Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0032
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2010 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0032 TMC Capital Improvement Phase 1/4/10 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (X) Other - Development Package CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: TMC PAD-16 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 1/5/10 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 11/16/09 (X) No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-5505 DATE: 1/4/10 |
| 01/04/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A letter of appeal for items 4a, 4b and 4c was not found in the resubmittal package. 2. At Sheets 9, 15 and 19 there seems to be some confusion about adding doors across the accessible route at the entrance to the Ambulatory Surgery. Please show consistency between all these sheets. If these doors are to be added, they may not be locked and must meet all requirements for accessibility. Please provide a note to that effect on the drawings. 3. Sheet 15, the Parking Garage: Please provide Detectable Warning Strips separating the vehicle way and the accessible route at levels 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 at all accessible parking areas and extend to the elevator and stair lobby area. This also applies to the exit stairs at the opposite side of the garage. Reference ADAAG Section 4.29.5. 4. There seems to be some confusion concerning the number of 1st level parking garage accessible parking spaces on Sheets 9, 10, 15, 19, 60, 61, and 67. Some sheets show 6 spaces, some sheets show 11 spaces and several sheets do not identify the spaces at all. END OF REVIEW |
| 01/04/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: TMC Capital Improvements Development Package (3rd Review) D09-0032 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 4, 2010 DUE DATE: January 5, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development package for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. Once the DSMR is approved provide on the plan: DSMR Number, Date of Approval, What Was Modified, and any Condition of Approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0032 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 01/05/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Matthew Cawley, PE SUBJECT: TMC Capital Improvement Project Development Package Engineering 2nd Resubmittal Review ADDRESS: 5301 E Grant Rd FLOODPLAIN STATUS FOR PHASE 1: X-unshaded zone & A zone - contained in channel,1644K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE DATE: December 5, 2010 CASE NUMBER: D09-0032, T09BU01354 SUMMARY: The revised development package was submitted for the proposed TMC Hospital redevelopment improvements. Meetings were held 23NOV09, 2DEC09, 10DEC09, and at the counter on 11DEC09. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Development Package including plan sheets, TMC Phase 1 revised Drainage Report (RBF Engineers, 12/17/09), ADEQ diesel fuel container letter 25SEP92, Geotechnical Evaluation (Western Technologies, 8/10/09), comprehensive response letter, and revised W.A.S.H./ERR (Sage Landscaping DEC09). All comments reflect the revised Development Plan, revised Grading Plan, revised W.A.S.H./ERR, and revised SWPPP review. W.A.S.H./Environmental Resource Report is acceptable for Engineering. Retention requirements are waived for this project per geotechnical borings at your request in the drainage report. Engineering Division does not recommend approval until comments 1, 2, 4, 6, & 8 are addressed (call to discuss). BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENT: 1) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: The following comment remains until resolved: As stated in prior comments, should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. TMC is to maintain the new enhanced landscape areas for this project (trails, trees, erosion protection, retaining walls, handrails, and other vegetation) per PAD. Currently the areas are located outside of the TMC property boundary. There are areas that will be located within the public drainageway and other areas in other parcels not owned by TMC. Show the maintenance easements on planview sheets on east and north sides of TMC property lines and on east side of Alamo W.A.S.H. as indicated on sheet 126 and on other sheets. Those areas in the City of Tucson parcel for the drainageway needs to be accepted by TDOT. TDOT may also need to provide acceptance of proposed irrigation along top of bank protection along the Alamo W.A.S.H.; contact TDOT for correspondence. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 2) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.I: Floodplain Use Permit is required for this project for bridges. Submit City of Tucson's Floodplain Use Permit Application with next submittal. 3) DS Sec.10-01.2.2: For proposed subsurface stormdrain system, the following comment will be reviewed by structural reviewer for compliance: Please note that underground building storm drains shall be reviewed by the Structural Engineer of Record to assure that neither the storm drain or the structure will be subject to undue strains or stresses. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENT: 4) Sheet 123 still shows quite a few plantings proposed adjacent to the new Pediatrics building and near / crossing underground electrical lines. Per Geotechnical Engineering Report, planters and landscaping is not advised adjacent to or near building structures. Either relocate landscaping adjacent to buildings or show compliance to geotechnical recommendations on page 11, section 6.7. This would include adding notes, revising irrigation lines, and revising notes to landscape sheets per all geotechnical report recommendations. Specifically, remove, place non-irrigated xeriscape, or provide additional detail for compliance with geotechnical recommendation for sealed planters. Also, provide acceptance addendum by geotechnical engineer for new sealed planter detail as well as details 6 and 11 on sheet 133 and note 18 on sheet 135. Additional notes may need to be added to sheet 133. GRADING, PAVING, UTILITIES PLAN / DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS: 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Please be aware that CofO's will not be released until TEP abandons the "15' ELEC ESMT" that is in conflict with any proposed structure. 6) DS Sec.10-02.7.4.4: For details 4, 5, & 6 on sheet 62; for detail 7 on sheet 63; for details A, B, C, D, & E, show and label maintenance easement line on these details. 7) The following comment will be reviewed by Bob Sherry for compliance: UPC 2006: Revise callouts for type of materials for underground storm drains. Materials that are approved for use under buildings: ABS Schedule 40 DWV with solvent-welded joints or PVC Schedule 40 DWV with solvent-welded joints. Reference: Sections 313.4, 701.0, 718.3, 1101.3, and 1102.3, UPC 2006. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN COMMENTS: 8) Tucson Code Chap.26 Art.2: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) sheets do not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP sheets according to the remaining comments: a) Provide registrant sealed SWPP Report per local ordinance. b) In SWPP Report, at minimum, one Operator, either the engineer of record or the project manager or owner as listed on the bottom of the second page of the NOI shall sign one of the Operator certifications prior to grading permit issuance. Please note that the remaining signatures from the Operators must be on the SWPPP on the site copy of the SWPPP (exhibit or report) at or before commencement of construction. (Part IV.C.1) c) Provide the following general note on the SWPPP cover sheet: Add note stating a water truck or other temporary water source will be provided for dust control, otherwise explain how wind erosion/dust control will be achieved and provide specific practices. It is recommended that a phone call or a meeting be held to go over next resubmittal and how the engineering comments were addressed. Please provide a revised Development Package plan sheets, copy of revised Drainage Report, copy of the revised Geotechnical Report with any Geotechnical Addenda, revised SWPPP sheets/report, TDOT correspondence, and City of Tucson Floodplain Use Permit Application that addresses the comments provided above. Include a response letter with the sheet or page that addresses each comment. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 01/06/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 01/11/2010 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | I reviewed the plans and don't see anything to object to. So no comments this round from Parks. Julie Parizek Project Manager Capital Planning and Development Unit City of Tucson Parks and Recreation 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, AZ 85716 520.837.8042 |
| 01/13/2010 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Environmental Services offers a conditional approval based on the revised sheet 2 of the DP provided in pdf format by Kim Wolfarth. Revision added note referencing " Additional/new solid waste compactor storage area will comply with DS 6-01.5.3 of the revised standards for Solid Waste Disposal requirements" and called out the compactor storage area within the location map of sheet 2. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/14/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 14, 2010 Kim Wolfarth AIA Sears Gerbo Architecture 4539 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D09-0032 TMC Capital Improvement Phase I Development Package Dear Kim: The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made per the online comments, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled blue line COMPLETE SET of the Development Package, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. 1 Rolled blue line set of the Development Package. 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. The extra rolled blue line set that you submit will be delivered to Pima County for permanent recording. Additional blackline copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your plans to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Your printing company will deliver the original rolled blue lines to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 722-5468 |
| 12/18/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/21/2009 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved |