Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0027
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/17/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/17/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Notn a COT owned or operated property |
| 08/18/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Tucson Water piping map indicates existence of a fire hydrant in the southeast corner of the site. Your plan does not show this hydrant. Please verify existence, location, and provide explanation of how it might impact your proposal. |
| 08/26/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Due Date Case Number Project Address September 15, 2010 D10-0027 Western Archaeological Conservation Center 251 N. Commerce Park Loop DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: Denied, The proposed Development Plan for the Western Archaeological Conservation Center, Case No.D10-0027, Located at 251 North Commerce Park Loop, dose not meet the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01.0. The Development plan must show a detail plan of the double enclosures with the dimension of the enclosure to verify that suitable clearness will allow the solid waste collection truck to maneuver for both refuse and recycle collection. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/26/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At the front entrance accessible parking, please provide a complete marked crossing as per 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition), Sections 106 and 406.12. Provide all required curb ramps, detectable warnings and slopes as required by section 403.3. 2. Please clarify why all the accessible parking spaces are grouped in one area of the site and distributed equitable throughout the entire site as per Chapter 6 of the IBC, Section 1106.6. 3. Please connect the accessible route from the West side of the building to the North accessible route as required by the IBC, Section 1104.3 4. Please provide large scale details of all the different groups of accessible parking, marked crossings and ramps. Please show all dimensions and accessible requirements required for code compliance. 5. Please indicate accessible route slope compliance throughout the entire site as required per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 403.3. 6. Please show accessible parking signage, their locations and a large scale detail. 7. Please identify the "Van Accessible" parking spaces as required by the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11, Section 1106.5. 8. Please identify all accessible parking spaces with the international accessible symbol. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/30/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Manx Investments LLC. Development Plan (1st Review) D10-0018 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 30, 2010 DUE DATE: August 31, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements 2. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 3. Revise the title to read "DEVELOPMENT PLAN" not updated site plan. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.1.F Provide a reduced-scale map of the PAD District on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Provide the development plan number D10-0027 6. D.S. 2-05.2.4.B All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Under "PARKING CALCULAITONS" the loading space shows three (3) 12 x 55 loading spaces required and provided. Keynote 9 and the plan shows 12 x 35. Provide the required 12 X 55 loading spaces. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0027 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 08/31/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.0 Include any calculations or special requirements of the Rio Nuevo PAD. |
| 08/31/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D10-0027 Western Archaeological Conserv 8/31/10 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: D10-0023 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: PAD-4 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: September 15, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an FLD, No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) Resubmittal Required - See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-5505 DATE: 8/31/10 Planning and Development Services Community Planning Section D10-0027 Western Archaeological Conserv August 31, 2010 Comments: 1. Please provide a Landscape Plan that demonstrates the revised development plan still meets the landscape requirements found in PAD-4, Development Area 5, i.e. Minimum landscape requirement of 10% of gross site area excluding up to 5' width of landscape areas along public rights-of-way (should be addressed by a table showing percentages of landscape provided before the lot configuration and after the lot configuration); provide special screening or buffering - a 6' high wall and a 5' wide planting strip buffer on south property lines where a 5' wall does not exist. 2. The southern property line has a notation that states 0' Landscape Buffer. Please address and/or remove per direction of the PAD. |
| 09/07/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: RICK Engineering, Tri Miller, P.E., Paul Iezzi, P.E. REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE SUBJECT: Western Archeological Conservation Center Development Plan Engineering Review ADDRESS: 251 N Commerce Park Loop LOCATION: T14S R13E Sec11 FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded & X-shaded zones, 2226K REZONING CASE: C9-07-14, PAD-4 CASE NUMBER: D10-0027 SUMMARY: A development plan was submitted for the proposed parking improvements for Western Archeological Conservation Center. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Development Plan. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan until the following comments are addressed. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: Relevant case number (D10-0027) shall be provided adjacent to the title block. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: All easements shall be drawn and labeled on the plan. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.G: A City of Tucson Rio Nuevo North Closed Landfill exists at the site. Address the following comments: a) Identify location of landfill remediation on planview. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled "to be removed" or other notation. b) Provide remediation status update in response letter to assure all Environmental Services requirements are met for this landfill. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Show proposed catch basin at northwest portion of project. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D: For gated entry at west entrance area, indicate maneuverability for turn around scenario. Explain in response letter how this gated entry system works. 6) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.D: A grading permit will be required for this project. 7) Tucson Code Chap.26 Art.2: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required as this is a phase or part of the QIP project. Either provide information that includes QIP SWPP or provide separate SWPPP. Please provide a revised Development Plan, grading plan, SWPPP, and a response letter addressing all of the above comments. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 09/08/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 8, 2010 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 3945 E. Fort Lowell Road # 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D10-0027 Western Archaeological Development Plan Dear Tri: Your submittal of August 17, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 8 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, Zoning HC, Env Svcs, Zoning, Landscape, Community Planning, Engineering, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Community Planning, Engineering, PDSD) Please be advised a separate grading plan and SWPPP will be required for this project per engineering comments. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 322-6956 |