Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0013
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/24/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/24/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 06/29/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 07/02/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 26, 2009 To: JESUS ORTIZ DOWL HKM Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: QUIKTRIP STORE NO. 1450 Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D09-0013 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD).This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 4: Fill in the blanks of the Dkt and Page for the private sewer easement shown on plan. Call out the easement as vacated instead of abandoned. Sheet 15: The building can not encroach upon the public sewer easement shown on plan. The proposed new alignment of the public sewer is not acceptable due to the inability to access the proposed new public sewer manhole. If you would like to discus this with PCRWRD contact Mr. Don Wilhoit @ (520)740-6779. Sheet 15: Call out the public sewer easement on site with width and recordation information. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. |
| 07/09/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1450 Development Package (2nd Review) D09-0013 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 9, 2009 DUE DATE: July 23, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 5, 2010 2. This project was review for full code compliance of the City of Tucson Land Use Code, Development Standard 2-01.0 and Development Package Submittal Requirements Draft dated 12-20-07. 3. Zoning acknowledges that a demo plan was provided with this submittal. A separate demolition permit will be required. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Zoning acknowledges that a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) has been approved and that the DSMR Number DS09-0015 has been added to the plan, also provide the date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There is a Public Drainage and a 20' Sewer easement shown on the Final Plat, Bk. 44 Pg. 62. Show these easements on the development plan. The proposed building appears to be over the 20' sewer easement. This easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development plan. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B Based on discussions with the adjacent tenants there are CC&R's in place for this development. Within the CC&R's there are cross access easements shown across the proposed site that run directly under the proposed fuel canopy and around the existing building to the north. Provide documentation that these CC&R's have been amended and that the easements have been abandoned. 7. Based on discussions with the adjacent tenants there are CC&R's in place for this development. This said if the cross access is to be amended provide a copy of the amended CC&R's. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a copy of the cross access agreement between this parcel and the parcels to the west. 8.See comment 4. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d It does not appear that the proposed Class 2 bicycle parking meets the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1. Provide a dimension from the proposed Class 2 bicycle parking to the main entrance of the proposed building. If the location of the Class 2 bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1 and you propose to leave the bicycle parking as shown on the plan a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) is required. If the DSMR is approved provide on the plan the DSMR case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval. 9. Stone Loop is not shown on the Major Streets and Routes map therefore there is not a future curb proposed for this street. Remove the reference to future curb for Stone Loop in the Land Use Requirements. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The perimeter yard requirements shown for the east and north perimeter yards are not correct. Based on the size of the apartment complex located north of W. Stone Loop the Average Daily Traffic is greater than 1000 therefore the required perimeter yard is 21' or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, which ever is greatest, measured from the back of curb. Zoning acknowledges that the proposed development meets these requirements, revise the perimeter yard requirements under the "LAND USE REQUIREMENTS" sheet 1 and show the perimeter yard dimensions correctly on sheet 4. 10. D.S. 2-05.3.9.R Zoning acknowledges that this comment should have been made on the last review. The proposed striped crosswalk running west from the proposed building needs to be re-routed so that it does not run parallel with the PAAL that connects to the adjacent parcels. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a. The proposed vehicle parking spaces located along the south property line may not be located within the 30' Scenic Corridor buffer. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0013 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1450 Grading Plan (2nd Review) T09BU00493 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 9, 2009 DUE DATE: July 23, 2009 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1450 T09SA00178 Overlay Zone Review (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 9, 2009 DUE DATE: July 23, 2009 COMMENTS: 1. This development is subject to the review and approval of the special application for the Scenic Corridor Overlay. Provide a general note stating: "The Special application case number is T09SA00178.The special application has been reviewed and approved, approval date __________, without conditions." 2. LUC Sec. 2.8.2.3.C Add the 400-foot SCZ corridor boundary from River Road on site plan. Zoning acknowledges that the 400-foot SCZ corridor boundary from River Road is off site provide a dimension to the line and show as not to scale. 3. LUC Sec. 2.8.2.4.A Label the required thirty (30) foot buffer as "30 FOOT UNDISTURBED NATURAL BUFFER TO BE PRESERVED AND MAINTAINED IN IT'S NATURAL STATE". 4. LUC Sec. 2.8.2.6.B Provide the view corridor calculation on the plan. 5. Please add the following notes to the site plan. a. Maximum height of structures will be 1/3 the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way of River Road, not to exceed 30 feet for commercial development from design grade. b. No grading beyond what is necessary for siting of buildings, drives, private yards, and structural improvements. All viable vegetation with a caliper of 4 inches or greater and all saguaro cacti will be preserved or relocated on the site per the Native Plant and Preservation Ordinance. c. All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along River Road will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, if area is revegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D d. Building or structure surfaces, which are visible from River Road will have colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape such as desert and earth tones. e. Fencing and freestanding walls facing River Road. will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements. f. All areas between the MS & R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be revegetated with native vegetation. g. All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from River Road and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be revegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. 6. Provide the overlay number T09SA00178 in the lower right hand corner, near the title block on all sheets of the development plan. 7. The proposed vehicle parking spaces located along the south property line may not be located within the 30' Scenic Corridor buffer. 8. All requested information will be provided on the development plan or as attachments to the development plan If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com |
| 07/14/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0013 QUIKTRIP STORE 1450/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/13/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Addresses are not required to be on Development Plans. Please remove 68 W. River Road on all locations. This Development Plan does not show the entire portion of lot 1 of Northmall Centre 44/62. Please correct legal description on all Title Blocks. |
| 07/14/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/15/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/16/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov> 07/15/2009 12:27 PM >>> ADOT recommends approval of this development. |
| 07/24/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/24/2009 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0013 Quiktrip Store 1450 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan SCENIC ROUTE: YES COMMENTS DUE BY: July 23, 2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Comments Below (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: April 27, 2009 REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: June 25, 2009 |
| 07/29/2009 | JWILLIA4 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 29, 2009 J. Lorenzo Ortiz, P.E. DOWL HKM 166 W. Alameda Street Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D09-0013 Quicktrip Store #1450 Development Package Dear Lorenzo: Your submittal of April 3, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 4 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, Addressing, Wastewater DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 624-0384 |