Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0003
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: January 5, 2010 TO: Merwin Yellowhair, PE SUBJECT: Wash Depot Development Package Engineering Resubmittal Review ADDRESS: 4941 & 4945 N Oracle Rd FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded 1636K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE CASE NUMBER: D09-0003 SUMMARY: A revised development package was submitted to mitigate impacts from the existing commercial development and assure Wash Depot and Joel's Pottery Barn are in compliance with applicable City of Tucson requirements. Meetings were held to discuss proposed development situation. The revised Development Package including development plan, grading plan, and landscape sheets were submitted with a Drainage Report and copy of zoning conditions. Engineering recommends conditional approval of the Development Package. This can be addressed by correcting the tree locations on Landscape plan sheets L-1 and L-2 or by adding a note to the revised final set of approved Development Package sheets. BASE LAYER SHEET CONDITION OF APPROVAL: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R, DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.1: Other than trees as noted below, plant materials located within existing and future sight visibility triangles shall be limited to ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty inches. Trees may be located within existing and future sight visibility triangles only if clear of leaves and branches to a height of at least six feet above grade upon installation, and at all times thereafter. The trunk caliper of any species selected may not exceed twelve inches in diameter at maturity. Trees with multiple trunks are not allowed. Trees may not be planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect as viewed from the motorist's perspective. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 01/06/2010 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 01/06/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#208250 January 6, 2010 Arrowhead Engineering Inc. Attn: Merwin Yellowhair 1685 S San Todaro Place Tucson, Arizona 85713 Dear Mr. Yellowhair : SUBJECT: Wash Depot D09-0003 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted December 4, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Ricahrd Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Lorraine Ruiz at (520) 918-8241. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) L. Ruiz, Tucson Electric Power |
| 01/06/2010 | JWILLIA4 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 01/06/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. Revise the site/landscape plans to provide minimum landscape area as calculated on the 1988 Development Plan. Locations may be varied as long as the minimum area is provided. LUC 3.7.1.2.B.2 |
| 01/06/2010 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/06/2010 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | q |
| 01/06/2010 | JWILLIA4 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/07/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | January 7, 2010 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0003 PROJECT NAME: Wash Depot PROJECT ADDRESS: 4945 N Oracle Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Comment 2 from the previous submittal was not clearly addressed on the revised DP. "The northern driveway will require 25' curb returns per (DS 3-01.0 figure 6)" 3. The R1-5 and R2-1 signs are unconventional and should be removed from the DP. 4. Call out the existing driveway and provide dimensions for verification that the minimum standards for driveway widths are being met. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/08/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D09-0003 Wash Depot Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 01/08/2010 DUE DATE: 01/05/10 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 12/06/10. 2. DS 2-05.2.1.C Please darken all lettering on the development plan for clarity in reproduction and scanning by DSD. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.H The scale bar next to the north arrow is at a 1 to 20 scale but the plan scale is shown and drawn at 1 to 30 scale. Revise. 4. DS 2-05.2.1.K Prior to approval of the development plan a lot split application must be processed and approved. A separate application, fees, review, and approval by DSD is required for the lot split. If the lot split has been processed and approved by DSD, submit copies of the approved survey drawing along with the recorded legal descriptions (with docket and page stamped) with the next submittal. Provide the lot split case number (S10-___) near the lower right corner of all sheets. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 List the name, telephone number, and address of the developer of the project. 6. DS 2-05.2.2.3 List the proposed use as follows: Automotive - Service and Repair "33" 7. DS 2-05.2.2.7 The note in the lower right corner "Rezoning: Ordinance 5651" is not correct. The correct note would be "Annexation case number: Ordinance #5646". Revise. 8. DS 2-05.2.2.10 Revise general note number 6 to read as follows: This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R). 9. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a dimension of the PAAL along the north side of the vacuum bay canopy. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.K Provide a dimension for the required 5' pedestrian refuge area along the north side of the existing canopies. The pedestrian circulation path cannot cross through the stacking spaces for the vacuum bays. Relocate. A possible solution is to extend the proposed sidewalk to the west and provide a cross walk in front of the vacuum bay (at the west end of the canopy). The pedestrian circulation path from the handicap access aisle, where it crosses vehicular use areas, is required to be a striped cross walk with a minimum width of 4' (all cross walks are to be minimum 4' and striped). In all other locations the pedestrian circulation path is required to be physically separated from the vehicular use area and to be constructed of concrete (at the west end and north side of the landscape island). FYI: The proposed sidewalk along the landscape border east of the proposed canopy is not a required pedestrian circulation path. This can be removed if you choose. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.N For clarity purposes please darken the footprint lines for the existing and proposed structures. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.P Provide on the plan the number of required and provided parking spaces. The parking spaces located at the southwest corner of the property are being restriped and must meet current code. Provide a dimensioned detail of the standard and handicap parking spaces. Indicate the required 2'-6" distance from the front of the parking space to the front of the wheel stop. The furthest west parking space will be required to be a minimum of 10' in width due to the location of the adjacent wall. This parking space is also required to have 24' clear area behind the parking space. The location of the fence/gate appears to block this clearance. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D09-0003-1dp.doc |
| 01/11/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Declined, Solid waste refuse and recycle collection enclosure must comply with the new 2010 Development standard No.6-01.0 for double container enclosure. |
| 01/11/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 11, 2010 Merwin T. Yellowhair Arrowhead Engineering, Inc. 1685 S. San Todaro Place Tucson, Arizona 85713 Subject: D09-0003 Wash Depot Development Package Dear Merwin: Your submittal of February 18, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 10 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (HC Site, Addressing, AZ DOT, Wastewater, Engineering, Landscape, Traffic, Zoning, Env Svcs, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 777-3438 |
| 01/11/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Issued by DSD 12/21/2009 D09-0003 Octopus Car Wash 4941 North Oracle Road Due Date January 28, 2010 Date Received at Pioneer February 2, 2010 Date Reviewed and Comments submitted to DSD: February 3, 2010 Comments: Approved By Environmental Services Department, February 3, 2010 |
| 12/04/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 12/04/2009 | JWILLIA4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/04/2009 | JWILLIA4 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 12/08/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/14/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Some areas of new accessible route construction show proper slope requirements with spot grades however, the existing areas for newly assigned accessible routes do not show slope compliance. Please provide spot grades through out the entire accessible routes or otherwise show slopes. 2. The marked crossing leading to the existing wash depot building must have detectable warings at both ends complying with ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Section 406.12 and 406.14. 3. The marked crossing to the North side of the vaccuum bays requires a detectable warning at both ends complying with ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Section 406.12 and 406.14. 4. Where does the concrete walk headed North and terminated with a detetcable warning lead to? Please provide a connection to something. 5. The "pedestrian path" leading from the accessible parking aisle to the island located North West of the pre wash canopy requires a detectable warning at both ends complying with ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Section 406.12 and 406.14. a. The rest of the accessible pedestrian path that traverses from the arch of the island East to the building entrance needs to be as per detail A/2. b. The accessible route traversing across the West exit of the Vacuum bays is requierd to be a marked crossing and must have detectable warnings at both ends complying with ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Section 406.12 and 406.14. 6. The accessible parking must be "Van Accessible" parking; 8' wide parking space plus 8' wide aisle or 11' wide parking plus 5' wide aisle as per ICC (ANSI) Section 502.2. 7. Please provide a large scale parking sign detail complete with a "Van Accessible" sign. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/21/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMENTS - CDRC Land Use Plan Compliance D09-0003, Wash Depot: DP and LP Submittal # 1, revised Items Reviewed: " Development Plan & Landscape Plan " Annexation Ord. #5651 Comments: This development proposal is not part of an active rezoning case, and it is consistent with the annexation conditions. The plans are approved, and a re-submittal is not required. Reviewed by: J. Hershenhorn, 12/21/09 837-6965 Joanne.Hershenhorn@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/22/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 16, 2009 To: MERWIN YELLOWHAIR ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: WASH DEPOT Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D09-003 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the North Rillito Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2nd Request. The development plan submitted is significantly deficient. Refer to Pima County Development Services “Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements” section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at; http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.pdf This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 12/22/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | We have reviewed the Development Plan for the Wash Depot located on the west side of SR 77 (Oracle Road) south of River Road. The following comments are provided: 1. ADOT requires a Pipe Corrugated End Section per ADOT Standard Drawing C-13.25 at the end of the 24" CMP. Provide a Detail on the plans. 2. Provide a Detail of the 18" Diamond Plate Sidewalk Scupper (Key Note 500). 3. In general, all work in ADOT right-of-way shall be to ADOT standards and specifications. If no ADOT standard is available, COT or MAG standards are acceptable. 4. The 6' Temporary Chain Link Fence shall be installed outside ADOT right-of-way. 5. Off-site Improvement Plans shall be provided to ADOT for our review, comment and approval. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Development Plan for the Wash Depot. Maria Deal Southern regional traffic Engineering 1221 S. 2nd Ave. Tucson, AZ 85713 Phone #: 520-388-4235 ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 12/22/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D09-0003 WASH DEPOT/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 12/18/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Delete adjacent tax codes and owner information. Include 105-08-014B on all Title Blocks. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |