Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0023
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/01/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/01/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 07/02/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 07/09/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 8, 2009 To: JAMIE BITLER SWAIM ASSOCIATES Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: THE SALVATION ARMY HOSPITALITY HOUSE Dev. Plan –1st Submittal D09-023 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values Sheet 1: Add a general note that states: NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES MAY BE CONSTRUCTED (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.), ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT, OR WITHIN 10’ OF PUBLIC SEWERS IN COMMON AREAS, WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. Sheet 1: Remove General Note #11 and revise General Note #14 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 2: The 4” BCS line should be shown as directly connected to the 8” public sewer line with a minimum of 5’ space between the two connection points. The connection should be per PCRWD Engineering Directive 2005-01. This will eliminate the proposed manhole shown on plan. Sheet 2: Mark the existing public sewer lines shown on plan with the correct construction plan # and pipe size. Also the IMS #’s for the existing public manholes have not been shown correctly on plan. Sheet 2: The concrete curb shown across the proposed public sewer easement will need to be recessed and the concrete sidewalks will need to be H-20 loaded so that the maintenance trucks can have access thru the easement. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/13/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | July 13, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0023 PROJECT NAME: Salvation Army PROJECT ADDRESS: Main/Speedway PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The Right of Way to be dedicated and vacated needs to be reviewed by COT Real Estate. TDOT-Traffic will not approve the development plans until the dedication and vacation of right of way has been recorded/accepted by COT Real Estate. 3. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/13/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/14/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0023 THE SALVATION ARMY HOSPITALITY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/14/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add suffixes to all streets on Location Map. Title Blocks must be located on the bottom right hand corners of all pages. These include the name of the development plan, legal description and Section, Township and Range. Include books and pages of subdivision in legal description. Number buildings. Spell out Ave. of Main Ave on page 1.1. Change 11th Street to Avenue on page 1.1. |
| 07/14/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Re: D09-0023 THE SALVATION ARMY HOSPITALITY >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 07/10/2009 8:26 AM >>> Regional Traffic: No comments from Traffic Engineering on this submittal. The development will not affect any ADOT facilities. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 07/15/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMENTS - CDRC Land Use Plan Compliance D09-0023, The Salvation Army Hospitality: DP Submittal # 1 Comments due: 7/30/09 Items Reviewed: · Development Plan (DP) & Landscape Plan (LP) · Special Exception conditions & site plan Cross Reference: SE-04-08, ZE decision 10/7/04 Land Use Plan(s): General Plan Comments: This section reviews for compliance with special exception conditions relative to the adopted land use plans. The DP and LP are not approved - a resubmittal is required. Please revise them and address the following: 1) Per special exception conditions # 10 and #14, please provide a 6-foot high wall along the northern site boundary, east of the paved turn-around along Alder Ave. and connecting to the wall that's shown. The purpose of the wall is to prohibit access between the site and the neighborhood to the north. 2) Per special exception condition # 12, please provide fully dimensioned elevation drawings for all four sides of the site. 3) Per special exception condition #15, sidewalks along Main are to be at least 6 feet wide. Please revise sheet dp1.1 to show a 6-foot wide sidewalk (per the scale it's only 5 feet wide). 4) Per special exception conditions #20 and #21, please provide a decorative wall detail on the development plan. Please add a note by the detail indicating that it will be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant material. Please feel free to contact this reviewer to discuss any of the above. Reviewed by: J. Hershenhorn, 837-6965 7/14/09 Joanne.hershenhorn@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/20/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#213690 July 16, 2009 Swaim Associates Attn: Jamie Butler 7350 E Speedway, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85710 Dear Jamie : SUBJECT: The Salvation Army Hospitality D09-0023 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 2, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.***Pole #10 will be in the way of new building. Please note: removal of pole is billable to the customer.*** Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/20/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Connect the accessible route on the West side of the property to the accessible route on the east side of the property. 2. Zoning may require an accessible route connection to the 1st Street right of way pedestrian way. Reference zoining comments. Provide all marked crossings as required. Modifications required will need further accessible review. 3. Provide a "Van Accessible" on the sign detail. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/21/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D09-0023 THE SALVATION ARMY HOSPITALITY: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: N/A PM Peak: N/A Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 07/29/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the CDRC Development Plan case number (D09-0023) and any other related case numbers to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, and native plant preservation plan. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 2. Special Exception condition #14 states that a minimum 6-foot high screen wall shall be constructed along the north east and south property boundaries. Demonstrate compliance with this condition along the north property line (the note on the landscape plan states "5-foot screen wall). Revise as necessary. 3. It is not clear what material is to be used in the jogged spaces between the screen wall along the south property line. The symbol shown (a line with an "x" placed in the middle is not given in the legend. Clarify what type of screening is being used in these areas. 4. Landscaping proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. 5. Some of the plants proposed--chitalpa tree (Chitalpa tashkentensis) and Fantex Ash (Fraxinus velutina) are not on the ADWR low water use plant list. Revise proposed trees or provide an oasis calculation for these areas. 6. Any changes made to the development plan based on comments from other reviewers must also be reflected on the landscape plan as necessary. |
| 07/29/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Salvation Army Hospitality House Development Plan (1st Review) D09-0023 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 29, 2009 DUE DATE: July 30, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 07, 2010. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 The section is listed incorrectly on the location map. It should be 12, not 12S 3. D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 Identify the section corners on the location map. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the D09-0023 development plan number in the lower right corner of the plan. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Revise General Note 5 to include the LUC Section 2.8.3 for the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B If applicable all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C Based on the existing "60' ½" right-of-way (ROW) shown on the plan and a "FUTURE TAPERED R.O.W." there appears to be a dedication of ROW that includes taking back ROW along the taper. Please clarify what is proposed. If dedication is planned the dedication must be approved prior to approval of the development plan. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.A The proposed lot split/combination will need to be processed and approved by the City of Tucson prior to approval of the development plan. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.A For clarify remove all existing interior lot lines that will be eliminated when the lot split/combination is completed. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.B Provide the zoning classifications for the parcels on the west side of Main Avenue and south side of 1st Street. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide the 3'-0" radius on the proposed backup spur shown at the east end of the parking area. See D.S. 3-05.2.2.D 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a dimension for the "SANITATION VEHICLE CIRCULAITON" access lane. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 There appears to be a proposed fence running along the east and south side of the "SANITATION VEHICLE CIRCULAITON" access lane, per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 Show the required two (2) foot setback on the plan. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E Per Special Exception Condition 2 show the required ROW dedication on the site plan and label. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E South and east of parcel 117-02-3510 there is ROW that appears will be abandoned. Provide a copy of the documents for the abandonment and show the recordation information on the plan. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E Zoning acknowledges that portions of Alder Ave. are to be abandoned. Provide a copy of the documents for the abandonment and show the recordation information on the plan. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E It appears that portions of the alley are to be abandoned along the northeast corner of this project. Provide a copy of the documents for the abandonment and show the recordation information on the plan. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G If applicable all proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private on the plan. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B all street perimeter yard setbacks are measured from the back of curb or future curb. Provide a setback dimension from the back of future curb along Main Street to the northwest corner of the proposed "EMERGENCY SHELTER". 20. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G Per Special Exception Condition 7 a turn around area is required for residential properties located to the north. An easement will be required for this turn around. Show this easement on the plan and label the purposed and whether it will be public or private along with the recordation information. 21. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per Special Exception Condition 10 all access is to be through the main entrance of the building. This said there is a gate shown near the south west corner of the "TRANSITIONAL FAMILY APARTMENTS" that appears to allow access other than via the main entrance, please clarify. 22. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per Special Exception Condition 10 all access is to be through the main entrance of the building. This said provide a sidewalk from the southeast parking are to the main entrance. There appears to be a proposed fence blocking any route to the main entrance. 23. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide, as a note, the square footage of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed. 24. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide overall building dimensions on the plan. 25. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Per LUC Section 3.4.5.4 and based on a total building square footage of 38,536 two loading spaces are required for the proposed "RESIDENTAIL SHELTE CARE SERVICES" use and per Special Exception Condition 19 an additional loading space is required for the billboard, for a total of three (3) 12 x 35 foot loading spaces. Zoning was only able to locate two (2) loading spaces on site. Also add the required loading space for the billboard to the calculation. 26. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Clearly identify the existing billboard and any structural element extending from the billboard, including, but not limited to, overhangs, cantilevered beams, and elevated walkways on the plan so that the requirements of LUC Section 3.4.4.1.B.3 can be verified. Additional comments may be forth coming. 27. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Demonstrate on the plan how access to the northern most loading spaces is provided and that it meets LUC Section 3.3.7.3. 28. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P There appears to be a fence located along the east end of the southern most loading space that runs south. This fence is adjacent to a vehicle parking space to the east. Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3 When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet. Provide a width dimension for this vehicle parking space. 29. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Demonstrate on the plan or detail how lighting is provided to the bicycle parking area. 30. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Per D.S. 2-09.5.2 show the required five (5) foot wide access aisle on the plan or detail. 31. D.S. 2-05.2.4.U Demonstrate on the development plan how Special Exception Condition 14 has been met. 32. General Note 2 B) SITE COVERAGE should be shown as lot coverage and based on Special Exception Condition 26 e Maximum lot coverage: 61,490 square feet, the percent of lot coverage should be shown as 58%. 33. Provide a lot coverage calculation per LUC Section 3.2.9 on the plan. 34. Based on development designators 30 & 31 provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation on the plan see LUC Section 3.2.11. This calculation needs to reflect a FAR for development Designator 30 for the area of this project zoned O-3 and reflect a FAR for development Designator 31 for the area of this project zoned C-2 & C-3. 35. General Note 2 D) DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATOR should list both 30 & 31. 36. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/ D09-0023 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 07/30/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet DP1.1, Provide detail of adjacent development north to identify residential property driveways, sight visibility to the north for collection vehicle when backing into turnaround and clarify Alder access from Speedway Blvd. 2. Clarify whether there will be resident vehicle circulation within the turnaround area to determine if will conflict with collection vehicle manuevering. 3. What type of traffic is intended through the gate/s, which are identified directly south of the solid waste enclosure? This may create issues if traffic is expected to manuever around collection vehicle during service operation and present potential conflicts. 4. Solid waste enclosure may need to be moved 12 ft west to allow collection vehicle (moving south bound) to make a right hand turn and adequately position itself perpendicular to enclosure without encroaching oncoming traffic. Please provide clarification or corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/30/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department - Plans Coordination Office FROM: Bianca Ramirez Engineering Associate PROJECT: The Salvation Army Hospitality House Development Plan (1st Review) D09-0023 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 29, 2009 DUE DATE: July 30, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Engineering Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 - Verify that the property figuration is depicted properly within location map. In addition, identify the section corners within the location map. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.1.G.2 - Provide a legal description for the property. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.1.H - Provide the contour interval on the plan, preferably together with the scale and north arrow in the upper right corner of the plat. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.1.K - Ensure that any applicable rezoning, annexation, or subdivision case numbers are listed in the lower right corner next to the title block. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B - Verify that all easements have been indicated on plan along with recordation information including location, width and purpose indicated on the plan. Specify on plan as to whether they will be or are public or private. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 - Place the development plan number D09-0023 in the lower right corner of the plan. 7. All Public Right of Ways adjacent to a site are to have the name, right of way width, recordation data, type, and dimension width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks - verify that both are dimensioned and labeled throughout plan. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C Based on the existing "60' ½" right-of-way (ROW) shown on the plan and a "FUTURE TAPERED R.O.W." there appears to be a dedication of ROW that includes taking back ROW along the taper. Please clarify what is proposed. If dedication is planned the dedication must be approved prior to approval of the development plan. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.3.I and D.S. 2-05.2.3.I .3 - Provide all floodplain information including the location of the 100-year floodplain limits and associated information such as the water surface contours. 10. Aerial does not match the plan submitted. Any lot modifications will need to meet zoning requirements. See Zoning Comments. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N - Provide dimensions for all buildings indication on plan. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 - Label all curb radii within plan, specifically label curbs and the 3'-0" radius for proposed backup spur. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 - Provide a dimension for the "SANITATION VEHICLE CIRCULAITON" access lane. Provide the radii for the fire circulation lane. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 - There appears to be a proposed fence running along the east and south side of the "SANITATION VEHICLE CIRCULAITON" access lane, per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 Show the required two (2) foot setback on the plan. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.R - Call out length of site visibility triangle on plan. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.S - Call out fire circulation radii on plan. 17. Per Special Exception Condition 2 indicate the required ROW dedication on the site plan and label. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E South and east of parcel 117-02-3510 there is ROW that appears will be abandoned. Provide a copy of the documents for the abandonment and show the recordation information on the plan. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E - N portions of Alder Ave. are to be abandoned. Provide a copy of the documents for the abandonment and show the recordation information on the plan. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E - It appears that portions of the alley are to be abandoned along the northeast corner of this project. Provide a copy of the documents for the abandonment and show the recordation information on the plan. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O - Demonstrate on the plan how access to the northern most loading spaces is provided and that it meets LUC Section 3.3.7.3. 20. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P There appears to be a fence located along the east end of the southern most loading space that runs south. This fence is adjacent to a vehicle parking space to the east. Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3 When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet. Provide a width dimension for this vehicle parking space. 21. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Per D.S. 2-09.5.2 show the required five (5) foot wide access aisle on the plan or detail. 22. D.S. 2-05.2.4.U - Provide all rezoning conditions and copies to engineering. Assure that all conditions have been met prior to next submittal. 23. Label Main Street as an MS&R, Arterial Road and provide recordation information. Indicate that road is a public road. Identify 1st Street as a Local Street and provide recordation information. 24. Dimension the width of ingress/egress and call our radii of entrance. 25 D.S. 2-05.3.1.E - Submit two copies of a drainage report prepared and stamped by an engineer registered in the State of Arizona as required by Floodplain Regulations. 26. D.S. 2-05.3.2.A - A report which includes the proposed solution for any land with unusual topography, soils, or other geographical hazard to life, health, or property shall be prepared to the City Engineer's specifications ad will be submitted to the City's Engineer's Office. 27. Note that a grading plan and a floodplain use permit will be required for further development of the property. 28. Indicate the location and type of postal service to assure that there is no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessability, utilites and landscaping. 29. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Bianca Ramirez, (520) 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, drainage report and additional requested documents. |
| 08/03/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | P&R Review not required for this DP plan. |
| 08/03/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/03/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 08/04/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject development plan (D09-0023) Salvation Army 1002 N Main. The site is not within the TIA Public Disclosure Area. The Tucson Airport Authority does not oppose this request. Respectfully, Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org www.tucsonairport.org (520) 573-5115 office (520) 573-8006 fax |
| 08/06/2009 | JWILLIA4 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 6, 2009 Jamie Bitler Swaim Associates 7350 E. Speedway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85710 Subject: D09-0023 the Salvation Army Hospitality House Development Plan Dear Jamie: Your submittal of July 1, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 11 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Traffic, Addressing, Community Planning, HC Site, Landscape, Zoning, ESD, Engineering, Real Estate, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Community Planning, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Fully Dimensioned Elevations (Community Planning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Abandonment Documentation (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 326-1148 |