Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0037
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/24/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/25/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 12/11/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | Need to provide for an accessible route and marked crossings from the most Northerly end of the existing concrete walkway to continue North accross the newly developed vehicle entrance islands and continue to pedestrian walkways North. |
| 12/11/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: TPC @ Gateway Center D09-0037 Development Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 11, 2009 DUE DATE: December 24, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 24, 2010. 2. The development plan cannot be approved until the lot split/lot line adjustment has been recorded and fully approved by PDSD. 3. Provide copies of the legal descriptions used for the lot split/lot line adjustment. 4. Sheet 1 of 2, the "REFERENCE SITE PLAN" needs to match what is proposed on sheet 2 of 2. 5. Clarify what is going to happen to the remaining west and southwest parking areas that are being cut off by the proposed curb. 6. Based on the points shown along the new property line and curbing the proposed curb is located on the adjacent parcel. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the D09-0037 development plan number in the lower right corner of the plan. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The provided vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. Based on 210 counted on the site North of Rosewood and 162 counted on the site South of Rosewood, for a total of 372. This said a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines. This said provide wheel stops for the 15 vehicle parking spaces shown along the Southwest property line. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Based on the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided the number of required accessible vehicle parking spaces is not correct. Per IBC Table 1106.1, 301-400, 8 accessible vehicle parking spaces are required. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Based on the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided the number the bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. 8% of 376 = 30 required. 12. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D090037dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 12/16/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a revised Landscape Plan and a Native Plant Preservation Plan or Application for Exception. |
| 12/21/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0037 TPC at Gateway Center 12/21/09 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Revised Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Gateway Center PAD GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: December 24, 2009 ( X ) Resubmittal Required: 1) Please correct parking calculations as they appear incorrect on Sheet 1 of 2; subject lot only shows 162 spaces while plan still indicates 183 spaces. 2) My previous comments indicated that it should be noted that any future development for Lot 5, Block 3 of the Gateway Center will need to show that 182 parking spaces are being used to meet the required parking for 7333 E. Rosewood Street, Lot 2, Block 2. Will this lot be used for any other parking besides Lot 2, Block 2 as Gateway PAD calls for cross access and shared parking? REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 12/21/09 |
| 12/22/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: December 22, 2009 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: TPC @ Gateway, 7340 E. Rosewood Street Development Plan D09-0037 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 08 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. NOTE: Comments nos. 3 through 5 and 7 are site specific. The remainder of the following comments are from the DS 2-02.0 and may not be applicable to your site. 3. What instrument will be used to record the reconfiguring of the lots? The development plan is not a legal document in which to reconfigure the lots previously subdivided by a recorded plat. 4. The DP cannot be approved prior to the legal recordation for reconfiguring the lot lines. Also, the record information for the reconfiguring of the lot lines shall be shown on the development plan. 5. When a Development Plan is required to be submitted in lieu of a Site Plan, it's because there are usually special conditions associated with the project, however the Development Plans must still adhere to the minimum standards per the - City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-02.0 "Site Plan Content and Specifications" 6. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 7. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. If is very difficult to separate the existing lot lines from the proposed reconfigured lot lines. Perhaps adjusting the line thickness would work. 8. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. 9. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 10. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 11. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 12. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 13. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 14. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 15. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 16. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 17. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 18. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP/DP. 19. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 20. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 21. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 22. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 23. Show Development plan number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 24. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 25. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 26. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 27. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 28. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 29. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 30. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 31. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 837-4932 for additional information. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. 5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7340 E Rosewood St. DP |
| 12/23/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 23, 2009 David Tannous A.I.A. GDA Southwest LLC 250 South Craycroft Road, #200 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D09-0037 TPC Gateway Center Development Plan Dear David: Your submittal of November 24, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Zoning HC, Landscape, Community Planning, Engineering, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, Community Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Legal Description Documentation (Zoning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) |
| 12/23/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved |