Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0028
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/11/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
09/21/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | September 18, 2009 To: MARTY MAGELLI BAKER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: THE PLACE AT TANQUE VERDE CREEK Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D09-028 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Signed SSA’s have not yet been received by this office. The development plan will be approved upon receiving the signed SSA’s. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
09/29/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D09-0028 THE PLACE AT TANQUE VERDE CREEK/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 09/28/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change Matchline – See Sheet #3 to #2 on sheet 3. Changed apartments 12103/12203 to 12106/12206 on sheet 2. Building #7 seems to have apartment numbers out of sequence. Is this how they should be numbered? |
09/30/2009 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Laith Alshami, Enginering and Floodplain Review, 09/30/2009, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: The Place at Tanque Verde Creek D09-0028, Ref. S07-082, T14S, R15E, SECTION 02 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on September 11, 2008 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The Drainage Report is acceptable for Development Plan and it is hereby approved. Additional drainage information may be required with the grading plan. The Tentative Plat is recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review. |
10/05/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please note governing accessibility prode for private property is the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI) 117.1 2. Please note governing authority for all accessibility in the public right of way is the City of Tucson, Department of Transportation. 3. Please provide large scale details of all different configurations of accessible parking layouts, curb ramps, side walk ramps, accessible signage and marked crossings showing compliance with ICC (ANSI) 117.1. 4. Pedestriann routes to the dumpster areas are not required to be accessible. Please remove all curb ramps and detectable warnings at these areas and maintain a 6" high concrete curb. 5. Please provide a large scale detail of the connecting ramp to the public right of way at Speedway Blvd. Please show all slopes, landings, railings and critical dimensions. END OF REVIEW |
10/07/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planing and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Place At Tanque Verde Creek Development Plan (2nd Review) D09-0028 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 07, 2009 DUE DATE: October 09, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 15, 2010. 2. Based on the requirements for dedication of property for this project all LUC and Development Standard requirements are based on the property boundaries after the dedications have been completed. Ensure all calculations; setbacks etc. are based on the property after the dedications have been completed. 3. This comment was not fully addressed. The south property line is still shown at the existing location. Show the south property line at the location where it will be after the dedication. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E Based on the note "FUTURE 30' PUBLIC R/W PER MS&RP TO BE DEDICATED BY SEP. INSTR." it appears that dedication of right-of-way (ROW) is proposed. If this is the case show the property line at future location and revise any applicable calculations. The dedication must be completed prior to approval of the development plan. Provide documentation for this dedication. 4. Provide a note on the plan stating "ABANDONMENT OF BONANZA AVENUE PER DKT.___ PG.___. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E Zoning acknowledges that vacation of 45' of ROW (Bonanza Avenue) is proposed. The vacation must be completed prior to approval of the development plan. Provide documentation for the vacation. 5. All future property lines, required dedications, must be shown on the plan as property lines with dimensions and bearings. Provide a note on the plan "(size of area) TO BE DEDICATED PER DKT.____ PG.____. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E Per the annexation conditions show the required dedications for the Tanque Verde Creed Floodway and the north/south drainageway along the eastern portion of the property. Also show the dedication of necessary access points into the Tanque Verde creek along the south bank of the Tanque Verde for open space. Revised any applicable calculations. Provide documentation for this dedication. 6. Based on the future property line shown on Sheet 4 and the adjacent zoning of SR the proposed carports do not meet the required 25' perimeter yard setback. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4, Development Designator "P", Perimeter Yard Indicator "CC" the required perimeter yard is 25'. A setback waiver from the neighboring property owner will be required to maintain the proposed perimeter yard. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I The "9' B.S.L. (CARPORT) setback shown along the west property line zoned SR is not correct. All structures including carports are required to meet LUC Sections 3.2.6.4. The minimum setback adjacent to the SR zone is 25'-0". 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Based on the future property line shown along the east parking area it does not appear that the proposed covered parking meets the required perimeter yard setback. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4, Development Designator "P", Perimeter Yard Indicator "CC" the required perimeter yard is 10' or ¾ the height of the building wall, which ever is greatest. A setback waiver from the neighboring property owner will be required to maintain the proposed perimeter yard. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S 3-05.2.2.B.1 A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. And per D.S. 2-08.4.1.B a sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. This said provide a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge and a minimum 4' sidewalk along the south side of Building #24. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Sheet 3 shows Keynote "D" along the street frontage. This is not correct and should be designated as Keynote "C". 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Sheets 3 & 4 show Keynote "C" along the west property line. This is not correct and should be designated as Keynote "D". 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Sheet 3 shows Keynote "E" within the center vehicle parking area. This is not correct and should be designated as Keynote "F". 12. Revise all calculations to reflect this property once all dedications have been completed. This includes: GROSS LOT AREA, LOT COVERAGE DENSITY CALULATION. 13. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/ D09-0023 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
10/08/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | In-lieu fees are to be paid to the Department of Transportation prior to pulling and/or the issuance of building permit(s). Once TDOT has received payment for the in-lieu fees a notice or letter to PDSD will be provided which will remove the noted restriction from the issuance of building permit(s). To clarify the in-lieu fees are for Speedway Boulevard improvements that are to be constructed on behalf of the developer by TDOT's Speedway Blvd (Camino Seco - Houghton) RTA project. These improvements are located along the frontage of Speedway at 'The Place at Tanque Verde Creek' development. Improvements include curb, sidewalk, and a right turn lane. |
10/09/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Subject to provision of the dedications required by the annexation conditions 7 A-F. |
10/13/2009 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | Comments provided 10/13/09, Andy Steuart, Property Agent, City Mgr. Office/Real Estate Program, (520) 837-6715. Request the following be accomplished before final approaval is provided: 1. A signed "Offer to Exchange" agreement between City and OT Gila, LLC, as referenced in draft document provided to OT Gila, LLC, 9/24/09. 2. Recorded Deeds, Slope Easement, and Drainage Easement instruments for the exchange public R/W (Bonanza Ave.) with proposed R/W, slope easement, drainage easement and temporary construction easements for proposed roadway improvements for Speedway Blvd. 3. Easements retained within the existing Bonanza Ave. corridor for drainage, recreation and sewer line purposes. 4. Provisions for Temporary Construction Easements be provided for proposed improvements to Speedway Blvd. |
10/16/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet 2, In reference to the double wide solid waste enclosure located at the NW corner, the required 14ft x 40ft clear approach is in conflict with the adjacent vertical curb parking island. Recommend either reducing the size of the island or moving the enclosure to the north or a combination of the two in order to demonstrate the clear approach is met. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
10/19/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 19, 2009 Marty Magelli, P.E. Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc. 3561 E. Sunrise Dr. #225 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D09-0028 The Place at Tanque Verde Creek Development Plan Dear Marty: Your submittal of July 15, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, HC Site, Zoning, ENV SVCS, Real Estate, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 318-1930 |