Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0035
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 11/06/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/09/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/12/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 11/17/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#218452 November 16, 2009 DGA Southwest LLC Attn: Michael Schooler 250 S Craycroft Rd, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Dear Mr. Schooler SUBJECT: Brown Mackey College Parking D09-0035 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 6, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. ricahrd Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 11/17/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D09-0035 BROWN MACKIE COLLEGE PARKING/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 11/17/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: On Final Development Plan delete street directions on sheets 3 and 4. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 11/20/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject request; the site is outside of the airport disclosure area. TAA does not oppose the request. Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org www.tucsonairport.org (520) 573-5115 office (520) 573-8006 fax |
| 11/20/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | November 20, 2009 To: MICHAEL SCHOOLER GROMATZKY DUPREE & ASSOCIATES SOUTHWEST LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: BROWN MACKIE COLLEGE PARKING, LOT 1 BLOCK 7 (AKA: B M C TUCSON PARKING LOT) Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D09-035 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD).This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 11/24/2009 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | PDSD Engineering has no objection or adverse comment to C9-09-14. The 36,000-square foot parcel lies at the northwest corner of Venice Avenue and Bellevue Street. Both streets are local streets with thirty-six feet (36') wide pavement and vertical curbs; right-of-way for both streets is sixty feet (60') wide. There is no sidewalk adjacent to the subject parcel but there is intermittent sidewalk in the vicinity. Construction of sidewalk along the site frontage is indicated on the PDP. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of each street. The nearest major streets (Speedway Boulevard and Swan Road) lie one block south and one block east, respectively. Each of these Arterials has bike lanes and bus route service. Onsite drainage is generally towards the northwest and toward the Belvedere Avenue/Fairmount Street intersection. The site does not lie within a mapped floodplain. The site lies within the Alvernon Wash watershed, a non-designated watershed. Detention is not required. Since the rezoning site is less than one acre in size, threshold retention would not be typically required. However, since the rezoning site is considered as part of the Brown & Mackie development, threshold retention will be required since the development is greater than one acre in size. The retention requirement will be, at a minimum, the difference in runoff volume for the 5-year event from the runoff at the rezoning site. Since the Grant-Alvernon Area Plan encourages the incorporation of water-harvesting into the landscape design, and water harvesting volumes may be used to offset required retention volumes, the use of water harvesting to accomplish threshold retention is encouraged. Water harvesting areas are not considered to be detention/retention basins and are not subject to the typical conditions for detention/retention basins. The PDP indicates construction of water harvesting areas. No rezoning conditions are requested. PDSD Engineering CONDITIONALLY APPROVES D09-0035 & T09BU01655 subject to: Water harvesting depth shall be revised to match drainage report (12" depth). The drainage report and geotechnical engineering report are approved. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development package mylar Sheets 1-8 of 8. Matt Flick, P.E. Planning & Development Services City of Tucson Phone: (520) 837-4931 Fax: (520) 791-4340 Please visit our web site: www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd |
| 11/30/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | November 30, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0035 PROJECT NAME: Brown Mackie College Parking PROJECT ADDRESS: 1201 N Venice Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Handicap ramps shall be required at the intersection of Bellevue St and Venice Avenue at the northwest corner and possibly at the southwest corner to accommodate the additional pedestrian crossing Bellevue St from and to the College and the proposed parking area. Call out curb access ramp on sheet 2 (in keynotes). 3. Street lighting should be considered at this intersection for evening users of the College. Additional coordination with TDOT Street's Division is required to address potential street lighting. 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 5. Schematically illustrate the recommended off site improvements on the development plan. Final dimensions for all off site improvements will be illustrated on the PIA plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/01/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | CASE: D09-0035, BROWN MACKIE COLLEGE PARKING: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NA (There is no sufficient information included in the plan for a precise traffic impact analysis. Therefore, PAG has no comments.) Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: N/A PM Peak: N/A Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 12/04/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 4 DECEMBER 2009 D09-0035/BROWN MACKIE COLLEGE PARKING REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. Provide and identify the Accessible Route throughout the site to all building entrance and exits, parking facilities and public right of ways as per 2006 IBC Section 1104 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 402. 1. Provide spot grades throughout accessible route or otherwise to show slope compliance with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3. B. Verify accessibility to all buildings as required per 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 302 AND 303. C. Provide Accessible Parking as per 2006 IBC, Chapter 11, Section 1106.1 and ICC (ANSI) 17.1, Section 502: 1. As per 2006 IBC, Section 1006.5, one of every six required accessible parking spaces is to be "Van Accessible". Please identify the selected "VAN ACCESSIBLE" parking spaces as required by 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.5 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, SECTION 503 on the site plan. 2. Specific large scale details of all accessible parking groups need to be provided to show accessibility to accessible route, spot grades, and signage: a. Surface slopes for all accessible parking spaces are to be no greater than 1:48, ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 502.5. b. Specific types of ramps need to be shown for each different access to the accessible route as per Sections 405 and 406. 3. Provide large scale details of accessible parking signage including "Van Accessible" added signage. D. Provide all required and necessary Marked Crossings: 1. All accessible parking ramps, private property side walk ramps, curb ramps and raised marked crossing ramps are to comply with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 405 AND 406. Provide larges scale details of each different type showing size of space and aisle signage, accessible route and grade slopes. Provide detectable warnings as per Section 405.2. Please show all details specific to site plan developments layouts and design. Generic details do not show compliance. E. All public right of way accessible requirements are as per COT DOT standards. Reference their comments. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/08/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D09-0035 Brown Mackie College Parking Development Package / Rezoning TRANSMITTAL: 12/08/2009 DUE DATE: 12/09/09 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 11/05/10. 2. Zoning acknowledges that a rezoning is occurring at the same time as this development package. The development plan cannot be approved until the rezoning is completed and all rezoning conditions have been met. 3. DS 2-01.2.6 Provide on the location map the following criteria: a. Locate map in upper right corner of the first sheet. b. Indicate the main cross streets within the section: 1. Venice Av. 2. Bellevue St. 3. Pima St. 4. Columbus Blvd. 4. DS 2-01.3.1 Provide the name, mailing and email address and phone number of the primary owner of the site and the developer of the site. 5. DS 2-01.3.2.D Provide the administrative street address for this site near the title block. 6. DS 2-01.3.3 Provide the case number, D09-0035, and the rezoning case number, C9-09-14, in the lower right corner of each sheet. 7. DS 2-01.3.7.A.3 List the conditions of rezoning on the development plan. 8. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide the required number and type of handicap parking spaces per the IBC. (90 parking spaces requires minimum 3 handicap parking spaces with at least one being a van accessible parking space) Provide a dimensioned detail of a standard and the handicap parking spaces. 9. DS 2-01.3.9.R Show on site accessible pedestrian circulation connecting from the handicap parking spaces to the sidewalk in the right of way. 10. DS2-01.3.9.U Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with rezoning conditions. Provide a separate letter stating how conditions of rezoning have been complied with. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.W If applicable, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D09-0035dp.doc 12/08/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: T09BU01655 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 12/09/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | D09-0035/T09BU01655/C9-09-14 Provide the following information on the designated plans per the Development Package Standard: Development Plan 1) All proposed and existing Walls & Fences: location & layout. 2) All proposed Wall & Fence construction composition. 3) Delineation of basins. 4) Provide sheet numbers for details referenced in keynote 4 on sheet 2. Landscape Plans 1) Identify walls as new or existing. Clarify if they are on or off site. 2) If a new development is using an existing screen on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of a recorded covenant (or wall agreement/easement) locating the required screen(s) on adjacent the property is required. DS 2-03.2.1.A.15 3) Five foot high screening is required along Bellevue and Venice due to residential uses or zoning across the streets. Revise the callout, the plant selection is OK. LUC Table 3.7.2-I Grading Plan 1) Existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites. 2) Basin details: bottom & top elev., weir detail, Q100 in & out, volume, etc. Rezoning The DSD Landscape Section has no object to the rezoning, subject to correction of the above items. |
| 12/10/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/10/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 12/10/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 12/10/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 12/14/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0035 Brown Mackie College Parking 12/3/09 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/09/2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-5505 DATE: 12/2/09 Planning & Development Services Department Community Planning Area Comments D09-0035-Brown Mackie College Parking December 2, 2009 Staff offers the following comments: 1. Please revise development plan to include in the general notes all rezoning conditions (per verbatim), as approved by Mayor and Council on ______________, Ordinance Number________. 2. Per rezoning requirement please revise development plan to comply with onsite lighting requirements. Add a "key" symbol to the appropriate sheet(s) to show location of all onsite light poles (except at perimeters). Add a note to the "Key" symbol that identifies the type of light element as a "full cutoff" light and provide the height of proposed light poles. 3. Per rezoning requirement please revise development plan to identify all onsite perimeter parking lot lighting to be at a maximum height that does not exceed the height of the adjacent existing or proposed perimeter wall. Add a "Key" symbol to the appropriate sheet(s) to show location of perimeter lighting fixtures. 4. Per rezoning requirement please revise development plan to identify pedestrian lighting at the northwest corner and the southwest corner of the Bellevue Street and Venice Avenue intersection. In addition, the applicant shall contact the Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT) to determine if overhead lighting (use of existing pole) is needed at the intersection to provide a safe pedestrian access (night classes) between the off-site parking lot and the Brown Mackie College Campus. 5. Per rezoning requirements please revise development plan to identify pedestrian handicap ramps at the intersection of Bellevue Street and Venice Avenue (northwest and southwest corners of intersection). 6. Per rezoning requirements please add a new and separate sheet to the development plan to address the required Water Harvesting Plan including detail(s). Identify all water harvesting locations at the site including common areas, perimeter buffer areas, and any retention/detention basin(s) and should include the length, width and finished depth of the water harvesting areas, curb openings, raised walkways, use of mulch, and drainage arrows showing runoff routing to each water harvesting area and information on where overflow will be routed. 7. Per rezoning requirements please revise development plan to identify two pedestrian openings/paths that cross the landscape/wall perimeters as links from the parking lot to the street sidewalks, one on the Bellevue Street border and the other on the Venice Avenue border. Openings to be located in the area of the southeast corner of the parking lot. Staff recommends the Venice Avenue opening be located on the east property line, approximately 50 feet north of the southeast corner pin of the parcel. The Bellevue Street opening to be located between the proposed vehicular access lane on Bellevue Street and the parking spaces located east of the entrance fronting Bellevue Street. 8. Per rezoning requirements please revise development plan and/or landscape plan to identify a perimeter wall at a height of no less than three (3) feet along the full length of the eastern and southern perimeters (excluding vehicular access lanes and sight visibility areas). 9. Per rezoning requirements please revise the appropriate sheet(s) to the development plan to provide a detailed drawing to scale, of the proposed walls (3 feet tall) along Bellevue Street and Venice Avenue and the proposed wall (5 feet tall) along the north property line. Also provide a "Key" symbol that states the walls to be graffiti-resistant and incorporates one or more visually, appealing design elements, such as the use of two or more decorative materials like stucco, stone, tile or brick 10. Per rezoning requirements please revise development plan to identify a change in color, texture, and/or material to the surface within the vehicular access entrances at both Bellevue Street and Venice Avenue. This distinguishable material is to provide an identifiable extension of the |
| 12/17/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/18/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 18, 2009 Michael Schooler Gromatzky Dupree & Associates 4811 E GRANT RD #261 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D09-0035 Brown Mackie College Parking Development Package Dear Michael: Your submittal of November 6, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 8 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Package (Addressing, Engineering, Traffic, HC Site, Zoning, Landscape, Community Planning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 881-4390 |