Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0004
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/19/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/20/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/24/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/25/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: CIENEGA SUBSTATION D09-0004 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 19, 2009. Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo, Right of Way Agent II Tucson Electric Power Co. Unisource Energy Services offc-(520) 917-8745 fax-(520) 545-1416 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 02/27/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0004 Cienega Substation (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan CROSS REFERENCE: SE-08-45 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon Southeast Subregional Plan COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/19/09 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan Comments 1. Please list Special Exception conditions under the General Notes Section of the Development Plan. 2. Please provide decorative wall detail to include proposed colors that will blend with the natural surroundings. Per SE conditions #7 and #10. REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: February 27, 2009 |
| 03/02/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | March 2, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0004 PROJECT NAME: Cienega SubStation PROJECT ADDRESS: 12733 E Colossal Cave Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The proposed gated entry needs to follow the draft development standard - 3-02 "Gated Entrances" 3. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/03/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 03/03/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 02, 2009 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D09-0004 Cienega Substation: Development Plan(2/19/09) Staff has no comments. |
| 03/05/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Thank you for the opportunity to comment on D09-0004 Cienega Substation Development Plan, a development plan review application for approximately 13 acres located north and west of the northwest corner Dawn Drive and Colossal Cave Road. This site is not within the Tucson International Airport or Ryan Airfield public disclosure areas or traffic pattern airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority does not oppose this development plan review application. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Respectfully, Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org www.tucsonairport.org (520) 573-5115 office (520) 954-4465 mobile (520) 573-8006 fax cc file |
| 03/09/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | |
| 03/09/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/16/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 16, 2009 SUBJECT: Cienega Substation Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 12733 E Colossal Cave Rd, T16S R16E Sec16 Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D09-0004 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan and Drainage Statement (Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc., 29JAN09). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or Drainage Statement at this time. The Drainage Statement was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Clarify in the Introduction of the Drainage Statement and the General Notes of the Development Plan the acreage proposed for the project site. The Statement calls out 3.34 acres, however General Note #1 calls out a disturbance of 4.59 acres and an equipment area of 2.58 acres. The Development Plan and Drainage Statement must match in the total acres of disturbance and the retention volume calculations must specifically address the total disturbance acreage area to assure the correct volume of retention. 2) Provide a clear easy to read pre- and post-developed work map within the Drainage Statement. The work maps must be separate and must clearly show the areas of the proposed project along with specific details for drainage improvements including channel and retention basin cross sections. 3) Revise the Hydraulic Structure section of the Statement to include a discussion along with details for the proposed wall outlet protection as shown in Detail F/4 on the proposed Development Plan. The Development Plan must match any requirements of the Drainage Statement. 4) Revise the Hydraulic Structure Section of the Drainage Statement to clarify the location of the triangular shape channel, verify the location on the proposed Development Plan. Per the Development Plan this location collects flow and discharges into Basin #2 and does not sheet flow to the northeast and into the Franco Wash Tributary #1, clarify. Provide a detail for this triangular channel in the Drainage Statement to verify that it is accurately shown on the Development Plan. 5) Clarify in the Threshold Retention Section of the Drainage Statement the proposed location of both Basin outlets. Per the Statement the outlets weir is to be constructed at the north end of each basin, however the Development Plan does not reflect this for either Basin. Basin #2 has the outlet structure closer to the north side, but is still labeled along the east side of the proposed basin and the outlet structure for Basin 1 is along the west side of the south portion of the basin, clarify. 6) Revise the Drainage Statement to provide specific details or cross sections for both Basins. Verify that the Development Plan provides for all aspects of the basin including basin side slopes, average bottom widths, average top widths, basin lengths, etc as called out in the discussion portion of the Drainage Statement. 7) Verify that all details and cross sections proposed on the Development Plan match the requirements of the proposed Drainage Statement. All side slopes must be labeled per the Statement along with locations, widths, depths, rock rip rap specifications, etc. 8) Revise the Drainage Statement and Development Plan so that the proposed sedimentation traps meet the minimum requirements of DS Sec.10-01.3.4.2. Specifically sediment traps can not be located at the outlet of the basin, but must be located at the basin inlet. 9) Provide an existing condition work map for this project to verify all variables used in the Hydrology Sheets for the existing condition discharges. Specifically for the proposed basin factors used to determine the 100-year discharge. Per Table 4.2 in DS Sec.10-02.4.2 the standard basin factor for dispersed flows in a natural/rural area would be 0.055 not the 0.045 that was used for natural channels in natural/rural areas. Per the discussion the area within the block wall for these calculation sheets is dispersed sheet flow and not contained within a natural channel. The 0.045 basin factor is only used to calculate the offsite discharge for the Franco Wash tributaries which would be considered in a natural channel area, clarify. 10) Verify in the developed discharge calculation sheets the contributing area factor and the percent imperviousness used for the area within the proposed block wall. Per the Development Plan and the details provided this area is to be 100% compacted with 6 inch stabilized aggregate therefore the impervious factor of 50% would not reflect the proposed conditions, clarify. 11) Revise or clarify the variables used in the worksheet for the proposed Channel 3A. The roughness coefficient of 0.035 needs to be clarified per DS Sec.10-02.8.5 Table 8.1. The landscape plans do not show this area nor how it is to be restabilized therefore the roughness coefficient could not be verified. 12) Provide a cross section for the proposed channel 3A in the Drainage Statement to verify if the details provided on the Development Plan match in depth, top width, slope, etc. 13) Clarify in the Threshold Retention calculations the Drainage Area used for the retention volume calculation. Per the Drainage Statement introduction and the Development Plan the drainage area for this project is greater than the 1.67 acres used in the calculations for retention volumes, clarify. 14) Clarify the wall opening calculations and the safety factor used to determine the required length of wall openings. The equation used a safety factor of 1.5 however per the "Note" on this sheet a safety factor of 1.5 is used for substantially paved contributing watersheds. Per the discussion within the report and aerial view of the project site a safety factor of 2 seems more reasonable since the project lies within a natural contributing watershed, clarify. 15) Clarify or revise either the Drainage Statement or the proposed water surface elevation cross sections on the Development Plan to match. Per the HEC-RAS output the cross sections shown on the Development Plan do not match for either Tributary #1 or #2, revise. 16) Provide a discussion with calculations for the proposed erosion hazard setback lines for the tributaries of the Franco Wash that are labeled on the proposed Development Plan. The Drainage Statement must provide erosion hazard setback calculations per DS Sec.10-02.7.6 to verify the proposed locations shown on the Development Plan. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 17) Revise the Development Plan to include the site address in the "Site Address" box provided on Sheet 1. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.A: Revise the Development Plan to include a minimum one-half inch margin on each side of the sheet. This allows for standardization of material for more efficient record keeping and assures legibility. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.2: Revise the location map on the Development Plan to label all major water courses adjacent to the project, i.e. the Franco Wash. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.G.2: Revise the Development Plan to include a brief legal description for the project in the title block. 21) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.J: Verify that all symbols used on the drawing are included within the legend, for example the proposed top of berm symbol shown on Sheets 2 and 3 must be included within the legend. 22) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.3: Revise General Note #12 to include all proposed improvements per this Development Plan, specifically the proposed underground water tanks as shown on the proposed Landscape Plans. Verify that this area is included in the gradable area on the Development Plan and within the calculations. 23) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Provide a General Note on Sheet 1 of the Development Plan to reference all special overlay zones. Specifically the note should confirm conformance with LUC Code for the overlay that affects the subject property such as follows; "Sec.2.8.2, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) and Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone." 24) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.A: Revise the Development Plan to provide the site boundary information for all property lines in distances to the hundredth of a foot. The overall dimensions and the labeled boundary information do not include the dimensions to the hundredth of a foot on the proposed plan. 25) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Revise the Development Plan to include the recordation information for all existing easements that are shown in plan view. Specifically the 130-foot Transmission Line easement. 26) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to provide the following information for the existing public right-of-way: right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. Label the roadway as both MS&R and Scenic per the MS&R right-of-way maps. 27) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.3.I.1: Revise the Development Plan and the labeled water surface elevations to match the HEC-RAS output values within the proposed Drainage Statement. 28) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.3.I.3: Revise the Development Plan to provide the symbol used to represent the water surface elevation in the legend on Sheet 1. 29) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.2: Revise the Development Plan to label Colossal Cave Road as Public on all sheets (specifically Sheet 1). Revise to label any existing curbing and/or sidewalk within the right-of-way of Colossal Cave Road. 30) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.E: Revise the Development Plan to show all right-of-way dedication on or abutting the site for Colossal Cave Road. Verify through City of Tucson Transportation if street dedication in accordance with the MS&R Plan will be required. 31) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.F: If street dedication is not required or proposed and since the site is adjacent to a MS&R street the future MS&R right-of-way lines must be shown along with the future curbing and sidewalk area, verify. 32) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Revise the Development Plan to provide the recordation information for all proposed easements shown in plan view and label them as public or private. Specifically the proposed underground electrical easement and the proposed access easement. 33) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H: Revise Sheet 2 of the Development Plan to specifically label the 100-year discharge of both tributaries for the Franco Wash per the proposed Drainage Statement and Sheet 3 of the proposed plan. 34) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Clarify in the Development Plan the flow direction and discharge location of the proposed access road. Per the profile view of the substation access road the roadway slopes to the "See Above/Below Sheet" match line, however plan view does not show the discharge location for the roadway and does not provide any required erosion protection for this location. Verify the low point of the access road and how the water discharges off the roadway and into existing natural grade. 35) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Revise the Development Plan to clearly label the Beginning and Ending of the proposed cutoff wall on both the upstream and downstream side of the west drive. Provide a detail that shows the minimum dimensions to include length, width, depth, etc per the Drainage Statement. 36) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Revise the Development Plan to meet the minimum requirements for all proposed rock riprap slope protection. Provide method of placement, size (D50=8 inch as calculated in the Drainage Statement not the 6 inch as shown on the Development Plan), thickness, depth of embedment; filter fabric specifications, etc. to match the recommendations within the Drainage Statement. 37) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Verify that all details and drainage improvements that are on the proposed Development Plan meet the minimum requirements and design parameters per the Drainage Statement. Verify that the proposed drainage improvements, rock riprap erosion protection, basin details, storm drain pipe call outs/details, etc are labeled and that they also meet the requirements within the Drainage Statement. Specifically: a) Revise Cross sections A and B to verify the location of proposed Channel 3A. Verify that the detail reference in plan view represents the cross section view (viewed left to right or right to left depending on how the detail label is shown in plan view). Provide the minimum requirements per the Drainage Statement, 5-foot top width, D50= 8 inch, upstream versus downstream side, etc. b) Provide the referenced soils report per Cross Section C for the proposed pavement design to verify that all recommendations within the report have been addressed. c) Revise Cross Section D to label the minimum basin width requirements per the Drainage Report, revise to show the required minimum 3-foot top of berm. d) Revise Cross Section E to label the minimum basin width requirements per the Drainage Report, revise to show the required minimum 3-foot top of berm. e) Revise Cross Section F to meet all requirements of the Drainage Statement. The submitted Drainage Statement does not include a discussion or calculations for this improvement, clarify. Verify that the wall openings proposed meet the requirements of the Statement and the safety factor used. f) Revise Cross Section J to label the weir side slopes, top width of weir, outlet side slopes, inlet and outlet invert elevations of the culvert, slope of culvert, location of the proposed 10-foot rancher access road, minimum rip rap rock size, filter fabric specifications, etc per the proposed Drainage Statement. 38) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.4: Revise the Development Plan, Drainage Statement and cross sections (Sections E, D and J) to show a minimum 3-foot wide top of berm for the proposed basins. For construction purposes (compaction, fencing installation, freeboard to verify that the water outlets at the weir, etc) the 3-foot wide berm must be installed to allow access and room for constructing that portion of the basin sides. 39) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: Provide a note on the Development Plan stating, "(a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." 40) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the required basin access ramps. Verify that the ramp meets the minimum width and slope requirement of 15-feet and 15%, respectively. Alternate means of access will be reviewed by the City Engineer on a case-by-case basis. 41) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.I: Revise the Development Plan to correctly label and dimension the 400-foot Scenic Corridor Setback Line from the MS&R Roadway. The Development Plan incorrectly labels the 200-foot sitting line and also labels this dimension from the access road and not from the MS&R Scenic Corridor Roadway (Colossal Cave Road), revise. 42) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Revise the Development Plan and details to label and dimension the required 6-foot wide sidewalk along the MS&R Street (Colossal Cave Road). Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. All sidewalks must comply with ADA accessibility requirements. If an existing 4- or 5-foot sidewalk is already constructed along the frontage of the roadways provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 6-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing sidewalk, if less than the minimum 6-foot required, to remain. The DSMR must be approved prior to Development Plan approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. 43) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Provide on the Development Plan the proposed handicap access ramps within the Public Right-of-Way at the access road intersection. Revise to include a separate Keynote or provide a note to state that the handicap ramps that are to be constructed within the right-of-way are constructed per COT Standard Detail Reference #207. 44) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise the Development Plan to correctly label and dimension the required sight visibility triangles for the intersection of the access road and the MS&R Arterial Roadway. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.3 for the correct dimensions. 45) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Verify in writing from Environmental Services if any proposed refuse containers will be required for this site. If refuse is not proposed than a DSMR will be required to eliminate this Development Standard requirement. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 refuse requirements and for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements. 46) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction and after grading plan approval. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. GRADING PLAN: 47) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit is required for this project. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. 48) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 49) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) is applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan and Drainage Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan and Drainage Report. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 03/16/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Cienega Substation Development Plan (1st Review) D09-0004 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 13, 2009 DUE DATE: March 19, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is February 18, 2010. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B 1 Revise General Note 3 to read "EXISTING ZONING IS RH". There is no proposed zoning for this project. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the D09-0004 development plan number in the lower right corner of the plan. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Revise General Note 4 to read "DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM "25", LIMITED TO: POWER SUBSTATIONS WITH AN INPUT VOLTAGE OF ONE HUNDRED FIFTEEN (115) KILOVOLTS OR GREATER, SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.11.1.C, .F, .G, AND .J AND APPROVAL THROUGH A ZONING EXAMINER FULL NOTICE PROCEDURE, SEC. 23A-50 AND 23A-53". 5. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.6 As the proposed project requires a special exception approval provide the special exception number SE-08-45, date of approval and all conditions of approval on the development plan. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Provide a note on the development plan stating: "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA: 2.8.2, SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ); SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". 7. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all existing easements on site will be stated on the plan. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.B All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing. This said provide the zoning for the property located east of Colossal Cave Road. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.F Label Colossal Cave Road as an MS&R and show the future right-of-way (ROW) along with the location of the future curb. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 11. Once comment 9 has been addressed show the 400' Scenic Corridor Zone on the plan. This 400' Scenic Corridor Zone is shown in relationship to the future ROW for Colossal Cave Road not the proposed access road. 12. Once the 400' Scenic Corridor Zone is shown correctly on the plan if the proposed lease area is within the 400' Scenic Corridor Zone a Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone review may be required. 13. Clarify what the "200' (FUTURE) SENIC CORRIDOR SETBACK LINE" is that you show on the plan. It appears this is shown in error, see comment 11 above. 14. Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 15. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0004 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 03/17/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Revise the cover sheet of the landscape plan regarding rezoning conditions. It is likely that a Special Exception case applies, rather than a rezoning. List the case number with any conditions. 3) Submit an Environmental Resource Report. LUC 3.8.6.4.A 4) Clarify the mitigation proposal for the Coryphantha scheeri. Preservation and mitigation requirements this species shall conform to Sec. 3.8.6.2. 5) Provide a native plant preservation plan for areas where off-site access easements and access roads are proposed. 6) Revise the development plan legend to use the term "Natural Undisturbed Open Space" LUC 3.8.6.4 7) When the set-aside methodology of Native Plant Preservation is used, the mitigation requirement is for a minimum of thirty (30) percent of the site to be set aside in perpetuity as NUOS area. The area(s) to be set aside are required to be platted and included in Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) as NUOS or similarly protected. LUC 3.8.6.4.B The NPP plan indicates the NUOS area will be platted and included in CC&R's. Provide documentation regarding any applicable legal covenants or restrictions and any proposed lot splits or subdivisions designed to meet the requirements. Show the NUOS areas in a surveyable manner on the Development plan. |
| 03/19/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 03/19/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | No solid waste disposal/collection services will be required for this unmanned facility. |
| 03/19/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D09-0004 CIENEGA SUBSTATION: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Not Available Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 03/23/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 03/23/2009 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/31/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0004 CIENEGA SUBSTATION/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 3/27/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Label project number on all sheets. Delete direction from Colossal Cave Road on Location Map. Correct scale for Location Map to 3”= 1 mile. Spell out suffix for Dawn on sheet 1. County records indicate Vail Road street name change pending to Colossal Cave Road. Please provide documentation of approved street name change. (contact Bill Ballek, City of Tucson). Delete “State of Arizona” from plan top of sheet 1. Label section corner 22 on Location Map. Provide copy of lease agreement required for substation. Correct Success Road to Success Drive on Location Map. Label Colossal Cave Road bottom of sheet 3 drawing. (Pending street name change verification comment 5.) Correct Colossal to Colossal Cave on sheet 1. (Pending comment 5.) |
| 04/01/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 1, 2009 Becky Hammond Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D09-0004 Cienega Substation Development Plan Dear Becky: Your submittal of February 19, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 7 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (DUPD, Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, Addressing, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (DUPD, Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Environmental Resource Report (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0333 dp-resubmittal |