Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0032
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/04/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 49a: (and all othere plans of this area) 1. Please confirm and note on the drawings, that the two existing corners where two new marked crossings attach themselves are in fact, code compliant with all properly sloped curb ramps and detectable warnings. FYI UPDATE 2. Through an interperation from the DOJ, the OEOP has issued a statement that Detectable Warnings at all curb ramps need be only 2' deep. This does not however, include transitional flush areas of access including flush island and median cut throughs. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/09/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: TMC Capital Improvements Development Package (Revision) D09-0032 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 9, 2010 DUE DATE: August 17,2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development package for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. Sheet 4, PARKING INVENTORY, the "TOTAL" line does not appear to reflect the changes shown on the table. Revise the table to reflect all changes. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0032 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 08/11/2010 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/12/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | An appeal has been approved for an ADAAG review. Reference ADA folder |
| 08/12/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0032 REVISION TMC Capital Improvement Phase 8/11/10 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (X) Other - Development Package CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: TMC PAD-16 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 8/17/10 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 11/16/09 (X) No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-5505 DATE: 8/11/10 |
| 08/17/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/17/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Matthew Cawley, PE SUBJECT: TMC Capital Improvement Project Development Package Engineering 3rd Resubmittal ADDRESS: 5301 E Grant Rd FLOODPLAIN STATUS FOR PHASE 1: X-unshaded zone & A zone - contained in channel,1644K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE DATE: August 17, 2010 CASE NUMBER: D09-0032, T09BU01354 SUMMARY: The revised development package was submitted for the proposed TMC Hospital redevelopment improvements. The Grading Permit T09BU01354 was issued early with conditions to the permit. Meetings were held at the counter on 8JUL10. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Development Package including plan sheets, TMC Phase 1 revised Drainage Report Addendum 1 (RBF Engineers, 7/30/10), and revisions letter. All comments reflect the revised Development Plan, revised Grading Plan, revised W.A.S.H./ERR, and revised SWPPP review. Engineering Division does not recommend approval until comments are addressed. BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENT: 1) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: The following comment remains until resolved: As stated in prior comments, should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. TMC is to maintain the new enhanced landscape areas for this project (trails, trees, erosion protection, retaining walls, handrails, and other vegetation) per PAD. Currently the areas are located outside of the TMC property boundary. There are areas that will be located within the public drainageway and other areas in other parcels not owned by TMC. Show the maintenance easements on planview sheets on east and north sides of TMC property lines and on east side of Alamo W.A.S.H. as indicated on sheet 126 and on other sheets. Those areas in the City of Tucson parcel for the drainageway needs to be accepted by TDOT. TDOT may also need to provide acceptance of proposed irrigation along top of bank protection along the Alamo W.A.S.H.; provide copies of TDOT correspondence. Also, the 15-ft electrical easement Dkt 5791 / pg 1012 shows no information regarding abandonment. Clarify that this will be done prior to CofO issuance for the parking structure. (Sheet 9) DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 2) The addendum 1 is acceptable for Phase 1. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENT: 3) It does not appear that the following comment was addressed. Please revise plans, submit geotechnical addenda, and provide response to the following comment: Sheet 123 still shows quite a few plantings proposed adjacent to the new Pediatrics building and near / crossing underground electrical lines. Per Geotechnical Engineering Report, planters and landscaping is not advised adjacent to or near building structures. Either relocate landscaping adjacent to buildings or show compliance to geotechnical recommendations on page 11, section 6.7. This would include adding notes, revising irrigation lines, and revising notes to landscape sheets per all geotechnical report recommendations. Specifically, remove, place non-irrigated xeriscape, or provide additional detail for compliance with geotechnical recommendation for sealed planters. Also, provide acceptance addendum by geotechnical engineer for new sealed planter detail as well as details 6 and 11 on sheet 133 and note 18 on sheet 135. Additional notes may need to be added to sheet 133. GRADING, PAVING, UTILITIES PLAN / DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS: 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Please be aware that CofO's will not be released until TEP abandons the "15' ELEC ESMT" that is in conflict with any proposed structure. 5) DS Sec.10-02.7.4.4: For details 4, 5, & 6 on sheet 62; for detail 7 on sheet 63; for details A, B, C, D, & E, show and label maintenance easement line on these details. - No sheet 62 was provided in resubmittal; clarify whether this was corrected on another sheet. 6) Indicate location of cross section A-A which is called out on sheet 37. 7) Provide the sheet for the temporary signage and traffic control plan. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN COMMENTS: 8) Tucson Code Chap.26 Art.2: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) sheets do not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP sheets according to the remaining comments: a) Provide registrant sealed SWPP Report per local ordinance. b) In SWPP Report, at minimum, one Operator, either the engineer of record or the project manager or owner as listed on the bottom of the second page of the NOI shall sign one of the Operator certifications prior to grading permit issuance. Please note that the remaining signatures from the Operators must be on the SWPPP on the site copy of the SWPPP (exhibit or report) at or before commencement of construction. (Part IV.C.1) c) Provide the following general note on the SWPPP cover sheet: Add note stating a water truck or other temporary water source will be provided for dust control, otherwise explain how wind erosion/dust control will be achieved and provide specific practices. Please provide a revised Development Package plan sheets, copy of revised Drainage Report Addendum 1, copy of any Geotechnical Report Addenda, revised SWPPP sheet & report, any TDOT correspondence, and a response letter for the above comments with the sheet or page that addresses each comment. If you have questions, you are welcome to call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 08/17/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Due Date Case Number Project Address August 17, 2010 D09-0032 TMC PHASE-1, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Date: August 17, 2010 Comments: The TCM Capital Improvement Development Plan, Case No. D09-0032, meets the requirements of the Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01.0 an therefore, is here Approved. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/18/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 18, 2010 Kim Wolfarth, AIA KKE Architects Inc. 177 N. Church Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D09-0032 TMC Capital Improvement Phase I Development Package Rev. Dear Kim: Your submittal of August 3, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 4 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, ADA, Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report Addendum 1 (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report Addenda (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised SWPPP sheet and Report (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 882-0989 |
| 08/18/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES *** REVISED *** August 27, 2010 Kim Wolfarth, AIA KKE Architects Inc. 177 N. Church Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D09-0032 TMC Capital Improvement Phase I Development Package Rev. Dear Kim: Your submittal of August 3, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 6 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, ADA, Engineering, Fire, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report Addendum 1 (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report Addenda (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised SWPPP sheet and Report (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 882-0989 |