Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0031
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/24/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/07/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1492 Development Package (3rd Review) D09-0031 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 7, 2009 DUE DATE: December 10, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development package for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. There are still easements on the development package with "DKT____ PG____", if these easements are to be abandoned at a later date show them as to be abandoned under separate instrument. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The easements shown on the plan as to be abandoned will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this development package. Provide the recordation information, Docket and Page, on the plan 3. Zoning acknowledges that a Plat will be completed for this project. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E There appears that some type of lot split/lot line realignment is proposed, this will require a subdivision plat and will need to be approved prior to approval of the development package. 4. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0031 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1492 Grading Plan (3rd Review) T09BU01312 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 7, 2009 DUE DATE: December 10, 2010 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the grading plan for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/09/2009 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Landfill Ordinance OK, nothing required for gas per Jeff Drumm. 12/12/09 |
| 12/10/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: December 2, 2009 SUBJECT: QuikTrip #1492 Development Plan Core Review- 3rd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 1425 N Grant Road, T145S R13E Sec03 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Team Review- Elizabeth Leibold, PE; Loren Makus, EIT; and Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D09-0031 (T09BU01312) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Report No. 3 (DOWL Engineers, 22NOV09), Geotechnical Engineering Report (Kleinfelder, 01SEP09) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (DOWL Engineers, 13OCT09). Engineering Division recommends conditional approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the draft policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed prior to final CDRC approval: NEW COMMENT: " Provide a note in the Note Section to state; "Full excavation of the fill material and replacing with clean soils for the area in the SE retention basin is required. Special inspection and field report is required by geotechnical engineer when fill materials have been excavated." DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) Acknowledged. 2) Acknowledged. 3) Complied. 4) Complied. 5) Acknowledged. 6) Complied. 7) Acknowledged. 8) Complied. 9) Acknowledged. 10) Acknowledged. 11) Complied. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 12) Acknowledged. 13) Complied. 14) Complied. 15) Complied. 16) Complied. 17) Complied. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: All easements that are proposed to be abandoned are required to be vacated prior to approval of the development plan documents therefore the easements that are to be abandoned must be removed from the development plan documents for clarity. 19) Complied. 20) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.I: Revise Sheet 6 to provide the Q100 in plan view for the Santa Cruz River. The discharge value for the Santa Cruz Rive was not included in plan view on the development plan documents. 21) Complied: 22) Acknowledged. 23) Complied. 24) Complied. 25) Complied. 26) Acknowledged. 27) Complied. 28) Complied. 29) Complied. 30) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M: Revise detail 8/12 for the grouted riprap slope. Provide the length of the slope protection, toe down design and verify key-in or other method of protection for the top of slope to prevent erosion from undermining the top and bottom of the slope protection. This comment is a maintenance issue and is only a recommendation. 31) Complied. 32) Complied. 33) Complied. 34) Complied. 35) Complied. 36) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise Sheet #6 to provide pad dimensions (length and width) for the proposed riprap pad at the inlet to the "equalizer" pipe between Basins 1 and 2. 37) Complied. 38) Acknowledged. 39) Complied. 40) Complied. 41) Complied. 42) Acknowledged. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 43) Complied: a) Complied. b) Complied. c) Complied. d) Complied. e) Complied. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 44) Complied. 45) Complied. 46) Complied. 47) Complied. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above for final approval through CDRC. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 12/10/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 10, 2009 Richard Cordova DOWL HKM 166 W. Alameda St. Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D09-0031 Quiktrip #1492 Development Package Dear Richard: The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made per Zoning and, Engineering, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled blue line COMPLETE SET of the Development Package, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. 1 Rolled blue line set of the Development Package. 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. The extra rolled blue line set that you submit will be delivered to Pima County for permanent recording. Additional blackline copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your plans to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Your printing company will deliver the original rolled blue lines to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 624-0384 |
| 12/10/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved |