Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0017
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/06/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/07/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide large scale detail showing actual accessible parking design showing dimensions, ramps, existing building wall and front entrance with doors open. Insure a 4' accessible route between the top of ramp and the edge of the open door. 2. Zoing will require an accessible pedestrian route to Houghton Road. Further accessible review will be required for this addition to plan on resubmittal. Refer to Zoning comments. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/07/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/07/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATERED PROPERTY |
| 05/11/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject development plan (D09-0017 Valero at the Pavilions/ Civano Development Plan). The site is not within the TIA Public Disclosure Area. The Tucson Airport Authority does not oppose this request. Respectfully, Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org www.tucsonairport.org (520) 573-5115 office (520) 573-8006 fax |
| 05/13/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 05/13/2009 8:48 AM >>> Regional Traffic: No comments from Traffic Engineering on this submittal. The development will not affect any ADOT facility. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 05/18/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | May 15, 2009 To: WARREN THOMPSON STANTEC CONSULTING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: VALERO AT THE PAVILIONS AT CIVANO Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D09-017 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD).This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Sheet 6: G-2007-028 has not been accepted by the PCRWRD or given authorization to discharge by the state. No permits for connection will be allowed until such time as authorization to discharge and acceptance by PCRWRD has been completed. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 05/18/2009 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D09-0017 VALERO AT THE PAVILIONS AT CIV: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 3,256 PM Peak: 268 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 05/19/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0017 Valero at the Pavilions at CIV () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Civano Master PAD (PAD-12) SCENIC ROUTE: YES COMMENTS DUE BY: 6/04/09 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Comments Below () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan REVIEWER: John Beal 791-4505 DATE: April 27 2009 Urban Planning and Design Department D09-0013 Quiktrip Store 1450 April 21, 2009 The following are staff's comments: 1. Please correct development plan, by including a new sheet with four-sided building(s) elevations drawn to scale and in color, including the gas pump canopy to demonstrate proposed color palette and paint scheme (paint codes) are in compliance with LUC, Scenic Route, Section 2.8.2.10.A. 2. Development plan, sheet 6 identifies a light fixture (pole) within the required thirty (30) feet wide Scenic Route buffer area. Please provide information which identifies the square footage of buffer area to be disturbed and include a revegetation plan that complies with LUC section 3.7.5.2.D, which states; "Within the Scenic Route buffer area and the MS&R rights-of-way, all areas between the MS&R rights-of-way line and the existing street rights-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be revegetated with native vegetation. 3. Please revise development plan, sheet 6, by adding a "key note" and location of the proposed four (4) Class II bicycle spaces. 4. Staff defers to the Department of Transportation, on the issue of potential off-site improvement costs related to Civano's Pavilions PAD as identified within section E-5.b -Allocation of Off-Site Improvements Costs. 5. Please revise development plan sheet 3, detail 3/9 typical tree well to be in compliance with LUC Section 3.7.2.3.1.A.1.c. The Civano's Pavilons PAD, E-4.c.2 requires parking lot tree wells to meet LUC,Section 3.7.2.3.1.A.1. (a) through (d). 6. Landscape plan, sheet 11, identifies proposed landscape improvements to the site. A portion of the southwest corner of the site (excluding the Scenic Route 30 foot buffer area) is inadequately landscaped. More specific that portion of the site located between the proposed self-standing sign and the south property line fronting Drexel Road. Please revise landscape plan sheet 11 to be in compliance with Civano's Pavilions PAD, Section E-3.1. Landscape Theme. Please include landscape plants, shrubs, and canopy trees which complement plant palette in the Sierra Morado PAD. Keep in mind to provide a view corridor toward Houghton Road as it relates to the proposed self-standing sign. 7. Please provide self-certification approval, as required within the Master Developer Self Certification, Section C-2.a.2. The self-certification shall follow the Revised Impact System Standards and the Revised Civano Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), as delineated in Section 5.3, and Section 7. 8. The site is located at the intersection of Houghton Road, a Scenic Route and Drexel Road an Entry Corridor Zone. In the future when the Houghton Road RTA project is completed it will have a direct benefit to this site. In addition, the Civano Master PAD identifies Drexel Road with a Multi-Use Trail. The proposed site is located within a predominate intersection of the Civano Master PAD. Based on the importance of the site and criteria of the Master Development Plan, Section C-2.b, and Section C-2.c, please address the following issues: · Master Development, PAD Section C-2.c, bullet-points read; Maximize compatibility and suitability with the land and Sensitivity and compatibility with adjacent land uses. Please revise development plan to include scaled elevations of outdoor lighting fixtures, poles etc., including gas pump canopy lighting. Pole and wall light fixtures to be shielded/hood. Gas pump canopy light fixtures to be recessed into the gas pump canopy ceiling to eliminate flood light effects and glare onto neighboring residential communities. · Master Development, PAD section C-2.c, bullet-point reads; An emphasis on non-vehicular internal circulation that provides pedestrian and bicycle linkages between residential, employment, commercial, recreation and open space uses through out the project. Please revise development plan to include an on-site pedestrian/bicycle crosswalk at the western most entrance from Drexel Road. Cross-walk surfaces shall be textured and colored with material which is durable and resistant to discoloration and staining from vehicle fluid contamination such as oils, anti-freeze, grease, etc. Crosswalk width to accommodate both pedestrian use and bicyclist use. · Master Development Plan, Recreation and Trails, Section C-5, require a Multi-use Trail on Drexel Road adjacent to the proposed Valero project. Staff defers to the Department of Transportation the requirement and timing of a Multi-use Trail as part of the Drexel Road rights-of-way improvements. |
| 05/27/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0017 VALERO AT THE PAVILIONS AT CIV/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 5/22/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Delete Admin Address from all Title Blocks. 2.) Delete Lot 7 from Sheet Index Map and all other applicable pages. 3.) Delete all street directions from Location Map. 4.) Delete all adjacent owner information and tax codes. |
| 05/28/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet 2 - Trash enclosure detail Concrete filled pipe (bollard) provided for wall protection along the inside perimeter should show a 1 (one) ft. dimension from the inside face of the bollard to the inside face of the CMU wall for adequate separation/clearance. 2. Trash enclosure detail - Provide a separate post at the face of the CMU wall for mounting the gates to. 3. Trash enclosure detail - Provide a minimum of two bollards along each side wall for protection. Dimension the front side bollard 2ft from the front face of the CMU wall/gates and the rear side bollard 4 ft from the front side bollard. The container service area requires a minimum 10 ft x 10 ft clear between the rear and side bollards and the front gates DS 6-01.4.1.B 4. Trash enclosure detail - Gates must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open and closed positions. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Annotate and show within detail. Recommend "Positive locking and (Bayonet) anchors, Qty - 4/1in. Dia. X 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush in concrete/foundation. 5. Sheet 6 DP, There is not an adequate turnaround as shown. 6. Access, manuverability, and approach to enclosure area works (other than turnaround). However, keep in mind that the collection vehicle will be obstructing the access drive during service operation as currently designed. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/01/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/03/2009 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/03/2009, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Valero At the Pavilions at Civano D09-0017, T15S, R15E, SECTION 07 RECEIVED: Development Package and Drainage Report on May 07, 2009 The subject project has been reviewed. The project can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that where made and references the exact location in the drainage report and the development plan package where the revisions were made: EVERY PAGE OF PACKAGE: 1. Complete the D (yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-01.3.3.3. BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS: 1. Show the existing 20' telephone and 10' electrical easements as required by (D.S. 2-01.3.8.B.). 2. Drainage, construction and access easements are required on the adjacent parcels in order to install the proposed improvements. Show the required easements with their dimensions and provide the recordation information as required by D.S. 2-01.3.9.L. 3. The flare out, at the Houghton Road entrance, appears to be an unnecessary disturbance to the 30' native vegetation buffer. Revise the base layer to minimize the encroachment into the buffer area. General Notes: 1. Add a note that specifies drainage structures maintenance responsibility. 2. Add the following grading general notes: a. The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work. b. Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it. c. The contractor is not permitted to make an autonomous decision to carry out construction field changes without prior written approval from the Engineer of Record and the City of Tucson Development Services Department. d. CALL FOR SWPPP INSPECTION AND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS. FOR A DSD ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: http://WWW.CI.TUCSON.AZ.US/DSD/ONLINE_SERVICES/ONLINE_PERMITS/ONLINE_PERMITS.HTML. e. A copy of the approved Grading Plan, Grading Permit, and any Geotechnical Reports shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval. f. Any revision to the Grading Plan MAY require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review. Contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in grading design. g. If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact DSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. h. See the associated Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan as a part of this grading permit. i. Contact Permits and Codes at 791-5100 for any questions regarding any right-of-way permit requirements. j. As-builts and letters of completion for basin and overall project are required. k. The Engineer of Record shall submit a statement of conformance to as-built plan and the specifications. l. The permitee shall notify the DSD when the grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all drainage facilities and their permanent protective devices, and all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the approved grading plan and grading permit, and any required reports have been submitted. 3. Provide the drainage structures maintenance responsibility note. Site Plan: 1. Add the 100-year floodplain limits to the Legend. 2. The existing ground elevations appear to be different from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Plat. Clarify the discrepancy. 3. Provide the amount of the 100-year runoff along Houghton Road as required by (D.S. 2-01.3.8.I.). 4. Key note 29 does not appear to be shown on Sheet 6 of 16. Revise as needed. 5. Provide all the entrances and PAAL's widths (D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5). 6. Show the required 12' asphalt pathway along Houghton Road as was shown and approved on the Pavilions Tentative Plat (S06-204). Show the connection between the pathway and the sidewalk along Drexel Road. 7. Show the future sight visibility triangles along Houghton Road (D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2). 8. The Development Plan does not have any drainage related information. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow especially for the proposed building and canopy (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.2). 9. Verification will be provided that any proposed improvements and drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development document area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the next submittal.). Construction, access and drainage easements shall also be provided for all improvements proposed on adjacent private parcels (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.5). 10. Bleed pipes may be utilized for waterharvesting areas to ensure that water will not pond for prolonged periods of time. 11. Dimension the concrete pedestrian areas around the proposed building (D.S. 2-01.3.9.S.). 12. All proposed work in the public right of way will require a right of way excavation permit or a Private Improvement Agreement. Contact Thad Harvison of Transportation Department Permit and Codes at 791-5100 for additional information. 13. Revise the Development Plan Package according to the Drainage Report revisions. Drainage Report: 1. Address, in the report, how the building roof drainage and the eastern entrance will leave the site in a sheet flow pattern. Show any proposed splash pads if applicable. 2. Provide design calculations for all proposed drainage structures including curb openings and erosion control pads. 3. The open channel or the storm drain system associated with the regional detention basin has not been built yet. According to the Master Drainage Report, the first development must install the detention basin infrastructure. Revise the report to address this issue and provide the conveyance systems design calculations which are included in the Master Drainage Report. 4. It appears that the proposed improvements encroach on Lots 5, 6 and 8. Written permissions from the owners of the adjacent parcels are required. Additionally, construction, access and drainage easements need to be dedicated on the adjacent parcels in order to install the improvements and drainage facilities. If permission is not granted, proposed improvements need to be revised to fit in within the subject parcel. 5. It is not clear how the gas pumps canopy will be draining. Show the canopy on the drainage exhibit and address its drainage in the report. 6. The driveway and P.A.A.L. capacity calculations should be included. Show on the drainage exhibits the locations of the cross sections, where the P.A.A.L's are being analyzed. 7. Revise the Drainage Exhibits to provide all proposed drainage solutions/structures with all required construction details (i.e. type, materials, location, size and dimensions, slopes, grades, roof drainage, inlets and outlets, sidewalk scuppers, building finished floor elevation, etc.) that would clarify how the proposed drainage scheme will work. 8. All proposed splash pads and curb design calculations shall be included in the report. 9. Address waterharvesting and how runoff will be directed to waterharvesting areas. 10. State in the report who is, currently, and will be, in the future, maintaining the regional detention basin. Landscape Plan: 1. Ensure that the proposed landscaping does not obstruct visibility within the sight visibility triangles. Grading Plan: 1. Provide the proper dimensions that clarify the exact location of the dowels in all applicable details (i.e. How far the dowel is supposed to be from the bottom or the top of the concrete). 2. Show the canopy drainage arrows. 3. Show how the building roof drainage and the eastern entrance will leave the site in a sheet flow pattern. Show any proposed splash pads if applicable. Provide all the construction details associated with any proposed drainage structure. 4. Provide all grade breaks and high and low points. 5. Provide a couple of post barricades in Detail 3/8. 6. It appears that the proposed improvements traverse the three adjacent lots. Written permission from the owners of the adjacent parcels is required. Additionally, construction, access and drainage easements need to be dedicated on the adjacent parcels in order to install the improvements and drainage facilities. If permission is not granted, proposed improvements need to be revised to fit in within the subject parcel. 7. Provide all slope ratios and additional spot elevations on the top and bottom of the slopes in order to facilitate their construction. Show the required slope protection and stabilization as recommended by the geotechnical report. 8. According to D.S. 11-01.9.0, the minimum cut or fill setback shall be 2' from the parcel line. Verify compliance with this requirement. 9. Provide construction details and all dimensions (i.e. length, width and depth, material, rock sizes, filter fabric, etc.) for all erosion control pads. 10. Provide additional details for the depressed areas between the two entrances and between the western entrance and the sidewalk. Will the area be used for waterharvesting? Provide water depth. 11. The trash enclosure does not appear to match the standard trash enclosure including the minimum clearances. Revise the trash enclosure detail to match Standard Detail 6-01.0. 12. The location of the trash enclosure does not appear to work properly without the additional area from Lot 6, with the assumption that a wall will not be built between the two lots. Revise the location of the trash to address the stated concern. 13. Cross Section 6/2 does not show what appears to be two curbs near the 30' buffer area. Revise as necessary. Geotechnical Report: 1. Address the need to stabilize the proposed slopes on this project. SWPPP: 1. Include a copy of the authorization certificate received from ADEQ (Part III.D.3). 2. Identify any city or county which received a copy of the authorization certificate (Part III.D.4). 3. Include copies of other agreements with any state, local or federal agencies that would affect the provisions of implementation of the SWPPP, if applicable (i.e. 404 permits, etc.). 4. Provide the name(s) of the person(s) having control over project specifications, including the ability to make changes to the specifications (Part III.B.2.b). 5. The first two activities in the "Major Construction Activities" shall be determining the disturbance limits and installing the PMB's inside the limits. 6. Identify all potential sources of pollutants/pollution from construction activities that could possibly contact stormwater (Part III.A.2.a) 7. Provide a location map that shows the receiving waters as required by Part III.C.2.f. 8. Identify how records of when construction activities temporarily or permanently cease on all portions of the site will be kept (Part IV.B.3.) 9. Identify how records of when stabilization measures are initiated and completed and reason(s) for delay will be kept (Part IV.B.3). 10. Provide sizing criteria and show calculations for sediment basin(s) and indicate whether basin(s) will be temporary or permanent (i.e., post-construction) (Part IV.C.3). 11. Provide reason(s) or rational why a sediment basin was determined to not be possible at the project site (if applicable) (Part IV.C.3). 12. Specify the names and telephone numbers of government agencies that need to be notified in case of a spill (Part IV.B.1). Provide this information on the exhibit for easy access. 13. Describe how the SWPPP will be modified when needed, within 7 calendar days of inspection. BMP's must be modified or added before next storm event or as soon as possible (Part IV.H.7). 14. Revise the SWPPP exhibits in accordance with the Development and Grading Plan comments. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package |
| 06/03/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#211771 June 1, 2009 Stantec Consulting Attn: Warren Thompson 201 N. Bonita Ave. #101 Tucson, AZ 85745 To Warren Thompson: SUBJECT: Valero At The Pavillions At Civano D09-0017 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted May 28, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The customer is responsible for the new trenching to relocate them as well as the relocation cost. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-918-8726 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson (Email only) N. DiMaria Tucson Electric Power |
| 06/04/2009 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: D09-0017 (SCZ T09SA00127 & Grading T09BU00660) 10335 East Drexel Road Valero at the Pavilions (PAD12 Pavilions District) TRANSMITTAL: June 4, 2009 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) This review is subject to Development Standards No.2-05, the Land Use Code and PAD 12, Civano I, Pavilions District, Sub-District B (Master PAD E-1 & E-2 & figure 29 [pgs 118 - 126]). All references to PAD 12, in this review for this site, are from the Civano Master PAD revised April 7, 2005 (C9-05-02 Ordinance 10147). 2) A maximum of one (1) year is allowed from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan (LUC Section 5.3.8.2). The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 7, 2010. 3) List in the general notes: "Existing zoning is PAD 12, OCR-1 Pavilions District, Sub-District B." (SD 2-05.2.2.B.1). 4) In the general notes provide the proposed use of the property (DS 2-02.2.2.B.3). 5) Add a not stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for the Scenic Corridor Zone (LUC Section 2.8.2) (DS 2-02.2.2.B.10). 6) Provide the square footage and the acreage of the site in the general notes (DS 2-02.2.B.11). 7) All existing easements shall be drawn with dimensions on the development plan. Provide the docket and page information along with the purpose of all easements on the Development plan (DS 2-05.2.3.B). 8) "All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private" (DS 2-05.2.4.G). All cross-access agreements and blanket easements should be provided. 9) Provide sight-visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan (DS 2-05.23.4.I). 10) Provide dimensions for the distance from each structure and the property lines (DS 2-05.2.4.I). 11) Clearly depict all on site pedestrian circulation (DS 2-05.2.4.K). A continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the site to the pedestrian circulation path along the streets (DS 2-08.3.1, DS 2-08.4.1 & LUC Sec 3.2.8.1, LUC Sec 3.2.8.4.B [also see illustration]). 12) Provide the parking calculations for the number of motor vehicles spaces required and the number of spaces provided on the plan (DS 2-05.2.4.P). It appears that the number of spaces required is [4,487 + 380 (approx for outdoor seating) = 4,867 / 200 = 24.335] twenty-four (24) and the number provided is twenty-seven (27) (LUC Section 3.3.4). 13) "Show on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided" (DS 2-05.2.4.Q). The number of bicycle spaces required is two (2) Class 2 (LUC Section 3.3.7.8.A). 14) Show all sight visibility triangles on the plan (DS 2-05.2.4.R). The following comment is relative the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) (LUC Section 2.8.2): Clearly depict and dimension the depth of the SCZ as four hundred (400) feet measured from the edge of the future right-of-way (LUC Section 2.8.2.3). The submitted plans depict two hundred (200) feet from the current ROW. Please be aware that additional comments may be required relative to subsequent submittals. |
| 06/04/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. 1) An unpaved planting area, a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. In addition, trees may not be located inside parking spaces, but are to be located at the front edge per DS 2-06.3.3.E & DS 2-06. Figure 5. Revise the planters on all plans. 2) The Scenic Route Buffer Area is required to be a minimum of thirty feet wide along Houghton Road per LUC 3.7.5.2.A. Revise the plans to provide the minimum width near the Houghton ingress/egress location. 3) The provisions of the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) apply to any portion of all real properties or parcels which are within four hundred (400) feet of the future right-of-way line. Revise the plans to correctly show the SCZ where applicable. LUC 2.8.2.3 4) Show and identify existing plants (in the SRBA) to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 5) Revise the development plans show the Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) indicated on the approved NPP plans. 6) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading and any required dust control treatments. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5, LUC 3.7.2.7. 7) Extend the Drexel Road landscape border to the eastern extent of the development site. LUC 3.7.2.4.A 8) Fencing shall be required during construction for all undisturbed natural desert areas of Protected Native Plants and for individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. The area to be fenced shall be beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A 9) Add notes to the grading plans regarding the NPP Plan provisions for fencing, monitoring, and the required NPPO pre-grading inspection. LUC 3.8.6.7.B SCZ REVIEW The Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the SCZ application. Revise the plans as necessary to comply with applicable codes. 1) The Scenic Route Buffer Area is required to be a minimum of thirty feet wide along Houghton Road per LUC 3.7.5.2.A. Revise the plans to provide the minimum width near the Houghton ingress/egress location. 2) The provisions of the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) apply to any portion of all real properties or parcels which are within four hundred (400) feet of the future right-of-way line. Revise the plans to correctly show the SCZ where applicable. LUC 2.8.2.3 3) Show and identify existing plants (in the SRBA) to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 4) Revise the development plans show the Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) indicated on the approved NPP plans. 5) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading and any required dust control treatments. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5, LUC 3.7.2.7., LUC 3.7.5.2.D |
| 06/08/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/09/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 06/04/2009 11:08 AM >>> No comment |
| 06/09/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approv-Cond | DATE: June 04, 2009 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D09-0017 Valero at the Pavilions at Civano: Development Plan Review(5/07/09) Notify Parks and Recreation as to whether the Transportation Dept. is asking that the Houghton Greenway be constructed by developer/owner or an in-lieu fee is to be paid. |
| 06/11/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 06/11/2009 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/12/2009 | JWILLIA5 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 12, 2009 Warren D. Thompson Stantec Consulting, Inc. 201 N. Bonita Avenue., Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: D09-0017 Valero at the Pavilions at Civano Development Package Dear Warren: Your submittal of May 7, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 8 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Package (H/C, Planning, Addressing, ENV SVCS, Engineering, Landscaping, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised SWPPP Exhibits (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 750-7470 |