Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0013
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/06/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/07/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/09/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | Regional Traffic * No comments from Traffic Engineering on this submittal. The development should not affect any ADOT facilities. * Traffic will be forwarding development plans to Development Engineer for separate comments. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 04/09/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 02, 2009 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D09-0013 Quiktrip Store 1450: Development Plan(4/6/09) Staff has no comments. |
| 04/14/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/16/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D09-0012 AIRPORT COMMERCE CENTER: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 53 PM Peak: 5 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 04/22/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#209539 April 22, 2009 DOWL HKM Attn: J. Lorenzo Ortiz P.E. 166 W Alameda Street Tucson, Arizona 85701 Dear Mr. Ortiz : SUBJECT: Quiktrip Store D09-0013 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 6, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. * Plans do not depict complete existing electrical facilities/equipment. Verbiage only. Plans should show the existing transformer and complete UG electric line and be tied down by surveyor.* Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Susie McCann at (520) 917-8741. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) S. McCann, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/27/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The Marked crossing is positioned in a hazardous way. An auto parked in the farest North space has no option but to back up into the marked crossing. Relocate marked crossing at the building to start at the curb near the dumpster area, perpendicular to the curb and traffic and crossing with direct access to the kiosk. Provide ramps at either end complying with ANSI 117.1, Sections 406.12 and .14. Extend the accessible route East along the curb to a point where another marked crossing providing route to cross perpendicular ro curb and traffic flow through the drive entrance. Again, provide ramps at either end complying with ANSI 117.1, Sections 406.12 and .14. 2. Change note 38, sheet 4 to read "ICC/ANSI 2003 Edition, Sections 406.12 and 406.14" not "COT...207. COT 207 is for Public Right of Way construction only. 3. Zoning will require a pedestrian access to the Stone Loop right of way. This will be an accessible route complying with section 11 of the IBC and Section 402 of ANSI. Reference Zoning comments. 4. Detail Numbers 1/15 and 1/17: The distance from the top of the ramp to the door jamb shall be no less than 7'; a 4' wide passing accessible route as required by Zoning with a 3' length of an extended door equals 7' minimum. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/28/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0013 Quiktrip Store 1450 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan SCENIC ROUTE: YES COMMENTS DUE BY: April 28, 2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Comments Below () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: April 27 2009 Urban Planning and Design Department D09-0013 Quiktrip Store 1450 April 21, 2009 The following are staff's comments: 1. Please correct development plan, sheet 1, by adding a new general note that states the site is subject to rezoning case C9-87-43, and to include (per verbatim) all the rezoning conditions of rezoning case C9-87-43. 2. Per rezoning case number C9-87-43, condition # 1.d, please correct Development Plan, sheet 2, within the Land Use Requirement legend to show that the maximum building height to be allowed is 30 feet, NOT 40 feet. 3. To address compliance requirements of rezoning case number C9-87-43, rezoning condition # 1.f, please provide the following information; 3.a. Please provide on development plan, sheet 4, a new keynote to identify the lighting fixture (include model number and manufacturer) that is planned to illuminate gas pump island. 3.b. Please add to development plan, on sheet 4 the location of all light fixtures going on the gas pump island, including gas island façade lighting, and recessed fixture canopy ceiling lighting. 3.c. Please add to development plan, a cross-section of gas island ceiling/light fixture, to demonstrate light fixture is recessed and light cover to be level with gas island ceiling. If light cover is not proposed, then light elements are not to be visible unless standing directly underneath the element. 3.d. There are residential neighborhoods located north and northeast of the proposed QuickTrip commercial business. Rezoning condition prohibits lighting that is directed at the residential area. Back lit panels directed north and northeast would not be in compliance with the requirement of a rezoning condition which does not allow direct lighting toward residential areas. Therefore, any building wall or gas island canopy façade facing north and northeast shall not be illuminated with back lit paneling. Please provide four sided elevation drawings of the main building and the gas pump island to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition # 1.f. 4. Rezoning case C9-87-43, rezoning condition # 1.g requires a pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that links all uses in the proposed development to one another and to the arterial streets. If the new vehicular access point (third on-site access point) on Stone Loop is approved by the Department of Transportation (See staff's comment # 5), then please provide a pedestrian crosswalk across this new access point. New cross-walk to link existing/new sidewalk along Stone Loop to existing/new on-site pedestrian path, directly from Stone Loop sidewalk to the proposed QuikTrip Store. 5. Subject to rezoning case C9-87-43, rezoning condition # 10, the proposed access to be located just north of the River Road and Stone Loop intersection shall require approval from the City's Department of Transportation. Rezoning condition reads as following; "There will be no access on the north side of the Stone Avenue intersection unless otherwise approved by the City Department of Transportation. |
| 04/29/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 28, 2009 To: JESUS ORTIZ DOWL HKM Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: QUIKTRIP STORE NO. 1450 Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D09-0013 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD).This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the North Rillito Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Revise Wastewater Note #2 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 2: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 2. Sheet 3: Call out the sewer easement as private and show the sewer line running thru it as private. Sheet 8: Call out the SSMH and sewer line west of SSMH #6371-01 as private. Sheet 8: Call out the size of the existing private sewer line west of SSMH#6371-01. Sheet 8: Revise the word PINTS to POINTS in the second line of Note #4 under Private Sanitary Sewer Lines General Notes. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $200.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. April 28, 2009 To: JESUS ORTIZ DOWL HKM Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: QUIKTRIP STORE NO. 1450 Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D09-0013 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 04/30/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0013 QUIKTRIP STORE 1450/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 4/30/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete 64 and 68 W. River Rd in all locations. Delete all adjacent tax codes and owner information. Delete “Lots 18 & 19” and “Lots 19 & 20” on Site Map. Correct Legal Description on all Title Blocks. This is only a portion of Lot 1. |
| 05/01/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plan to reference any of the following special overlay zones (SCZ, MS&R, etc.) that are applicable, and add a note stating that the plat is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria and note the case file number, date of approval, and any conditions of approval. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 2) Applications for projects within the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) shall be reviewed in accordance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sec. 23A-50 and 23A-51. LUC 2.8.2.11 A separate application for the SCZ Overlay review is usually required. Contact the CDRC Office for additional information. 3) Within the 30' scenic route buffer area, indigenous plant material is to remain. If any disturbance occurs during construction or prior to permit application, the buffer area is to be revegetated with native plants indigenous to the site and the area reconstructed to look as natural as possible. Consider use of plant materials typically occurring along River Road, such as Saguaros. DS 2-06.7.1.B, DS 2-16.4.1 Provide sufficient plant materials to restore the buffer to a natural appearance and to meet the screening requirements of LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 4) Clarify any ground surface treatments proposed for the scenic route buffer area. The Zoning staff has determined that only materials that replicate the native conditions are suitable for scenic route buffer restoration. DS 2-06.7.1.B 5) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 6) Hedges and other vegetative screens shall not extend more than three (3) feet into the street landscape border per LUC 3.7.3.2.C.2. Revise the locations of the proposed vegetative screening along Stone Loop if necessary to comply. 7) Revise the landscape bufferyard calcs on sheet 10 to more accurately characterize the requiremements for the scenic route buffer area. DS 2-07.2.2 8) Label the scenic route buffer area on the landscape plans. LUC 2.8.2.4.A 9) Revise the Water Harvesting Plan in coordination with Ann Audrey of OCSD as necessary. We can attend any meetings scheduled to discuss the plans, if desired. It appears that Rainwater Harvesting Calculations Note 3 is incorrect. 10) Revise the Landscape and Native Plant Preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A 11) Revise the planting plan such that the space in the small parking bay near the intersection of the streets are within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1.a 12) In order for canopy trees to count toward the vehicular use area requirement, they must be planted within or within ten feet of the paved portion of the parking lot. Locate the tree near the east end of the long parking bay accordingly. DS 2-06.3.3.D, LUC 6.2.22 GRADING PLAN 1) Revise the grading plan to correspond with changes made to the development plans. 2) Revise the Grading plan to identify any water harvesting basins in addition to #2. |
| 05/01/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1450 Development Package (1st Review) D09-0013 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 1, 2009 DUE DATE: May 01, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 5, 2010 2. This project was review for full code compliance of the City of Tucson Land Use Code, Development Standard 2-01.0 and Development Package Submittal Requirements Draft dated 12-20-07. 3. Zoning acknowledges that a demo permit was provided with this submittal. A separate demolition permit will be required. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet: D09-0013, C12-92-07E, C12-92-07, C9-87-43 & C9-82-48. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.3 List the conditions of rezoning C9-87-43 on the plan. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 General Note 3, the existing use should be listed as "Food Service "30", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C and Sec. 3.5.13.5". 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b List as a General Note "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONES CRITERIA; Sec. 2.8.2, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ); Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b This project must go through Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone review and approval prior to approval of the development package. Contact Patricia Gehlen @837-4919 for Overlay Zone review requirements. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There is a Public Drainage and a 20' Sewer easement shown on the Final Plat, Bk. 44 Pg. 62. Show these easements on the development plan. The proposed building appears to be over the 20' sewer easement. This easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development plan. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F Provide the existing zoning for the parcels south of River Road. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a copy of the cross access agreement between this parcel and the parcels to the west. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d It does not appear that the proposed Class 2 bicycle parking meets the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1. Provide a dimension from the proposed Class 2 bicycle parking to the main entrance of the proposed building. If the location of the Class 2 bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1 and you propose to leave the bicycle parking as shown on the plan a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) is required. If the DSMR is approved provide on the plan the DSMR case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.K If applicable show all proposed easements on the site plan. Dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be private or public. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The perimeter yard requirements shown for the east and north perimeter yards are not correct. Based on the size of the apartment complex located north of W. Stone Loop the Average Daily Traffic is greater than 1000 therefore the required perimeter yard is 21' or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, which ever is greatest, measured from the back of curb. Zoning acknowledges that the proposed development meets these requirements, revise the perimeter yard requirements under the "LAND USE REQUIREMENTS" sheet 1 and show the perimeter yard dimensions correctly on sheet 4. 15. D.S. 2-05.3.9.R Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route is required. The path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. This said a sidewalk is required to connect to W. Stone Loop. 16. D.S. 2-05.3.9.R As this site works as a single site with the development to the west clearly show the required pedestrian circulation path/accessible route between the two developments. The following comments are based on Development Package Submittal Requirements Draft dated 12-20-07. 17. Sheets 15, 16 & 17 should follow sheet 7. 18. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0013 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1450 Grading Plan (1st Review) T09BU00493 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 1, 2009 DUE DATE: May 1, 2009 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 05/04/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 05/04/2009 7:49 AM >>> No comment |
| 05/04/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 05/04/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | May 4, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0013 PROJECT NAME: Quicktrip - River/Stone PROJECT ADDRESS: 68 W River Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The proposed location of the access drive onto Stone Loop needs to be re-elevated for the following reason. The lack of a left turn bay/pocket on Stone Loop for this site could create backup on the through lane when a left-turning vehicles is queuing to enter this site. 3. The existing access points on River Road needs to be modified to have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/04/2009 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/06/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Access and maneuverability onto and within development okay. Approach to and from enclosure area good. It is understood that this convenience store is typical to use reusable containers for majority of the products stocked and that minimal, if any, recyclable waste will be generated. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/08/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | May 8, 2009 D09-013 Quick Trip 1450, Development Package Reviewer: Loren Makus, EIT Resubmittal Required: Revised Plan Set. 1. Revise the site map on the cover sheet so that data is complete and doesn't overlap. 2. Provide sidewalk along Stone Loop frontage. Since this is a local street, five-foot sidewalks are required. 3. The "mountable curb" doesn't conform to the standard details for public improvements details. Revise the mountable curb in the right-of-way areas to conform to the standard details or provide evidence of acceptance by TDOT. A development standards modification request might be required if the design doesn't conform to the standard details. 4. Clearly identify the wash that runs along the west side of the project on all location maps, site plans and grading plans. 5. In the SWPPP, identify the adjacent wash as a receiving water if it receives any runoff from the project. 6. Revise and provide an explanation to demonstrate that the water that is collected for water harvesting will be used to supplement the landscape watering to the maximum extent practicable. |
| 05/12/2009 | CDRC1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 7, 2009 pblackmon@dowlhkm.com Subject: D09-0013 Quicktrip Store #1450 Dear Lorenzo: Your submittal of April 6, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, Addressing, Wastewater, Landscape, Urban Planning, Engineering, Traffic, ADOT, Zoning, DSD) 10 Copies Detailed Cover letter 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Urban Planning, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Grading Plan (Landscape, Urban, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies PCRWRD letter, written within 90 days (See Wastewater comments) 1 Check Pima County Treasurer for $200 for second review fee. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen, 837-4919 CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ |