Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0039
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#219888 January 4, 2009 Looker & Cappelo Architects Attn: Al and Michelle 2070 E. Southern Avenue Tempe, Arizona 85282 Dear Al or Michelle : SUBJECT: Taco Bell @ Albertson’s El Rio D09-0039 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted December 15, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. ricahrd Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 01/05/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 5, 2010 Al Cappello/Michele Sawko Looker & Capello Architects, Inc. 2070 E Southern Avenue Tempe, Arizona 85282 Subject: D09-0039 Taco Bell @ Albertson's El Rio Plaza Development Package Dear Al & Michele: Your submittal of December 14, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 6 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning HC Site, Wastewater, Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies NPPO Plans (Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised SWPPP (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (480) 968-6571 |
| 12/14/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/15/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 12/15/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | At the marked crossing from the accessible parking aisle, headed West across the PAAL, provide dectectable warnings at the concrete accessible route area just prior to the adjacent asphalt paving vehicle areas as per ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Sections 406.12 and 406.14. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/16/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/22/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December18, 2009 To: AL CAPPELLO LOOKER & CAPPELLO ARCHITECTS INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: TACO BELL @ ALBERTSON'S (EL RIO PLAZA) Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D09-039 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD).This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: All of the General and Permitting Notes for Wastewater are missing. Refer to Pima County Development Services “Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements” section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at web site noted above. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 12/23/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Taco Bell Development Package (1st Review) D09-0039 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 23, 2009 DUE DATE: December 29, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is December14, 2010. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Provide the administrative street address within the title block. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide page number and number of pages within the title block 4. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, D09-0039, adjacent to the tile block on each sheet. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following case numbers D00-0003, C9-82-06 & S98-066, adjacent to the tile block on each sheet. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.1 List as a general note: "Existing zoning is C-1" 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.2 List as a general note the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 List as a general note the existing and proposed use and provide the subject to LUC Section. The proposed use should be listed as "FOOD SERVICE "28", SUBJECT TO: SEC 3.5.4.6.A AND .C." 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b As a general note state that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria, Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone 10. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.d When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. Provide the following for the entire site: Floor area for each building. Floor area ratio (FAR) Vehicle and Bicycle parking calculation - required and provided Loading space calculation - required and provided 11. D.S. 2-01.3.8.A Clarify what the heavy dashed line, with dimensions and bears, is. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.8.A Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Also label Speedway blvd as an "MS&R". 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Provide the zoning for the parcels on the south side of Speedway Blvd. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) dimension from the north corner of the proposed refuse enclosure across the PAAL to the northeast. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation show 28 spaces required and 28 spaces provided but there area only 27 provided on the plan. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The bicycle details shown on sheets 2 & 5 do not match. Zoning recommends that one (1) of the details be removed from the plans. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B the required street perimeter yard setback is measured to the back of curb. Provide a street perimeter yard setback dimension from the building to the curb along Speedway Blvd. 20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Please clarify where the requirement for the "UTILITY TOWER SETBACKS" comes from. 21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide a sidewalk width dimension for the sidewalk shown along the western most vehicle parking spaces. If this sidewalk is less the 6'-6" wheel stops are required for the vehicle parking spaces. 22. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R The striped area between the western vehicle parking spaces is required to be a sidewalk, physically separated from the parking spaces. 23. D.S. 2-01.3.9.W If applicable show the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. 24. Sheet 1 had several references to details on sheet SD10. As there is not a sheet SD10 revise the reference to the correct sheet. 25. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0039 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Taco Bell Grading Plan (1st Review) T09BU01825 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 23, 2009 DUE DATE: December 29, 2009 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/23/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 23, 2009 SUBJECT: Taco Bell Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 1720 W Speedway Blvd, T14S R13E Sec03, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D09-0039 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning Development Services Department has received the proposed development plan package, Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, Inc., 04DEC09) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, Inc., 03DEC09). Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted development plan and Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report and does not recommend approval of the development plan package at this time. This review falls under the policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: HYDROLOGIC/HYDRAULIC REPORT: 1) For future reviews please use the new City of Tucson name of "Planning & Development Services Department" for letters and/or general note references. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PACKAGE: 2) DS Sec.2-01: Verify that the development plan package follows the outline format and requirements within DS Sec.2-01. All requirements within this section must be applied to the site plan and grading plan sheets (i.e. 3x5 space, notes, title block information, references to development plan number, etc.). 3) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan documents to include a 3-inch by 5-inch space in the lower right quadrant on all sheets that shall be reserved for the CDRC approval stamp. This includes the civil sheets, Stormwater exhibit and the landscape plans. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.1: Revise the development plan documents to include the phone number for the primary owner of the site. 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.2: Provide the administrative street address within the title block. Verify that the title block meets the standard template for DS Sec.2-01.3.2 on all sheets. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The Development Plan number (D09-0039) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Provide a General Note on the development plan document for the overlay zone associated with this project. Specifically "LUC Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone." 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.B.2: Remove Drainage Note "C" since floodplain regulations do not apply to this site. A Floodplain Use Permit and elevation certificates are not required for this project. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Verify that all easements are drawn with recordation information; location, width, and purpose of on the development plan documents (specifically keynote #39- sewer easement). A Title Report was not submitted for this project, but is required to verify if additional easements affect this property. Clarify all easements shown as "Private or Public." 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan documents (both Sheet SP1 and Sheet 1 of the civil plan) to label and dimension the existing/future right-of-way width, recordation data, label as a MS&R Route and "existing and/or future," also dimension the width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.F: Revise the development plan documents to label all existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site. Provide a label for the existing catch basins and storm drainage improvements within the right-of-way of Speedway Blvd. Provide the Improvement Plan number for all existing drainage improvements. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan documents to label the far and near side dimensions for the sight visibility triangles that are drawn. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.Q: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project, if applicable. 14) Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way and for the connection of the private storm drains into the public infrastructure. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 15) Part III.A.3 and VIII.J.2: Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of CGP Part VIII.J. The engineer of record and the owner of the property, since known, are required to sign the certification sections prior to SWPPP approval. 16) Part III.D.3: Include a copy of the completed NOI form that will be submitted to ADEQ. The NOI must be signed by the owner prior to SWPPP approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised development plan package, Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report and SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the development plan package, Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report and SWPPP reviews. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning and Development Services |
| 12/29/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | LANDSCAPE SECTION REVIEW D09-0039/T09BU01825 J. Linville 12/29/09 1) Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8.4. Identify on the plans the native plant preservation methodology used to comply with the regulations. LUC 3.8.6.1 2) Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. Show the location of individual plants one (1) gallon or larger in size on the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.a, DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 3) Landscape plans shall include a summary of plants required for mitigation and show plant locations on the landscape plans. Show the total PIP, TOS, required mitigation for each species. DS 2-15.3.4.B 4) Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two (2) years from the date of planting. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 The following issues often affect coverage calculations: The use of vegetation to satisfy the screen requirement is allowed only to provide for alternative treatment and is not in any way meant to imply that the vegetative screen can also be used to meet the landscape requirement. Screening plants are not calculated as part of the 50% vegetative groundcover requirement. 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPLY PENDING ADDITIONAL DETAILED PLANTING AND PLANT PRESERVATION INFORMATION. |