Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0017
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/01/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned or operated property |
| 06/01/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Fire Comments: Fire Department approved lock box required at gate; please refer to COT amendments to the 2006 IFC, Section 503.6.1 and 503.6.2 for details. Provide the types and quantities of inside and outside hazardous material strorage. Fire walls may be required. Automatic fire sprinklers will be required. Show fire hydrant locations. File lane signs will be required on one way access lane. Refer to 2006 IFC COT Modifications Appendix D for proper verbage and spacing. |
| 06/14/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 June 11, 2010 To: PAUL NZOMO CORONADO ENGINEERING & DEVELOPMENT, INC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: ADDITION TO TUCSON PRECISION PRODUCTS Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0017 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #11 to read as follows: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). The development plan submitted is significantly deficient. Refer to Pima County Development Services “Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements” section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at; http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.pdf This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 06/15/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Precision Products Development Plan (1st Review) D10-0017 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 15, 2010 DUE DATE: June 28, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 26, 2011. 2. This development plan was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site due to a greater than 25% expansion of building area. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.1.H Provide a north arrow and scale on sheet 2, preferably in the upper right hand corner. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Provide the development plan number D10-0017 in the lower right corner of the plan. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 General Note 2, "PROPOSED USE" needs to have a use as stated in the LUC, i.e. GENERAL MANUFACTURING "34", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.5.1.B, F, G AND .H". Make sure to include the Subject to sections. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.B All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 There is a patio area shown along the south side of the existing building that appears to encroach into the parking area access lane (PAAL). Provide a PAAL width dimension at this area so that the minimum width of twenty-four (24) feet can be verified. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.F If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, etc.). 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 There are gates that appear on the most current aerial photos. If these gates exist now and are to remain show them on the plan. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I The required building perimeter yard setback to the east property line could not be verified as a building height was not provided. Once the building height is provided, see comment 15 below, the required building perimeter yard setback can be verified. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K For your information per D.S 2-08.3.1 Portions of certain Land Use Classes which by their nature will not be used for public pedestrian access, such as industrial uses, are not required to have sidewalks constructed in conformance with this Standard, as long as adequate pedestrian refuge areas are provided. That said the sidewalk shown along the east side of the building is not required as long as a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area is provided. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K There is a striped pedestrian circulation shown running south from the south side of the building to a sidewalk that provides connection to the sidewalk along Renaissance Drive. Based on the last approved development plan and D.S. 2-08.4.1 the areas shown striped adjacent to the vehicle parking spaces are required to be sidewalks physically separated from the parking spaces. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation that includes the allowed FAR and proposed FAR, see LUC Section 3.2.11. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide a building height for the proposed building. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N There is a "COVERED LOAD DOCK" shown near the southeast corner of the proposed building. Show the extents of the covered dock and provide the height and dimensions. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Based on the most current aerial photos there is a shade structure located along the south side of the existing building. If this structure exist and is to remain show it on the plan and provide the height and dimensions. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O The total building square footage shown in the loading space calculation does not appear to be correct. Based on the square footage shown under the parking calculation the total should be 59,760. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O For the new loading dock shown at the southeast corner of the proposed building provide dimensions for the loading space size. 20. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The parking spaces calculation is not correct. 105 plus 24 equals 129 provided, shown is 128 and the total shown on the plan is 126. Zoning acknowledges that the minimum number of required vehicle parking spaces is provide, revised the calculation to reflect what is shown on the plan. 21. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Zoning acknowledges that the provided bicycle parking exceeds the required but the calculation is not correct. Based on 126 vehicle parking spaces provided the required number of bicycle parking space is 10. 22. D.S. 2-05.2.4.R Show the required sight-visibility triangles on the plan. 23. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0017 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 06/15/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 15, 2010 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Tuc. Precision Products, 6601 S. Renaissance Dr. Development Plan D010-0017 (First Review) T15S, R13E, Section 15 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. FYI- When a Development Plan is required to be applied for and submitted in lieu of a Site Plan, it's because there are usually special conditions associated with the project, then a Site Plan is no longer applicable. However the Development Plan must still adhere to the minimum standards per the City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-02.0 and No. 2-02.2.0 - Site Plan Content and Specifications. 3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 5. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 6. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. The approach to the refuse enclosure shall avoid any skew when possible. By straitening the approach, the service vehicle would avoid backing up on a curve which would eliminate a possible blind spot. 7. The title information shall include that the development is of the "Amended Plat", etc. Revise as required. 8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 10. All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 12. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 13. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Call out which datum was used on the "Basis of Elevations" and "Bench Mark", i.e. NAVD88 or NGVD29. 14. Provide the book and page and pertinent information for the plat called out in the "Basis of Bearing" information. 15. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 16. Show Development plan number (D10-0017) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 17. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The min. turning radii for the refuse service vehicle is 36' for the inside curve and 50' for the outer curve. Revise as required. Also see comment no. 6. 18. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 19. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 20. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 21. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 22. Per the City of Tucson's record the project is not in a designated flood plain or is not impacted by any regulatory flow. Remove general notes 17, 18 and 19. 23. Complete general note 11. 24. Correct the spelling for the architect's title call-out. 25. Correct the section, township and range information on the location plan. 26. A sump pump will be required at the depressed loading dock for stormwater collection. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan if necessary. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. 5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/6601 S. Renaissance Dr. DP |
| 06/25/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The total number of accessible parking spaces needs to be dispursed throughout the site and not lumped all together in one araea as required by 2006 IBC, Chapter 11, Section 1106.6. 2. In reference to the three accessible parking spaces grouped together and shown on the Site Plan and Detail 3/3, detectable warnings are not required to the access ailses unless the access aisle is part of a marked crossing shown at the two grouped accessible spaces on the West end of the Site. 3. At the accessible route from the existing building to the Renaissance Drive right of way: a. The following route areas will be required by zoning to be a concrete walk: 1. From the sidewalk opf the existing building to the curb face 2. Both areas routed through the parking spaces. b. There will be three areas of the accessible route that crosses the PAAL. These crossings are marked crossings and shall have detectable warnings at each end of the marked crossing located at the edge just prior to entering the PAAL. 4. Please confirm that all slopes for the accessible routes comply with the 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI 117.1) Section 403.3 5. Please provide large scale details of all the different types of parking groups showing all ramps, accessible routes, detectable warnings as required, dimensions, "Van Accesible" spaces and signage loaction. 6. Please provide large scale details of all other ramps not detailed in the parking areas. 7. Please provide a large scale detail of the sign including "Van Accessible" signage. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/28/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Any required storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. LUC 3.7.4.3.A. Revise the plans to include basin landscaping. 2) Revise the landscape plan to include the following calculations: a. Square footage of the site. b. Square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation, if applicable. c. Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees. d. Minimum width and square footage measured from the inside edge of tree planters in vehicular use areas. e. Length and width of landscape borders and number of canopy trees per length. f. Square footage of all street landscape borders and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage. 3) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B. Revise the plans as necessary to make maximum use of storm water runoff. 4) Note 14 on sheet 1 of the landscape plan is contrary to the maintenance requirements of LUC. Plants proposed on the landscape plan will require permanent irrigation. A temporary system is not approved. 5) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c. Revise the plans and details as necessary. Include dimensioons for all tree planting areas. 6) Include the correct address of site on the site and landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B. Use "South Renaissance Dr." 7) Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 8) Identify the symbol used for each species in the landscape plan legend. DS 2-07.2.2 9) We could not verify that the site qualifies for a Native Plant Preservation Exception, based on the photos reviewed. Identify existing vegetation on the site. |
| 06/29/2010 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 29, 2010 Paul Nzomo Coronado Engineering 4007 East Paradise Falls Drive #125 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D10-0017 Tucson Precision Development Plan Dear Paul: Your submittal of May 27, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 7 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, Wastewater, Zoning, Engineering, ADA, Landscape, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 722-5394 dp-resubmittal |
| 06/29/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#225572 June 17, 2010 Dear Paul Nzomo : SUBJECT: Tucson Precision Products D10-0017 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 10, 2010. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. We will however need load plans of the new building to determine if an additional transformer will be required. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Please call the area Designer Jennifer Wojnar at (520) 917-8717, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures Pima County (Email only) cc:J. Wojnar |