the approved plans, permits, and other documents shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval. These documents are for onsite finish grading construction for redesigned parking area, utility infrastructure, private paving, drainage improvements, and landscaping associated with Development Package D10-0027 (sealed 3-16-11 Bruce Paton, P.E.). 4) SWPPP measures shall be maintained and updated throughout project until final grading approval. Sequential list of grading construction activities for this project shall be updated and provide for installation of SWPPP control measures at start of project prior to clearing and rough grading of this site, and removal or interim controls once all permanent controls are in place. All Operators shall be identified and have separate certification statements. For the Owner/Operator Certification Statements, provide name and signature for the Operators with each certification statement. Assure these certifications are available on-site. List of contractors and subcontractors shall be filled out at commencement of grading construction activity and updated on site and kept with SWPP documents. 5) Operator shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. Operator shall orally notify office listed below within 24 hours: (a) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1) Phoenix, AZ 85007 Office: 602-771-4466; Fax 602-771-4505 6) Receiving waters is unnamed tributary which connects to Santa Cruz River located quarter mile downstream of project. 7) Stabilized entrances shall be maintained at all active access entrances. Use of water trucks or other dust controls shall be utilized, and construction entrances shall be maintained to minimize sedimentation, dust issues, and tracking onto public streets. 8) Stormwater shall be prevented from entering and possibly causing ponding/infiltration within the landfill boundary. 9) No storage of materials, no vehicular storage, no concrete wash out shall occur in water harvest areas. 10) There shall be no disturbance outside of these approved grading limits. Any grading outside of the grading limits requires separate grading permit or a submittal, review, and approval for separate permits. 11) Contractor is responsible to protect in place the existing sewer line; all work within this easement must be coordinated with Pima County Waste Water prior to any site construction. 12) Any revisions to Grading Plan must be reviewed by PDSD Engineering Engineer and may include discussion, details, or a revised grading plan/development package. Call PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss any revisions. If grading construction is expected to last longer than expiration date of grading permit, contact PDSD to renew/extend Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before Grading Permit expires, and permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. Requests for grading permit extensions may be submitted to Planning & Development Services Department (attn: Claudia Buford), prior to grading permit expiration date, for consideration of grading plan extension approval. 13) Permitee shall notify PDSD when grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all drainage improvements and their permanent protective devices, and all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with approved grading plan and grading permit, and all conditions of permit are completed. 14) Areas to be used for future parking shall have permanent erosion control placed as called out on approved plans - gravel - small decomposed gravel or fines shall not be accepted. 15) As-builts are required to be submitted under activity number T11BU00234 to PDSD permit clerks. Submittal will be reviewed and then if acceptable, a copy will be provided to PDSD Engineering Inspector for final grading inspections. For Grading Permit Project Completion documentation, submit: one copy of original grading plans, 2 copies of as-builts ("Final Revised Grading Plan"), letters of substantial completion. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 06/21/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise the native plant preservation note on sheet 13 to include the activity or permit number of the plan referenced. |
| 06/21/2011 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D10-0027 (Revision) Western Archaeological Conserv 6/21/11 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: D10-0023 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: PAD-4 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: June 22, 2011 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an FLD, No Comment () Proposal Complies with PAD-4 (Rezoning Conditions) () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: Reviewer: Jbeall Date: 6/21/11 Planning and Development Services Community Planning Section D10-0027 - (Revision) Western Archaeological Conserv June 22, 2011 Community planning staff Conditionally - Approves Development Plan -D10-0027, subject to the following minor changes: Comments: 1. Please provide an approved clarification letter from the PDSD Director that clarifies that the existing archaeological storage use is consistent with the intent of Business Park Uses as defined in the PAD document. Clarification letter to also indicate that the parking requirements will use commercial storage use calculations. Approved clarification letter to be included with development plan resubmittal. Please revise development plan, sheet 1 of 19, to indicate that the existing use is Business Park Use, and will use the 'Commercial Storage Use' calculations. |
| 07/11/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 21, 2011 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 3945 E. Fort Lowell Rd. # 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D10-0027 WESTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL Development Package REVISION Dear Tri: Your submittal of 06/07/11 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 5 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Package (Fire, Zoning, Landscape, Community Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Approved Clarification Letter from PDSD Director (Community Planning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |
| 07/11/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES *** REVISED *** July 11, 2011 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 3945 E. Fort Lowell Rd. #111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D10-0027 WESTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL Development Package REVISION Dear Tri: The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled blue line COMPLETE SET of the affected sheets of the Development Package, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. Additional black line copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City’s contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your plans to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Plans will not be signed and released until the CDRC office has been notified by PC Addressing that all fees for this plan have been paid. The CDRC office will need this confirmation in writing PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 322-6956 |