Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0009
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/11/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/11/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 02/12/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/24/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size DS 2-05.2.1.C. Revise lettering as necessary. 2. This site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval LUC 3.7.1.2.B.1.a. Landscape must be installed and maintained per Case # C12-85-39A 3. The planting plan and layout will include the location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place. Additional planting may be necessary to satisfy previously approved plans. 4. The grading plan has been reviewed by the Landscape / NPPO Section but cannot approve the plan until all Engineering, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed 5. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape & grading plans. |
| 03/01/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Fry's Food & Drug #131 - Fuel Center Development Package (1st Review) D10-0009 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 1, 2010 DUE DATE: March 05, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is February 10, 2011 2. There are vehicle parking areas shown on this plan that have not been paved at this time. These area constitute and expansion of vehicle use area, provide a cumulatively vehicle use area expansion calculation. 3. This development plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the area of expansion only. As no cumulatively building area or vehicle use area expansion calculation were provided additional comments maybe forth coming. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.1 Based on the current Pima County Assessor's information the current owner is SMITHS FOOD KING PROPERTIES INC, please clarify the difference in owners name. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.2.B Provide a brief legal description within the title block. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide the page number and number of pages within the title block on all sheets. Based on the sheet index there should be 55 sheets total, only 13 were submitted, please claify. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet, D10-0009; C9-59-15; C9-59-19; C9-79-68; C10-85-108; C12-85-39A-J. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.4.C Label the section corners on the location map. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7 There are two (2) "ZONING AND LAND USE" one (1) on sheet T and one (1) on sheet GFA1. Although some data is the same and some data, parking calculations, are different provide one (1) set of "ZONING AND LAND USE" data. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.2 List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. The subject to section 3.5.9.2.C as shown under "ZONING AND LAND USE" is not applicable to General Merchandise Sales "31", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.A within a C-2 zone. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note stating that "THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE." 13. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a floor area ration (FAR) calculation that shows the allowed FAR and the proposed FAR, see LUC Section 3.2.11. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.8.A Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B If applicable all existing easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 If applicable show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS& the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a detail for the proposed "NEW VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKIGN STALL" shown on sheet SP. 21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a This comment is based on the vehicle parking space calculation shown on sheet GFA1. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, General Merchandise Sales, One (1) space per two hundred (200) sq. ft. GFA the proposed "CENTER PARKING DEFICIT" -68 SPACE" will required a Board of Adjustment for Variance. The variance will need to be approved prior to approval of this development package. Also the total number of provided vehicle parking spaces may change depending on how comments ? & ? are addressed. 22. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L If applicable all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 23. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The perimeter yard setback shown from the proposed fuel canopy to Swan Road is not shown correctly. Per LUC section 3.2.6.5.B and Table 3.2.6.I ADT of 1,000 or greater the perimeter yard is measured from the back of existing or future curb to the structure. Zoning acknowledges that when the perimeter yard setback is shown correctly it will meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B. 24. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 25. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide a dimension for the existing/proposed pedestrian circulation/accessible path shown from Swan Road adjacent to the fuel center and the connection to the existing Frys building. 26. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R There is a new accessible crosswalk and sidewalk shown near the northwest corner of the existing Fry's building. As there appears to be a wall along the entire north property line please clarify the purposed of the pedestrian circulation/accessible path. 27. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0009 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan & copy of the last approved development plan or site plan. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Fry's Food & Drug #131 - Fuel Center Development Package (1st Review) D10-0009 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 1, 2010 DUE DATE: March 05, 2010 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/04/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | AT SHEETS SP AND C-2 1. Please correlate sheets SP and C-2 to be the same design. Please show all ramps, detectable warnings and island cut areas on SP. 2. At the most Southerly marked crossing: a. The south end of this crossing is reference by note 12 to COT 207. Detail 207 is for COT DOT use only and is strictly for accessibility in the public right of way. Please change reference to read ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Sections 406.12 and/or 406.14. Redesign all ramps with this reference to meet the ICC (ANSI) requirements. The detectable warning need be only 2' deep in the direction of travel. Where is the ramp taking the sidewalk down to be flush with the pavement? 3. At the most northerly marked crossing: a. This crossing is an extremely long crossing and directs physcially impared persons across an area at the end of the canopy where vehicle traffic is not direct and may be helter skelter creating a extra hazardous crossing area at this location. b. Please provide a crossing island at the North end of the canopy in the middle of the shown marked crossing, to be as long as the canopy is wide. It may be flush with raised concrete curbs or raised as desired . If raised, please provide all required sidewalk/curb ramps. Insure that all required detectable warnings are in place regardless of elevation. 4. Where the new accessible route is connected to the existing accessible route to the main store entrance, there is no marked crossing at the PAAL in front of the store. Please provide a new marked crossing as required by section 406.12 and/or 406.14. Provide all required ramps and detectable warnings. 5. At the new marked crossing indicated at the North West corner of the Fry's building, for both ends of the crossing, please provide required sidewalk and/or curb ramps, proper slopes and detectable warnings as required by Sections 406.12 and 406.14. SHEET DP-1 6. At detail 7, please provide accessible parking plan exactly as design on the sheets SP and C-2. Gernic details are not acceptable. GENERAL COMMENTS 7. Please provide large scale details of each different ramp and or landing access ends and accessible parking layouts showing all critical accessibile requirements, slopes, dimensions, curbs, detectable warnings and access to the accessible route. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/11/2010 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | March 11, 2010 D10-0009 Fry's Food & Drug Fuel Center Development Plan and Grading Plan: 1. The proposed development plan shows a monument sign located in the right-of-way for Swan Road. A temporary revocable easement will be required for this sign. 2. Show sight visibility triangles for the proposed and existing driveways. The proposed sign must be outside of the SVTs. 3. Label PAAL widths and dimensions of other existing and proposed features such as landscape islands and parking spaces. 4. Show how all new landscape areas will be designed and constructed to maximize water harvesting. Include curb openings and depressed planting areas. Drainage Statement 5. Provide a discussion in the drainage statement indicating the existing volume of the "detention basin" and the proposed volume. Discuss how the effective detention volume will be maintained. If necessary, show how the discharge locations will be elevated to restore the volume displaced by the fuel center and kiosk. 6. Address the design criteria for the drywell shown on sheet C-2. Specifically address all of the criteria in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and in the Retention Detention Manual. Clearly show how gasoline and oil spills will be prevented from entering the drywell system. 7. Provide complete specifications for the drywell system including the size of the collector chamber. |
| 03/11/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | March 11, 2010 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D10-0009 PROJECT NAME: Fry's Fuel Station # 131 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2480 N Swan Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The COT Transportation Access Management Guidelines 5.4 requires a minimum driveway separation of 80' along any major-street and route such as Swan Road. The separation of Water Street and the fuel center driveway is less then 80' therefore the fuel center driveway will be restricted to a right-in/right-out entry (restricting left-in/left-out). To prevent left-in/left-out movements a 4' median (with left turn bays) is required from Water Street to the main driveway entrance into the Fry's Shopping complex. 3. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. 4. Schematically illustrate the recommended off site improvements on the development plan. Final dimensions for all off site improvements will be illustrated on the PIA plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/16/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | March 16, 2010 To: METRO ARCHITECTURE BILL BURKE Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: FRY'S FOOD & DRUG STORE NO 131 FUEL CENTER Development Plan- 1st Submittal D10-0009 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD).This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. |
| 03/17/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 17, 2010 Bill Burke Metro Architecture, LLC 4501 N. 22nd St # 100 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Subject: D10-0009 Fry's Food & Drug Fuel Station # 131 Development Package Dear Bill: Your submittal of February 11, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 6 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Package (Landscape, Zoning, Zoning HC, Engineering, Traffic, PDSD) 2 Copies Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Last approved DP or Site Plan (Zoning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 532-7287 |