Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0019
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/01/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned or operated property |
| 06/01/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 06/02/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Fire Comments: Fire lane on 23rd to be 20 feet wide between parking spaces. Fire lane signs per IFC Appendix D required instead of paint on road. A Knox or Supra lock box is required on the gate. |
| 06/15/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | CDRC Review Planning and Development Services Dept., Community Planning Review D10-0019, TMM Family Services, 1st submittal Comments Due: 6/29/10 Comments Submitted: 6/14/10 Items reviewed: Development Plan C9-01-29 (RZ06-86): time extension & conditions, 2/13/07 Comments: 1. The plans are conditionally approved, subject to adding keynote 25 on sheet SD-1 2. A resubmittal is not required. Reviewed by: J. Hershenhorn, 6/14/10 F:\Shardir\UPDfiles\Development Review\CASE_REVIEW\CDRC\2010 Cases\D10-0019.doc |
| 06/17/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 April 21, 2010 To: GEORGE E HOLGUIN, AIA ADC WEST, LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: TMM FAMILY SERVICES Development Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0019 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Are you proposing new sewer? If so then obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. The development plan submitted is significantly deficient. Refer to Pima County Development Services “Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements” section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at; http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.pdf Sheet 1: If no new sewer is proposed then include a General Note as follows: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 06/17/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/22/2010 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov> 06/22/2010 7:52 AM >>> Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and recommends approval of this development. It will have no impact on any existing ADOT facilities. Thank you. |
| 06/23/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/23/2010, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: TMM Family Services D10-0019, T14S, R14E, SECTION 20 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on June 01, 2010 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. Provide in the text, in more details, what improvements currently exist and what improvements are being proposed. 2. Provide a drainage exhibit that shows all onsite watersheds and all proposed drainage solutions. 3. Provide a more detailed discussion of the proposed detention/retention basin and the routing and design calculations. Additionally, provide design calculations for all proposed drainage structures and show, on the drainage exhibit, where those structures are. Provide any required cross sections or details. 4. Are there any existing onsite drainage problems that might need to be addressed with this proposed improvement? 5. Show on the drainage exhibit existing spot elevations/contour lines. 6. Address in the text how waterharvesting will be accomplished and show on the drainage exhibit the proposed waterharvesting basins. 7. Show on the drainage exhibit all proposed drainage solutions/structures with all required details (i.e. type, materials, location, size and dimensions, slopes, grades, high and low points, water ponding and slope setback lines, , waterharvesting basins, , cross section locations and details, etc.) that would clarify how the proposed drainage scheme will work. The drainage information shown on the development plan and grading plan will be based on the information provided in the drainage report text and drainage exhibits. 8. Clarify if the detention/retention basin require maintenance access ramp. 9. Address in the report drainage structures maintenance and provide drainage structures maintenance checklist. Development Plan: 1. Complete the D (yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2. 2. Provide the sheet numbers on every sheet. 3. All lettering shall be equivalent to twelve (0.12") point or greater in size as required by D.S. 2-05.2.1.C). Revise plan as needed. 4. List the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project (D.S. 2-05.2.2.A.1.). 5. Add the rezoning case number (i.e. C9-01-29) in the lower corner of the plan (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.7.). 6. List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.11). 7. List the following drainage notes as: a. "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." (D.S. 2-05.2.2.C.1.a.). b. "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan." (D.S. 2-05.2.2.C.1.b.). 8. Add the following note: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0." (D.S. 2-05.2.2.D.). 9. Provide the boundary information as required by (D.S. 2-05.2.3.A.). 10. Verify that there are no existing onsite easements that might conflict with the proposed development (D.S. 2-05.2.3.B). 11. Provide monuments on parcel line corners wherever are needed (D.S. 2-03.2.3.A). 12. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on the City of Tucson Datum (D.S. 2-05.2.3.E.). 13. Provide any existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site if applicable (D.S. 2-05.2.3.F.). 14. Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.1.). 15. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2.). 16. Provide locations and types of drainage structures (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3.). 17. Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.4.). 18. Provide the dimensions of the sight visibility triangles (D.S. 2-05.2.4.I) and (D.S. 2-05.2.4.R). 19. Reference, in Keynote #7, the trash enclosure Standard Detail from Development Standard 6-01.0. and provide the detail as stated in the Keynote #7 (D.S. 2-05.2.4.T.). 20. Show and label all waterharvesting areas. 21. Provide all onsite curb radii. 22. Revise the Development Plan in accordance with the drainage report revisions. Landscape Plan: 1. Ensure that the landscaping within the sight visibility triangles does not obstruct sight 2. Ensure that if landscaping is proposed within the detention/retention basin, it does not obstruct maintenance access if applicable. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report |
| 06/28/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D10-0019 TMM FAMILY SERVICES/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: June 28, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all the street directions on the Location Map. Add Road to Country Club on the Location Map. Add sections to the Location Map. Include title blocks on the lower right hand corner of sheets 1 and 2 per Development Plan requirements. Spell out street of 22nd St. and 23rd St. on sheet 2. |
| 06/28/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Due Date Case Number Project Address June 29, 2010 D10-0019 TMM FAMILY SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Denied, Comments: Case No. D10-0019, TMM FAMILY SERVICE Development Plan; the proposed development plan must show a detail plan demonstrating the inside dimensions of the solid waste container enclosure. Also a general note must be added on the site plan, stating the proposed method for recyclable collection. All containers must be labeled on the plan to clarify the location and use of the solid waste refuse container and the recycle container for the proposed development, as per the Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01.0. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/28/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show slopes for all accessible routes complying with 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI 117.1) Section 403.3. 2. Clarify all ramps shown on site plan with a note and a slope directional arrow. a. Please provide a large sacle detail of all different ramps provided showing compliance with 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI 117.1) Section 405 or 406 and 406.12 or 13 (for detectable warnings as required) depending of the type of ramp. b. Detectable warnings are not required for access to the parking aisle. 3. Delete the concrete walk East of the 3rd accessible parking space and provide a 5' aisle instead. 4. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout. Generic details are not accesptable. Show all critical accessible requirements as per code including dimensions, signage, slopes, accessible route, access to accessible route, all curbs or flush concrete walkways, wheel bumpers and striping. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/29/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained for the 22nd Street landscape border. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific landscape requirements. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3 2) Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border. The screen wall is depicted in front of the landscape border along 23rd Street, but the code requires it to be located behind the border with only minimal encroachment as described above. LUC 3.7.3.2.C 3) Revise the plans to comply with the conditions of rezoning applicable to the project and note the related cases on the plans. Provide a transmittal documenting how all of the conditions are met. 4) The gates are required to be opaque along the 23rd Street frontage. C9-01-29. No other wall openings should be present as the screening requirement is to provide a solid visual barrier. The PDP shows only one gate. Close the unused curb cut. 5) Provide a varied wall alignment per C9-01-29 along 23rd Street. 6) The PDP's and development plans associated with CD9-87-23 and C9-01-29 includes a number of trees along the west property boundary (identified as Cercidium Microphyllum). Trees existing in this location should be retained and additional trees should be added where necessary to comply with the conditions of rezoning. 7) Fix the symbols in the plant legend on sheet LS-1 for accents and groundcovers. 8) Provide a coordinated water harvesting plan per the conditions of rezoning. LUC 3.7.4.3 9) Provide a detail including the refuse enclosure gates. The opening is to be screened per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. |
| 06/29/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D10-0019 TMM Family Services Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 06/29/2010 DUE DATE: 06/29/2010 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 05/31/2011. 2. DS 2-05.2.1.A.D Provide section corners on the location map. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.A.K Provide applicable rezoning case numbers near the lower right corner of all sheets. (C9-87-23 and C9-01-29) Provide a separate letter clearly indicating how all conditions of rezoning have been complied with. Provide elevation drawing of the two sets of gates along 23rd St., clearly indicating how rezoning condition #5 will be meet. The east set of gates does not appear to access anything, clarify. Provide as general notes on the plan all conditions of rezoning, date of approval and case number. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 List the names, addresses, and telephone number of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 List as a general note: "Existing zoning is C-1, P, & R-1." 6. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 This project is in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is C-1 & P." This development plan has been assigned case number D10-0019. List this number near the lower right corner of each sheet. 7. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 List the proposed uses of the property as follows: " General Merchandise Sales "28", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.C and Parking "40", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.12" 8. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R). 9. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.A This site contains six (6) separate parcels therefore you will need to show how the parcels can work as stand alone parcels if sold separately or provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. The provided legal description will be required to be revised. 11. DS 2-05.2.3.A Provide distance and bearings for all property lines. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.B Clearly indicate the location of the zoning line separating the C-1 zone from the P zone on the plan. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 The indicated backup spur south of building A requires a 3' clear area behind the curb. Revise. The single parking space south of building B appears to be blocked by curbing. Revise. Curbing or barriers will be required along side the single parking space and south connecting to the existing curbing in order to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.F clearly indicate the location of the future right of way and future curb location. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.K Clearly indicate with dimensions the width of all pedestrian circulation paths. The pedestrian circulation path cannot be located behind the loading zones. Revise. The handicap access aisle located east of the east handicap parking space is required to be striped. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.N Label the heights and dimensions of all structures. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.P The parking calculations indicate 72 parking spaces required and provided. A count of the parking spaces on the plan indicates 67 sparking spaces provided. A redesign will be required. Along the east side of the parking area clearly indicate the required 2'-6" overhang to prevent damage to walls, etc. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Provide a dimensioned detail of the class one bicycle locker and the class two bicycle rack. 19. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 20. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D10-0019dp.doc |
| 06/29/2010 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 06/30/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approv-Cond | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#225830 June 30, 2010 ADC West Architects and Plan Attn: George Holguin 1670 N Kolb Road, Suite 144 Tucson, Arizona 85715 Dear Mr. Holguin : SUBJECT: TMM Family Services P1210-019 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 15, 2010. It appears that there are possible conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Transformer and pad may be in conflict with new Trash Enclosure. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. ricahrd Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 06/30/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/30/2010 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 30, 2010 George E. Holguin, AIA Arc West LLC 11,100 East Sundance Drive Tucson, Arizona 85749 Subject: D10-0019 TMM Family Services Development Plan Dear George: Your submittal of June 1, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 9 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, PCWWM, Engineering, ADA, ESD, Addressing, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 3 Copies Water Harvesting Plan (Engineering, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (480) 772-4761 dp-resubmittal |
| 06/30/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 06/30/2010 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed |