Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0040
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/09/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/09/2010 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/17/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 17, 2010 CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Paul Machado Engineering Division SUBJECT: Fry's Store 138 remodel, 4036 N. 1st Ave. Development Plan D09-0040 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please provide North arrow and scale per D.S. 2-02.2.1. 2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 3. FYI - When a Development Plan is required to be applied for and submitted in lieu of a Site Plan, it's because there are usually special conditions associated with the project, hence a Site Plan is no longer applicable. However the Development Plan must still adhere to the minimum standards per the City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-02.0 and No. 2-02.2.0 - Site Plan Content and Specifications. 4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. It appears from the site plan that a lot split or reconfigure of the property is planned and must be completed/approved prior to the approval of the DP. Contact the CDRC office for complete details. 5. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. If the parcel will not be split or reconfigured (see comment 4), bearings and distances shall be shown on the existing property corners. 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 7. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 8. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. Show the length and width of the back-up areas for the loading zone and for the refuse service vehicle. 9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 10. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 11. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 13. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Show which datum was used, i.e. NAVD88 or NGVD29. 14. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 15. Show Development plan number (D09-0040) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 16. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. See comment no. 8. 17. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 18. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 19. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 20. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 21. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 22. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 23. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site/dev. plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. Revise any references in the DS from the future FIRM panels, "L" series, to the existing "K" panels. Although there is no change in the flood plain designations on the FIRM panels, the "L" series have not been officially accepted. 3. Include a statement in the DS that you have reviewed and agree to data from the previous site plan by Great Basin Engineering. 4. Check the spelling on section IV of the DS. It appears it should be "floor" instead of "flood". 5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/4036 N. 1ST Ave DP.doc |
| 06/23/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 June 22, 2010 To: SCOTT D JACKSON P & R ARCHITECTS Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: SHOPS AT FRY'S #138 Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D09-040 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. This plan is missing all of the General and Permitting Wastewater Notes required. Refer to Pima County Development Services “Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements” section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at; http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.pdf Sheet 1: Show symbols in the legend for all of the sewer elements in plan including both existing and proposed. Sheet 3: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. Sheet 3: Call out the construction plan #’s for the existing public sewer lines in Roger Rd. Show both the 8” line and the 30” line. Sheet 3: Call out the IMS #’s with rim and invert elevations for all of the existing public manholes shown on plan. Sheet 3: Show the slope and length of pipes between cleanouts and call out the rim and invert elevations for all of the private cleanouts shown on plan. Sheet 3: Please explain why the proposed connection to sewer is not to the existing private sewer on site. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 06/23/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/30/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout showing compliance with 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1). Please show all slopes, dimensions, "Van Accessible" parking space, signage, accessible route, ramps as required and detectable warnings as required. a. What is the marked side aisle next to a regular parking space. Is this to be another accessible parkings space? b. Please provide a large scale detail of the signage including a "Van Accessible" sign. 2. Please provide an accessible route connecting all the accessible parking spaces. Please reference zoning requirements for finishes and width. (concrete and 4' wide minimum) 3. The marked crossing does not comply with ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 406.12 and 406.14. The parking asile is extended out into the PAAL therefore reducing the PAAL width and not providing a safe accessible transition area prior to entering the vehicle hazard area. a. Provide a center accessible route in the middle of the accessible parking spaces and extend East through the landscape island, directly accross the access PAAL and to the concrete walk (accessible route) adjacent to the building. Provide all concrete ramps and detectable warning strips as required by 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 4076.12 and 406.14. b. Zoning will require the center lane accessible route to be 4' wide and made of concrete. Reference zoning comments. 4. At the South end of the marked crossing from the building to the parking island, provide a minimum of 5' x 5' square turning area at the island's end and provide detectable warning strips at both the North side and West side of the square just prior to entering the PAAL. Insure a curb surround except at the access ways to both crossings. 5. At the West end of the marked crossing traversing the 36' wide access driveway, provide a minimum of 5' x 5' square turning area at the island's end and provide a detectable warning strip at the East side of the square just prior to entering the PAAL. Insure a curb surround except at the access way to the crossing. 6. For both details B and C/C02 the flared wings of the ramp can slope no more than 1:10. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/06/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Due Date Case Number Project Address July 7, 2010 D09-0040 FRY’S STORE REMODEL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DENIED, Comments: Case No. D09-0040, FRY’S STORE REMODEL Development Plan; the proposed development plan must show a detail plan demonstrating the inside dimensions of the solid waste container enclosure per the dimensions as per the Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01.0. Also a general note must be added on the site plan, stating the proposed method for recyclable collection. All containers must be labeled on the plan to clarify the location and use of the solid waste refuse container and the recycle container for the proposed development, as per the Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01.0. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/07/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#225826 June 30, 2010 P & R Architects Attn: Scott Jackson 4527 N 16th Street Suite 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Dear Mr. Jackson : SUBJECT: Fry’s Store 138 Remodel D09-0040 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 8, 2010. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Jennifer Crawford at (520) 917-8708. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) J. Crawford, Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/07/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D09-0040 Fry's Store 138 Remodel Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 07/07/2010 DUE DATE: 07/07/2010 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 06/07/2011. 2. This project has been submitted as a Development Plan. A separate submittal will be required for the grading plan. Please remove the grading plan from the Development Plan submittal. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.D Provide on the location map the township, range, and section. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 List the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 The correct zoning of this parcel is C-1 and P. Revise general note #1. 6. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 List the proposed use as follows: "General Merchandise Sales "28", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.C" 7. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a note stating the following: "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone." 8. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 This project is operating in conjunction with the entire shopping center. List the square footage and acreage for the entire site. 9. DS 2-05.2.3.B Provide the recording docket and page information for the indicated 15' water easement. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.A Prior to approval of the development plan a lot split application must be processed and approved. A separate application, fees, review, and approval by DSD is required for the lot split. If the lot split has been processed and approved by DSD, submit copies of the approved survey drawing along with the recorded legal descriptions (with docket and page stamped) with the next submittal. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.B All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right of way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 For clarity purposes remove all existing islands and parking spaces which are to be demolished from sheets DP-02 and DP-03. If required a separate demo plan can be submitted. Provide dimensions for all PAALs (parking area access lanes). Minimum width for a two way PAAL is 24'. Review LUC Sec. 3.3.7-I for PAAL widths with angled parking and provide dimensions for PAALs and parking spaces. Provide the angle for the angled parking spaces in degrees. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.I Provide building setback dimensions. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.K Clearly indicate the widths of all sidewalks, minimum width is 4' clear. A sidewalk is required between a building and a parking space access by a PAAL. Required along the east side of the proposed building. The indicated cross walk at the handicap parking space cannot be located within a PAAL except to cross at 90 degrees. A suggestion would be to move the cross walk north and have it go through the island. The area of the pedestrian circulation path going through the island will be required to be constructed of concrete. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.N On the drawing, show the heights and dimensions of the building footprint. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.P Provide a detail of a standard parking space and handicap parking space. Clearly dimension the location of the wheel stops. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.R Show sight visibility triangles. See engineering comments. 19. Provide FAR (Floor Area Ratio) calculations for the entire shopping center. 20. Provide building expansion calculations. 21. DS 2-05.2.4.O The addition of 10,532 sq. ft. of general merchandise sales requires two (2) 12 x 35 loading zones being provided. Provide calculations for the entire shopping center for the number of required and provided loading zones. The new loading zones must be located within close proximity of the building they serve. 22. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 23. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D09-0040dp.doc |
| 07/07/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D09-0040 FRY’S STORE 138 REMODEL/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: July 6, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include the township, range and section under the Vicinity Map. Include title blocks on the right hand corner of all pages and include all the necessary information per the Development Plan requirements. Delete all the adjacent tax codes. |
| 07/07/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: " If the expansion is less than 25%, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B " If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. Provide expansion calculations. 2. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 3. All new landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting DS 10-03 4. Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. 5. Additional comments may apply |
| 07/08/2010 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0040 Fry's Store 138 Remodel () Tentative Plat (X) Revised Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-90-8 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan, (Campus Farm Subarea) GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: July 7, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-5505 Date 7/1/10 Department of Planning and Development Service Planning Comments D09-0040 Fry's Store 138 Remodel July 1, 2010 Community planning staff offers the following comments: 1. This comment remains unchanged from staff's previous review, please revise development plan to include as a general note the fourteen (14) conditions of rezoning for (C9-90-08) Coulter-First Avenue R-2 to B-1. List the fourteen (14) rezoning conditions (verbatim) as approve by Mayor and Council on January 28, 1991. 2. Please revise development plan, sheet 3 of 3, by adding a new key note using (verbatim) the language in rezoning condition 1.d, to show compliance of parking lot pole lighting with rezoning condition 1.d. New key note is required to address the two existing and/or proposed parking lot pole lights within the parking lot located between the proposed building addition and the neighborhood located to the east of the overall commercial site. 3. Rezoning condition #14, requires the applicant to notify and offer to meet with affected neighborhood associations and property owners a minimum of one week prior to scheduled development review (CDRC) submittals. Please provide documentation(s) of notice and the offer to meet and a summary of any meeting(s) held as part of rezoning condition # 14 requirements. |
| 07/08/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 8, 2010 Scott D. Jackson P&R Architects 4527 N. 16th St. # 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Subject: D09-0040 Fry's Store #138 Remodel Development Plan Dear Scott: Your submittal of December 14, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 9 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Wastewater, Zoning HC, Env Svcs, Addressing, Zoning, Landscape, Planning, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Neighborhood Notification Documentation (Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $100.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: N/A Emailed to Sjackson@prarchitects.com |