Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0028
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/15/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/16/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 07/17/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/21/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D09-0028 THE PLACE AT TANQUE VERDE CREE: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 2,341 PM Peak: 218 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 07/27/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 07/22/2009 10:31 AM >>> Regional Traffic: No comments from Traffic Engineering on this submittal. The development will not affect any ADOT facilities. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 07/27/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 07/23/2009 7:16 AM >>> A Traffic Engineering & Impact Analysis from Mathieu Engineering was delivered to ADOT Traffic Engineering by Zach Hinman. After a cursory review, this project will not affect any ADOT facilities. ADOT recommends to proceed with the approval of this development/request. Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 07/29/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#214072 July 28, 2009 Baker & Assoc. Engineering Attn: Marty Magelli P.E. 3561 E. Sunrise Dr. #225 Tucson, AZ 85718 To Marty Magelli : SUBJECT: The Place at Tanque Verde Creek D09-0028 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 21, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The customer is responsible for the new trenching to relocate them as well as the relocation cost. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-918-8726 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) N. DiMaria Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/31/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0028 THE PLACE AT TANQUE VERDE CREEK/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/28/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change Unsub. (SW portion of Section 2) to 63-32 on Location Map. Add “See Sheet” to all applicable pages. Label apartment numbers. |
| 08/04/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject development plan (D09-0028) The Place at Tanque Verde Creek 9971 E Speedway Blvd. The site is not within the TIA Public Disclosure Area. The Tucson Airport Authority does not oppose this request. Respectfully, Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org www.tucsonairport.org (520) 573-5115 office (520) 573-8006 fax |
| 08/04/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Place At Tanque Verde Creek Development Plan (1st Review) D09-0028 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 4, 2009 DUE DATE: August 12, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 15, 2010. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the D09-0028 development plan number in the lower right corner of the plan. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Revise General Note 3 to include the LUC Subject to Section 3.5.7.1.F. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a General Note stating that this project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria Section 2.8.3 for the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 It appears that an Environmental Resource Overlay Zone review may be required. See landscape and engineering comments. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C Provide a dimension for the future curb along Speedway Blvd. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.3.D.3 Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.2 a minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between any open structure, such as a carport, and a PAAL. The distance is measured to the closest part of the structure, i.e., a roof overhang. This said the proposed covered parking does not meet this setback requirement. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E Based on the note "FUTURE 30' PUBLIC R/W PER MS&RP TO BE DEDICATED BY SEP. INSTR." it appears that dedication of right-of-way (ROW) is proposed. If this is the case show the property line at future location and revise any applicable calculations. The dedication must be completed prior to approval of the development plan. Provide documentation for this dedication. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E Zoning acknowledges that vacation of 45' of ROW (Bonanza Avenue) is proposed. The vacation must be completed prior to approval of the development plan. Provide documentation for the vacation. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E Per the annexation conditions show the required dedications for the Tanque Verde Creed Floodway and the north/south drainageway along the eastern portion of the property. Also show the dedication of necessary access points into the Tanque Verde creek along the south bank of the Tanque Verde for open space. Revised any applicable calculations. Provide documentation for this dedication. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G Per the annexation conditions show the required easement along Tanque Verde Creek containing the 100 year floodplain. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I The "9' B.S.L. (CARPORT) setback shown along Speedway Blvd. is not correct. All structures including carports are required to meet LUC Sections 3.2.6.5.B, 21' or the height of the proposed exterior building wall. The 9'-0" setback shown from the future property line does not meet this requirement. At a minimum the setback from the future property line would be 12'-0". Show the setback measured from the back of future curb. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I As elevation were not provided for the proposed covered parking and no height was given zoning cannot verify the required setback to the west property zone O-3. Provide elevations and or the height of the proposed covered parking. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I The "9' B.S.L. (CARPORT) setback shown along the west property line zoned SR is not correct. All structures including carports are required to meet LUC Sections 3.2.6.4. The minimum setback adjacent to the SR zone is 25'-0". 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Per the annexation conditions show the required 300 foot building setback from the primary back of the Tanque Verde creek. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Show the location of all required accessible ramps on the development plan. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide a typical dimension for all interior site sidewalks, not adjacent to the PAAL, or provide a note clarifying the proposed width for the sidewalks. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.R Show existing and future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the development plan. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.W If applicable show the location and types of proposed signs on the development plan. 20. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. 21. For your information based on a conversation with City of Tucson Real Estate department the proposed vacation of the existing ROW for Bonanza Ave may be required to be a purchase. Contact the Real Estate department in regards to this matter. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/ D09-0023 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 08/04/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 4 August 2009 D09-0028/THE PLACE AT TANQUE VERDE CREEK REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. Provide and identify the Accessible Route throughout the site to all building entrance and exits and to parking facilities as per 2006 IBC Section 1104 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 402. 1. Provide spot grades throughout accessible route or otherwise to show slope compliance with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3. B. Verify accessibility to all buildings as required per 2006 IBC, Section 1105 AND ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 302 AND 303. C. Please recognize and confirm compliance with the Reduced Vertical Clearance requirements of ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 307.4 at all stairways to the second level of all buildings. D. Accessible Parking: 1. As per 2006 IBC, Section 1006.5, one of every six required accessible parking spaces is to be "Van Accessible". A total of three is required for this facility. Please identify the selected "VAN ACCESSIBLE" parking spaces as required by 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.5 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, SECTION 503 on the site plan. 2. Specific large scale details of all accessible parking groups need to be provided to show accessibility to accessible route, spot grades, and signage: a. Surface slopes for all accessible parking spaces are to be no greater than 1:48, ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 502.5. b. Specific types of ramps need to be shown for each different access to the accessible route as per Sections 405 and 406. E. All accessible parking ramps, private property side walk ramps, curb ramps and raised marked crossing ramps are to comply with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 405 AND 406. Provide larges scale details of each different type showing size of space and aisle signage, accessible route and grade slopes. Provide detectable warnings as per Section 405.2. Please show all details specific to site plan developments layouts and design. Generic details such as detail 2/6 do not show compliance. F. There are several walkways with accessible curb ramps leading to the dumpster areas and others leading to no where. These are not required by code. G. As per ICC/ANSI, Section 406.13, the 2' deep in the direction of travel. The most Northerly marked crossing needs to be redesigned to comply with this directive. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/11/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/12/2009 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floddplain Review, 08/12/2009, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: The Place at Tanque Verde Creek D09-0028, T14S, R15E, SECTION 02 Ref. S07-082 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on July 16, 2009 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. It is not clear if the subject property is in compliance with 404 Permit. Clarify and revise the report and the 404 Compliance Statement accordingly. Additionally clarify if the proposed 12'X4' culvert is encroaching on the 404 Jurisdictional area. 2. Provide, on the drainage exhibit, the width of all P.A.A.L's. 3. Provide hydraulic rating for the proposed P.A.A.L's. The driveway and P.A.A.L. hydraulic capacity calculations should be included. Show on the drainage exhibits the locations of the cross sections, where the P.A.A.L's are being analyzed. 4. Provide the design calculations for all proposed scuppers. 5. Show roof drainage arrows on drainage exhibit. 6. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated into the development by conveying surface flow and rooftop drainage to designated water harvesting areas. Please address, in details, how water-harvesting techniques will be incorporated into the development. Refer to the newly adopted City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual for design considerations. Copies of the above-referenced manual can be obtained from the Engineering Counter. Please be advised that for water harvesting purposes, the landscaped areas shall be depressed a maximum of 6". 7. The drainage report does not address roof drainage and sidewalk scuppers. According to D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. and D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when concentrated runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. Additionally, show the roof drainage direction on the drainage exhibit and provide sidewalk scuppers for the roof drains. Please be advised that the 10-year flow requirement does not apply to roof drainage. Roof drainage has to be discharged in its entirety to avoid prolonged ponding on the roof that might cause the roof to collapse. Demonstrate compliance with the sidewalk scupper requirement including design calculations. 8. Provide the design calculations for all required splash pads/erosion control structures. 9. Show on the Drainage Exhibit all drainage structure dimensions (i.e. the erosion control pads, number and size of all scuppers, etc.), drainage structure elevations (i.e. flow line and pipe invert elevations, etc.). The drainage information shown on the Development Plan shall match the information shown on the drainage exhibits. 10. The drainage report did not include the analysis that determined the calculated 100-year floodplain and water surface elevations. Provide the analysis for review. 11. Show on Drainage Exhibit all proposed drainage solutions/structures with all required details (i.e. type, materials, location, size and dimensions, slopes, grades, high and low points, water ponding and slope setback lines, , waterharvesting basins, , cross section locations and details, etc.) that would clarify how the proposed drainage scheme will work. The drainage information shown on the development plan and grading plan will be based on the information provided in the drainage report text and drainage exhibits. 12. Add the culvert structure to the maintenance checklist. 13. Will the circles within the roundabouts be used for waterharvesting? Clarify that water will not be ponding within the circles for a long time. Development Plan: 1. Complete the D (yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2. 2. Verify that there are no existing onsite easements that might conflict with the proposed development (D.S. 2-05.2.3.B). 3. Verify that new easements are not required for utilities, etc. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.G). 4. Provide monuments on parcel line corners wherever are needed (D.S. 2-03.2.3.A). 5. It appears that the parts of the proposed paved areas will be raised several feet above existing grades. Additionally, some of the proposed buildings will span over several existing contour lines which will create a situation where the buildings will higher on one side than the other. Address this issue and show, on the Development Plan, the required slopes. Address how the slopes will be protected and stabilized based on the geotechnical report recommendation. Provide a copy of the geotechnical report. 6. It is not clear how the buildings that are proposed to be installed on a fill will be protected from erosion. Are retaining walls or other erosion control methods proposed? Provide this information on the Development Plan. 7. Cross section 1 appears to be for the entire P.A.A.L., but it does not match the detail on Sheet 5. Revise as necessary. 8. Demonstrate how the proposed plunge basins will drain out completely. Revise Cross Section Detail 12/6 accordingly. 9. Show roof drainage direction (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2). 10. Provide locations and sizes of all sidewalk scuppers including the ones associated with roof drainage (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3). 11. Provide the proposed culvert invert elevations (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.4). 12. Provide water surface elevations for flows of 100 cfs or more (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.6). 13. Provide the dimensions of the sight visibility triangles (D.S. 2-05.2.4.I) and (D.S. 2-05.2.4.R). 14. Clarify the minimum distance between the sidewalk and the slopes in Detail 10/6 15. The locations of Cross Section 10, near Buildings #1 and #2, appear to be incorrect. Revise. 16. Show all waterharvesting areas. 17. Check the dimensions shown on Cross Sections 8/6 and 9/6. The numbers do not appear to add up. 18. Cross sections 8/6 and 9/6 do not appear to match the standard MS & R cross section for 120' right of way. Address this issue and revise as necessary. 19. Are Speedway Boulevard improvements, shown in Details 8/6 and 9/6, part of this project or will they be installed by the City? (i.e. Clarify the words "by others"). Speedway improvements may need to be coordinated with City Transportation Department, Engineering Section. New curb and sidewalk are required for this project. Revise the plan as needed. 20. The right of way dimensions shown on Details 8/6 and 9/6 do not match the dimensions shown on Sheet 3 of 6. Revise as necessary. 21. Provide the curb return radii for the development entrance. 22. Verify compliance with Annexation Conditions #5 and #7. 23. Slope treatment and stabilization shall be based on the Geotechnical Report recommendation. Provide a copy of the Geotechnical Report with the required recommendations. 24. Revise the Development Plan in accordance with the drainage report revisions. Landscape Plan: The Landscape Plan is acceptable to Engineering and Floodplain Review subject to addressing satisfactorily Landscape Review comments. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report |
| 08/12/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | CDRC Review Planning and Development Services Dept., Land Use Plan Review D09-0028, The Place at Tanque Verde Creek DP, 1st submittal Comments Due: 8/12/09 Comments Submitted: 8/11/09 Items reviewed: Development Plan, Annexation Conditions Zoning Ordinance #6089 Comments: 1) General Note #10 on sheet 1 of the Development Plan lists annexation conditions that need to be addressed. Staff defers to DSD Engineering to ensure annexation conditions # 6, & #7A, B, C, D, E and F have been addressed. 2) The plans are approved. No re-submittal is required. Reviewed by: J. Hershenhorn, 6/11/09 S:\CASE_REVIEW\DSMR\08-09\D09-0028.doc |
| 08/12/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise to provide the dedications required by the annexation conditions 7 A-F. 2) Under the set-aside methodology for Native Plant Preservation the 30% area is required to be set-aside in perpetuity and platted and included in CC&R's. DS 2-15.3.5 |
| 08/13/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 08/13/2009 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/13/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 11, 2009 To: MARTY MAGELLI BAKER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: THE PLACE AT TANQUE VERDE CREEK Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D09-028 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Wastewater Treament Facility via the North Rillito Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #8 to read as follows: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). Sheet 4: Show the easement width and recordation information over the proposed public sewer line G-2008-080 going west from MH#7 onto the adjoining property. Sheet #6: In the private manhole chart for manhole #14 the invert direction should be changed from N to W. We will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents. Upon receiving Owner(Applicant) or Title Company with address and Trust # information from you we will generate the SSA. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the development plan . This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 08/14/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This site will require four additional single enclosures or modify four existing single enclosures to double wide enclosures in order to accomodate for both refuse and recycle waste types. The enclosures should be postioned at the southwest, northwest, southeast , and northeast sections of development to demonstrate adequate user accesibility for all development. DS 6-01.9.1 2. Current access, circulation, and manueverability within development okay. Access and approach to each enclosure works and enclosure detail good. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/17/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 08/19/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | August 19, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0028 PROJECT NAME: The Place at Tanque Verde Creek PROJECT ADDRESS: 9971 E Speedway Bl PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The Development Services Department (DSD) is requiring the developer to provide curb and sidewalks. TDOT-Traffic is requiring a right turn decel lane per the submitted traffic impact analysis. Rather then have the developer install the right turn lane, curb, and sidewalk in a manner that could be in conflict with the designs for the Speedway improvements TDOT-staff will work with DSD to waive the curb and sidewalk and to have these improvements installed with the Speedway improvement plans. The developer is still responsible for the funding of the curb and sidewalks along with the ramps, driveway, and the right turn lane so in-lieu fees will need to be determined for the required off-site improvements. A note will be required on the development plan stating that the developer will provide compensation for the required off-site improvements prior to the release of the first certificate of occupancy. Once TDOT has determined the in-lieu fees a note can be finalized for the development plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/21/2009 | JWILLIA4 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 21, 2009 Marty Magelli, P.E. Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc. 3561 E. Sunrise Dr., Suite 225 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D09-0028 The Place At Tanque Verde Creek Development Plan Dear Marty: Your submittal of July 15, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 10 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Zoning, HC Site, Engineering, Landscape, Wastewater, ESD, Traffic, Real Estate, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 318-1930 |
| 10/13/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | . |