Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0003
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/17/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/19/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | The driveway cannot be gravel. Fire lanes must have minimum paving per the Development Stds. |
| 02/24/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/02/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | March 2, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D09-0003 PROJECT NAME: Wash Depot PROJECT ADDRESS: 4945 N Oracle Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The northern driveway will require 25' curb returns per (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 3. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 4. ADOT acceptance/permitting maybe required prior to the issuance of permits from TDOT-Permits and Codes. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/03/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#208250 March 3, 2009 Arrowhead Engineering Inc. Attn: Merwin Yellowhair 1685 S San Todaro Place Tucson, Arizona 85713 Dear Mr. Yellowhair : SUBJECT: Wash Depot D09-0003 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted Febraury 18, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Lorraine Ruiz at (520) 918-8241. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) L. Ruiz, Tucson Electric Power |
| 03/03/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 02, 2009 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D09-0003 Wash Depot: Development Plan(2/18/09) Staff has no comments. |
| 03/05/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | We have reviewed the submitted Development Plan for the Wash Depot located on the west side of SR 77 (Oracle Road) south of the Oracle Road/River Road intersection. The following comments are provided: 1. Since this property has access on N. Old Oracle Road, ADOT recommends closing the existing unpaved driveway on SR 77 (Oracle Road). If this driveway remains, the permittee shall be required to pave this access within the State right-of-way. ADOT does not allow gravel driveways within the State right-of-way. In addition, the need for any drainage pipe across the driveway shall be evaluated. 2. The permittee shall be required to maintain landscape rock placed in ADOT right-of-way. In addition, the permittee shall maintain the landscaping along the ADOT right-of-way line and trim any tree branches etc. that overhang into the State right-of-way. 3. Any work in ADOT right-of-way will require a permit from the City of Tucson Permits and Codes. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Development Plan for the Wash Depot on Oracle Road. Maria Deal Southern Regional Traffic Engineering ADOT 1221 S. 2nd Ave. Tucson, AZ 85713 Phone #: 520-388-4235 ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 03/05/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | >>> "Jordan Feld" <jfeld@tucsonairport.org> 03/05/2009 1:52 PM >>> Patricia, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on D09-0003 Wash Depot Development Plan, a development plan review application for approximately 1.5 acres located south of the southwest corner of Oracle Road and River Road. This site is not within the Tucson International Airport or Ryan Airfield public disclosure areas or traffic pattern airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority does not oppose this development plan review application. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Respectfully, Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org www.tucsonairport.org (520) 573-5115 office (520) 954-4465 mobile (520) 573-8006 fax cc file |
| 03/05/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PLEASE DEFINE BUILDING NUMBER 10 2. AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC ANSI 117.1, SECTION 402, PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONNECTING ALL IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SITE AND A CONNECTION TO THE ORACLE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. A. PROVIDE ALL RAMPS, MARKED CROSSINGS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AN ETC AS REQUIRED. B. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHOWING SLOPE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 403.3. 2. PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES INCLUDING ALL DIMENSIONS, SLOPES, AISLES, SIGNAGE AND ETC SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 502. 3. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL ACCESSIBLE ROUTE REQUIREMENTS. |
| 03/06/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D09-0003 Wash Depot Development Plan Package TRANSMITTAL: 03/06/2009 DUE DATE: 03/17/09 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 02/17/10. 2. The development plan, grading plan and landscape plan as submitted are inadequate for review. A meeting was held on 3/6/09 with Merwin Yellowhair to discuss the submitted development plan. Mr. Yellowhair concurred that a complete redesign of the project will be required in order to meet the requirements of Development Standards and the Land Use Code. Most of the following comments are general in nature as the new redesign will require a complete review. 3. Review Development Standard 2-01 and Development Package submittal requirements and comply. Copies of both have been provided to Mr. Yellowhair. 4. This site contains two (2) separate parcels therefore you will need to show how the parcels can work as stand alone parcels if sold separately or provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. 5. The proposed uses are to be listed as follows: Automotive-Minor Service and Repair "33" General Merchandise Sales "34" subject to: 3.5.9.2.A 6. Provide documentation of permitting for all structures. Buildings 3,4,7,8,9,10,11,and 12 appear to have been constructed with out permits. If permits have not been secured for these structures indicate on the plans as being new structures. Provide the use of each structure. Some of the structures have been placed over easements. Provide documentation of location approval from the affected utility companies. 7. Review DS 2-08 and comply for the requirements of pedestrian circulation. 8. Review DS 2-09 and comply for the requirements for bicycle parking. 9. Review DS 3-01 and comply for the requirements for street, PAAL, sidewalk, etc. 10. Review DS 3-05 and comply for the requirements for vehicular use area design criteria. 11. Review the appropriate sections of the Land Use Code and comply. For example: Parking requirements, vehicle use area surfacing materials, loading zone requirements, building setback requirements, etc. Grading notes for permits plus. With DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 |
| 03/09/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0003 Wash Depot 3/6/09 ( ) Tentative Plat (ü) Development Plan - first submittal (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-82-48, D05-0042 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway Route (Oracle Rd.) COMMENTS DUE BY: March 17, 2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (ü) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (ü) No Resubmittal Required ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 837-6965 DATE: 3/6/09 |
| 03/09/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 6, 2009 To: MERWIN YELLOWHAIR ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: WASH DEPOT Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D09-003 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the North Rillito Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. The development plan submitted is significantly deficient. Refer to Pima County Development Services “Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements” section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at; http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.pdf This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 03/17/2009 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Merwin Yellowhair, PE SUBJECT: Wash Depot Development Package Engineering Review ADDRESS: 4941 & 4945 N Oracle Rd FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded 1636K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE CASE NUMBER: D09-0003 SUMMARY: A development package was submitted in lieu of an otherwise required development plan to mitigate impacts from the existing commercial development and assure Wash Depot and Joel's Pottery Barn are in compliance with applicable City of Tucson requirements. A meeting was held January 12, 2009 with Dennis E. Roberts, Merwin Yellowhair, Elizabeth Leibold, and Terry Stevens to discuss NOV and proposed development situation. The Development Package including development plan, grading plan, and landscape sheets were submitted with a Drainage Report and copy of zoning conditions. Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Package until the following items are addressed. BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.A: Clarify if boundary data is measured, recorded or calculated on planview development package sheet 1. 2) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: All easements shall be drawn on the development package sheets 1 and 2. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.L: All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Flowage easement along frontage shall be labeled. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.9: Clarify whether buildings 10-13 are proposed. Also, clarify / show & label existing canopy along frontage near south side of site which does not appear to show up on plans. 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. 6) DS Sec.2-01.5.5: For resubmittal, the applicant shall submit a detailed response letter addressing each comment. Submit revised Development Package with Drainage Report, Grading Plan, a copy of the geotechnical report, and response letter. Address all comments in resubmittal. MASTER COVER / SITE PLAN SHEET COMMENTS: 7) Clarify the Development Package general notes on sheet 1: i) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.1: List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." ii) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.2. List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. iii) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.3: If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. iv) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: List overlay zones that are applicable to the property, such as Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone; in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, state that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. v) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.B.3.a: Revise general note 14 verbiage: "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development package." vi) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.E.3: The following note shall be provided for commercial or industrial use: "Any wastewater discharged into the public sanitary sewerage system shall meet the requirements of Pima County Ordinance No. 1991-140, as currently amended." 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Label / dimension that portion of right-of-way that is ADOT on the development package sheet 1. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.b: Clarify lot combo intent for this project. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.U: Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE PLAN / UTILITIES PLAN / DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS: 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.E: Indicate benchmark elevation on sheet 2 and provide datum. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.F: Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. Show existing stormdrain catch basin at frontage perpendicular to Oracle Road. Also, clarify second drainage pipe running parallel to Oracle Road 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.c: Show all loading zones, and vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route, and provide, as a note the design vehicle. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.I: Label width of sidewalk along the MS&R Oracle Road on sheets 1 and 2. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M: Provide total square footage and clarify extents of disturbance limits for project for all proposed improvements on sheet 2. Clarify permanent erosion control for proposed and existing exposed dirt areas. 16) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: On streets with median islands, only 1 sight triangle is required on the side of approaching traffic; however, a 20-ft stem by 30-ft curb pedestrian visibility triangle will be maintained on the opposite side of approaching traffic, per DS Sec.3-01.5.1.B.1. Clarify future and existing sight visibility triangles. 17) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.3: Indicate emergency vehicle circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Sheets 1 and 2 should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. 19) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and the design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. Show on-site pedestrian refuge areas and accessible route clearly on sheet 1 and 2. Add note and clarify on plans, that ANSI requires the marked accessible routes to have truncated domes at the ends at connection between vehicular access (paved areas) and the edge of the sidewalk areas. 20) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: An adequate and safe ingress/egress is required for the collection vehicle in each new project per DS Sec.6-01.3.1.A. Provide documentation of acceptance for proposed refuse collection design for solid waste pick-up area and maneuverability from Environmental Services. Show maneuverability on planview sheet 1. DRAINAGE REPORT 21) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N: Address the following Drainage Report comments: i) Clarify number, size, and type of culverts along frontage. Calculation indicates (2) 24-in CMP's however pipes on site are different size and only labeled as one pipe on plans. ii) DS Sec.10-01.2.2: Clarify that the detention requirement is waived however, the retention requirement is not waived with Criterion 1. Retention should be discussed separately in report. State that the site is within a non-designated basin management area. For sites larger than 1 acre, the project is required to have 5-yr threshold retention unless retention is requested to be waived if there are subsurface constraints at the site. SOILS REPORT 22) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N: Provide soils report to substantiate subsurface constraints (such as poor percolation) at site that would provide reason for waiving retention. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 03/17/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 03/17/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Development Package Review & Grading Plan Review D09-0003 & T09BU00239 1) Street landscape borders are required the full length of the site (except for approved ingress/egress) locations along Oracle Road and Old Tucson Florence Highway and shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide as measured from the street property line. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1 2) Revise the development plan to provide curbing or other suitable barrier for all landscape areas within and adjacent to the vehicular use area. LUC 3.7.2.3.B The vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary. 3) Rain water harvesting must be conducted at this site per the requirements in Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.7.1.1.A, requiring that landscaping should accomplish natural resources conservation; LUC Section 3.7.4.3.B requiring integration of grading, hydrology and landscaping to make the maximum use of stormwater for on-site irrigation; and LUC Section 3.7.4.5.B requiring that stormwater and runoff harvesting be used to supplement drip irrigation for both new and preserved vegetation. Techniques to design and implement water harvesting are described in the City of Tucson's Water Harvesting Guidance Manual. This document can be downloaded as from the following website: http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/ To comply with the above-referenced LUC sections, rain water harvested from building roofs, sidewalks, and parking lots shall be employed to assist in supporting landscaped areas including parking lot tree wells, landscape buffers, sidewalk plantings, and other vegetation locations at the site. Details and Specifications for water harvesting shall be clearly indicated on site plans to ensure it is correctly implemented at all necessary stages of construction. The City of Tucson's Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development is available for consultation regarding water harvesting principles, techniques and code requirements. Please contact Ann Audrey in the Office of Conservation and Sustainable development (OCSD) to make an appointment. 4) The surfacing of the vehicular use areas is required to comply with LUC 3.3.7.3. Revise as necessary. 5) Show required sight visibility triangles on the landscape plan. Plant materials located within SVT's should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. However, trees may be planted within SVT's provided that: A) The trunk caliper, at maturity, will not exceed twelve (12) inches in diameter; B) The lowest branch of any tree is at least six (6) feet above the grade of the street, and C) Trees are not planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect when viewed from an angle. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06 6) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise the tables and plans as necessary. LUC 3.7.3 & DS 2-06.3.7. Grading Plan Review 7) Revise the Grading Plans to incorporate water harvesting and also to incorporate development plan comments from other review agencies. |
| 03/18/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 03/18/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D09-0003 WASH DEPOT: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: N/A PM Peak: 420 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 03/18/2009 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/19/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Identify turnaround area from Old Tucson-Florence HWY or clarify other designated ingress/egress. Collection vehicle will require adequate circulation and maneuverability to and from area. DS6-01.3.1.A & 6-01.7.0.B 2. Single enclosure detail - Front side post barricade (bollard) must be 2 ft from front face of CMU wall and rear side bollard 4 ft from front side bollard...rear bollards okay. 3. Single enclosure detail - Solid waste enclosure must be equipped with gates. DS 6-01.4.2.B. Provide a seperate post at the face of the CMU wall for mounting the gates to. Gates must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open and closed positions. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Show and annotate within detail "Positive locking with (Bayonet) anchors, Qty-4, 1in. Dia. x 6in. long galvanized pipe flush with concrete." 4. Recommend adding and additional single enclosure or one double wide enclosure to accomodate for both refuse and recycle waste materials/containers. This facility generates both types. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/24/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0003 WASH DEPOT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 3/19/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete Tucson Mall from Location Map on sheets 1, 3 and 4. Delete administrative address information from sheet 1. Label project number on all sheets. Delete all owner and taxcode information for surrounding properties on all sheets. Delete owner and taxcode information for project on plans on all sheets. Add missing line break between E ¼ corner and NE corner SE ¼ SE ¼ on sheet 1. Delete building numbers for all structures not considered buildings (ie: canopies, bays, billboards). Renumber remaining buildings numerically (1-3) and correct building tables/references to changes on all corresponding sheets. Provide blank 3”x5” block in lower right corner of sheet 1 for addressing purposes. Correct “N. Old Oracle Road” to “Old Tucson Florence Highway” and delete street direction. Delete addresses from title (right side of sheets 3-5). Question 1: Will property be combined? If so, please provide signed and approved combo form from Pima County Assessor’s Office. Note: Addresses on this project are subject to change to be brought up to code with the Pima County Addressing Ordinance and 911 Standards. Question 2: Please contact our office regarding existing addresses on property and which building is currently using what address? |
| 03/25/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 25, 2009 Merwin T. Yellowhair Arrowhead Engineering, Inc. 1685 S. San Todaro Place Tucson, Arizona 85713 Subject: D09-0003 Wash Depot Development Package Dear Merwin: Your submittal of February 18, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 11 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Development Package (Fire, Traffic, ADOT, ADA, Zoning, Wastewater, Landscape, Engineering, ESD, Addressing, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Permits for existing buildings (Zoning, DSD) DUE TO ZONINGS COMMENT #2, PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OF THE THESE PLANS LAYOUT CHANGES MUST BE DISCUSSED WITH THE CDRC MANAGER. SINCE PCWWM CHARGES BY THE PAGE, ONE PAKCAGE NEEDS ONLY CONTAIN THE DEVELOPMENT PAGES. PLEASE LABEL FOR PCWWM. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 777-3438 |