Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0040
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/04/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 4, 2010 To: SCOTT D JACKSON P & R ARCHITECTS Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: SHOPS AT FRY'S #138 Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D09-040 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2nd Request. Show the length of the existing 6” stubout and call it out as private. No part of the 6” BCS should be called out as public including the section in the ROW. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 08/04/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned or operated property |
| 08/12/2010 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0040 Fry's Store 138 Remodel () Tentative Plat (X) Revised Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-90-8 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan, (Campus Farm Subarea) GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: August 31, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan (X) Other (Rezoning Condition # 14 - compliance documentation) REVIEWER: msp 791-5505 Date 8/12/10 Department of Planning and Development Service Planning Comments D09-0040 Fry's Store 138 Remodel August 12, 2010 Community planning staff offers the following comments: 1. As previously requested, rezoning condition #14, requires the applicant to notify and offer to meet with affected neighborhood associations and property owners. Since the previous review, staff has provided you with names and addresses of affected property owners and registered neighborhood associations. Please provide documentation (letter/mailing) of notice and/or any other form of offering to meet and if a meeting/calls were made, provide minutes/discussion notes. |
| 08/17/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: August 17, 2010 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Fry's Store 138 remodel, 4036 N. 1st Ave. Development Plan D09-0040 (Second Review) T13S, R14E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. The future right-of-way width for Roger Rd. is 100.0', 50.0' on each side of the centerline. The future face of curb for a future 100.0' R/W is 11.0' from the property line. This is where the stem side and through side of the future SVT at the ingress/egress intersect and shall be also shown on the site plan. Revise as required. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 4. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. Show the length and width of the back-up areas, the turning radii for the loading zone and refuse service vehicles. The access to the refuse enclosure cannot be shared with the new loading zone. Also the outside radius is 50' with an inside radius of 36' for the service vehicle to turn in combination of the maximum "back-up" distance of 40' to exit the site. 5. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. See comment no. 4. The access to the enclosure cannot be shared with the loading zone. Drainage Statement: 1. The DS has been accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/4036 N. 1ST Ave DP 2.doc |
| 08/23/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: " If the expansion is less than 25%, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. " If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. 2. Provide expansion calculations on the site plan. If expansion is less than 25% the proposed landscape area (for expansion only) along Rodger road will need to meet current code requirements. 3. Identify screening elements on the landscape plan 4. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 5. All new landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting DS 10-03 6. Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. 7. Additional comments may apply |
| 08/23/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D09-0040 FRY’S STORE 138 REMODEL/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: August 19, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. On the final development plan add “Block A of Resubdivision of Prima Vista Addition MP 12/62” to all Title Blocks. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 08/26/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/27/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Due Date Case Number Project Address August 31, 2010 D09-0040 FRY’S STORE 138 REMODEL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Date: August 27, 2010 Comments: The FRY’S STORE 138 REMODEL Development Plan, Case No. D09-0040, meets the requirements of the Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01.0 an therefore, is here Approved. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/31/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D09-0040 Fry's Store 138 Remodel Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 08/31/2010 DUE DATE: 08/31/2010 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 06/07/2011. 2. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide dimensions for all PAALs (parking area access lanes). Minimum width for a two way PAAL is 24'. The area near the north loading zone appears to be less than the required 24'. Provide dimension for the PAAL between the parking spaces along the east side of the building, now is dimensioned as 23.67, minimum 24' required. 3. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area (minimum 4' clear). For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. 4. Provide the allowed and provided FAR (Floor Area Ratio) calculations for the entire shopping center. 5. Provide building expansion calculations. Area of building added (10,532) divided by the existing building area (74,176) equals the building area expansion in percentage (14%). Add this calculation as a note on the plans. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.O Provide calculations for the entire shopping center for the number of required and provided loading zones. The indicated 21X35 loading zone is indicated as using parking spaces, this is not allowed. Remove striping. Clearly indicate with a rectangle the required 12X35 loading space and maneuvering in and out of this space. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please add a note on the plans stating such. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D09-0040dp.doc |
| 09/01/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 1, 2010 Scott D. Jackson P&R Architects 4527 N. 16th St. # 200 Tucson, Arizona 85016 Subject: D09-0040 Fry's Food Store 138 Remodel Development Plan Dear Scott: Your submittal of December 14, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 7 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Planning, Engineering, Addressing, Landscape, Zoning, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Planning, Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Rezoning Condition #14 Compliance Documentation (Planning, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $39.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: |