Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0040
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a marked crossing from each group of accessible parking spaces to the accessible route of the building door. a. Provide all detectable warnings as per ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Sections 406.12 and 406.14 b. Provide curb cuts trough island as needed. c. Min 4'-0" wide marked crossing 2. Please provide an accessuible route from the accessible entry to the North First Avenue public right of way pedestrian way. 3. Please provide an accesssible route from the accessible entry to the Roger Road public right of way pedestrian way. 4. The original plan for the Fuel Station shows one accessible parking space. Please reinstate this parking space with aisle and access to the Fuel Station Kiosk. END OF REVIEW |
| 01/13/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add relevant previous case numbers on the Development Plan. 2) Identify existing landscape areas to remain (keynote 8). 3) Review the previously approved landscape plans for the site and include landscape restoration with this parking renovation in order to keep the site in compliance with zoning regulations. 4) Ensure that any upgrades to existing parking lot lighting do not disturb exitin landscaping. |
| 01/13/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D09-0040 Fry's Store 138 Remodel Development Plan - Parking revision TRANSMITTAL: 01/13/2010 DUE DATE: 01/13/10 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 12/14/10. 2. Provide copies of all approved development and site plans for this site in order to complete the review of this project. The development plan on line indicates buildings located to the south of the Fry's store. If the approved previous plans do not indicate this area as parking spaces please provide dimensions of all PAALs, angle of the parking spaces, size of the parking spaces for this area. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.K Provide the annexation ordinance number 7199, any previous approved development plan numbers and the assigned development plan number D09-0040, in the lower right corner of all sheets 4. DS 2-05.2.4.A Provide all correct property lines with distance and bearing for each property line. 5. DS 2-05.2.4.K Provide accessible pedestrian circulation paths from all handicap parking spaces to the building including providing the handicap parking space and accessible route to the kiosk for the gas island which was indicated on the last approved site plan provided.. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.P The indicated parking spaces adjacent to the north side of the existing building will require to have wheel stop curbs. This is required in order to prevent vehicles from overhanging the side walk and limiting the width of the side walk to less than 4'. Clearly indicate on the plan with the minimum dimension of 2'-6" from the front of the parking space. 7. Based on changes to this plan and submittal of previous approved plans additional comments may apply. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D09-0040dp.doc |
| 01/14/2010 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 01/20/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 20, 2010 Scott Jackson P+R Architects 4527 N. 16th St. # 200 Tucson, Arizona 857016 Subject: D09-0040 Fry's Store 138 Remodel Development Plan Dear Scott: Your submittal of December 14, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Community Planning, Zoning HC Site, Landscape, Zoning, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Community Planning, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Previously Approved Site and Dev. Plans (Zoning, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) N/A emailed to Sjackson@prarchitects.com |
| 12/14/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/15/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 12/16/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/30/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: December 31, 2009 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Fry's No. 138, 4036 N. 1st Ave Development Plan D09-0040 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. When a Development Plan is required to be applied for and submitted in lieu of a Site Plan, it's because there are usually special conditions associated with the project, then a Site Plan is no longer applicable. However the Development Plan must still adhere to the minimum standards per the City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-02.0 and No. 2-02.2.0 - Site Plan Content and Specifications. 3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 4. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and widths of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 7. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 8. Show the limits of the 100-year water surface elevation for the detention basin per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 9. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 10. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. If both are zero, list the cut and the fill as zero. 11. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. The future right-of-way widths for First Ave. and Roger Rd. are 120' and 100' respectfully. The MS&R Plan is available on line at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/planning/maps/city/msr.pdf 12. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. If applicable. 13. Add the basin maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. Show the detention basin on the DP. 14. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 15. Provide a Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 16. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 17. Show Development plan (D09-0040) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 18. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 19. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 20. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 21. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 22. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. 5. Include the basin maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/4036 N. 1st Ave DP |
| 12/31/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0040 Fry's Store 138 Remodel () Tentative Plat (X) Revised Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-90-8 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan, (Campus Farm Subarea) GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: January 13, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-5505 Date 12/29/09 Department of Planning and Development Service Planning Comments D09-0040 Fry's Store 138 Remodel December 30, 2009 Community planning staff offers the following comments: 1. Please revise development plan to include as a general note the conditions of rezoning for (C9-90-08) Coulter-First Avenue R-2 to B-1. Show the fourteen (14) rezoning conditions verbatim as approve by Mayor and Council on January 28, 1991. 2. Please revise development plan, sheet A1.0, key note #5 to include verbatim rezoning condition # 1.d. 3. Rezoning condition #14, requires the applicant to offer to meet one week prior to CDRC submittal with affected neighborhood association(s) and property owners. Please provide documentation(s) of the offer to meet and a summary of any meeting held as part of your CDRC submittal. 4. Per the City of Tucson Fire Department please revise development plan sheet A1.0, key note #3, to include the following language: Paint existing fire lane curb full length of front and back building and fire lane(s) along the east façade of the building shall provide adjacent to the fire lane double face "no parking fire lane" signs. This requirement is per Development Standard, Appendix D, Section D101 of C.O.T. Amendments to the 2006 IFC. |