Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0027
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2009 | SREEVES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/14/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 07/15/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Fire sprinklers will be required if the new occupant load is over 100. |
| 07/15/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 07/21/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 21, 2009 To: ANTHONY HERRERA EPS GROUP, INC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: McDONALD'S Dev. Plan –1st Submittal D09-027 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 1: Fill in the blanks for General Note # 11. Sheet 1: If no new sewers are proposed then add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Sheet 1: If new sewer is proposed then add the following general notes: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 1: Show the public and private(also existing and proposed) sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. Sheet 1: Add the following General Notes: THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. NO PERMITS FOR PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 2: Show the sewer line north of MH# 9274-01 as private. Sheet 2: The connection to the sewer line, if new sewer is proposed, should be to the existing 4” private line. Sheet 2: Show the public sewer easement with width and recordation information. Also the dumpster enclosure cannot be located inside the public sewer easement. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/21/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D09-0027 MCDONALD'S: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 2,374 PM Peak: 162 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 07/21/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0027 MCDONALD’S/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/20/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include entire legal description under Legal Description. Include Section, Township and Range on all Title Blocks. |
| 07/23/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At the marked crossing, please show large scale details of all the different types of ramps complying with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 405 and 406 for curb and sidewalk ramps and 406.12 and 406.14 for ramps and transitions and detectable warnings for marked crossings. Please show all accessible critial details, dimensions, slopes and criteria. 2. At the accessible parking ramp, please show large scale details of ramp position and location to the front entrance door/s. As per ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section406.7, a 3' deep clear landing is required exclusive of door swing enchroachment. Zoing requires a 4' minimum clear passage. Please show all accessible critial details, dimensions, slopes and criteria. Reference zoning comments. 3. The accessible route extension to the west side does not lead to a continuation of an accessible route to another part of the property development. Please delete the west side concrete pedestrian way as an accessible route extension and delete all accessible ramps and maintain the 6" high curbs. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/27/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#214047 July 23, 2009 EPS Group Inc. Attn: Anthony Herrera 17 W Wetmore, Suite 302 Tucson, Arizona 85705 Dear Mr. Herrera: SUBJECT: McDonalds D09-0027 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 14, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Lorraine Ruiz at (520) 918-8241. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) L. Ruiz, Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/27/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 24, 2009 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D09-0027 McDonalds: Development Plan Review(7/14/09) Staff has no comments. |
| 07/31/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the CDRC Development Plan case number (D09-0027) and any other related case numbers to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the development plan and landscape plan. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 2. Remove the word "conceptual" from the landscape plan title. 3. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g 4. A 30" continuous screen along the development side of the street landscape border must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I Label the type/materials (i.e. vegetative or masonry), height and location of screening on the landscape plan. 5. Any changes made to the development plan based on comments from other reviewers must also be reflected on the landscape plan as necessary. 6. The NPPO application for exception is approved as submitted. |
| 07/31/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | We have reviewed the Development Plans for the McDonald's Restaurant located on State Route (SR) 77 at 4495 N. Oracle Road and the following comments are provided: 1. Provide ADOT stations for the centerline of the two existing driveways. 2. Label the existing ADOT right-of-way line. Our records indicate that ADOT's right-of-way at this location is 85 feet from the construction centerline. The construction centerline is 25 feet east of the section line. 3. Clarify the 15 feet future right-of-way notation on the plans. To whom will this future right-of-way be dedicated? 3. The diagonal sawcut line at the south driveway needs to be revised. The sawcut line should go straight across the driveway. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Development Plans. Maria Deal Southern Regional Traffic Engineering ADOT 1221 S. 2nd. Ave. Tucson, AZ 85713 Phone #: 520-388-4235 ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 07/31/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the plans as necessary to comply the requirements of the MS&R Zone. LUC 2.8.3.5 The street landscape border at Oracle is required to be located based on the MS&R right-of-way line. |
| 08/04/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject development plan (D09-0027) McDonald's Oracle/Wetmore. The site is not within the TIA Public Disclosure Area. The Tucson Airport Authority does not oppose this request. Respectfully, Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org www.tucsonairport.org (520) 573-5115 office (520) 573-8006 fax |
| 08/07/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D09-0027 McDonalds 4495 N. Oracle Rd. Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 08/07/2009 DUE DATE: 08/10/09 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 07/13/10. 2. This project is not a stand alone project and is therefore considered an expansion of the shopping center adjacent to this site. Provide a copy of the last approved development/site plan for the shopping center in order to complete this review. Provide expansion calculations for the shopping center for lot size expansion, vehicular use area expansion and building area expansion. The expansion calculations are cumulative and must include any previous expansions of the shopping center. If the expansion calculations exceed 25% for any of the three calculations full code compliance will be required for the entire shopping center. Because of the changes being made to the existing shopping center parking, trash enclosure and possible changes made to the Arby's building, outside dining and parking a revised development plan may be required. Provide in the calculations how this entire site meets the requirements of a shopping center. (greater than 50% of the GFA must be retail use). Provide a copy of the ingress/egress and parking agreement (general note #13) for review. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D09-0027 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.3 In general note #3 list the proposed use as follows: Food Service "33", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C. 5. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 The PAAL and landscape border along the east side of the property is partially located within the future right of way. A future development plan will be required to be provided showing how the site will still meet the code requirements once the widening occurs. See LUC Sec. 2.8.3.5.F. A copy of the required MS&R covenant can be obtained here at DSD. Recording docket and information for the covenant is required to be placed on the future site plan. Another possibility is to design the project to meet future MS&R widening. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.I All applicable building setback lines will be shown. On zoning setbacks, if the building is proposed for location at a greater distance from the property line than the required setback, show only the dimension of the distance between the building and the property line. If the setback's point of measurement is not the property line, include the distance from the property line to the point of measurement (back of future curb). 7. DS 2-05.2.4.K The pedestrian circulation path from the south property line cannot cross through the stacking spaces for the drive through. Clearly indicate the widths of all sidewalks. Minimum width is four (4) feet. Including at the top of the handicap ramp between the ramp and the building. See DS 2-08.5.1.A. The type of handicap ramp at the east side of the building does not appear to be correct. See Handicap comments. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide the dimensions of the proposed structure on the foot print of the building. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.P The parking spaces along the north side of the property will be required to have wheel stops or clearly indicate the required 2'-6" overhang area that will not cross the property line. See DS 3-05.2.3.C.1. If wheel stops are to be used clearly indicate on the development plan all parking spaces using wheel stops. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.R Clearly indicate the location of the future curb and future sight visibility triangles. 11. Provide a elevation detail of the proposed lighting fixtures clearly indicating the required minimum height clearance above the vehicular use areas of 15'. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D09-0027dp.doc |
| 08/07/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMENTS (Land Use Plan group) Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) Application CASE NUMBER: D09-0027 CASE NAME: McDonald's Development Plan DATE SENT: Items reviewed: Development Plan 1st submittal Cross Reference Cases: Annexation ordinance #5651 Area or Neighborhood Plan: N/A Gateway or Scenic Route: Oracle Rd. is a Gateway Route Due Date: August 10, 2009 The only annexation condition no longer applies, as Rillito Creek has been bank protected. The plans are APPROVED - a resubmittal is not required. Reviewed by: J. Hershenhorn 8/5/09 |
| 08/10/2009 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Manager FOR: Anthony Herrera, PE, EPS Group Engineering SUBJECT: Development Plan Engineering Review submittal PROJECT: McDonald's Restaurant renovation Development Plan LOCATION: 4495 N Oracle Rd, Ward 3 FEMA PANEL: 1636K X-unshaded REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0027 SUMMARY: The Development Plan package including development plan, drainage report, easement documentation, rezoning conditions, and landscape documents was submitted and reviewed. Planning & Development Services Department Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-02.2.3.1.3.A.2, 2-05.2.3.F, 2-05.2.4.H, 2-05.2.3: Provide case number (D09-0027) on the report cover page of Drainage Report. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Update estimated cut/fill quantities on sheet 1. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B, 2-05.2.4.G: Provide authorization for south offsite improvements. Show where within easement documentation that the easement provides for construction / improvements. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Add to general note 3 stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: the LUC Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving and sidewalks. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.D: Provide the location of nearest existing fire hydrant. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E: Please be aware, a local basis of elevation / benchmark with datum will be required at grading plan review stage. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.G: Show existing (or proposed as shown on plat) structures within project. Label as to be removed, retained, or proposed. A general note may suffice unless Zoning review needs other information. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.F, 2-05.2.4.L: Show existing or proposed sidewalks along abutting right-of-way for Oracle Road. Label the MS&R future sidewalk (6-ft min width) along Oracle Road. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.S: Show new curb returns; driveway entrance will not be accepted. Label radii for new curb returns on planview. Per Minimum Curb Return Radius Table Figure 6 section 3-01.10, minimum radius is 25-ft for the new curb returns. 11) DS Sec.3-01.3.2.E: Provide minimum curb returns, located in accordance with the City of Tucson Code, Chapter 25. Show proposed wheelchair ramps in frontage sidewalk. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.V: Explain or indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 13) For the proposed restaurant parking area, address the following: a) Provide clarification on Development Plan planview showing: i) Stormwater runoff flow arrows; ii) Roof drainage direction; iii) Any drainage improvements including scupper locations; iv) Show proposed elevations and grades in the restaurant parking area that directs stormwater runoff to curb openings for water harvesting areas. b) Dimension sidewalk widths around building showing on-site pedestrian circulation. c) Label striped area northeast of loading zone, west of northwest proposed parking stall adjacent to building. d) Label or add notation regarding planter islands / medians to be removed. Otherwise add general note regarding demolition or removal of existing McDonald's and adjacent improvements. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.X: Clarify general concept how water harvesting is provided in landscaped areas. Revise spot elevations with in parking area to show directed water towards water harvesting areas. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Show dimension for existing sidewalks, or label on keynote 5 sheet 2. Minimum 6-ft wide sidewalk is required for MS&R streets. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Dimensions for proposed refuse collection area appear to be an over sized design for a single unit dumpster. Be advised that the minimum interior dimension for a double dumpster is 20-ft between interior bollards and 10-ft front to rear between gate and rear bollards. 17) DS Sec.3-01.5.3: Show both existing and proposed SVT's. Revise sight visibility triangle locations on Development Plan sheet 2 using the SVT table per this section, using 12-ft setback for sidewalk area. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R, DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.1: Other than trees as noted below, plant materials located within existing and future sight visibility triangles shall be limited to ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty inches. Trees may be located within existing and future sight visibility triangles only if clear of leaves and branches to a height of at least six feet above grade upon installation, and at all times thereafter. The trunk caliper of any species selected may not exceed twelve inches in diameter at maturity. Trees with multiple trunks are not allowed. Trees may not be planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect as viewed from the motorist's perspective. The number and location of trees within existing and future sight visibility triangles may be restricted or modified by the City of Tucson in order to preserve visibility. Show both existing and proposed SVT's on landscape plan, and revise landscape plan sheet to assure that no proposed/existing vegetation obstructs the line of sight. 19) Please acknowledge that a separate grading permit submittal and review for the restaurant will be required for development of the site once the Development Plan is approved. Submittal of the grading plan review package may occur concurrently with the next Development Plan review, for this project. Resubmittal is required. Submit response letter, copies of the cross access easement documentation, authorization to do offsite improvements, revised landscape sheet, and revised Development Plan. The next submittal should address all the above items. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 08/10/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 08/10/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | August 10, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0027 PROJECT NAME: McDonald's-Oracle PROJECT ADDRESS: 4495 N Oracle Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The COT Transportation Access Management Guidelines 5.4 requires a minimum driveway separation of 80' along any major-street and route such as Oracle Road, therefore the closer of the southern driveway should be considered due to the cross access provided by the parcel to the south and the PAAL that would provide access to the northern drive. 3. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6), Due to constraints with neighboring driveways TDOT-Traffic will accept 18' radius curb returns. 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/11/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/14/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Existing conditions provide for both refuse and recycle waste with two separate containers. Currently the refuse is in a single enclosure with the recycle container next to it unscreened. Either revise enclosure design to a double wide enclosure for storing two containers or add another single enclosure and demonstrate adequate approach and manueverability to them. DS 6-01.4.1.M 2. Sheet 3 - Dumpster enclosure, Provide dimensions identifying spacing of bollards. Require 2 ft for front side bollard to front gates/enclosure and 4ft between front side bollard and rear side bollard. Rear wall bollards should be 4ft on either side of centered bollard. Require a minimum 10 ft x 10 ft clear container service area between the rear and side bollards to the front gates. DS 6-01.4.1.B. 3. Gate must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open position. Annotate and show within detail. Recommend "Positive locking and (Bayonet) anchors, Qty-4, 1 in. Dia. x 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush in concrete/foundation." Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/14/2009 | JWILLIA4 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 14, 2009 Anthony Herrera EPS Group, Inc. 17 West Wetmore, Suite 302 Tucson, Arizona 85705 Subject: D09-0027 McDonalds Development Plan Dear Anthony: Your submittal of July 14, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 10 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Waste Water, HC SITE, AZ DOT, Landscape, Zoning, Traffic, Engineering, ESD, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Last Approved Development Plan/Site Plan (Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Cross Access Parking Documentation (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 408-1403 |