Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0022
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/25/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/26/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/08/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Plaza Centro Development Package (2nd Review) D10-0022 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 8, 2010 DUE DATE: September 17, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 30, 2011 2. This development package was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 3. The document provided is a copy of the minutes from the DRB not an approval. This document only recommends approval. Once the DRB is approved by the Planning and Development Services Director provide the DRB number date of approval and any conditions of approval on the plan. Applications for projects within the Rio Nuevo and Downtown (RND) Zone shall be reviewed in accordance with the Administrative Design Review Procedures, 23A-32. The application must include a Design Context and Compatibility Report in conformance with Development Standard 9-10.2.0. Applications shall be subject to the following level of review. Major Project Design Review. Applications which have completed the major review process which shall be reviewed to verify incorporation into the final plans and drawings the preliminary findings and recommendations of the Development Review Board (DRB) rendered in the major review. Once the DRB is completed provide the DRB number date of approval and any conditions of approval on the plan. The following comments are based on the Development Package Submittal Requirements: 4. This comment was not addressed. Based on the "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE/SHEET INDEX" there are a total of eleven (11) sheets therefore sheet one should show 1 of 11, sheet two should show sheet 2 of 11 etc. Also there are four (4) "ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY" sheets that have been submitted. If these sheets are to be part of this package the total number of sheets would be 15. The total number of sheets, X of 5, does not appear to be correct. As this is a development package the total number of sheet should include, site, grading, landscape, SWPP. 5. If the four (4) "ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY" are to be part of the development package include them in the sheet index. The Sheet Index shown on sheet one should include all sheets of the development package. The following comments are based on the assumption that all lot split/reconfiguration issues have been addressed. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Revise General Note 3 to include the proposed retail and residential uses. Also provide the subject section 3.5.9.2.A for the retail use. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a Provide the floor area for all use on site. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b As the retail/residential use are now proposed provide a floor area ratio (FAR) calculation that includes the proposed retail/residential areas 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Based on the OCR-2 zone and a Residential Use, Development Designator "X" provide a lot coverage calculation for the residential use. 10. Provide written documentation from the COT Real Estate department that all issues in regards to the lot split/reconfiguration and right-of-way have been dealt with. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E There appears to be some type of lot split/reconfiguration planned for this project that includes the addition of right-of-way. Until the lot split/reconfiguration has been approved by the City of Tucson Zoning will be unable to approve the development package. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As new proposed uses are shown on the plan provide a vehicle parking calculation that reflects all proposed uses on the plan. This vehicle parking calculation should show the number required and provided spaces for all uses on site. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d As new proposed uses are shown on the plan provide a bicycle parking calculation that reflects all proposed uses on the plan. This bicycle parking calculation should show the number of required and provided spaces for all uses on site. 13. Zoning acknowledges that the proposed use has been added to the plan but was not able to locate the square footage and height of the retail/residential areas. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 14. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0022 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Plaza Centro Development Package (2nd Review) T10BU01053 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 8, 2010 DUE DATE: September 17, 2010 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/10/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 September 10, 2010 To: MARTY MAGELLI, P.E. BAKER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: PLAZA CENTRO GARAGE Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D10-0022 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 09/13/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/13/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: SHEET 1 of 5 1. Please insert ADAAG for all accessibility requirements in the list of Codes and Standards in the General Notes on sheet 1. RESUBMITTAL COMMENT: THE REQUIRED ACCESSIBILITY CODE FOR THIS PROJECT IS "ADAAG". THIS PERTAINS TO ALL SITE DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AS WELL AS BUILDING DESIGN. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE REQUIRED ACCESSIBILITY CODE IN THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. Generic details are not acceptable. Please provide large scale details of each different layout of accessible parking as per the floor plan design. OK b. The parking signage is to be located outside of the 18' deep parking area. OK c. Please show the signage on all floor plans. THIS IS REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT THE SIGNAGE DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH THE WIDTH REQUIRED FOR ACCESSIBLE ROUTES. EITHER SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON THE LARGE SCALE PARKING PLANS WITH A WIDTH DIMENSION OR SHOW THE SIGNAGE LOCATION ON THE PLANS. THIS APPLIES ALSO TO THE GUARD RAILS AND THEIR LOCATION AND EFFECT ON THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. SHEET 2 3. Please provide a curb ramp and 2' wide detectable warning strip at the top the accessible parking aisle. OK SHEET 3 2ND FLOOR PLAN 4. Please provide a 3' wide detectable warning strip paralleling the front of the two accessible parking spaces and three regular spaces just on the edge of the front end of the parking spaces and accessible parking aisle. PLEASE NOTE GUARD RAILS ON THE LARGE SCALE PARKING PLANS. 5. Please provide a 3' wide detectable warning strip in front of the two standard parking spaces located in the South East corner, turn the corner at the marked aisle and line the West and North ends of the marked aisle to the curb of the ramp. DITTO NOTE 4 THIRD FLOOR PLAN 6. Ditto 2nd level floor plan but extend the detectable to all areas accessible that are flush with the parking spaces. DITTO NOTE 4 FORTH FLOOR PLAN 7. Ditto 3rd floor plan. DITTO NOTE 4 GENERAL COMMENTS 8. All detectable warnings are to be positioned in the accessible route just on the edge of the parking area and are to be compliant with ADAAG, Section 4.29.5. DITTO NOTE 4 9. Provide dimensions of all accessible parking spaces on all floor plans. OK 10. Locate accessible parking signs on all floor plans. DITTO NOTE 2c END OF REVIEW |
| 09/16/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) Add the RND and CDRC Case Numbers to the landscape plans. Provide the plans approved by the DRB and the PDSD Director. Address how the site complies with applicable RND criteria or conditions. |
| 09/16/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Marty Magelli, PE SUBJECT: Plaza Centro Development Package Engineering Resubmittal Review ADDRESS: 345 E CONGRESS ST FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded zone, 040076-2227K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE DATE: September 16, 2010 CASE NUMBER: D10-0022 SUMMARY: The revised development package was submitted for the proposed Plaza Centro improvements. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Development Package including plan sheets, ALTA, truck maneuverability detail, Drainage Statement for Plaza Centro Garage (Martin Magelli, P.E., 8/19/10), revised SWPPP, and partial response letters. The landscaping comments need to be discussed in a meeting so that subsequent submittal may be approvable. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Package until the remaining items are addressed. BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS: 1) Address the remaining base layer comments: a) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.c: Unless not required by Zoning or Rezoning, show all loading zones for future commercial retail structures, and vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, and the design vehicle. b) The recently submitted ALTA sheets may be kept as an engineering supplemental review document for the case file and does not necessarily need to be added to the Development Package as part of the sheets since the pertinent information has been transferred from the ALTA to the Development Package sheets. c) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: For the existing FO line add notation to legend or on planview whether the line will not be excavated after the construction of the building structure per communications with the FO utility. SIGNING & STRIPING SHEET COMMENT: 2) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.3: There are two entrance lanes on the south side -clarify or add signage to prevent traffic conflict for vehicles in right lane wanting to proceed straight when a vehicle in the left lane wants to go right toward the second floor. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.O: Regarding landscape sheets address the remaining comments: a) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.O: On sheets 2 & L-3.1 delineate and label SVT's. Remove any non-conforming tree from SVT at east entrance that falls within SVT. b) Landscaping and associated irrigation will increase potential damage to the foundation of the proposed structure. Per Geotechnical Report, planters and landscaping is not advised adjacent to or near building structures. Either provide additional geotechnical addenda, or show compliance to geotechnical recommendations by adding drain-out systems such as Type 1 scuppers directing runoff away from building structure for any waterharvest area that has ponding potential or irrigation lines. GRADING, PAVING, UTILITIES PLAN / DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS: 4) Address the remaining comments: a) Show the roof drainage arrows to a planview. b) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.E: On a planview sheet, label and identify local vertical benchmark with elevation and datum. c) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: The existing stormdrain pipe crossing south portion of project will need to be extended and may need the stormdrain manhole adjusted so that the pipe is not beneath the proposed stairwell structure. SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL/ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT COMMENTS: 5) DS Sec.2-01.4.2.A: If any type of retention is being proposed to be waived and detention requirements are met using surface basins and/or water harvesting areas, provide referenced Exhibit A section 8 of the phase 1 Environmental Assessment to substantiate subsurface constraints at site that would provide reason for waiving retention. The Environmental Assessment report is needed to be provided to CDRC for resubmittal. The CD that was submitted for the Phase 1 ESA was unreadable. Provide a copy of the report or provide a readable CD. Please provide a revised Development Package plan sheets, Environmental Assessment report or readable CD, ALTA survey, revised Drainage Statement, SWPPP and a complete response letter that addresses all of the remaining comments. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 09/16/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/16/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Plaza Centro Development Package Engineering Resubmittal Review ADDRESS: 345 E CONGRESS ST FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded zone, 040076-2227K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE DATE: September 16, 2010 CASE NUMBER: D10-0022 SUMMARY: The revised development package was submitted for the proposed Plaza Centro improvements. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has reviewed the revised Development Package. PDSD Engineering Division maintains conditional approval and is still awaiting documentation from Fiber Optic communications utility regarding the project; grading permit issuance is pending response by utility. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 09/17/2010 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 17, 2010 Marty Magelli, P.E. Baker and Associates Engineering, Inc. 3561 East Sunrise Drive #225 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D10-0022 Plaza Centro Development Package Dear Marty: The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made per the on-line comments for Engineering , Zoning, Landscape, and ADA, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled blue line COMPLETE SET of the Development Package, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. 1 Copy of SWPPP Report if applicable Additional black line copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your plans to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Plans will not be signed and released until the CDRC office has been notified by PC Addressing that all fees for this plan have been paid. The CDRC office will need this confirmation in writing. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: 318-1930 |