Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0001
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/12/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 01/13/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Fire Comments: Automatic fire sprinklers are required due to distance from fire hydrant. A new hydrant may be provided instead per IFC 508.5.1 as amended. |
| 01/28/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 01/28/2010, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Geo-Wrap Solutions D10-0001, T13S, R14E, SECTION 32 Ref. S07-082 RECEIVED: Development Plan and Landscape Plan on January 12, 2010 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: The proposed work appears to be at least 25% expansion of what is existing. Consequently any existing drainage problem needs to be taken care of with this project. The "Drainage Notes" provided on the Development Plan are not sufficient. Provide a drainage statement that addresses offsite and onsite drainage impact on the proposed development and any possible existing drainage concerns that need to be resolved with this project. The Drainage Statement will also address roof drainage and water harvesting. Clarify how roof drainage will be directed towards waterharvesting basins. Design calculations for all proposed erosion control pads and sidewalk scuppers must be provided. Development Plan: 1. (D.S. 2-05.2.1G.) The following title block information is to be provided, preferably in the lower right corner of the sheet: a. The proposed name of the project or, if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name or the property address. b. A brief legal description. 2. (D.S. 2-05.2.1K.) Applicable rezoning, annexation, or subdivision case numbers should be listed in the lower right corner, next to the title block. 3. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2.) Place the D[YR]-__ file numbers in the lower right corner of the plan or in that vicinity. 4. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.7) If the property is subject to annexation requirements, provide the Planning Department's applicable C9-__-__ or C15-__-__ annexation file number, preferably in the lower right corner of the plan. Also list the conditions of development as a note. 5. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.C.2.a) "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations. 6. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.C.2.b) A floodplain use permit and finished floor elevation certificate are required. 7. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.A) Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. Additionally, provide a tie between the basis of bearing and one of the parcel corners. 8. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.B) All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. 9. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.C) The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving and curbs. 10. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.D) The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. 11. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.F) Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. 12. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.I) It appears that the 100-year flood limits are shown incorrectly. Additionally, the datum used for the water surface elevations shall be the same datum used for the ground and building finished floor elevation. If the FIRM's use a different datum, provide the conversion equation. 13. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3.) If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. Provide the P.A.A.L. width and back up spurs where needed. 14. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.G.) All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 15. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.) A drainage statement is required for this project. It shall include the following information, which shall also be shown on the Development Plan: a. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2.) Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction (including roof drainage direction), and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow. b. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H 3.) Provide locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings and pipe culverts, sidewalk scuppers, roof drains, erosion control pads, etc. c. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H 4.) Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage. d. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H 6.) Provide the 100-year runoff amount and the 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more. e. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H 7.) Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points. 16. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.I.) All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain and zoning will be shown. 17. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.K.) Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. 18. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.L) Show existing sidewalks along abutting right-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled. Provide the width of the sidewalks and wheelchair ramps with truncated domes where applicable. 19. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.R) Show sight visibility triangles correctly. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section 20. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.T) It appears that the proposed location of the dumpster is inaccessible. Revise the location or the approach angle. Replacing the existing driveway aprons with curb returns may also help. 21. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.V.) Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 22. Provide the curb return radii where applicable. 23. Verify compliance with the Annexation Conditions. Landscape Plan: 1. Show the sight visibility triangles correctly on the Landscape Plan 2. Address Landscape Review comments satisfactorily. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report |
| 02/01/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: GEO-WRAP Solutions Development Plan (1st Review) D10-0001 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 1, 2010 DUE DATE: February 11, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 11, 2011. 2. This development plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site due to a greater than 25% expansion of building area. 3. Clarify what sheet 2 of 2 is for. 4. Remove the "T09CM01396" number from the plan as this permit has been "NUMBER VOIDED/WITHDRAWN" 5. Provide documentation, last approved site plan, that shows that all shade structures including from covered patio were permitted. 6. A separate demolition permit is required for the shed that is shown to be removed. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.1.G Provide the following information within the title block, preferably in the lower right corner of the sheet; the proposed name of the project or, if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name or the property address, a brief legal description. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.1.K Provide the re-zoning case number C9-77-74 in the lower right corner next to the title block. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.2.A.1 List the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project on the development plan. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Place the D10-0001 development plan number in the lower right corner next to the title block. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Under the use add the development designator "29". 12. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Provide a general note stating that "THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE." 13. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B If applicable show All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way (ROW) adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Also label Ft. Lowell Road as an MS&R. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.B The existing "R2" zoning show for the parcel located south of this project is not correct. This zoning should be listed as R-1. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said demonstrate on the plan how this Development Standard has been met. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 A back up spur is required at the west end of the PAAL see D.S. 3-05.2.2.D and Figure 2 for requirements. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.F Until the existing ROW information is provided, see comment 14, zoning cannot verify if future ROW issues exist. Additional comments may be forth coming. 20. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G If applicable show all proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 21. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Provide building perimeter yard setback dimensions for all structures, buildings and shade structures, on site. See LUC Sections 3.2.6.4 & 3.2.6.5 for perimeter yard setback requirements. 22. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Based on the most current aerial photos it does not appear that the existing shade structures will meet the required setbacks to the R-1 zoned parcel to the south. 23. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K The proposed striped crosswalk from the accessible access isle to the street sidewalk needs to run perpendicular to the PAAL. Zoning recommends that the accessible access isle and parking space be moved to the west so that the crosswalk is perpendicular to the PAAL. 24. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K The striped area shown in what appears to be a landscape area is required to be a sidewalk. 25. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Clearly indicate how the pedestrian circulation works under the front patio. 26. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Under the "PARKING CALCULATIONS & BLDG. COVERAGE" there is a square footage of 2,290 and under "EXPANSION CALCULATION" there is a square footage of 2,165; clarify which square footage is correct. 27. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N On the drawing, show the locations and footprints of all structures. Label the heights and dimensions. 28. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N The footprint shown on the plan for the "EXIST. STORAGE SHED TO BE REMOVED" does not match what is shown on the current aerial photos, clarify. 29. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Demonstrate the maneuvering area for the proposed loading space. 30. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Provide a loading space calculation that includes the number required and provided on the plan. 31. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. 32. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. 33. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. 34. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. 35. D.S. 2-05.2.4.R Show sight visibility triangles on the plan. 36. D.S. 2-05.2.4.T Demonstrate the maneuvering area for the proposed refuse collection area. 37. D.S. 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. 38. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0001 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan & copy of the last approved development plan or site plan. |
| 02/04/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Move the accessible parking space to the West so as to provide a 90 degree angle marked crossing to the Ft. Lowell pedestrian right of way. 2. Please provide a large scale detail of accessible parking layouts, marked crossing, detectable warnings and ramps. Show all critical accessible dimensions, slopes and signage necessary for code compliance. 3. Please provide detectable warnings strips at both ends of the marked crossing as per ICC (ANSI), Sections 406.12 and 406.13. 4. If the accessible aisle is flush with the concrete accessible route, please indicate so. If it is not flush and has a 6" high curb, please provide a curb ramp as per Sections 405 and/or 406. 5. Please insure that the slopes for all new and existing accessible routes comply with ICC (ANSI), Section 403.3. END OF REVIEW |
| 02/10/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4. Dimension landscape borders, future and existing right of ways 2. Indicate all Sight Visibility Triangles on the site and landscape plans. 3. A 10' interior landscape border is required along site boundaries of the adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 4. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape borders per LUC 3.7.2.4. 5. A 30" continuous screen along entire street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Show detail how Ocotillo fence will provide screening 6. A 5' screen is required for adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 7. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 8. Additional comments may apply. |
| 02/16/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | The COT Transportation Access Management Guidelines 5.4 requires a minimum driveway separation of 80' along any major-street and route such as Fort Lowell, therefore the existing access points need to be revised. The existing western most access driveway needs to be eliminated. Revise the plans to close the existing curb cut. |
| 02/23/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 23, 2010 To: STEVE CORRALES ENGINEERING CORP. CHARLES CORRALES Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: GEO-WRAP SOLUTIONS (2820 E FORT LOWELL) Development Plan- 1st Submittal D10-0001 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD).This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. 3. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). 4. Sheet 1: If no new sewer is proposed then add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. 5. Sheet 1: If new sewer is proposed then add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 6. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 7. Sheet 1: Show the IMS #'s for all of the existing public manholes on plan and include the rim and invert elevations. 8. Sheet 1: Call out the sewer line shown on site as existing and private. Also call out the size/slope and length of the BCS on site. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. |
| 02/23/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 23, 2010 Charles Corrales Steve Corrales Engineering Corporation 1008 W. St. Mary's Road Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: D10-0001 Geo-Wrap Solutions Development Plan Dear Charles: Your submittal of January 11, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 8 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, Engineering, Zoning, HC Site, Landscape, Traffic, Wastewater, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Last Approved DP or Site Plan/Documentation (Zoning, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check $50.00 made out to "Pima County Treasurer" (Wastewater Fees) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 622-2554 |