Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0013
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/13/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/13/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 04/15/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Due Date Case Number Project Address May 11, 2010 D10-0013 Tucson Water Well Site DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7095 E. Via Rio Pico Comments: APPROVED, Subject to the following condition, General note 30 on the Development plan state: “Refuse collection will not be required at this site”. In view of the proposed land use for a well site on this property. It is understood that there will be no permanent employees at this location. In this case the following notes must be added to the development plan. 1.) The owner shall install and maintain a minimum of two signs that will state “Any refuse materials broth on site by employees or visiting personal must be removed from the property at the time employees or visitors depart from the site”. 2.) A note must also be added stating that, “The owner shall be responsible for the removal and disposal of any on site acumination of refuse”. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/15/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/20/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 04/20/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | D10-0013 Tucson Water Well Site E-028A TAA has reviewed the proposed development plan and has no objection. Respectfully Jordan D. Feld, CM, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org <mailto:jfeld@tucsonairport.org> www.tucsonairport.org <http://www.tucsonairport.org/> (520) 573-5115 office (520) 573-8006 fax |
| 04/30/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D10-0013 TUCSON WATER WELL SITE E-028A/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 28, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all street directions (S and E) on the Location Map. Include the section numbers on the Location Map. Include the legal description on all the Title Blocks. Also, change Range 18 to Range 15. |
| 04/30/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | This is a utility area and is exexpt from accessibility requirements |
| 04/30/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | This is a utility area and is exexpt from accessibility requirements |
| 05/04/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: May 3, 2010 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Equip. Well E-028A, 7095 E. Via Rio Pico. Development Plan D10-0013 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 18 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement.. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Stormwater detention facilities shall be incorporated within all new developments in a balanced basin to the extent necessary to ensure that, at a minimum, the post-development 2-, 10- and 100 year peak discharges from the site will not exceed the pre-development conditions. Per chapter 2.1 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual. 3. The water harvesting basins located on the high side of the site does not seem to satisfy comment no. 2 requirements. Perhaps a different location for the det. basin would work better. 4. Add a general note indicating that the 7' high fence and wall are to be constructed by a separate permit. 5. Edit note no. 2 on sht. 2 to include that the improvement plans generated by Tucson Water shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Services Department for review. 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 7. It appears that the disinfection system enclosure's FFE is at grade. Is this intentional or should the FFE be at 0.67' above FG? Adjust FFE if required. 8. Correct the range number (T-S-R) on the title block of both sheets. 9. Is the dist. of 33.4' shown on the South line of the project boundary correct? Revise as required. 10. Correct general note no. 31 to reflect that the project is an unshaded zone x per FEMA firm panel etc.. 11. Vehicle use area and driveways shall be paved at a min. with double-shot chip seal (requirement #3 below) per L.U.C. -3.3.7.3, Surfacing Requirements. All vehicular use areas shall be surfaced with one (1) of the following materials: 1. Asphaltic concrete. 2. Cement concrete. 3. A penetration treatment of bituminous material and seal coat of bituminous binder and mineral aggregate. 4. Exception. Vehicular use areas for Residential Care Services with four (4) or fewer spaces provided, single- family residential development, mobile home dwellings, and duplexes on individual lots are not required to comply with surfacing requirements. 12. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. Show the limits of the parking area or show the limits of the surface treatment. 13. All easement of record (exist. elec. esmt.) must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 14. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 15. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 16. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line. 17. Show Development plan (D10-0013) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 18. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 19. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. Stormwater detention facilities shall be incorporated within all new developments in a balanced basin to the extent necessary to ensure that, at a minimum, the post-development 2-, 10- and 100 year peak discharges from the site will not exceed the pre-development conditions. Per chapter 2.1 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual. 3. The water harvesting basins located on the high side of the site does not seem to satisfy comment no. 2 requirements. Perhaps a different location for the det. basin would work better. 4. The slopes listed on the Hydrologic Peak Estimator data sheets vary dramatically. The avg. slope of the site is listed in the DS as 3 to 4 percent on sheet 3 under Existing Conditions. Revise peak estimator sheets with the data called out in the DS if applicable. 5. Correct the amount of the existing Q100 listed in the table for concentration point 2E on sht. 4 or is the amount listed correct? 6. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7095 E. Via Rio Pico_Dev |
| 05/04/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Water Well Site Development Plan (1st Review) D10-0013 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 4, 2010 DUE DATE: May 11, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 13, 2011. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 Label the section corners on the location map. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.1.F Provide a reduces-scale map of the entire PAD District on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.1.K Provide the following reference case number in the lower right corner, next to the title block, S99-060. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.1 Revise General Note 1 to show that the "EXISTING ZONING IS PAD 7". 6. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Revise General Note 3 to read "THE PROPOSED USE IS ISTRIBUTION SYSEMT "34", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.11.1.A, .B, AND .D" 7. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Provide a General Note on the plan stating that "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE; SEC. 2.8.4, GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE; SEC.2.8.5, AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ)." 8. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.11 Per LUC Section 2.8.5.8.B.1.b the minimum project site area is five (5) acres. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C Provide the following information for Kolb Road; right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.A Along the south property line there are two (2) "33.4'" dimensions given and the 26' wide driveway totaling 92.8'. The overall property line dimension is shown as 85.00 (R). Please clarify the difference. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.B All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Provide the zoning for the property on the east side of Kolb. The zoning shown for the railroad right-of-way to the north is not correct, it should be labeled "SH". 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 The proposed gravel driveway, vehicle use area and required parking must meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.7.3 Surfacing Requirements. All vehicular use areas shall be surfaced with one (1) of the following materials. a. Asphaltic concrete. b. Cement concrete. c. A penetration treatment of bituminous material and seal coat of bituminous binder and mineral aggregate. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.F If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, etc.). 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G State weather the proposed 15' x 15' electrical easement is public or private. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Once the future curb for Kolb Road is shown, see comment 13, provide a setback dimension from the back of future curb to the proposed "7' HIGH SCREEN WALL" shown along Kolb Road. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M The "MAXIMUM PERMITTED FAR = 2.0" is not correct. Per LUC Section 2.8.5.8.B.1.c the maximum FAR is 0.30. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide a building height for the proposed buildings based on the requirements of LUC Section 2.8.5.11.2. This height is based on the Median Sea Level at the end of the runway. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Per LUC Section 3.3.4 UTILITIES USE GROUP, Distribution System the requirement for vehicle parking spaces is "One (1) space per five hundred (500) sq. ft. GFA, with a minimum of two (2) spaces per facility. That said the provided vehicle parking calculation is not correct. Revise the parking calculation and show the require vehicle parking on the plan. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in D.S. 3-05. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.R Show the required sight-visibility triangles on the plan. 20. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0013 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 05/04/2010 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 05/04/2010 6:39 AM >>> Regional Traffic: Traffic Engineering has no objections or adverse comments on this Submittal. The Development will not affect any ADOT Facilities. Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 05/04/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | |
| 05/05/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D10-0013 Tucson Water Well Site E-028A 5/5/10 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-99-SP-7 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: La Estancia PAD - 7 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an FLD, No Comment (X) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () Resubmittal Required - See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: REVIEWER: JBeall 791-5505 DATE: 5/5/10 |
| 05/11/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The Landscape Section did not receive a response letter or a satisfactory revision to address the previous comment below: Revise the plans to provide a barrier for plant protection per LUC 3.7.2.3.B at (or near) the driveway and a barrier per DS 3-05.2.3.C. to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. |
| 05/11/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 May 11, 2010 To: GARY GRIZZLE THE WLB GROUP Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: TUCSON WATER WELL SITE E-028A Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0013 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Kristin Borer Green, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 05/12/2010 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | |
| 05/12/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/12/2010 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 05/12/2010 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/19/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | This has been approved and a line extension will be required. Thank you! Henrietta Noriega-Office Specialist T.E.P. Design/Build Ph: (520) 917-8709 Fax: (520) 917-8793 Mailstop: DB-103 HNoriega@tep.com |
| 05/19/2010 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 19, 2010 Gary Grizzle The WLB Group 4444 East Broadway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D10-0013 Tucson Water Well Site E-028A Development Plan Dear Gary: Your submittal of April 14, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 5 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-7492 dp-resubmittal |