Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CORE REVIEW
Permit Number - D09-0024
Review Name: CORE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/08/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/09/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 07/09/2009 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/20/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 17, 2009 To: RICHARD MACIAS OLSSON ASSOCIATES Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: EL CON MALL Dev. Plan –1st Submittal D09-024 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Faciltiy via the Santa Cruz Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Please explain or revise General Note #43 in regards to the stated existing FUE of 139. There does not appear to be an existing building on Pad # 4. Sheet 5: The public manhole #2 shown on plan should be private and the sewer line segment between public manhole #1 and #2 should be shown as private. Also you should consider proposing a 4” BCS with direct connection to the existing public sewer line in Broadway Blvd. This would eliminate both of the proposed manholes. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/21/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0024 EL CON MALL-PAD 4/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/20/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change Tierra Alta Blvd. to Terra Alta Blvd. on Location Map. Add Avenue to Palo Verde on Location Map. |
| 07/22/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Concerning the marked crossing from the four accessible parking spaces to the existing building: ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 406.12 resuires the detectable warnings to be the same width as the marked crossing, how about reducing the marked crossing width to fit the designed detectable warnings? 2. Detectable warnings are not required by code at the two accessible parking spaces aisle and at the ramp at the loading zone. 3. Please change the note reference 26 at the loading zone to 22. 4. At sheet 7 of 7, details A, C, D, P, K AND L, detectable warnings are required at all these details only if they are part of a marked crossing. Please provide a note to this effect and reference 406.12 and 406.14, "shall provide". END OF REVIEW |
| 07/29/2009 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (Planning Comments) Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0024 El Con Mall PAD-4 7/28/09 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( X ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( X ) Elevations and Self-Certification Letter CROSS REFERENCE: D07-0029; C9-88-12; DSMR 07-50 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon-Broadway GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: August 5, 2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) No Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 7/28/09 COMMENTS 1) See sheet 4 of 7 of the Revised Development Plan - Keynote Section, where it appears the trash enclosure (keynote 10) and bicycle parking (keynote 12) are identified in-correctly. Could not find keynote 10; and keynote 12 seems to be identifying the trash enclosure. Please Correct. |
| 08/03/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/05/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/05/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/06/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/07/2009 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D09-0024 El Con Mall - PAD 4: Core Review Development Plan ( Change in Plan) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 5, 2009 DUE DATE: August 5, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 4, 2010. 2. The following title block information is to be provided, preferably in the lower right corner of the sheet. A. The proposed name of the project or, if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name or the property address. The title block on all DP sheets including landscape and NPPO should include the PAD name/number or the development name ie, Burger King, Jack in the Box. DS 2-05.2.1.G.1 3. It is not clear who is the developer and who is the owner of the development. Please clarify under the DEVLOPER/OWNER text box who is who. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 and .2 4. Under General Note 2, remove the sentence related to the proposed zoning. There is no zoning proposed it is just the existing zoning that needs to be indicated in this case. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 5. It appears that the Shell building is proposed with three suites. List the specific proposed use(s) of the PAD to be developed. General note 4 lists several uses for this PAD. It appears that at least one of the proposed uses of this pad is for Food Service with a drive through lane and possibly other uses. Revise the note to state the true use(s) of this PAD and include the appropriate development designators for each use. Include the following as note under general note 4 under a separate general note, "For all existing uses see sheet 3 of 7". DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 6. Clarify if general note 7 is intended to provide the gross square footage of the overall El Con Mall development or the parcel on which the PAD is located on. Please revise as required to make it clear. Also remove the word and after the words square feet. The word would imply that gross site area includes square feet noted plus the acreage. The number of acres should be placed in parenthesis. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 7. List the following note on all development plans: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0." (the note could be verified on sheet one or two) Add the note as required. DS 2-05.2.2.D.2 8. For consistency with the development standards revise the Utilities Note as noted in the development standards. "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." DS 2-05.2.2.E 9. If applicable to this pad, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. DS 2-05.2.3.B 10. Provide a barrier such as an extruded curb or bollard at the south end of the accessible route next to the disabled and two parallel parking spaces. DS 2-05.2.4.L and 2-08.4.1 11. On sheet 4 of 7 replace the keynote noted as 26 on the loading zone with the correct keynote, 22. DS 2-05.2.4.O 12. Zoning could not verify the location of the class one bicycle parking for this out pad. Fifty percent of the required parking must be class one. Draw and label the location of the class one facility and add a keynote. The note should include the number of bicycles the facility supports. Add the required details for the class one facility. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Class one bicycle parking must be provided to this PAD. The overall bicycle parking provided must be distributed throughout the development site and to each pad Bicycle parking which includes class one and two facilities. 13. The following are comments are related to sheet 3 of 7. 14. For consistency with the process we have been instituted for all Pad development for El Con Mall, please use the same format of sheet SPT.1 of the latest approved development plan, case number D07-0029. The format and tabulation should include the following: The original tabulations, the last set of tabulations based on the last approved development plan, and the proposed tabulations which includes up to date information. The cloud revisions must be added to clearly show what changes have been made. The tabulations block will be re-reviewed on the next submittal of the development plan for accuracy and compliance with the previous tabulation in D07-0029. Add the revision dates of the tabulation in order to verify the last approved tabulation. Provide the location of the new Building E noted on the abs at 44,698 sq ft. 15. Additional comments may forthcoming based on the revisions and changes to the plans and per response comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D070024dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and if applicable additional requested documents. |
| 08/10/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#1213688 July 13, 2009 CB Richard Ellis Asset Services Attn:Cardell Andrews II 3025 W Ina Road Tucson, Arizona 85741 Dear Mr. Andrew II: SUBJECT: El Con Mall D009-0024 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 8, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 08/11/2009 | JWILLIA4 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 11, 2009 Cardell Andrews II CB Richard Ellis Asset Services 3025 West Ina Road Tucson, Arizona 85741 Subject: D09-0024 El Con Mall - PAD 4 Development Plan Dear Cardell: Your submittal of July 8, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 5 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Addressing, HC Site, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Sewage Capacity Response Letter (Wastewater, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 777-3872 |