Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0003
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/01/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned or operated property |
| 06/02/2010 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/09/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Due Date Case Number Project Address June 29, 2010 D09-003 4941 N. Oracle Road DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: Per Solid Waste Disposal this development plan meets the requirements of Standard 6-01.0 an is here Approved. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/18/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: June 18, 2010 TO: Merwin Yellowhair, PE SUBJECT: Wash Depot Development Package Engineering Resubmittal Review ADDRESS: 4941 & 4945 N Oracle Rd FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded 1636K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE CASE NUMBER: D09-0003 SUMMARY: A revised package was submitted to mitigate impacts from the existing commercial development and assure Wash Depot and Joel's Pottery Barn are in compliance with applicable City of Tucson requirements. The package included a Development Plan (previously submitted as a Development Package), Drainage Statement, and response letter. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R, DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.1: For the following comment the response letter stated that general note 9 of the landscape plan addressed this comment. Please clarify. Detail 11 on sheet L-3 does not match the 6-ft requirement for clearance beneath tree branches. Other than trees as noted below, plant materials located within existing and future sight visibility triangles shall be limited to ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty inches. Trees may be located within existing and future sight visibility triangles only if clear of leaves and branches to a height of at least six feet above grade upon installation, and at all times thereafter. The trunk caliper of any species selected may not exceed twelve inches in diameter at maturity. Trees with multiple trunks are not allowed. Trees may not be planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect as viewed from the motorist's perspective. 2) Add the following Development Plan general notes: a) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.1.a: "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." b) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.1.b: "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan." c) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.D.2: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0." d) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.E: All development plans are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 06/22/2010 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | We have reviewed the resubmitted Development Plan and the Off-Site Improvement Plan for the Wash Depot located on the west side of Oracle Road (SR 77) south of River Road. The following comments are provided: 1. Since the existing concrete driveway on Oracle Road near the north property line is no longer needed, ADOT requires the removal of this driveway. The existing depressed curb and gutter shall be replaced with new Curb and Gutter, Type D, H=7", as per ADOT Construction Standard Drawing C-05.10. Install new concrete sidewalk in the area of the driveway per ADOT Construction Standard Drawing C-05.20. Match the existing curb, gutter and sidewalk. Add the ADOT Notes to the KEY NOTES shown on the Plans. 2. On the Off-Site Improvement Plan, provide a DETAIL for the Driveway Removal and the Installation of new Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk. Provide the Beginning ADOT Station and the Ending ADOT Station for work in ADOT right-of-way. 3. The Off-Site Improvement Plan is too cluttered. Please show all the DETAILS on a second sheet. Also, increase the font size and size of the drawings for easier readability. 4. Add the Pavement Removal Detail to the Off-Site Improvement Plan for the removal of pavement along the ADOT right-of-way. 5. Label ORACLE ROAD as ORACLE ROAD (SR 77) on all plan sheets. 6. Add the following note to the Off-Site Improvement Plan: "Traffic shall be protected in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2003 Edition with Revision 1, the Arizona Supplement to the MUTCD 2003 Edition, and the ADOT Traffic Control Design Guidelines. All signs, placement of signs, the necessity of flag persons and uniformed officers are the responsibility of the Permittee." We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Development Plan and the Off-Site Improvement Plan for the Wash Depot on Oracle Road (SR 77). Maria Deal Southern Regional Traffic Engineering ADOT 1221 S. 2nd Ave. Tucson, AZ 85713 520-904-3570 cell ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 06/22/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | When looking at the plans it appears that the northern driveway will not be used. Close the northern driveway if not needed as an access point into this development. |
| 06/22/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D09-0003 WASH DEPOT/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: June 22, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 06/25/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D09-0003 Wash Depot Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 06/25/2010 DUE DATE: 06/29/2010 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 05/31/2011. 2. DS 2-05.2.1.K The annexation case number indicated near the lower right corner is incorrect (C9-82-4811), should read C9-82-48. Revise. 3. DS 2-05.2.4.A Provide copies of the tax parcel combination and the covenant regarding the development and use of real property for review. Provide the recording docket and page information for the covenant in general not #2. 4. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Remove the plus or minus signs from the PAAL widths. The minimum width of a two way PAAL is 24'. Barriers or curbing will be required along the west, south and east side of the area indicated with gravel covering to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Cubing will be required along the area north of the loading zone for the billboard also. 5. DS 2-05.2.4.I Provide the existing and proposed setbacks for all structures from property lines. Provide the height of the proposed detail canopy. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.K Clearly indicate an accessible pedestrian circulation path from Oracle Rd. to the front of the existing building. Not complete from the end of the crosswalk. At the west end of the indicated sidewalk near the southwest corner of the vacuum bays provide a barrier which will separate the pedestrian circulation path from the vehicle use area. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide dimensions for the footprint of all existing structures. A note indicates the relocation of existing structures out of the easement at the southwest corner of the property. Clearly indicate where these structures are to be relocated to. Remove structures within the easement from the plan. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.O The location of the loading zone for the billboard does not appear to be in a position to provide maneuvering in and out. Clearly indicate maneuverability for this loading zone. Relocating the loading zone to a north south position may be required. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.T The required clearances with in a double trash enclosure are 10' from the ballard to the front of the trash enclosure and 20' clear in width between ballards within the trash enclosure. Revise. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. If none exists please state so. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D09-0003dp.doc |
| 06/25/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At the front entrance marked crossing, the detectable warning at the East end can not be in the PAAL. It must be set within the boundaries of the entrance patio pedestrian area. 2. Please show the slope of the accessible route from the Oracle Rd right of way and the marked crossing to the front entrance. 3. Please show all ramps required in this area from the right of way to the front entrance and indicate all accessible route areas that are flush with the asphaltic paving or provide ramps for accessibility where required. 4. At the concrete walk from the proposed detail canopy area to the back side of the dumpster: a. Remove the three dectectable warning strips shown. b. Please indicate if this concrete accessible route is flush with the asphaltic paving and if not please show ramps required for access and indicate all slopes. c. Please provide a detectable warning strip just at the South end of the accessible parking aisle just prior to entering the PAAL via the marked crossing. d. The marked area along side the loading may be required by zoning to be concrete. Reference Zoning comments. This area is not required to be accessible 5. At the marked crossing at the vaccuum bays, the detectable warning on the South end must be with in the pedestrian walk area. It can not be loacted in the PAAL. 6. Delete the detectable warning strip shown at the rear entrance to the building. 7. Horizontal control points do not work for a slope analysis. Please provide vertical spot grades for slope analysis through out all accessible routes, ramps and parking areas. The Accessible parking sign is not COT standard. Contact your local sign company or the TDOT for actual layout. 8. Please provide large scale details of all accessible parking and all required ramps showing all critical zccessible requirements; i.e. dimensions, slopes, detectable warning s as required, signage and etc. as per 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1) END OF REVIEW |
| 06/29/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plans to identify the billboard and associated loading area and the required screen wall. 2) Provide information on how the refuse storage area gates meet the screening requirements of LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 3) The vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary. 4) Revise the LANDSCAPE BORDER AND SCREENING SUMMARY NOTES on sheet L-1. Landscape borders are not provided per BK 9, Pg.56. 5) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B. Revise the plans to incorporate water harvesting areas. 6) Revise the calculations for area of rock proposed on the landscape and offsite improvement plans if necessary. Revise the plans to also include dust control per LUC 3.7.2.7 along North Old Oracle Rd between the property line and the street. 7) Revise the plans to provide a street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 along North Old Oracle Rd. Dimension the landscape border and designated driveways. 8) Revise the plans to provide screening per LUC 3.7.3 along North Old Oracle Rd. 9) A DSMR should be obtained for the proposed refuse pickup location. Refuse containers are to be placed so that the collection vehicle does not have to back into moving traffic, on or off the premises. As currently proposed the refuse collection vehicle would block the Old Oracle Rd. right of way. DS 6-01.4.1.I. An adequate and safe ingress/egress is required for the collection vehicle in each new project per DS 6-01.3.1.A & New development will provide on-site refuse storage, collection, and pickup areas with service access from within the tract per DS 6-01.4.1.A |
| 06/30/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 June 29, 2010 To: MERWIN YELLOWHAIR ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: Wash Depot Dev. Plan – 3rd Submittal D09-003 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Show the existing connection to the public sewer for the existing buildings on site. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the fourth(4th) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 06/30/2010 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 30, 2010 Merwin T. Yellowhair Arrowhead Engineering, Inc. 1685 S. San Todaro Place Tucson, Arizona 85713 Subject: D09-0003 Wash Depot Development Plan Dear Merwin: Your submittal of June 1, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 8 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, ADOT, Traffic, ADA, Zoning, Landscape, PCWWM, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Lot combo form and covenant (Zoning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 777-3438 dp-resubmittal |