Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0010
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/20/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/27/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/03/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approv-Cond | April 3, 2009 Ms. Gehlen: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on D09-0010 TUCSON MARKET PHASE 1. Pursuant to C9-06-32 (PAD 15), The Bridges planned community consists of multiple phases of commercial, residential, and office development for which the subject application seeks master development plan approval (approximately 115 acres) and development plan approval (approximately 15 acres) for the commercial/retail block, and portions thereof (respectively), located at the northwest corner of Kino Parkway and Interstate 10. This site is within the Tucson International Airport public disclosure area and traffic pattern airspace. The site is not within the City of Tucson Airport Environs Zone. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject requests contingent upon the following condition of approval for the master development plan: "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Airport Disclosure Statement form that discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The intent of this condition is for the Airport Disclosure Statement form to be recorded for the entire 115 acre master development plan (MDP) area, thereby reducing the burden to subsequent owners and developers of having to record piecemeal disclosures for each individual development allowed under the MDP approval. The Tucson Airport Authority also asks that the requested condition of approval be identified in the general notes of the master development plan and that the property owner forward a copy of the recorded Airport Disclosure Statement form to: Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Tucson, AZ 85756 Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject application and the City of Tucson's recognition of the regional importance in ensuring continuing safety and viability of Tucson International Airport. Respectfully, Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning cc JM file |
| 04/09/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#209216 April 9, 2009 Wood/Panel Attn: Dave Bateman 3499 N Campbell Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85719 Dear Mr. Bateman : SUBJECT: Tucson Marketplace Phase I D09-0010 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 19, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/10/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This project is governed by the IBC 2006 Edition. All accessible requirements are as per Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 edition. Please denote such on front cover sheet. 2. Sheet C-1.2 a. The COT development standards 2-08.4.1 clearly defines that the acessible routes (concrete sidewalks) be physically separated by surface mounted curbing if both are flush, bollards or an elevation height change between the two. b.1. The strip of truncated domes lining the pedestrian way at the front entrance is not one of the Development Standards approved means to define the accessible route/vehicle way separation. Please revise accordingly. b. ICC/ANSI clearly defines the requirement of detectable warnings at the beginning and end of a Marked Crossing to provide vision impared individuials an indication of the beginning of a vehicular way (hazardous area) entry and and end to the vehicular way as per Sections 406.12 and 406.14. b.1. The detectable warning strip lining the pedestrain way at the front entry disrupts the purpose and function of a marked crossing by indicating to visually empared individuals a begining entrance to a hazardous area but not providing a marked crossing and an end to the hazardous area. Please remove the strip of detectable warnings except at the two marked crossings and provide alternate separation medthods as prescribed by the Development Standards. c. Provide ramps and detectable warnings at both of the the begining accessible route connections to the existing facility accessible routes in the North corner of the property and the West area. d. Provide a large scale detail of all different types of ramps showing dimensions, ramp configuration, slope, detectable warnings, marked crossing and connection to existing pedestrian way. e. If the accessible route is flush with the vehicle way, please indicate so. f. Where the two accessible routes travel down the middle of two parking areas, there is incidated by note 9 a ramp midway down both paths. The referenced detail 9/C-1.5 indicates a dectable warning strip be provided. The detectable warning strips are not required in this location. g. For both marked crossings at the front entrance, provide a detectable warning at the North end and West end. Reference 406.12 and .14. h. Two "Van Accessible" spaces are required. Please identify these spaces on the plan. 3. Sheet C-1.4: At Detail 9, please reference note 1 above and adjust all DOT 207 references. |
| 04/13/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Market Place. Development Plan (1st Review) D09-0010 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 13, 2009 DUE DATE: April 16, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 18, 2010. 2. As a development plan was not provided Zonings review is based on sheets C-1.0, C-1.2 & C-1.4. 3. Remove General Note 17 from the Sheet 1 of this development plan. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Provide the D09-0010 development plan number in the lower right hand corner adjacent to the title block of all plans. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Provide a general note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. This said some type of barrier is required to prevent vehicles from driving off of the proposed 36' Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) located along the northeast boundary of this phase. Also some type of barrier is required for the proposed 20' temporary access road that connects to Park Avenue. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G Provide the recordation information, docket and page, for all proposed easements on the plan. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent street. This said it is not clear how the required continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, connects to Kino Parkway. It does not appear that the required continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, to Park Avenue has been provided. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.B a sidewalk is required between a PAAL and a building. This said it is not clear what is provided between the PAAL and the south side of the building. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K The pedestrian circulation located in front of the Tire Center doors needs to be striped. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide a dimension that shows a minimum 4'-0" clear between the Class 1 bicycle parking and the trellis located near the northeast corner of the proposed building. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide a Floor Area Ratio Calculation on the plan. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The vehicle parking space calculation appears to be incorrect. Per PAD 15 Section C.2.2.C.4.b the required parking is based on 4.5 spaces for each 1000 sq. ft. of gross floor area or 665 vehicle parking spaces required. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The accessible vehicle parking space calculation is incorrect. Per the International Building Code (IBC) Table 1106.1 the required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces is based on the number of vehicle parking spaces provided not required. This said the number required should be 16. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The vehicle parking spaces adjacent to the trellis called out under PAVING CONSTRUCTION NOTE #17, are required to have some type of barrier to prevent damage to the trellis, see D.S. 305.2.3.C.1. Show the required barriers on the plan. 16. Provide a street cross section for the proposed PIA project that connects to Kino Parkway and for the emergency road to Park Avenue. 17. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0005 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 04/15/2009 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | ACTIVITY: D09-0010 PROJECT: Tucson Marketplace (COSTCO at Bridges) LOCATION: Ward 5 FEMA: 2237K, Zone X-Unshaded WATERSHED: Mission View Wash Watershed adjacent to Greyhound Wash REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE SUMMARY: The Development Plan package was received and reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering. Development Services Department Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for development plan purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-02.2.3.1.3.A.2: Address the following COSTCO drainage report drainage comments: a) Provide in statement regarding status of Sub-Area C-I Detention system completion, as the system must be able to receive runoff form the proposed Tucson Marketplace site. b) Due to the large area of the basin bottom, provide post-construction infiltration rates for the basin. c) Provide specific section in the report explaining the following: i) Explain and provide a list of maintenance requirements for the stormwater runoff system and other drainage improvements onsite. ii) Clarify if there are some drainage improvements within the COSTCO project that are solely the responsibility of COSTCO, or state whether it is the responsibility of Tucson Market Place. There may be a need to provide the drainage maintenance verbiage as a general note(s) on the Development Plan cover sheet per section DS Sec.10-02.14.3. iii) In drainage report, state entity who will be in charge of maintenance for Sub-Area C-I basin, as well as the entity responsible for the onsite drainage infrastructure. In particular, the outlets for stormdrain pipes at O-B and O-C - state whether these are to be included as part of an offsite easement for drainage maintenance by Tucson Market Place or other entity. d) Explain how flow from (2) 36-in concrete pipes located at southeast side of project is incorporated into design and directed around south side of project to the west. e) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: Identify locations of 8:1(H:V) Human Activity Zone emergency access from the detention flood-control facility as it impact access to adjacent sidewalk on Tucson Market Place project limits. f) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.a: Provide proposed capacity for outfall culvert pipe(s) from the western outlet area of Sub-Area C-I. Explain whether this will act as a bleed pipe system for the basin. g) There is a concern that the outlet spillways that are currently being constructed (per recent field trip) for the stormdrain pipes entering regional basin at O-B and O-C may not have sufficient erosion protection at outlet. Provide statement from engineering entity responsible for pipe outlet structures that the erosion protection spillways will be adequate to receive flows from the COSTCO improvements once built. h) Provide a general note on the Development Plan stating that basin completion statements must be provided prior to grading permit issuance. Otherwise provide copy of completion statement letter by EOR and acceptance by PCRFCD in Drainage Report. i) DS Sec.2-08.4.1.e, 2-05.2.4.H.3: Provide scuppers at sidewalks adjacent to building for roof drainage. Show roof drainage scheme on an exhibit. j) Add case number and administrative address to cover page of report: D09-0010. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E, 2-05.2.1.H: It will be necessary to provide a local benchmark for basis of elevation for the COSTCO project. 3) Address the following drainage related comments: a) Clarify on planview the proposed/existing basin outlet structures. Also add a general note stating that stormdrain pipes must be constructed to offsite outlet point. b) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Show roof drainage. Also, provide locations and types of drainage structures including any sidewalk scuppers. c) LUC 3.7.4.5.B: Most of the onsite drainage is directed to stormdrain pipe inlets to be discharged to regional basin area. State whether this is the intent to satisfy water harvesting or show proposed grades and drainage patterns to demonstrate that some water harvesting will be achieved onsite as described by this section of the code. Show how runoff from the roof and parking areas will be directed through the landscape areas to the maximum extent practicable; demonstrate positive drainage towards any landscape buffer areas in effort to promote water harvesting, clarify curb openings/depressed curbs. A type 1 scupper may be necessary to dissipate nuisance ponding water in landscape areas. d) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.a, 2-05.2.2.C.2.b: There is floodplain indicated tot eh west of project area. Show floodplain limits on planview. If the parcel is impacted by a jurisdictional floodplain as determined by the revised drainage report add the following two notes to the Development Plan: "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates may be required for the proposed building." "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." 4) DS Sec.2-5.3.2.D: Address the following conceptual grading comments: a) Provide some conceptual proposed pedestrian area width dimensions, as striped on planview sheet C-1.1, C-1.2, & C-1.3, with more spot elevations for accessibility along these pedestrian areas as well as the sidewalk adjacent to COSTCO building structure to assure accessible access routes are provided and minimum widths are provided. Spot elevations shall show no more than 2% slopes in the HC accessibility areas of the HC stalls, crossings, and other accessible routes. b) Add general note for accessibility. For privately-owned projects, design is subject to 2006 IBC / ICC A117.1 (ANSI) 2003 compliance. c) Provide details for the following: i) Solid waste pick up areas with bollards and dimensions. ii) If a Tentative Plat or Master Development Plan is not approved before the approval of this Development Plan, provide on this Development Plan the cross sections for the proposed south access road and the PAAL in the north portion of the Tucson Market Place. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B, 2-05.2.4.G: All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. All existing easements will be explained in a response letter or drawn on the plat, and recordation information, location, width, and purpose shall be included. All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned for widths and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. In particular, please clarify the following specific easement comments: a) Identify location, and width of optical fiber (AT&T or other utility) along south perimeter. Show how encroachment into easement is to be avoided or provide authorization to disturb the area of the easement. Also add general note to Development Plan stating that: "Common Area "x" contains an underground fiber optic cable; all work within this easement must be coordinated with the proper utilities prior to any site construction.". b) Identify and label location and width of Kinder Morgan gas line along southeast portion of the project. If project improvements are within utility area, provide documentation from the utility stating authorization to encroach into easement. c) Add to legend symbol/delineations for KM gas line and fiber optic line. 6) Address the following access comments: a) Revise pavement structural design section details on sheet C-1.4 to match recommendations of the geotechnical report. b) Pavement sections for the proposed south access road and the PAAL in the north portion of the Tucson Market Place must conform to geotechnical recommendations of a geotechnical report. c) Add the following as general notes to the Development Plan: i) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Provide general note on Development Plan cover sheet regarding PAD requirement for completion of new commercial public spine road to Kino to be completed during first phase of Tucson Market Place construction. ii) The north PAAL shall be constructed during first phase of Tucson Market Place construction. iii) The south emergency access road shall be constructed during first phase of Tucson Market Place construction. d) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.G: Clarify whether there are any cross access agreements in place for the project. Provide information regarding any cross access agreements. e) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.1: Label curb return radii dimensions in PAAL area for entrances at adjacent pads to accommodate future vehicle and truck use. Also, label entrance widths for entrances on Development Plan sheet C-1.2. 7) DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.1: Other than trees as noted below, plant materials located within existing and future sight visibility triangles shall be limited to ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty inches. Trees may be located within existing and future sight visibility triangles only if clear of leaves and branches to a height of at least six feet above grade upon installation, and at all times thereafter. The trunk caliper of any species selected may not exceed twelve inches in diameter at maturity. Trees with multiple trunks are not allowed. Trees may not be planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect as viewed from the motorist's perspective. The number and location of trees within existing and future sight visibility triangles may be restricted or modified by the City of Tucson in order to preserve visibility. Consider providing SVT on Landscape plan sheets at locations where COSCO pad meets PAAL for adjacent pads. 8) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A: On page 5 of the geotechnical report, it was stated that additional geotechnical assessment is highly recommended. A complete geotechnical report is needed for Development Plan approval. Submit geotechnical report with additional geotechnical assessment for areas where under ground storage tanks exist or other environmental concerns within the Tucson Market Place project. 9) Please acknowledge that a separate grading permit application submittal will be required for development of the site once the Development Plan is approved. A SWPPP will be required with the grading plan submittal. Also, a Right-of-way Use Permit may be needed; contact TDOT Permits and Codes. Resubmittal is required. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit a revised Development Plan, Geotechnical reports, revised Drainage Report, other supporting documentation, and a response letter. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 04/15/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0010 Tucson Marketplace, Phase 1 COS 04/16/09 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: S08-100 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: The Bridges, PAD-15 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: April 16, 2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 4/16/09 Comments 1. Costco Development Plan, Sheet C-1.0, please provide information in notes that identifies the permitted land use; provide the floor area ratio for the building. 2. Costco Development Plan, Sheet C-1.0, please include in the notes language that states: "Trash collection will be allowed between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm." 3. Costco Development Plan, Sheet C-1.0, please include in the notes language that states: "Loading and delivery will be allowed between 7:00 am and 10:00 pm." 4. Correct note 25 on Costco Development Plan, Sheet C-1.0 to read that Detail 4 is on C-1.5 instead of C-1.6. 5. Provide some type of screening along the east side of the Costco building, where the pallet enclosure, pump room, compactor, etc. are located. There appears to be an opportunity for such screening (softening of this edge) with a long parking island directly to the east. The landscaping for this parking island is not addressed by the Costco landscape plan nor the Tucson Marketplace landscape plan. 6. There needs to be a connection link from the Costco project site to the Loop Trail. There appears to be an opportunity to connect the trail to the pedestrian sidewalk along the western side of the building. 7. Although the development plan identifies a pedestrian path from the entrance of the building and across the parking lot to the fuel facility; and a pedestrian path from the building to the west; another pedestrian should be provided along the eastern half of the site that also connects to the future building pads (8, 9, and 10) located to the north/northeast. 8. Please clarify physically disabled motor vehicles calculations - 15 stalls are required; 37 stalls are provided; and 16 stalls are only identified on Sheet C-1.2. Also correct the spelling of "phsically". 9. The Bridges PAD states that all development plans/plat submittals will include running calculations/percentages of NOS and FOS set aside as they relate to overall requirements as presented in Table I. Please prove a sheet with the Master Development Plan/Tentative Plat for Tucson Marketplace, Phase 1 that shows the NOS/FOS for this site and how it relates to the overall requirements for Sub-Area A which establishes a target of 5.6% FOS. 10. Please provide a sheet with the Master Development Plan/Tentative Plat for Tucson Marketplace, Phase 1 that shows a running calculation for bicycle stalls required/provided for the total Tucson Marketplace and that for Phase 1. 11. Parking calculations appear incorrect. The calculation is a minimum of 4.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area. Please provide correct parking calculations and gross floor area for building. 12. Provide a street cross section for the proposed PIA project that connects to Kino Parkway and for the emergency road to Park Avenue. |
| 04/15/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 14, 2009 To: MIKE PNIEWSKI WRG DESIGN INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: COSTCO WHOLESALE - TUCSON III WAREHOUSE Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D09-010 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. We will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents. Upon receiving Owner(Applicant) or Title Company with address and Trust # information from you we will generate the SSA. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the development plan. Sheet C-1.3: Show proposed MH#1 as Public. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 04/15/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | Regional Traffic: * No comments from Traffic Engineering on this submittal. The development should not affect any ADOT facilities. * Traffic will be forwarding development plans to Development Engineer for separate comments. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 04/15/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | This development will have an impact to two I-10 traffic interchanges on the ADOT roadway system, Park Avenue and Campbell Ave/Ajo Way. This impact is required to be mitigated in order for the interchanges to function at an acceptable level. Please submit a traffic analysis that meets ADOT criteria giving all the pertinent information needed for the two interchanges including all ramps, cross roads and mainline. Approval of the TIA and mitigation plan by ADOT is needed before ADOT will give approval. Daniel Williams, PE ADOT Tucson District 1221 S. 2nd Avenue Tucson, AZ 85713 520 388-4200 ________________________________ ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 04/15/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D09-0010 TUCSON MARKETPLACE PHASE 1 COSTCO: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 8,8879 PM Peak: 849 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 04/16/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The DSD Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the plans at this time. Please revise the plans as jndicated below in accordance with the Bridges PAD and applicable City of Tucson Codes and Standards 1) Revise the Native Plant Preservation Plan to show Phase 1 grading limits also. 2) Rain water harvesting must be conducted at this site per the requirements in Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.7.1.1.A, requiring that landscaping should accomplish natural resources conservation; LUC Section 3.7.4.3.B requiring integration of grading, hydrology and landscaping to make the maximum use of stormwater for on-site irrigation; and LUC Section 3.7.4.5.B requiring that stormwater and runoff harvesting be used to supplement drip irrigation for both new and preserved vegetation. Techniques to design and implement water harvesting are described in the City of Tucson's Water Harvesting Guidance Manual. This document can be downloaded as from the following website: http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/ To comply with the above-referenced LUC sections, rain water harvested from building roofs, sidewalks, and parking lots shall be employed to assist in supporting landscaped areas including parking lot tree wells, landscape buffers, sidewalk plantings, and other vegetation locations at the site. Details and Specifications for water harvesting shall be clearly indicated on the plans to ensure it is correctly implemented at all necessary stages of construction. The City of Tucson's Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development is available for consultation regarding water harvesting principles, techniques and code requirements. Please contact Ann Audrey in OCSD. 3) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 4) Include the legal description and address of the site on the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 5) The grading limits on sheet 9 of the Tentative Plat do not appear to correspond with the limits indicated on the Native Plant Preservation Plan. Revise as necessary. 6) The locations for several of the grading cross section details on sheet 5 of tentative plat could not be located on the plans. Identify where these cross sections are applicable. 7) Revise the Tentative Plat and the development plan to show the location of the perimeter path referred to on p. 77 of the PAD. 8) Revise the Landscape Plans and the Tentative Plat to identify any improvements or landscape requirements for the grading indicated (shown on the NPPP) and other work in the northern part of the site along Park Avenue. 9) Provide calculations for the vegetative coverage of the street landscape borders on the TMP Phase 1 Landscape Plan. 10) Revise the TMP landscape plans and tentative plat to address applicable screening requirements. 11) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary to provide a means to prevent vehicles from driving off the secondary access from Park Avenue and other portions ofthe vehicular use area onto unimproved portions of the site. |
| 04/17/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 04/17/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 04/16/2009 2:08 PM >>> No comment |
| 04/22/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. DP calls out "Compactor" but does not specify for what..i.e. refuse/trash or recycle/cardboard etc. Clarify. 2. Compactor does not include screening provisions. Require a minimum 12 ft inside clear between the side walls. 3. Compactor 14 ft x 40 ft approach area must not obstruct traffic flow during service operation as it currently shows. 4. Clarify if store will be equipped with a cardboard baler? 5. May require an additional single/double solid waste enclosure to accomodate for recycling. Please provide corrections/response on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/22/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: April 21, 2009 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: John Beall Joseph Linville SUBJECT: D09-0010 Tucson Marketplace, Phase 1 Costco: Development Plan(3/19/09) Under Landscape Notes include a note that indicates trees shall be planted a minimum of 4 ft from the edge of the dg path and shrubs shall be planted a minimum of 2 ft from edge of path. Provide a cross-section for the dg path. Indicate how it will be stabilized. Provide a connection to the dg path from the parking lot at the southwest corner of the Costco building. Would prefer to see only native plants, indigenous to the Sonoran desert planted along the dg path corridor. Please replace Leucophyllum and Cassia with native species such as Larrea. |
| 04/30/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | April 30, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0010 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Marketplace PROJECT ADDRESS: 3434 S Kino Parkway PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The Development plan needs to illustrate access routes to public infrastructure. Additional comments may be forth coming when the access points are identified in the development plan. 3. Schematically illustrate the recommended off site improvements on the development plan. Final dimensions for all off site improvements will be illustrated on the PIA plans. 4. The TIA recommends off site improvements for a larger square footage commercial development then the proposed commercial square footage of this development. Please revise and phase out the TIA to address what improvements are needed for this development. If needed a meeting can be scheduled to discuss phasing options. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/01/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0010 TUCSON MARKETPLACE PHASE I/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 4/27/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all street directions on Location Map. All books and pages need to be filled in when The Bridges (S08-100) records. |
| 05/01/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 1, 2009 Dave Bateman Wood/Patel 3499 North Campbell Ave Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D09-0010 Tucson Market Place Phase I (Costco) Development Plan Dear Dave: Your submittal of March 19, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 12 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 12 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, Zoning, DUPD, ADOT, Wastewater, Engineering, Landscape, ESD, Parks and Recreation, Traffic, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DUPD, Engineering, Landscape, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, ADOT, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-7338 |