Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0014
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/13/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/14/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/16/2009 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D09-0014 Walmart Houghton/Golf Links Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 04/16/2009 DUE DATE: May 11, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 10, 2010. 2. Based on the following email from the Department of Urban Planning and Design Zoning cannot review the development plan at this time. Planning staff has determined this proposal is a substantial change of PDP, requiring M&C public hearing. The proposal creates a significantly greater amount of building massing along the east property line. In addition the loading zones are located on the east side of the building - granted there appears to be an improved buffer. The site layout is also quite different, resulting in a less favorable street scape along Houghton Road, which now has a view into a large parking lot. These proposed changes, combined with the age of the rezoning case, warrant another public review. Please have the applicant contact me so we can begin the process for the change of PDP process. Michael W. Wyneken, AICP Principal Planner, Rezoning Section 520.837.4955 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D090014dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, any additional requested documents. |
| 04/16/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | Regional Traffic: * No comments from Traffic Engineering on this submittal. The development will not affect any ADOT facilities. * Traffic will be forwarding development plans to Development Engineer for separate comments. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 04/16/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | To Whom It May Concern: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on D09-0014 Wal Mart, a development plan review application for an approximately 11 acre site at the southeast corner of Golf Links and Houghton. The proposed development is large scale retail. The site is not within the Tucson International Airport or Ryan Airfield public disclosure areas or traffic pattern airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority does not oppose the subject application. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Respectfully, Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org www.tucsonairport.org (520) 573-5115 office (520) 573-8006 fax c - file |
| 04/21/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0014 Walmart Houghton-Golf Links ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-89-13 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 5/11/09 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Other - Dimensioned elevations and color renderings 1. Condition 1.h and 1.j require the submittal of dimensional elevations and color renderings to confirm compliance with these conditions. |
| 04/24/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D09-0014 WALMART HOUGHTON/GOLF LINKS: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 9,409 PM Peak: 966 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. PLEASE UPDATE MAILING INFORMATION to avoid any unexpected delay The correct mailing information is PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Attention: KoSok Chae ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 04/29/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Throughout the site there are several different types of accessible ramps. Please provide large scale details of each different type showing compliance with 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 405 and/or 406. Include all dimensions required, detectable warnings, show slope requirements, if provided, requirements for flared sides, connection to accessible route and/or marked crossing and etc. 2. At all marked crossings, provide a detectable warning strips incompliance with ICC/ANSI, Section 406.12 and .14 at both ends of the marked crossing. 3. At the front entrance marked crossing (which is not identified), not only are detectable warnings required at both ends of the crossing but the crossing must be marked differently from the overall common front entrance YEILD area. 4. Provide spot elevations throughout the entire accessible route to show compliance with ICC/ANSI, Section 403.3, SLOPE. 5. Change Note 4, Sheet C3.0 to read "IBC 2006, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition, Sections 405 and/or 406" and delete the reference to "COT Standards". 6. At Note 20/C3.0, the 1986 ANSI is outdated and non applicapable. All accessible parking signage is directed by "Park Wise", Mr. Don Angle, (520) 429-3318. Please change governing reference. 7. At Note 23/C3.0 and any other sheet with the same reference, change the "Uniform Building Code (U.B.C.)" to "IBC" 2006". 8. Provide an Accessible Parking signage detail including a "Van Accessible" sign as required. 9. Provide locations of signage on all site and large scale detail plans. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/04/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#210199 May 4, 2009 Dear Dan Skeecham : SUBJECT: Walmart Houghton / Golf Links Store #5799 D09-0014 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 23, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures City of Tucson (Email only) cc:N. DiMaria |
| 05/04/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 1, 2009 To: DANIEL SKEEHAN KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: WAL-MART SUPERCENTER (STORE #5799-00) Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D09-014 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via Pantano Interceptor and South Rillito Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 2: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 2: Revise Wastewater General Note #1 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION LINES WILL BE PUBLIC AND DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. ALL BUILDING CONNECTION SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. Sheet 2: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 5: Refer to the separate plan for the public sewer to be constructed by others as G-2007-115. Sheet 5: The sewer line proposed by others should be shaded differently then the sewer proposed for this project. Sheet 5: Number all of the manholes shown on plan including manholes proposed by others. Also include both the rim and invert elevations for all public manholes and private cleanouts. Sheet 5: You are proposing a private 6” BCS for the Wal-Mart. A manhole will be required at the connection point of the 6” BCS to the proposed public sewer. Also include the slope for the private BCS. Sheet 5: Include the size and slope for the BCS for the CVS Pharmacy. Sheet 5: The easement width for the public sewer easement must be a minimum of 20’. Sheet 5: Extend the terminal MH north into Golf Links Rd. ROW. PCRWRD does not have control of when or if G-2007-115 will be constructed. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 05/08/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C 3) Applications for projects within the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) are reviewed in accordance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sec. 23A-50 and 23A-51. Contact Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager for application information. The decision to approve or deny the project will be based on the purpose, intent, and specific regulations of LUC 2.8.2. 4) Within the 30' scenic route buffer area along Houghton Road, indigenous plant material is to remain. If any disturbance occurs during construction or prior to permit application, the buffer area is to be revegetated with native plants indigenous to the site and the area reconstructed to look as natural as possible. DS 2-06.7.1.B In order to comply with the above section a number of changes should be made to the plans: A) Revise the Native Plant Preservation Plans and Landscape Plans to establish limits of grading/disturbance for the 30' scenic route buffer and portions of the site where PIP plants are indicated. DS 2-15.3.4.A.1 B) Show the existing preserved vegetation in the 30' scenic route buffer on the landscape plans. C) Revise the proposed plantings for the 30' scenic route buffer to exclude plants that are not indigenous to the specific site and surrounding area. Refer to DS 2-16.4.1 D) Indicate natural contours of undisturbed areas on the Landscape and Native Plant Preservation Plans. DS 2-07.2.2.B.4, DS 2-15.3.4.A.3 5) The Native Plant Preservation Plan (NPP) lacks the following elements that are required in the City of Tucson: A) Salvage and Mitigation Report is to include salvage and irrigation and maintenance information. DS 2-15.3.4.B B) Fencing Standards per DS 2-15.6.0. Revise the Construction Limit Barrier Fence Detail to provide the required plant non-disturbance area. Call out fence locations on the plans. C) Notes regarding the required tagging and flagging procedures. DS 2-15.5.0.A, B, C. D) Revise the calculations for preservation credits (and mitigation requirements where applicable) in accordance with LUC 3.8.6.2.B. Credits are only applied to plants preserved in place. Calculations on sheet NPP3 indicate in some instances that the number of plants included in the credit calculation exceed the number proposed as "PIP" on line 3 of the table(s). E) Revise the calculations (sheet NPP3) to only claim preservation credit for the plants on the proposed development site. Credits from the CVS property were already claimed for that site. F) Remove the notes regarding the preliminary nature of the NPP and Landscape Plan. We understand that if additional revisions become necessary due to grading or geotechnical concerns these plan(s) must be revised reviewed for code compliance again. Plans labeled preliminary or conceptual are not acceptable for approved plans. Approval of these plans will constitute the necessary documentation for approval upon review of grading/building permits. G) The preservation plan should be modified to indicate the disposition of each native plant per DS 2-15.3.4.A.4. Use unique symbols for PIP and TOS plants on the aerial photo. Include all symbols on the plan in the legend. H) Revise the Native Plant Preservation Plan to include the line types used on the plan. in the legend. I) Provide a simple summary table that details the Native Plant Preservation requirements. Add this table to the NPPP and the Landscape Plan: Species #Viable #PIP #TOS #RFS 5) Revise the landscape plans to show the locations of all TOS and PIP plants from the NPP Plan. 6) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations and note the height and materials used to construct any proposed or required screen walls. DS 2-07.A.3 7) Include grading limits on the Grading and Drainage plans. DS 11-01.4.1.C, LUC 2.8.2.6.A 8) Design the placement of trees in coordination with the outdoor lighting, so that the trees, at maturity, do not diminish the purpose of the lights. DS 2-06.2.2.J 9) Revise the notes regarding the use of decomposed granite (LC-1). Decomposed granite is not to be use for restoration of the scenic route buffer area. DS 2-06.7.1.B 10) Provide details and cross-sections for water harvesting areas in the plan set and include identification of water harvesting areas on the grading plans. LUC 3.7.4.3.B |
| 05/11/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please provide the Real Estate Division with the following; 1. Legal description and sketch prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor for the right of way dedication along Houghton and Golf Links per the re-zoning conditions. 2. A title report dated within 30 days for the property shown on the development plan. The corner development (CVS) dedicated right of way off their parcel, Docket 11047, at Page 1167, please have the surveyor tie the new right of way dedication for this development in like manner. Sincerely, Jim Stoyanoff Property Agent Real Estate Division City of Tucson 201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Fl. Tucson, Arizona 85701 (O) 520.837.6719 (F) 520.791.5641 Jim.Stoyanoff@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/11/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0014 WALMART HOUGHTON/GOLF LINKS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 5/07/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Note: On Final Development Plan: 1.) Delete all adjacent tax codes and owner information. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 05/12/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | May 14, 2009 D07-0014 First Review Resubmittal required: Drainage Report, Development Plan 1. In the drainage report, discuss the soils types for the site and its effects on hydrology and retention requirements. Calculate the required retention volume using the run-off coefficients for the five-year, one-hour rainfall amount. 2. Provide a drainage map describing the existing conditions and showing the concentration points and drainage areas corresponding to the hydrologic worksheets. 3. Demonstrate in the drainage report that all of the criteria for use of a dry well have been met. Show how maintenance will be performed, including access and scheduling. The City of Tucson generally doesn't accept drywells except as a last resort. Provide a clear and convincing justification for drywell use instead of other mechanisms for achieving disposal. 4. Include a copy of the preliminary development plan or concept plan with you next submittal. The rezoning conditions make reference to the plan and indicate the proposal must be consistent. The development plan must demonstrate conformity with the concept plan. 5. Show on the development plan the depth of water at all inlet structures and ponding areas. Delineate areas of ponding in these areas. 6. Clearly show in details, notes and on the plans how water harvesting will be maximized for all landscape areas. The concept plan indicated the retention basin and landscape buffer would coincide, providing stormwater for landscape irrigation purposes. Revise the development plan to be consistent with this purpose. Note that additional comments may be forthcoming once the revised concept plan is approved. |
| 05/15/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | May 15, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0014 PROJECT NAME: Walmart-Houghton/Golf Links PROJECT ADDRESS: 2711 S Houghton Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 3. Verify that a cross access easement has been provided for the parcel south of this development. 4. What off-site improvements for the two access points along Houghton Road are proposed to restrict left in and left out maneuvers from the proposed development? 5. The plans and the TIA do not address rezoning condition 10. A meeting may be needed to coordinate how this rezoning condition will be met. 6. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. 7. Address redlines associated with the Traffic Impact Analysis. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/18/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. No mention of Solid Waste disposal/collection storage area/s or arrangements. Must call out and shown within DP. Refer to DS6-01.0 2. Clarify if store will be equipped with a cardboard baler in relation to keynote 8. Please provide clarification on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/18/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 05/18/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: May 14, 2009 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D09-0014 Walmart Houghton/Golf links: Development Plan Review(4/13/09) No comments. |
| 05/18/2009 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/19/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 19, 2009 Dan Skeehan, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2210 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D09-0014 Walmart - Golf Links Development Plan Dear Dan: Your submittal of April 13, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 12 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 12 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADOT, Zoning, DUPD, ADA, WWM, Landscape, Real Estate, Engineering, Traffic, ESD, Tucson Water, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DUPD, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Dimensioned, color elevations (DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) 3 Copies Revised TIA (Traffic, ADOT, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 602-678-3464 |
| 05/19/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Denied | "Tucson Water is holding off on the water assurance approval for the Wal-Mart, which is currently within the boundaries of Rincon Ranch Water Company, until either the pending acquisition of the water company by the City is completed or the Rincon Ranch Water Company's owner releases the Wal-Mart parcel to Tucson Water for service. Tucson Water has been in close coordination with the water company on both fronts and hopes to have a resolution on this matter in the near future." Thanks again for your patience!! |