Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0009
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/12/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/15/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 06/17/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | June 17, 2009 To: Kent Delph Greinier Engineering, Inc Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: Quick Trip Store 1493 Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D09-009 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 06/22/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/24/2009 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0009 Quicktrip () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other - CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-24 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: July 13, 2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (X) Proposal Complies with Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: March 31, 2009 REVIEWER: msp for drcorral 791-4505 DATE: June 18, 2009 |
| 07/06/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 2, 2009 SUBJECT: QuikTrip #1493 Development Plan Core Review- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 1925 N Kolb Road, T145S R15E Sec06 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D09-0009 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report (Grenier Engineering, Inc., 13APR09, revised 12JUN09), Geotechnical Evaluation (ConformaTech, 17MAR08) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Grenier Engineering, Inc., 18MAR09, revised 12JUN09). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the draft policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Acknowledged. 2) Acknowledged. 3) Acknowledged. 4) Acknowledged. 5) Acknowledged. 6) Acknowledged. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 7) Acknowledged. 8) Complied. 9) Complied. 10) Complied. 11) Complied. 12) Complied. 13) Complied. 14) Complied. 15) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.8.F: Revise the development plan documents to provide the Improvement Plan number for all existing drainage improvements. All off site drainage improvements (storm drain, catch basins, grates, etc.) must be clearly labeled and the improvement plan number associated must be either keynoted or labeled in plan view. 16) Complied. 17) Complied. 18) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan documents to correctly label the near side dimensions for the future sight visibility triangles for the access road off of Kolb Road. The correct near side dimension for an Arterial MS&R route is 345-feet. Also provide the correct dimensions for the future near and far side sight visibility triangles (Keynote #53). 19) Complied. 20) Complied. 21) Complied. 22) Restated: DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Revise the development plan documents to verify that the proposed ramps meet the minimum slope requirement of 15%, respectively. 23) Complied. 24) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan documents to dimension the length of the trench drain in the proposed retention basin. The keynote and details differ in rip rap size and filter fabric specifications, clarify. 25) Acknowledged. 26) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan documents, keynotes and details to label the correct D50 size, thickness, and filter fabric specifications, per the proposed plans the details differ from the keynotes and from other details within the package. 27) Acknowledged. 28) Acknowledged. 29) Acknowledged. 30) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Provide the Improvement Plan number for all existing drainage infrastructure (storm drains and catch basins) within the Public Right-of-Way. 31) Acknowledged. 32) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.Q: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project, if applicable. 33) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.Q: Revise the development plan documents to include a general note to label the DSMR #, development standard being modified, date of approval, and any conditions placed upon the DSMR approval (if applicable). 34) Complied. 35) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise Detail 22/10 within the development plan documents to show the required 5-foot wide sidewalk along the street frontage of Calle La Paz. The cross section shows a proposed 4-foot sidewalk which differs from the correct 5-foot dimension as shown in keynote #7. 36) Complied. 37) Complied. 38) Acknowledged. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 39) Complied. 40) Complied. 41) Complied. 42) Complied. 43) Complied. 44) Complied. 45) Complied. 46) Complied. NEW COMMENTS 2nd REVIEW: 1) Provide an easement with recordation information along with approval from Pima County Wastewater for the proposed access to the existing sewer easement. Access for the easement must be from the adjacent right-of-way. In order for public vehicles to access the existing easement through the parking lot of private property a new easement for the proposed access will be required. 2) Provide the recordation information for the proposed 10-foot joint use easement label in keynote #61 on Sheet 5. 3) Clarify keynotes #38 and 39. Both existing access gates lead from the adjacent property to the back of the proposed property. Verify if access from the existing development to the new store is required. 4) Clarify the location of the proposed curb openings into the north basin. The alignment of the curb openings is adjacent to the proposed wall within the basin. Clarify drainage patterns so that the water does not pond in front of the walls but within the bottom of the basin. 5) Revise the development plan document and Sheet 2 to revise or remove the following. a) Revise General Construction Note #12 to label the correct public roadways that are adjacent to the site. Greasewood Road does not apply. b) Remove General Construction Note #22. The project does not propose cisterns or tanks that account for retention requirements. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 07/09/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D09-0009 Quiktrip - 1493 Kolb Site Development Package - 2nd Review TRANSMITTAL: 07/09/2009 DUE DATE: 07/13/09 COMMENTS: 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. Provide the administrative address for this project outside of the title block but as close as possible to the title block. 3. Provide as a note the DSMR case number (DS09-13), date of approval, what the DSMR was approved for, and any conditions of approval. The reviewer is assuming the DSMR was approved for the proximity of the bicycle parking spaces to the main entrance and the pedestrian circulation path being deleted to Kolb Rd. 4. Provide the recordation information for the proposed 10-foot joint use easement label in keynote #61 on Sheet 5. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D09-0009dpca.doc |
| 07/09/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0009 QUIKTRIP-1493 KOLB SITE/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/07/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 07/10/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) If a new development is using an existing screen on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of the recorded covenant locating the existing screen(s) on adjacent property is required. Note the recording data on the Development Plan. DS 2-03.2.1.A.15 2) Label and show the full extent of proposed and existing walls proposed to meet the screening requirements along the eastern property boundary. The wall is required to extend north to Kolb Road, except where the sight visiblity triangle would be obscured. 3) The height of screening material adjacent to property lines is measured on the project side of the screen, at finish grade. per DS 2-06.3.7.A.1. Ensure that the existing and/or proposed screen meets the minimum height requirements at the property boundaries. (Note: screening height for loading areas is 6' high.) |
| 07/15/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/16/2009 | JWILLIA4 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 16, 2009 Kent A Delph Grenier Engineering 5517 East 5th Street Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D09-0009 Quicktrip Store #1493 Development Package Dear Kent: Your submittal of March 19, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 3 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Package (Engineering, Landscaping, DSD) 2 Copies SWPPP Documentation (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 326-7508 |