Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0030
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/14/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/14/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 08/17/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 08/18/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/20/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/25/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0030 COSTCO PARKING LOT EXPANSION/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 8/24/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1.) Delete address on all Title Blocks. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 08/25/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 08/21/2009 8:50 AM >>> Regional Traffic No comments from Traffic Engineering on this submittal. The development will not affect any ADOT facilities. Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 08/27/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/01/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Thank you for the opportunity to review this development plan application. Tucson Airport Authority does not oppose the application. Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org www.tucsonairport.org (520) 573-5115 office (520) 573-8006 fax |
| 09/02/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | September 2, 2009 To: MICHAEL D PNIEWSKI WRG DESIGNS Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: COSTCO STORE #407 Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D09-030 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD).This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. |
| 09/04/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0030 Costco Parking Lot Expansion () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-03-05 (amended Dec. 16, 2008) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia-Alamo GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: 9/14/09 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-5505 DATE: 09/03/09 Planning & Development Services Department, Planning Comments D09-0030-Costco Parking Lot Expansion September 3, 2009 Staff offers the following comments: 1. Please revise development plan, landscape plan to comply with rezoning condition 6 of rezoning case C9-03-05, amended September 20, 2008. Rezoning condition number 6 requires canopy trees located within the rezoning boundary to be planted every 20 to 30 feet and averaging not less than every 25 feet. Trees in this border shall be of the species that will grow to a height of 30 feet in five years. 2. Please revise development plan to comply with rezoning condition 8 of rezoning case C9-03-05, amended September 20, 2008. Rezoning condition number 8 requires all outdoor lighting, pole or wall mounted to be directed down and away from residential parcels and be as low in elevation as possible. All outdoor lighting, pole or wall mounted; within two hundred (200) feet of the west property line shall be no higher than 17 feet, measured to the light source. The proposed development plan does not identify location or identify height of existing and of proposed outdoor lighting along the full western edge of the site, at a depth of 200 feet. 3. Please revise development plan, landscape plan to comply with rezoning condition 9 of rezoning case C9-03-05, amended September 20, 2008. Rezoning condition number 9 requires the four existing native mesquite trees, as identified on exhibit-2 of the Environmental Resource Report to be salvaged and transplanted on-site with a drip irrigation system. The landscape plan shall identify the four (4) native mesquites in the landscape matrix and on site location landscape map. The submitted/proposed landscape plan does not address the specific native mesquite trees identified on the ERR, Exhibit-2, by Novak Environmental, Inc. The trees are the four most easterly trees located within the xeroriparian mix area being graded for the expanded parking lot. Please identify these four trees in an aerial Native Plant Preservation, PPO plan and its associated matrix. Also identify the location of each of these four trees in the proposed landscape plan and identify as transplanted native mesquite trees. The April 29, 2003 aerial provided by Novak Environmental Inc, differs from the August 13, 2009 aerial provide by Cardno WRG, as it relates to grubbed/graded areas. If additional grading/grubbing has occurred within the rezoning boundary without approval, and subsequent trees called out by rezoning condition number 9 for transplanting on-site have be damaged or destroyed, then the Native Plant Preservation Plan shall also include mitigation measures to address this issue. 4. As per rezoning condition number 10, please include in the development plan submittal the required agreement between the applicant and the City to convey land either to the City or County to accommodate the Pantano Wash Trail Corridor. |
| 09/08/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/09/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#215744 September 3, 2009 Dear Mr. Priewski : SUBJECT: Costco Parking Lot Expansion D09-0030 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 25, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures Cc: N. DiMaria City of Tucson (Email only) |
| 09/10/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Costco Parking Lot Expansion Development Plan (1st Review) D09-0030 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 10, 2009 DUE DATE: September 14, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 16, 2010. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.1.K Provide the annexation case number C15-09-01 in the lower right corner next to the title block. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Place the D09-0031 development plan number in the lower right corner next to the title block. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Provide a dimension form the vehicle parking spaces shown along the northwest side of the expansion to the proposed wall. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Please clarify the vehicle parking calculation. Based on my count of the additional parking spaces there area 126 spaces being added to the plan. The last approved development plan shows 808 provided, this development plan shows 843 for a difference of 35 spaces. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Once comment 6 has been addressed Zoning will verify the bicycle parking requirements. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.U Per rezoning condition 10 show the required conveyance of land for the trail corridor on the development plan. 8. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0030 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan.. |
| 09/10/2009 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 09/10/2009, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Costco Parking Lot Expansion D09-0030, T13S, R14E, SECTION 36 RECEIVED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement on January 14, 2008 The subject project has been reviewed. The project can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that where made and references the exact location in the drainage report and the development plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. It appears that the ponding depth at SDMH-2 will be more than 0.5'. Determine the depth and show the 100- year ponding limits, water surface elevation and depth on the drainage exhibits. 2. Propose an erosion control structure downstream of the check dam. Provide the design calculations and show the structure, its material, elevations and dimensions on the drainage exhibit.. 3. Show and call out the proposed drainage structures on the drainage exhibits (i.e. the channel between the concrete outfall and the drop structure, swales 30 and 40). 4. Clarify what the check dam outfall worksheet is calculating. Provide a detail if necessary. 5. Provide sizing calculations for the proposed curb openings. 6. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated into the development by conveying surface flow and rooftop drainage to designated water harvesting areas. Please address, in details, how water-harvesting techniques will be incorporated into the development. Refer to the newly adopted City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual for design considerations. Copies of the above-referenced manual can be obtained from the Engineering Counter. Please be advised that for water harvesting purposes, the landscaped areas shall be depressed a maximum of 6". 7. Additional drainage related information might be required with the Grading Plan Development Plan: 1. List the applicable rezoning case number, in the lower right corner, next to the title block (D.S. 2-05.2.1.K.). 2. Complete the D (yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2. 3. It appears that Grant Road right of way is shown incorrectly on Sheet 2 of 6. The full right of way width appears to be shown the half right of way. Revise as necessary (D.S. 2-05.2.3.C.). 4. Show the location of the basis of elevation on the plan. 5. Does the information shown on Sheet 2 of 6 reflect the recent site modifications and additions? 6. Provide all required dimensions on Sections A-A and B-B on Sheet 4 of 6. 7. Show 100-year ponding limits, water surface elevation and depth for SDMH-2 (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.6). 8. Revise the Development Plan according to the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: The Landscape Plan is acceptable pertaining to Engineering. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Drainage Report and Title Report |
| 09/11/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D09-0030, COSTCO PARKING LOT EXPANSION: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 6,716 PM Peak: 681 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 09/14/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Planning and Development Services Landscape Section Review J. Linville 09/14/09 1) Revise the plans to document compliance with conditions 6, 9, 10, and 16 of rezoning case C9-03-05. Provide clarification in the response letter if necessary. 2) Landscape plans shall include a summary of plants required for Native Plant Preservation mitigation and show their site location on the landscape plans. Show the total PIP, TOS, required mitigation for each species. DS 2-15.3.4.B 3) Revise the landscape plan to include the following calculations: a. Square footage of the site. b. Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees (See rezoning condition 16). c. Length and width of landscape borders and number of canopy trees per length (condition 6). |
| 09/14/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | Parks and Recreation Review J. Linville 09/14/09 1) Provide documentation of compliance with rezoning condition 10. Include copies any relevant agreements between the City, the County, and the applicant. |
| 09/15/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 09/18/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/06/2009 | JWILLIA4 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 21, 2009 Michael Peniewski Cardno WRG 9977 N. 90th St. # 350 Tucson, Arizona 85258 Subject: D09-0030 Costco Parking Lot Expansion Development Plan Dear Michael: Your submittal of August 17, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Planning, Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, Parks & Recreation, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Planning, Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, Parks & Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Rezoning Compliance Documentation (Parks & Rec, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 977-8099 |